acceleration and radiation mechanisms in extragalactic
play

Acceleration and radiation mechanisms in extragalactic gamma ray - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Acceleration and radiation mechanisms in extragalactic gamma ray sources E.V. Derishev Institute of Applied Physics, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia Are jets efficient emitters? ? Prompt emission Cyg A Afterglow AGNs: GRBs: AGN jet luminosity


  1. Acceleration and radiation mechanisms in extragalactic gamma ray sources E.V. Derishev Institute of Applied Physics, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

  2. Are jets efficient emitters? ? Prompt emission Cyg A Afterglow AGNs: GRBs: AGN jet luminosity GRB (prompt) energetics 10 48 erg/s few × 10 54 erg up to up to radio lobe luminosity afterglow energetics 10 44 erg/s few × 10 52 erg of the order of up to Not too much room for inefficient sources

  3. Timescales in a relativistic jet variability timescale, t v R θ dinamical timescale, t d light-crossing time, t l In the comoving frame: t v ≃ t d t d = R/ (Γ c ) t l = min [ R/ (Γ c ) , θR/c ] For a wide jet ( θ ≥ Γ − 1 ): t v ≃ t d ≃ t l

  4. Are the jets wide? AGNs: you can see it GRBs: check observed correlations Narrow jets imply a correlation between peak energy ε p and energetics E GRB : E GRB ∝ ε 3 p Observed correlation: E GRB ∝ ε 2 Amati, 2006 p M 87

  5. Radiation mechanisms electrons 3 γ 2 σ T cB 2 L sy = 4 ε sy ∼ γ 2 � eB • Synchrotron radiation 8 π m e c undulator radiation • Inverse Compton radiation When coupled to diffusive shock acceleration, ε sy � m e c 2 /α f ∼ 70 MeV • Bremsstrahlung due to radiative losses, that limit acceleration protons • Synchrotron radiation • Inelastic nucleon collisions • Coulomb losses

  6. Radiation mechanisms Toptygin & Fleishman 1987, Medvedev 2000 electrons 3 γ 2 σ T cB 2 L und = 4 ε und ∼ γ 2 � c • Synchrotron radiation 8 π d undulator radiation d < m e c 2 / ( eB ) differs from synchrotron if • Inverse Compton radiation • Bremsstrahlung ν F ν synchrotron ν 4/3 undulator protons ν • Synchrotron radiation ν 2 • Inelastic nucleon collisions • Coulomb losses d B

  7. Radiation mechanisms electrons ( ε ph ≪ m e c 2 /γ ): Thomson regime • Synchrotron radiation L IC = 4 3 γ 2 σ T cw ph ε IC ∼ γ 2 ε ph undulator radiation • Inverse Compton radiation • Bremsstrahlung ( ε ph � m e c 2 /γ ): Klein-Nishina regime L IC < 4 3 γ 2 σ T cw ph ε IC ∼ γm e c 2 protons • Synchrotron radiation ε ph – background photons’ energy • Inelastic nucleon collisions w ph – background radiation energy density • Coulomb losses

  8. Interlude: Two-photon absorption ε γ ≫ m e c 2 In the limit we have σ γγ ≈ 2 σ eγ

  9. Two-photon absorption Optical depth for two-photon absorption τ γγ ( ω ) ≃ σ γγ N ph ( ω ∗ ) R Inverse Compton energy losses per particle ε ≃ 1 ˙ 2 ε σ eγ N ph ( ω ∗ ) c ( ˙ ε > ε/t v ) Under assumption of high radiation efficiency R ≃ ct v the optical depth of a source with size is τ γγ > 2 σ γγ ( ε/ 2) ≫ 1 σ eγ ( ε ) N ph ( ω ∗ ) – number density of photons with frequency ∼ ω ∗

  10. 2nd interlude: SSC vs ERC m e c w ′ Efficient cooling means that ph > • ) 2 Γ t v e 2 ( 32 π γ ′ m e c 2 9 2 π 2 ( � c ) 3 K ≃ w ′ Photons’ occupation number • ph ε 4 ∗ Comptonization in the Thomson regime, i.e. • Γ γ ′ > ε/m e c 2 ε ∗ < m e c 2 /γ ′ and ) 3 K > 9 π ε λ c ( (for SSC) α 2 Γ 4 ct v m e c 2 16 Hence, ) 3 K > 9 π ε λ c ( (for ERC) α 2 Γ 2 ct v m e c 2 16 ε ∗ – the energy of comptonized photon in the comoving frame α – the fine-structure constant – the electron Compton wavelength λ c

  11. SSC vs ERC Assume: the photons’ occupation number does not exceed its magnitude at the peak of black-body spectrum, i.e. K < 0 . 02 obtain: independent lower limit to the Lorentz factor For synchrotron self Compton • ) 3 / 4 ( λ c ≃ 2 ε 3 / 4 ) 1 / 4 3 ε ( 12 Γ > m e c 2 α 1 / 2 t 1 / 4 c t v 3 For external radiation Compton • ) 3 / 2 ( λ c ≃ 4 ε 3 / 2 ) 1 / 2 Γ > 9 ε ( 12 m e c 2 t 1 / 2 α c t v 3

  12. Radiation mechanisms electrons emission power density: • Synchrotron radiation w ff = 2 √ Tm e c 2 G ( n e , T ) πα f σ T c n 2 undulator radiation ˙ e • Inverse Compton radiation At an optical depth τ • Bremsstrahlung each electron on average radiates w ff = 2 Tm e c 2 G ( n e , T ) √ π α f τ protons n e • Synchrotron radiation f m e c 2 ∼ 25 eV T � α 2 inefficient unless • Inelastic nucleon collisions • Coulomb losses

  13. Radiation mechanisms electrons • Synchrotron radiation undulator radiation • Inverse Compton radiation • Bremsstrahlung At a given energy protons 4    m e sy ∼ 10 − 13 L ( e ) L ( p ) L ( e ) sy = • Synchrotron radiation sy  m p • Inelastic nucleon collisions very slow mechanism, • Coulomb losses works only in TeV range

  14. Radiation mechanisms electrons • Synchrotron radiation undulator radiation • Inverse Compton radiation • Bremsstrahlung protons • Synchrotron radiation end up with energetic electrons, • Inelastic nucleon collisions which radiate by either of the • Coulomb losses electron mechanisms

  15. Acceleration in shear flows Berezhko & Krymskii 1981 Ostrowski 1990, 1998 Rieger & Duffy 2006 Acceleration rate ) 2 ( ∇ V ε = 3 D ˙ ε c For Bohm diffusion ε = ( ∇ V ) 2 ε = ( ∇ V ) 2 ε 2 ˙ ω B eBc ε – particle’s energy c 2 ω B – gyrofrequency, D = 3 ω B Acceleration fails against losses if R 0 < 3 × 10 30 L 3 / 2 45 cm Γ 4 R 0 – size of the central engine

  16. Diffusive shock acceleration Acceleration rate V 2  η ≃ V 2   ε ≈ 1 r − 1 ˙ D ε  c 2 6 r r = u 1 ≤ 4 – shock compression u 2 ratio V – velocity of the shock D = p c 2 for Bohm diffusion 3 eB Spectrum of accelerated d N d ε ∝ ε − α particles: α = − r + 2 r − 1

  17. Acceleration at relativistic shocks θ ∼ 2/Γ The energy gain factor g = (1 / 2) (Γ θ ) 2 ≃ 2 The probability of particle injection back to upstream must be ∼ 1 to get efficient acceleration. The actual probability depends on the (unknown) magnetic field geometry. d N d ε ∝ ε − 22 Favorable geometry gives, e.g., 9 (Keshet & Waxman, PRL 2005) “Realistic” geometry leads to very soft particle distributions, with energy concentrated near Γ 2 mc 2 (Niemiec & Ostrowski, ApJ 2006; Lemoine, Pelletier & Revenu, ApJ 2006) cf. talk by L. Sironi

  18. Diffusive shock acceleration f�(��) � Γ – Lorentz-factor of the shock, γ – Lorentz-factor of an electron, Maximum�acceleration energy ω B = eB/m e c – gyrofrequency, “Thermal ” particles α – fine structure constant, Accelerated�particles � f ( γ ) – injection function 1 � m p c 2 m e (������) 2 m e � � B h f ( γ ) ∝ γ − s , Diffusive shock acceleration gives where s ≃ 2 . 2 (universal power-law)

  19. Schematic broad-band spectrum ν F ν ε sy ε IC Synchrotron peak IC peak Synchrotron cut−off ν

  20. Standard assignment of spectral features – F – log scale “Thermal” break Cut-off ν ν ν – log scale

  21. ... – standard problems • Position of the peak is too sensitive to the shock Lorentz-factor Photon energy at the peak in the comoving frame ) 2 � eB Γ m p ( ε ′ peak ∼ m e m e c ε peak ∝ Γ 4 in the laboratory frame (since B ∝ Γ) • The spectrum well above the peak frequency is universal and too hard N γ ∝ γ − 3 . 2 νF ν ∝ ν − 0 . 1 ⇒

  22. ... – standard problems • Low-frequency asymptotics in the fast-cooling regime is too soft The hardest possible injection f ( γ ) = δ ( γ − γ 0 ) gives for γ < γ 0 ; νF ν ∝ γη synchrotron losses νF ν ∝ ν 1 / 2 , if η = total radiative losses = const ⇒ more details on this point were given in the talk by E. Lefa

  23. Another assignment of spectral features – F – log scale Cut-off “Thermal” break ν ν ν – log scale

  24. ... – other problems • The synchrotron cut-off frequency is too high At the maximum energy, the scattering length (gyroradius) equals to the radiation length: ) − 1 B 2 = γm e c 2 ( 4 η 3 γσ T 8 π eB m e c ≃ η m e c 2 � eB γ 2 So that σ T – Thomson cross-section max α • Low-frequency asymptotics in the fast-cooling regime is too soft The hardest possible injection f ( γ ) = δ ( γ − γ 0 ) gives νF ν ∝ γη for γ < γ 0 ; νF ν ∝ ν 1 / 2 , if η = const ⇒

  25. A universal acceleration-radiation scheme for relativistic outflows?

  26. What limits acceleration? Particle escape from the accelerator Degradation of particles’ energy Sinchrotron radiation • Inelastic collisions • Inverse Compton losses (for electrons) • Photomeson interactions and creation of e − e + pairs • (for protons and nuclei) The probability of photon-induced reaction is usually small, ≪ 1

  27. How small has to be “small” to become dynamically negligible? For a non-relativistic shock, a probability ≪ 1 is always small For a relativistic flow, the answer is either ≪ 1 or ≪ 1 / Γ 2 , depending on what you are talking about If some energy leaks from downstream to upstream and mixes up with the upstream particles, we feed back to the shock Γ 2 times the initial energy! Γ is the Lorentz factor of the flow

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend