accelprint imperfections of
play

AccelPrint: Imperfections of Accelerometers Make Smartphones - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

AccelPrint: Imperfections of Accelerometers Make Smartphones Trackable Sanorita Dey, Nirupam Roy, Wenyuan Xu, Romit Roy Choudhury, Srihari Nelakuditi People use hundreds of apps Some apps are sneaky Exchanging IDs without consent is


  1. AccelPrint: Imperfections of Accelerometers Make Smartphones Trackable Sanorita Dey, Nirupam Roy, Wenyuan Xu, Romit Roy Choudhury, Srihari Nelakuditi

  2. People use hundreds of apps

  3. Some apps are sneaky • Exchanging IDs without consent is rampant – IMEI (device id), IMSI (subscriber id), or ICC-ID (SIM card serial number) help track users • One possible Solution: TaintDroid – Realtime filtering of exchange of device IDs

  4. Law: Get user’s consent • While installing a cookie • While sharing location

  5. People use hundreds of apps

  6. Our findings Sensors can also potentially track the users Accelerometers have fingerprint

  7. What if accelerometers have fingerprints?

  8. What if accelerometers have fingerprints?

  9. What if accelerometers have fingerprints?

  10. Evidence of fingerprint

  11. Toy Experimental Setup Controlled, Identical Impetus …

  12. Toy Experimental Setup …

  13. Toy Experimental Setup • Six stand-alone accelerometer chips • Stimulation with an external vibration motor • Arduino to control vibration and collect accelerometer readings

  14. Accelerometers are distinguishable Accelerometer chips of Samsung Galaxy S3 Accelerometer chips of Nexus S Accelerometer chips of Samsung Galaxy Nexus

  15. Accelerometers are distinguishable Samsung S3 Galaxy Nexus Samsung S3 Galaxy Nexus Nexus S Nexus S

  16. Accelerometers are distinguishable Nexus s_1 Nexus s_2

  17. Why are accelerometers distinct?

  18. Accelerometers are based on MEMS

  19. Internal structure of an accelerometer

  20. Reasons for difference in accelerometers • Manufacturing imperfections • Idiosyncrasies due to QFN and LGA Packaging • Subtle imperfections do not alter the rated functionality • Small imperfections can potentially introduce idiosyncrasies in data

  21. Evaluation and External Impact Analysis

  22. Larger Scale Exploration 80 stand-alone accelerometer chips 27 smartphones and tablets 107 stand-alone chips, smartphones and tablets in total + 36 time domain and frequency domain features + Bagged Decision Trees for ensemble learning (with accelerometer traces)

  23. Feature Selection Extract 8 time and 10 frequency domain features from S(i) and I(i) Time domain features Frequency domain features

  24. Overall classification performance

  25. Overall classification performance Samsung S3 Nexus One MMA 8452q ADXL 345 MPU 6050 MPU 6050

  26. Precision and Recall worst case precision & recall > 76% average precision & recall > 99%

  27. Questions • Is the external vibration mandatory for fingerprinting the accelerometers? • What is the impact of smartphone CPU load on fingerprints? • Does the fingerprint manifest only at faster sampling rates? • Does the system need to be aware of the surface on which device is placed?

  28. Precision and Recall Without Vibration worst case precision & recall > 66% average precision & recall > 88%

  29. Natural Questions • Is the external vibration mandatory for fingerprinting the accelerometers? • What is the impact of smartphone CPU load on fingerprints? • Does the fingerprint manifest only at faster sampling rates? • Does the system need to be aware of the surface on which device is placed?

  30. Is the system sensitive to CPU load? • CPU load matters. But up to 20% difference, high classification precision

  31. Natural Questions • Is the external vibration mandatory for fingerprinting the accelerometers? • What is the impact of smartphone CPU load on fingerprints? • Does the fingerprint manifest only at faster sampling rates? • Does the system need to be aware of the surface on which device is placed?

  32. Does the fingerprint manifest only at faster sampling rates? • Even at slower sampling rates, devices exhibit discriminating features • Likelihood of distinguishing devices improves with faster sampling rates

  33. Natural Questions • Is the external vibration mandatory for fingerprinting the accelerometers? • What is the impact of smartphone CPU load on fingerprints? • Does the fingerprint manifest only at faster sampling rates? • Does the system need to be aware of the surface on which device is placed?

  34. Does the system need to be aware of the surface on which device is placed? • Training on different surfaces helps but the system is surface-agnostic

  35. Conclusion and Future Work • Accelerometers possess fingerprints • Next step is commercial-grade evaluation • How to scrub fingerprint from sensor data?

  36. Two objects may be indistinguishable …

  37. … but no two objects are identical

  38. Thank You http://web.engr.illinois.edu/~sdey4/

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend