SLIDE 1 Academic Excellence and Bibliometric Tools
David PONTILLE and Didier TORNY *
* Random name order
The authors equally contributed to this communication No metrics could measure the respective contribution of each author By gentlemenʼs agreement, a la Lennon/McCartney, any production is coauthored whatever the actual contributions are
SLIDE 2
journal rankings
SLIDE 3
bibliometrics
SLIDE 4
databases algorithms bibliometric tools
SLIDE 5
Journal Impact Factor
1963
SLIDE 6 journal X journal X journal X journal X
…
+ + +
(Gross & Gross 1927 ; Bradford 1934)
counting citations
SLIDE 7 article A article C article E article N-1
…
+ + +
research potential realized
article A
+
article B
+
article C
+
article N
…
(Raisig 1960)
SLIDE 8 journal X journal X journal X journal X
…
+ + +
journal impact factor
article A
+
article B
+
article C
+
article N
…
(Garfield and Sher 1963)
SLIDE 9
Science Citation Index
1964
SLIDE 10
SLIDE 11
Journal Citation Reports
1975
SLIDE 12
SLIDE 13
SLIDE 14 institute for scientific information
Journal Impact Factor
1963
Science Citation Index
1964
Journal Citation Reports
1975
SLIDE 15
ISI
institute for scientific information
SLIDE 16
new data providers (1)
SLIDE 17
new data providers (2)
SLIDE 18
“new” algorithms (1)
influence weight
1975
SLIDE 19
all citations are not born equal
SLIDE 20
all citations are not born equal
SLIDE 21
all citations are not born equal
SLIDE 22 influence weight
1975
Scopus Elsevier
2005
eigen factor
2007
ISI - WoS
1998
SCImago journal ranking
2007
SLIDE 23
“new” algorithms (2)
h index
2005
SLIDE 24
h-index
SLIDE 25
h-index
SLIDE 26 h-index
2005
Google Scholar
2005
Publish
Perish
2006
SLIDE 27
PoP (Publish or Perish)
SLIDE 28
PoP (Publish or Perish)
SLIDE 30
SLIDE 31
SLIDE 32
SLIDE 33
SLIDE 34
SLIDE 35 downloads
database total impact
views citations hyperlinks
SLIDE 36
bibliometrics 1 2 3
1