Absolute Clean Energy Public Company Limited
October 2019
Absolute Clean Energy Public Company Limited Brief Company - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Absolute Clean Energy Public Company Limited Brief Company Information October 2019 Disclaimer This presentation is for information purposes only and does not constitute or form whole or part of any offer, invitation or solicitation by or on
October 2019
2
This presentation is for information purposes only and does not constitute or form whole or part of any offer, invitation or solicitation by or on behalf of the Company for sale or subscription of or solicitation or invitation of any offer to or recommendation to buy or subscribe for any securities of the Company, nor shall it or any part of it form the basis of or be relied on in connection with any contract, commitment or investment decision in relation thereto (“Securities”) in Thailand, the United States or any other jurisdictions. Any recipient considering a purchase of Securities is hereby reminded that any such purchase should be made solely on the basis of the information contained in a final offering document (which may be different from the information contained in this presentation ) and subject to the selling restrictions set out therein. No public offering of the Securities will be made in the United States or in any other jurisdiction outside of Thailand where such an offering is restricted or prohibited. This presentation should not be construed as legal, tax, investment or other advice. The information contained herein does not take into consideration the investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any particular investor, and should not be treated as giving investment advice. In addition, this presentation contains certain financial information and results of operation, and may also contain certain projections, plans, strategies, and objectives of the Company, that are not statements of historical fact which would be treated as forward looking statements that reflect the Company's current views with respect to future events and financial performance. These views are based on a number of estimates and current assumptions which are subject to business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies as well as various risks which are in many cases beyond the control of the Company, and which may change over time and may cause actual events and the Company's future results to be materially different than expected or indicated by such statements. No assurance can be given that future events will occur, that projections will be achieved, or that the Company's assumptions are correct. Such forward‐looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and accordingly, the actual results, financial condition, performance or achievements of the Company may differ materially from those anticipated by the Company in the forward looking statements. The recipient is cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward looking statements. In providing this presentation, the Company does not undertake to provide any recipient with access to any additional information or to correct any inaccuracies herein which may become apparent.
3
Company Core Competitive Advantages Financial Highlights Company Overview I IV III
Industry Overview and Growth Potential II Key Takeaways V
5
Company Overview
6
Company Overview
7
Company Overview
Remark: /1 Including APP’s capacity MW of 9.9, Currently, APP’s shareholders sent LOI for APP share purchase proposal to ACE /2 Compound Annual Growth Rate in term of MW from 2019-2024
8
Company Overview
ACP1 Ban Bueng ACP2 Ponthong ACP3 Bo Ploy ABA1 Thern ALCP1 Sri Chiang Mai ALCP2 Sirinthorn AAPP2 Chokchai AAPP1 Tanee AAP1 Nam Pong
Remark: /1 Including APP’s capacity MW of 9.9, Currently, APP’s shareholders sent LOI for APP share purchase proposal to ACE /2 Capacity MW
9
Company Overview
MSW Khon Kaen
Remark: /1 Capacity MW
10
Company Overview
AAA Chachoengsao
Remark: /1 Capacity MW
11
Company Overview
Remark: /1 Capacity MW
12
Strictly Private & Confidential
Company Overview
Source: ERC, company website/annual report Remark: /1 Average capacity of all powerplant type of ACE /2 Feedstock burn capacity for biomass powerplant
ACE: Up to 65% moisture content/2 of mixed fuel Others: Up to 40%
Unit : MW
Biomass: 97% > Listed Peer : 96% MSW: 95% > Listed Peer : 72% Cogeneration: 82% > Listed Peers: 81%
196
13 85.2 209.5 210.5 212.2 214.47 421.37 421.37 1,000
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2024
421.37
“To be the world practical model of Clean energy powerplant, which is responsible for environment, society, and shareholders”
1979/1 (40 years ago): Shaiyo Triple A Group Board of directors have experienced to lead rice, corns, cassavas and woodchips producer and exporter, has expertise in agriculture industry and R&D in the fast growing tree and intrigued in exploring the energy sector. 2016: First COD of VSPP “ALCP” MSW Power Plant 2015: Established Absolute Clean Energy (ACE) as a Holding Company with initial paid-up capital of THB 0.5 mm. 2017: First COD of SPP “AAA” Cogeneration Power Plant 2017: Won and secured 4 SPP Hybrid Bidding
MW 2018: First COD of VSPP Solar Rooftop 2012: First COD of VSPP “ACP1” Biomass Power Plant 2024: Expected to secure an installed capacity
and becomes Thailand’s largest biomass power producer 2022: Estimated to COD all projects/2 (421.37 MW)/3 Unit: MW
Company Overview
Remark : /1 http://www.saaa.co.th/SAA_ENG/home.php /2 Estimated timeline: Currently, Arbitration result states that PEA has to return PPA to ACE and with the assumption that normally power project’s construction period is approx. 2 years /3 Including APP’s capacity MW of 9.9, Currently, APP’s shareholders sent LOI for APP share purchase proposal to ACE
ACE’s Total Capacity MW/3 over time
Strictly Private & Confidential
14
ACE Business Portfolio in Thailand
Power Type Biomass Co-generation MSW Solar ACE’s Holding Stake in Projects 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Existing + Pipeline Projects
9+14+1/1 1+0 1+1 2+4
Capacity MW (Total Capacity MW) PPA MW to Government & IU (Total PPA MW)
89.1 201.9 114.35 1.73 3.29 6.0 5.0 Remark: /1 Including APP’s capacity MW of 9.9. Currently, APP’s shareholders sent LOI for APP share purchase proposal to ACE /2 Electricity Sale Agreement (ESA) with IU Total: 291.0/1 Total: 114.35 Total: 11.0 Total: 5.02/2 72 164.31 90 4.5 4.4 Total: 236.31/1 Total: 90 Total: 8.9 Total: 5.02 Existing Under Development + Pending for Development
Company Overview
/1 /1
1.73 3.29
COD: 211.18 Pipeline: 210.19 Total: 421.37 COD: 13 Pipeline: 20/1 Total: 33/1 COD: 168.23 Pipeline: 172.00 Total: 340.23
15 Assets Overview
Type Installed/ Equity MW PPA MW Location COD / SCOD Date Status Existing Projects (13 Projects) 1 VSPP - Biomass 9.9 8.0 Chonburi 24/04/2012 COD 2 VSPP - Biomass 9.9 8.0 Khonkaen 02/05/2012 3 VSPP – Biomass 9.9 8.0 Surin 30/10/2012 4 VSPP – Biomass 9.9 8.0 Nakhon Ratchasima 16/01/2013 5 VSPP – Biomass 9.9 8.0 Roi-et 04/06/2013 6 VSPP – Biomass 9.9 8.0 Nongkhai 26/12/2013 7 VSPP – Biomass 9.9 8.0 Lampang 09/07/2014 8 VSPP – Biomass 9.9 8.0 Ubonratchathani 14/08/2015 9 VSPP – MSW 6.0 4.5 Khonkaen 29/11/2016 10 SPP - Cogen 114.35 90.0 Chachoengsao 10/02/2017 11 VSPP – Biomass 9.9 8.0 Kanchanaburi 16/08/2017 12 VSPP – Solar Rooftop 1.0 Chonburi 20/11/2018 13 VSPP – Solar Rooftop 0.73 Nakhon Ratchasima 22/02/2019 Under Development and pending for development (20 projects) 4 SPP – Hybrids 93.0 76.31 2021 EIA process 15 VSPP – MSW 5.0 4.4 Krabi 2021 Under Construction 16 1 Solar Rooftop 1.0 Chonburi 2019 Quality assessment /under construction 17 VSPP – Biomass 9.9 8.0 Kampangphet Within 2022 Under negotiation SCOD/2 18 VSPP – Biomass 9.9 8.0 Kampangphet Within 2022 19 VSPP – Biomass 9.9 8.0 Supanburi Within 2022 20 VSPP - Biomass 9.9 8.0 Nakornpathom Within 2022 21 VSPP - Biomass 9.9 8.0 Nakhon Ratchasima Within 2022 22 VSPP - Biomass 9.9 8.0 Chonburi Within 2022 23 VSPP - Biomass 9.9 8.0 Amnatcharoen Within 2022 24 VSPP - Biomass 9.9 8.0 Lopburi Within 2022 25 VSPP - Biomass 9.9 8.0 Pracheenburi Within 2022 26 VSPP – Biomass 9.9 8.0 Srisaket Within 2022 Under consideration of Administrative Court 27 VSPP – Biomass/1 9.9 8.0 Chonburi Within 2022 Under negotiation SCOD/2 28 1 Solar Rooftop 0.83 Samut Sakhon 2020 Under construction 29 1 Solar farm 0.77 Nakhon Ratchasima 2020 Under construction 30 1 Solar farm 0.69 Nakhon Ratchasima 2020 Under construction Total Projects 421.37 335.21
Surin:
Khonkaen:
Roi-et:
Nongkhai:
Lampang:
Ubonratchathani:
Chachoengsao:
Kanchanaburi:
Kampangphet:
Srisaket:
Supanburi:
Nakornpathom:
Amnatcharoen:
Lopburi:
Krabi:
Pracheenburi:
Ranong:
Pending for development projects
Nakhon Si Thammarat:
1 2
COD Biomass SCOD Biomass COD Cogeneration COD MSW SCOD MSW SCOD 4 SPP-Hybrid Solar
Source: Company information as of 28 August 2019 Remark: /1 Including APP’s capacity MW of 9.9, Currently, APP’s shareholders sent LOI for APP share purchase proposal to ACE /2 Estimated timeline: Currently, Arbitration result states that PEA has to return PPA to ACE and with the assumption that normally power project’s construction period is approx. 2 years
Company Overview
Chonburi:
Samut Sakhon:
Nakhon Ratchasima:
16 COD Under Development + Pending for Development
Asia Clean Energy (“ASCE”) (Holding Company)
100%
(Holding Company)
Remark: /1 Including APP’s capacity MW of 9.9, Currently, APP’s shareholders sent LOI for APP share purchase proposal to ACE
Company Overview
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Advance Farm Tree (“AFT”) 1 VSPP (9.9 MW) AFT 1 Advance Asia Power Plant (“AAP”) 1 VSPP (9.9 MW) AAP 1 (May 12) Advance Bio Asia (“ABA”) 1 VSPP (9.9 MW) ABA1 (Jul 14)
100%
Advance Agro Asia (“AAA”) 1 SPP (114.35 MW) AAA 1 (Feb 17) Advance Agro Power Plant (“AAPP”) 3 VSPP (29.7 MW) AAPP 1 (Oct 12) AAPP 2 (Jan 13) AAPP 3 Advance Clean Power (“ACP”) 7 VSPP (69.3 MW) ACP 1 (Apr 12) ACP 2 (Jun 13) ACP 3 (Aug 17) ACP 4 ACP 5 ACP 6 ACP 7
Operating Company Operating Assets
100% 100%
Alliance Clean Power (“ALCP”) 4 VSPP + 2 MSW (50.6 MW) ALCP 1 (Dec 13) ALCP 2 (Aug 15) ALCP 3 (Nov 16) ALCP 4 ALCP 5 ALCP 6 ACE Solar (“ACE Solar”) 2 SPP + 6 VSPP (53.02 MW) Rooftop 1 (Nov 18) Rooftop 2 (Feb 19) BPP 1 Bio Powerplant (“BPP”) 2 SPP +1 VSPP (54.9 MW) BPP 2 BPP 3 Prasatporn Rungrueng (“PSPR”) PSPR 1 1 VSPP (9.9 MW)
100% 100%
ACE SOLAR 1 ACE SOLAR 2
Rooftop 1 expansion
Power Supply and Maintenance Service (“PSMS”) Advance Power Plant (“APP”)/1 APP 1 1 VSPP (9.9 MW)
100% Rooftop 2 expansion Farm 1 expansion Farm 1 expansion
17
PRANAI SUWANRATH, Independent Director
Chairman of the Board of Directors
CHAROON INTACHAN, Independent Director
Committee
Representatives- Constitution Drafting Committee
Court
NUEKRAK BAINGERN, Independent Director
Audit Committee, Nomination & Remuneration Committee
Chairman of the Audit Committee
President- Operation
TEERAWUT SONGMETTA, Executive Director
Chief Technology & Innovation Officer
Director
Director
CHONTICHA CHITRARPORN, Independent Director
Chairman of Audit Committee
Independent Director / Chairman of the Risk Management Committee
Risk Management Committee
JIRATHA SONGMETTA, Director
Chairman of Executive Committee, Nomination & Remuneration Committee
PORNMETT SONGMETTA,
Executive Director
Chief Operation Officer
Director
PATCHANEE SUTHEEVITANUNT, Independent Director
Audit Committee, Chairman of Nomination & Remuneration Committee
Committee
Secretary General
TANAVIJIT ANKAPIPATCHAI, Director
CFO, Management Committee
TANACHAI BUNDITVORAPOOM, Director
CEO, Management Committee
Director/the Nomination and Remuneration Committee
President- Head of Investment Banking
Company Overview
18
Company Overview
ACE’s Core Competency
Research & Development Innovation for production Sustainable growth Efficiency Improvement
ACE’s Strategy
Development for Stakeholders Systemetic Management Managerial Potential Development Production Innovation for Efficiency Long Term Feedstock Development Plan Profitability with CSR Sustainability
ACE’s Corporate Culture
Wisdom Empower Synergy Honest Adaptability Enterpreneur Result Oriented Social Responsibility ACE’s Sustainable Growth
ACE’s Core Value Operation
สร้างประสิทธิภาพ
สะสาง สะอาด สะดวก สร้างสรรค์ความ ปลอดภัย ส่งเสริมพัฒนา ทีมงาน ใส่ใจ สิ่งแวดล้อม สุขลักษณะ สร้างนิสัย
19
Company Core Competitive Advantages Financial Highlights Company Overview I IV III
Industry Overview and Growth Potential II Key Takeaways V
21 Electricity consumption is gradually growing amid the country’s instability
Source : Global Energy Statistical 2018
Industry Overview and Growth Potential
World Electricity Consumption Thailand Electricity Consumption VS SET index Unit: tWh Unit: tWh
10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 100 200 300 400 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 400 800 1,200 1,600 2,000
Ratchaprasong
Emergency announced by Thai Gov’t
Ratchaprasong
flooding around Bangkok Metropolitan Area
the Southern part of Thailand
Curtailment
PDRC
Shutdown
Government in action
volatility due to domestic unprecedente d negative factor
market volatility with improved market condition
from interest rate hike by FED
sub-prime mortgage market in USA (Hamburger Crisis)
protesting and stormed a hotel in Pattaya that was the venue for ASEAN summit
SET Index
22 Paris Agreement: Around 88% of the world have ratified or acceded to the Agreement. Thailand government has ratified the agreement. EV Revolution: EV trend is coming with 1) Fossil fuel vehicle bans 2) Renowned automakers are making promises on EV
Announced end sales of gas and diesel cars by 2040 Announced end sales of gas and diesel cars by 2040 Parliament voted through motion to end all gas and diesel car by 2025
Plans to sell only 100% EV or hybrid/electric onward
Source : Paris Agreement, Climate change, Vox
World Zero Carbon: Government around the world is collaborating to aim for net zero carbon by 2050. Sample Approach from Countries and States:
Target Date: 2030 Status: In law Target Date: 2050 Status: In law Target Date: 2050 Status: In law Target Date: 2045 Status: Executive Order
Ratified Signed Not Signed/Withdrawing
Norway France California United Kingdom France United Kingdom Netherlands
Industry Overview and Growth Potential
23
24
Paris Agreement Set a global goal to reach zero carbon emissions in the second half of the century
Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand Reformation Plan of the Country PDP 2018 Proposal Thailand Section 72(5): To promote energy conservation and cost-effective use
support the production and use of alternative energy to enhance sustainable energy security. Thus, current and ongoing government policies and actions shall comply with this Section. Set up biomass quality and pricing standard and develop market Initiate database of biomass producer Study/develop technology to transform biomass feedstock for value added Encourage firm contract for biomass power plant PPA Recently, Ministry of Energy has informed that there could be adjustment to the PDP 2018 where renewable portion could increase even further. A professor from Thailand’s leading institution has proposed an opinion
up to 40%.
Global and domestic trend are in the same direction to promote and support “Renewable Energy” Industry Overview and Growth Potential
25
According to Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand, Section 6 Number 5: Thailand will develop and support the production and usage of renewable energy for the security and sustainability of the future of Thai energy
and support the creation of Bio-Circular Green
communities and farmers to partake in the creation
for buying and selling of electricity (P2P).
the source
hygienic, and proper management of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW).
growth of fuel crops in Thai agriculture.
for fuel crops. Increase in megawatts from Biomass and Biogas power plants. ACE can sell left over capacity directly to user. Biomass power plant is the solution to PM 2.5 problem by buying agricultural waste from farmers and therefore prevents the farmers from burning the waste in their fields. ACE is a model and leader in the operation of MSW power plant in Thailand with the ability to process 80% moisture content waste as well as being the
power plant in Thailand. Official support from governments mean more fuel in the market for ACE.
Source : Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand
1 2 3 4 5
Industry Overview and Growth Potential
Bio – Circular Green Economy Peer to peer CO2 emission and PM 2.5 Solving MSW crisis Contract farming for fuel crops
26
Biomass Powerplant MSW Powerplant Contribute to the Paris Agreement Decreasing Greenhouse Gas Emission. Future Potential To provide base-load to grid instead of conventional energy
complications, masks distributions, water spraying in cities, etc.
Solves PM 2.5 problem at the root
have to give out
Thai farmers Positive Economic and Societal Impact GDP Contribution/1 1.8 Billion THB / year / 9.9 MW biomass power plant
Source: Thailand Energy Academy
Contribute to the Paris Agreement decreasing Greenhouse Gas Emission. Future Potential To provide base-load to grid instead of conventional energy Solves MSW mountain problems Save healthcare and environmental spending for government from problems caused by MSW in landfills
Industry Overview and Growth Potential
27
Total Electricity Capacity as of 2017 Total Electricity Capacity in 2037 New installing capacity for the next 20 years Retiring capacity in the next 20 years
Renewable 37%
Combined cycle 23% New or replacement power plants 15% Imports 10% Saving programme 7% Cogeneration 4% Lignite or coal-fired 3% Pumped storage hydropower 1% According to the Power Development Plan (PDP) 2018 hearing, Renewable Energy is targeted to contribute the largest portion, or 37%,
Potential MW during 2017-2037 PDP 2018 New Installing Capacity for the Next 20 Years (MW) Unit : MW
1
Source: Power Development Plan (PDP) 2018 Remark: /1 Based on crude oil used for in-land transport data in 2018 (EPPO) converted into Barrel of Oil Equivalent (BOE) with 35% cusion
Potential MW from EV/1 Total Electricity Capacity with EV Potential in 2037
+56,431
126,640 +49,429 77,211 46,090 Largest portion of increased capacity (37%) come from renewable Up to ~105,000 Potential MW within 20 years PDP2018 With EV Potential/1
Industry Overview and Growth Potential
28
Total Electricity Capacity as of 2017 New installing capacity for the next 20 years
Renewable 37%
Combined cycle 23% New or replacement power plants 15% Imports 10% Saving programme 7% Cogeneration 4% Lignite or coal-fired 3% Pumped storage hydropower 1% According to the Power Development Plan (PDP) 2018 hearing, Renewable Energy is targeted to contribute the largest portion, or 37%,
Potential MW during 2017-2037 PDP 2018 New Installing Capacity for the Next 20 Years (MW)
1
Source: Power Development Plan (PDP) 2018 Remark: /1 Based on crude oil used for in-land transport data in 2018 (EPPO) converted into Barrel of Oil Equivalent(BOE) with 35% cusion
+56,431 46,090 Largest portion of increased capacity (37%) come from renewable
Unit : MW
Total Electricity Capacity as of 2017 Total Electricity Capacity in 2037 New installing capacity for the next 20 years Retiring capacity in the next 20 years
Unit : MW
Potential MW from EV/1 Total Electricity Capacity with EV Potential in 2037
+56,431
126,640 +49,429 77,211 46,090 Up to ~105,000 Potential MW within 20 years PDP2018 With EV Potential/1
Industry Overview and Growth Potential
29
Unit: MW
Renewable energy portion will move from 26% in 2018 to 46% in 2037 % Electricity Capacity by Source of Total Capacity for 2018 and 2037 Electricity Capacity of Each Renewable Source for 2017 and 2037/1
% Installed Capacity
2037 2018
Remark : /1 Excluding retiring capacity in the next 20 years Source: Power Development Plan (PDP) 2018
Industry Overview and Growth Potential
2017 2037 2017 2037 2017 2037 2017 2037 2017 2037 389% 211% 48% 252% 254% 178% 2,573 1,659 5,632 590 175 306 12,573 5,155 8,357 2,075 619 852
Solar Biomass Hydro Wind Waste Biogas
2017 2037
73%
1% 48%
6%
Renewable Conventional Others
30
4,507 12,790 23,682 1,291 1,119 2,091 22,027 39,740 35,140 4,544 3,958 5,822
10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000
Solar Biomass Hydro Wind Waste Biogas Looking at GWh contribution to grid, Biomass is the largest contributor to renewable energy growth in Thailand Electricity contribution/1 of Each Renewable Source of from 2017 to 2037/2
Remark : /1 Assume 365 days, 24 hours and specific capacity factor of each plant type for electricity contribution calculation /2 Excluding retiring capacity in the next 20 years Source : Power Development Plan (PDP) 2018 Average capacity factor of each power type from EGAT, EIA
88%
Capacity factor applied to each plant type
Unit: GWh
20% 48% 25% 73% 78%
Industry Overview and Growth Potential
2037 2017 2037 2017 2037 2017 2037 2017 2037 2017 2037 2017
31 Continuous growth with existing PPA along with future potential growth supported by favorable government renewable energy policy Existing and Pipeline of Company’s MW/1,/2
Source: Power Development Plan 2018 Remark: /1 Including APP’s capacity MW of 9.9, Currently, APP’s shareholders sent LOI for APP share purchase proposal to ACE /2 Estimated timeline : Currently, Arbitration result states that PEA has to return PPA to ACE and with the assumption that normally power project’s construction period is approx. 2 years
85.2 209.5 210.5 212.2 214.47 421.37 421.37 1,000
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2024
421.37
Existing, Under-Development and Pending for Development projects Future Projects to reach company goal
Industry Overview and Growth Potential
32 Continuous growth with existing PPA along with future potential growth supported by favorable government renewable energy policy Existing and Pipeline of Company’s MW/1,/2
348 377 481 834 1,221 1,530 1,920 2,117 2,891 2,950 3,176 3,376 3,376 105 139 174 209 244 244 335 399 514 546 546 546 546 29 57 86 114 143 171 200 229 257 286 314 343 371 6 21 35 44
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 Biomass Biogas MSW Industrial Waste
2025 – 2037 Contract Capacity MW according to PDP 2018
Under-Development and Pending for Development
Source: Power Development Plan 2018 Remark: /1 Including APP’s capacity MW of 9.9, Currently, APP’s shareholders sent LOI for APP share purchase proposal to ACE /2 Estimated timeline : Currently, Arbitration result states that PEA has to return PPA to ACE and with the assumption that normally power project’s construction period is approx. 2 years
Industry Overview and Growth Potential
212 212 212 212 212 212
2 209 209 209 209 289 579 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Future Growth acc. to plan Existing
1000
33
Strictly Private & Confidential
196
Won the largest portion of MW in the 2017 SPP Hybrid Bidding (Renewable)
Unit : MW
2017 Biomass Bidding
Total PPA Capacity available for Bidding: 272 MW Potential Upcoming Community Biomass/Biogas PPA/1 Total Potential Capacity available for Bidding: 4,125 MW Largest bidding winner out of 42 candidates in the 2017 SPP Hybrid Bidding (Renewable)
1
ACE Other Bidding Winners in Biomass
ACE got 28% share in Biomass bidding winner
MW MW
2,997 1,128 Biomass Biogas
MW MW
Source : ERC, PEA /1 Community Power Plant Project Concept, PEA
Industry Overview and Growth Potential
34 Key Competitive Advantages of ACE to Win The Bidding
Economy of Scale
Lower plant heat rate = less fuel consumption by up to 30% Artificial Intelligence, IoTs and Big data for cost control and improvement Environmental friendly Proven track record in building and running 13 projects Continuous operational improvement Economy of scale Strong feedstock purchasing team
Advance Technology
Relationship with Key Stakeholder
Major shareholders’ plantation business can support long-term feedstock development plan Strong & long-term relationship with community and farmers Strong relationship with lender
R&D Sustainability
Potential Fuel Crops from Major Shareholders’ plantation business New Biomass Fuel Types Machinery and Powerplant Design Feed stock security Financial security Community support
Knowhow
Low O&M cost Big & strong Professional Teams get ready to handle New Projects.
Industry Overview and Growth Potential
35
Company Core Competitive Advantages Financial Highlights Company Overview I IV III
Industry Overview and Growth Potential II Key Takeaways V
37
Remark: /1 Estimated approximate MW growth during 2019-2022; Estimated MW growth of peers based on public information only
38 Biomass: 42.2% MSW: 2.8% Solar: 0.8% Co-generation: 54.2%
Biomass: 69.1% MSW: 2.6% Solar: 1.2% Co-generation: 27.1% Additional
Biomass: 29.1% Co-generation: 11.4% MSW: 1.1% Solar: 0.5%
COD Capacity : 211 MW COD + Secure Pipeline : 421.37 MW/1 COD Capacity : 421.37 MW COD + Secure Pipeline : 421.37+[x] MW COD Capacity : 421.37 +[x] MW Target Capacity/3 : 1,000 MW
Remark: /1 Including APP’s capacity MW of 9.9, Currently, APP’s Shareholders sent LOI for APP’s share purchase proposal to ACE /2 Estimated timeline: Currently, Arbitration result states that PEA has to return PPA to ACE and with the assumption that normally power project’s construction period is approx. 2 years /3 Company Target to COD+ secure 1,000 MW within 2024 /4 Additional capacity is subject to management guidance, but will focus in renewable field.
+26% MW CAGR From 2019 - 2022 +36% MW CAGR From 2019 - 2024 Company Core Competitive Advantages– Leading Integrated Renewable Power Producer
39 ACE’s in-house R&D capabilities results in feedstock and O&M cost reduction with the target to reduce feedstock cost approx. 5% – 15% for current plant and 24.7%-27.8% on top for pipeline plant and O&M cost reduction approx. 15% – 25% in the next 2-3 years
Advanced Technology Professional Run Continuing Improvement Proven Track Record
various types of high moisture content biomass efficiently up to 60-65%
mix with controllable cost
record of continued efficiency and profit margin improvement
biomass feedstock (no record of supply shortage)
Company Core Competitive Advantages – Proven Operational Capabilities
97% 98% 97% 80% 96% 32%
20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%2017 2018 2Q19 Listed Peers Others
Capacity Factor/1
2017 2018 Listed Peer Others 6M19
biomass power player in Thailand
continuing operation before requiring shutdown maintenance
leading to feedstock flexibility
Upside Potential
Source : Company annual report and presentation publicly available for peers’ information Remark: 1/ Selling capacity factor (Selling Electricity /(Total Operating hours * Selling Capacity)) 2/ Due to new technology ( high temp, high pressure turbine) and verified by third party technical advisor 3/ Third party technical report stated that general biomass powerplant has an average useful life of 25-30 years or greater in case of proper recurring maintenance
Biggest professional-run More than 1 year continuing operation Ability to burn high moisture content 60%-65%
after PPA expire/3
2017 2018
feedstock cost of 5% -15% by 2-3 years
heat rate decrease of 24.70%-27.81%/2 for pipeline plant (VSPP, SPP Hybrid)
O&M cost 15% -25% by 2- 3 years
40 ACE’s in-house R&D capabilities results in feedstock and O&M cost reduction with the target to reduce feedstock cost approx. 5% – 15% for current plant and 24.7%-27.8% on top for pipeline plant and O&M cost reduction approx. 15% – 25% in the next 2-3 years
Advanced Technology Professional Run Continuing Improvement Proven Track Record
various types of high moisture content biomass efficiently up to 60-65%
mix with controllable cost
record of continued efficiency and profit margin improvement
biomass feedstock (no record of supply shortage)
Company Core Competitive Advantages – Proven Operational Capabilities
Feedstock & O&M Cost
Feedstock Cost (THB/ kWh produced)
0.74 0.7 0.58 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 2017 2018 2019Q2
O&M Cost (THB/ kWh produced)
1.6 1.54 1.32 0.5 1 1.5 2 2017 2018 2019Q2 Q2’19 (3M) Q2’19 (3 M)
biomass power player in Thailand
continuing operation before requiring shutdown maintenance
leading to feedstock flexibility
Upside Potential Continuing Improvement Proven Track Record
record of continued efficiency and profit margin improvement
biomass feedstock (no record of supply shortage)
Upside Potential To decrease Feedstock cost 5%-15% by 2-3 years 24.70%-27.81% Plant heat rate decrease on top for
VSPP, SPP Hybrid pipeline
To decrease O&M cost 15%-25% by 2-3 years
Remark: 1/ Selling capacity factor (Selling Electricity /(Total Operating hours * Selling Capacity)) 2/ Due to new technology ( high temp, high pressure turbine) and verified by third party technical advisor 3/ Third party technical report stated that general biomass powerplant has an average useful life of 25-30 years or greater in case of proper recurring maintenance
after PPA expire/3
feedstock cost of 5% -15% by 2-3 years
heat rate decrease of 24.70%-27.81%/2 for pipeline plant (VSPP, SPP Hybrid)
O&M cost 15% -25% by 2- 3 years 1.34
41 ACE’s in-house R&D capabilities results in feedstock and O&M cost reduction with the target to reduce feedstock cost approx. 5% – 15% for current plant and 24.7%-27.8% on top for pipeline plant and O&M cost reduction approx. 15% – 25% in the next 2-3 years
Advanced Technology Professional Run Continuing Improvement Proven Track Record
various types of high moisture content biomass efficiently up to 60-65%
mix with controllable cost
after PPA expire/3
record of continued efficiency and profit margin improvement
biomass feedstock (no record of supply shortage)
Company Core Competitive Advantages – Proven Operational Capabilities
555 736 186 243
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
2017 2018 2019
Gross Profit Margin
24% 28% 37%
2019
biomass power player in Thailand
continuing operation before requiring shutdown maintenance
leading to feedstock flexibility
Upside Potential
2H19 Q1’19 Q2’19
Track record with Improvement ~24 Potential MW sales to IUs +15 operational years/3 after PPA
Q2/19
Remark: 1/ Selling capacity factor (Selling Electricity /(Total Operating hours * Selling Capacity)) 2/ Due to new technology ( high temp, high pressure turbine) and verified by third party technical advisor 3/ Third party technical report stated that general biomass powerplant has an average useful life of 25-30 years or greater in case of proper recurring maintenance
feedstock cost of 5% -15% by 2-3 years
heat rate decrease of 24.70%-27.81%/2 for pipeline plant (VSPP, SPP Hybrid)
O&M cost 15% -25% by 2- 3 years
42
Company Core Competitive Advantages – Proven Operational Capabilities
Availability Factor and Capacity Factor/1
Capacity Factor Availability Factor
92% 94% 95% 72%
50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100%2017 2018 2Q19 Listed Peers 85% 92% 95% 88%
60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100%2017 2018 Q219 Listed Peers
2017 2018 Listed Peer 6M19 2017 2018 Listed Peer 6M19
Advanced Technology Professional Run International Recognition
plant could burn high moisture content municipal solid waste up to 80% with efficiency
2016 for being an environment friendly power operator.
Interior , Minister of Energy and government
to visit the plant as MSW prototype
plant operator in Thailand
Team
O&M cost 15% -25% by 2- 3 years
ACE’s early engagement in MSW, reputable bidding track record and renowned expertise will secure the upcoming MSW bidding opportunity Proven Track Record
in excess of current PPA MW)
project return (fee increase 10%/3 years)
track record with high efficiency and high profit margin
Upside Potential
Source : Company annual report and presentation publicly available for peers’ information Remark: 1/ Capacity factor (Produced Electricity /(Total Operating hours * Total Capacity)), For Selling capacity factor of 2017,2018 and 6M2019 are 98%,100% and 99% respectively.
Most efficient MSW Ability to burn high moisture content up to 80% Zero discharge and Odorless
43
Company Core Competitive Advantages – Proven Operational Capabilities
Advanced Technology Professional Run International Recognition
plant could burn high moisture content municipal solid waste (Up to 80%) with efficiency
ACE’s early engagement in MSW, reputable bidding track record and renowned expertise will secure the upcoming MSW bidding opportunity Proven Track Record Upside Potential
2016 for being an environment friendly power operator.
Interior , Minister of Energy and government
to visit the plant as MSW prototype
plant operator in Thailand
Team
O&M cost 15% -25% by 2- 3 years
in excess of current PPA MW)
project return (fee increase 10%/3 years)
track record with high efficiency and high profit margin
44
Company Core Competitive Advantages – Proven Operational Capabilities
Advanced Technology Professional Run International Recognition
plant could burn high moisture content municipal solid waste (Up to 80%) with efficiency
2016 for being an environment friendly power operator.
Interior , Minister of Energy and government
to visit the plant as MSW prototype
ACE’s early engagement in MSW, reputable bidding track record and renowned expertise will secure the upcoming MSW bidding opportunity Proven Track Record Upside Potential
Kraisi Kanasuta (Former member of ERC) visited MSW KK powerplant
plant operator in Thailand
Team
O&M cost 15% -25% by 2- 3 years
in excess of current PPA MW)
project return (fee increase 10%/3 years)
track record with high efficiency and high profit margin
the National Reform Steering Assembly (NRSA)visited MSW KK powerplant
45
Company Core Competitive Advantages – Proven Operational Capabilities
Advanced Technology Professional Run International Recognition
plant could burn high moisture content municipal solid waste (Up to 80%) with efficiency
ACE’s early engagement in MSW, reputable bidding track record and renowned expertise will secure the upcoming MSW bidding opportunity Proven Track Record Upside Potential
2016 for being an environment friendly power operator.
Interior , Minister of Energy and government
to visit the plant as MSW prototype H.E.Mrs.Kshenuka Dhireni Senewiratne (Sri Lanka’s Supreme Ambassdor) visited MSW KK powerplant at 11 Dec 2018
plant operator in Thailand
Team
O&M cost 15% -25% by 2- 3 years
in excess of current PPA MW)
project return (fee increase 10%/3 years)
track record with high efficiency and high profit margin
46
Company Core Competitive Advantages – Proven Operational Capabilities
Advanced Technology Professional Run International Recognition
plant could burn high moisture content municipal solid waste (Up to 80%) with efficiency
ACE’s early engagement in MSW, reputable bidding track record and renowned expertise will secure the upcoming MSW bidding opportunity Proven Track Record Upside Potential
2016 for being an environment friendly power operator.
Interior , Minister of Energy and government
to visit the plant as MSW prototype
Development) visited MSW KK powerplant at 16 Feb 2019
plant operator in Thailand
Team
O&M cost 15% -25% by 2- 3 years
in excess of current PPA MW)
project return (fee increase 10%/3 years)
track record with high efficiency and high profit margin
H.E.Mrs.Kshenuka Dhireni Senewiratne (Sri Lanka’s Supreme Ambassador) visited MSW KK powerplant at 11 Dec 2018
47
Company Core Competitive Advantages – Proven Operational Capabilities
Environmental Inspection Division Team visited MSW KK powerplant Indonesia Vice President Deligation visited MSW KK powerplant Director-General of the Department of Local Administration visited MSW KK powerplant Director-General of the Pollution Control Department visited MSW KK powerplant Deputy Director-General of the Department of Local Administration visited MSW KK powerplant Amnat Charoen Governor visited MSW KK powerplant
48
Company Core Competitive Advantages – Proven Operational Capabilities
Udonthani Municipal visited MSW KK powerplant Phuket Municipal visited MSW KK powerplant Executive Committee of local administrative organization from Surat Thani visited MSW KK powerplant Nonsira, Khon Kaen Municipal visited MSW KK powerplant Management team from Choomporn Municipal Management team from Roi Et Municipal
49
Company Core Competitive Advantages – Proven Operational Capabilities
Management team from Maha Sarakham Municipal Management team from Krabi Municipal Local government leaders from Songkhla province visited MSW KK powerplant in order to solve the local waste issues Board of Directors, Ministry of Energy and Ministry of Local Administration from Bangladesh visted MSW KK powerplant Municipal team team from Udonthani Municipal team team from Banpai, Khon Khaen
50
Company Core Competitive Advantages – Proven Operational Capabilities
82 114 28 35
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
2017 2018 2019 Unit : THB mm / (%)
Gross Profit and Gross Profit Margin
36% 43% 50% Advanced Technology Professional Run International Recognition
plant could burn high moisture content municipal solid waste (Up to 80%) with efficiency
ACE’s early engagement in MSW, reputable bidding track record and renowned expertise will secure the upcoming MSW bidding opportunity Proven Track Record
in excess of current PPA MW)
project return (fee increase 10%/3 years)
track record with high efficiency and high profit margin
Upside Potential
2H19 Q1’19 Q2’19
Track record with Improvement ~0.4 Potential MW sales to IUs Additional Tipping fee enhance return
Q2/19
2016 for being an environment friendly power operator.
Interior , Minister of Energy and government
to visit the plant as MSW prototype
plant operator in Thailand
Team
O&M cost 15% -25% by 2- 3 years
51
83% 80% 82% 81% 70% 75% 80% 85% ACE
Availability Factor and Capacity Factor/1
Availability Factor Capacity Factor
96% 98% 99% 98% 90% 92% 94% 96% 98% 100% ACE
Company Core Competitive Advantages – Proven Operational Capabilities
Advanced Technology Professional Run Continuing Improvement
to control and manage plant according to EGAT demand
Team
O&M cost 15% - 25% by 2-3 years
SPP Co-Generation powerplant operator in Thailand
Proven Track Record
track record with high efficiency and competitive margin
could result in stable margin
contract with PTT
Upside Potential
2017 2018 Listed Peer 6M19 2017 2018 Listed Peer 6M19 Defensive scheme of Co-Generation Power Plant would help balance risk scheme of company’s powerplant portfolio
Remark: 1/ Selling capacity factor (Selling Electricity /(Total Operating hours * Selling Capacity)) 2/ Third party technical report stated that general natural gas powerplant has an average useful life of 30 -60 years
One of the most efficient SPP Co-Gen Strong in-house O&M To decrease O&M cost of 15%-25% by 2-3 years
~20 MW
from IUs for more than 100,000 tons/year
after PPA expire /2
52 Unit : THB mm / (%) Stable Gross margin
Gross Profit and Gross Profit Margin
484 567 141 142
400 600 2017 2018 2019
29% 29% 27%
Company Core Competitive Advantages – Proven Operational Capabilities
Advanced Technology Professional Run Continuing Improvement
to control and manage plant according to EGAT demand
Team
O&M cost 15% -25% by 2-3 years
SPP Co-Generation powerplant operator in Thailand
Proven Track Record
~20 MW
from IUs for more than 100,000 tons/year
after PPA expire /2
track record with high efficiency and competitive margin
could result in stable margin
contract with PTT
Upside Potential Defensive scheme of Co-Generation Power Plant would help balance risk scheme of company’s powerplant portfolio
2H19 Q1’19 Q2’19
Track record with stable margin ~20 Potential MW sales to IUs +25 operational years/2 after PPA
Q2/19
53
Reliable revenue source with high efficiency and controlled cost can guarantee cash flow to the company
Availability Factor Capacity Factor 2022 Revenue Contribution Feedstock Cost Control Result Upside Potential Co-Generation MSW Biomass Feedstock Sufficiency
agreement with PTT Cost pass-through
with government
No feedstock Cost Controllable Potential Sales to IUs ~25 operation years after PPA/2 Tipping fee Potential Sales to IUs Potential Sales to IUs ~15 operation years after PPA/1 AF : 99% CF : 82% AF : 95% CF : 95% AF : 92% CF : 97%
Secured cashflow with upside potential 92% 8%
Industrial Users
90% 10%
Industrial Users
82% 18%
Industrial Users
Company Core Competitive Advantages – Secure Cash Flow Supported by PPAs with EGAT/PEA
Remark: 1/ Third party technical report stated that general biomass powerplant has an average useful life of 25-30 years or greater in case of proper recurring maintenance 2/ Third party technical report stated that general natural gas powerplant has an average useful life of 30-60 years
54
Company Core Competitive Advantages Financial Highlights Company Overview I IV III
Industry Overview and Growth Potential II Key Takeaways V
56
54.0% 41.0% 5.0% 0.0% Biomass Co-Generation MSW Solar Others
1,886 4,243 4,833 2,335 2,462
2016 2017 2018 1H18 1H19
99% 1%
2018
significant rate of 60% each year
accounts for the majority of ACE’s revenue at 54% and 41% respectively.
secured by EGAT and PEA.
(THB mm)
Electricity sales to EGAT and PEA Sales to IUs
Revenue Breakdown by Type of Power Plant
Revenue/1
Revenue Breakdown by Customer
2017 2016
99.0% 1.0% 55.0% 40.0% 5.0%
Key Observation
2018
Financial Highlights
Q1: 1,150 Q2: 1,185 Q1: 1,213 Q2: 1,249
Remark: /1 Exclude revenue from construction cost under concession agreement and other revenue
57
793 1,472 1,635 825 907 42.1% 34.7% 33.8% 35.8% 34.1% 32.8% 34.8% 39.5%
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0%2016 2017 2018 1H18 1H19 EBITDA % EBITDA to Sales
669 1,121 1,417 699 775
35.5% 26.4% 29.3% 30.3% 29.2% 26.1%/1 29.6% 33.6%
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,5002016 2017 2018 1H18 1H19 Gross Profit %GP to Sales
EBITDA/3 and EBITDA margin/2
(THB mm)
Financial track record shows strong and consistent revenue, EBITDA and net profit growth with continuous margin expansion. Gross Profit and Gross Profit margin/2
Remark: *In 2016, ACE Group purchased biomass fuel from related parties and received the fuel cost adjustment fee through the purchasing agreement where the contracted suppliers were unable to meet the Group’s purchasing conditions. /1 Adjusted figures by removing supply penalty /2 Margin divided by sale and service revenue (not including construction revenue) /3 EBITDA is calculated from net income + tax+ interest +depreciation/amortization+ other non cash items (THB mm)
494/1
Financial Highlights
Key Observation
profit at CAGR of 70% (2016-2018).
hours) 3) launching new COD projects to the pipeline.
/1
Q1: 348 Q2: 351 Q1:355 Q2: 420 Q1: 412 Q2: 413 Q1: 414 Q2: 493 Q1 %GP to Sales Q2 %GP to Sales Q1 %EBITDA to Sales Q2 %EBITDA to Sales
618/1
58
Financial Highlights
134 334 547 317 342 7.1% 7.9% 11.3%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%2016 2017 2018 1H18 1H19 Net Profit %NP to Sales
Net Profit and Profit margin/2
(THB mm)
Q1: 103 Q2: 214 Q1: 133 Q2: 209 Q1 %NP to Sales Q2 %NP to Sales
9.0% 10.9% 18.1% 16.8%
134 448 557 295 418 7.1% 10.6% 11.5%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%2016 2017 2018 1H18 1H19 Net Profit %NP to Sales
Adjusted Net Profit/3 and Net Profit Margin/2
(THB mm)
Q1: 168 Q2: 127 Q1: 161 Q2: 257 Q1 %NP to Sales Q2 %NP to Sales
14.6% 13.3% 10.7% 20.6%
Remark: *In 2016, ACE Group purchased biomass fuel from related parties and received the fuel cost adjustment fee through the purchasing agreement where the contracted suppliers were unable to meet the Group’s purchasing conditions. /1 Adjusted figures by removing supply penalty /2 Margin divided by sale and service revenue (not including construction revenue) /3 Added back unrealized gain/loss from foreign exchange of finance lease
Financial track record shows strong and consistent revenue, EBITDA and net profit growth with continuous margin expansion. Key Observation
mislead if THB/USD exchange rate fluctuate overtime
increase in term of absolute amount and margin over time Exchange rate (THB/USD)
32.5146 32.2848 33.0065 30.5733 31.0573 31.6449 35.0684
At COD 10/2/2017 YE 2017 YE 2018 Q1’2018 Q1’2019 Q2’2018 Q2’2019
59
ACE’s Leverage Ratio
Financial Highlights
Unit: THB mm December 31 June 30 2016 2017 2018 2Q19 Current Interest-bearing debt 2,633 3,328 1,166 2,523 Non-Current Interest-bearing debt 5,825 5,197 6,632 4,840 Total interest-bearing debt 8,458 8,525 7,798 7,363 Equity 4,614 5,022 5,572 5,914 ACE’s debt decreased over time due to repayment of bank loan for under development projects so IBD/Equity improved over time. Unit : THB mm 4,614 5,022 5,572 5,337 5,914 1.8x 1.7x 1.4x 1.6x 1.2x
.x .2x .4x .6x .8x 1.x 1.2x 1.4x 1.6x 1.8x2016 2017 2018 1H18 1H19 Equity Total IBD/Equity
60
ACE’s Interest Expense
Financial Highlights
315 497 483 245 219 5.7% 5.5% 5.5% 5.50% 5.10% 8.11% 8.12% 8.03% 8.03% 6.80%
0.0% 200 400 600 800 1000 12002016 2017 2018 1H18 1H19 Interest Expense Project Finance interest rates Equity loan/debenture interest rates Unit : THB mm
Interest rate will be more competitive once listed in SET MLR -2.0%, MLR -2.5%/1 Remark: /1 According to the condition of the loan agreement, the financial institution will adjust interest rate of biomass/MSW powerplant and natural gas powerplant project finance to MLR -2.5% and MLR -2.0%, respectively for the first 2 years after listing in SET and to MLR-1.75% and MLR-1.5% , respectively after the period of 2 years after listing in SET
Unit: THB mm December 31 June 30 2016 2017 2018 2Q19 Current Interest-bearing debt 2,633 3,328 1,166 2,523 Non-Current Interest-bearing debt 5,825 5,197 6,632 4,840 Total interest-bearing debt 8,458 8,525 7,798 7,363 Equity 4,614 5,022 5,572 5,914
2 Years After Listing
61
Financial Highlights
Return on Asset Return on Equity 1.1% 2.4% 3.9% 6.0% 1.1% 2.8% 5.2% 7.9% 4.1% 8.1% 12.4% 16.0%
2016 2017 2018 Annualized Q2/19 Return on Asset Return of Asset (Exclude lease) Return on Fixed Asset
5.5% 6.9% 10.3% 14.2%
2016 2017 2018 Annualized Q2/19
Remark: Return on Asset calculated from net income / average total assets Return on Asset (exclude lease) calculated from net income / average total assets exclude lease Return on Fixed Asset calculated from (net income + depreciation) / average total fixed assets
62
Financial Highlights
Unit: THB mm (unless stated otherwise) COD Pipeline Land Area (ไร่ งาน ตร.ว.) 1,249-19-624 1,345-17-563 Land Value 1,765.23 Land Improvement 453.64 Total Land Value after improvement 2,218.87
ACE’s powerplants located in strategic land owned by itself could result to the upside potential from land value at the end of its operating period/2 General biomass powerplants have an average useful life of approximately 25-30 years/1, 30-60 years/1 for co-generation powerplant and 25-30 /1 years for MSW powerplant Potential Receivables from Government in the amount of THB 3,901.25 mm/2
2 1 3
Remark: 1/ third party technical advisor report with assumption that recurring maintenance will be executed properly 2/ Approximate claim due to FiT 58/59 issue of biomass powerplant. Currently, the case is under consideration of Central Administration Court.
Revenue from selling left over capacity to Industrial User
4
Possibility to double capacity on the available land bank adjacent to the existing power plants according to Town Planning Law
5
63
Company Core Competitive Advantages Financial Highlights Company Overview I IV III
Industry Overview and Growth Potential II Key Takeaways V
65
Strictly Private & Confidential
Efficient Operational Capabilities with Continuous Improvement
Low Downside Risk
Continuous Growth from Projects in the Pipeline and Future
World Megatrend
Thailand’s Leading Integrated Power Producer with Highest Growth Potential
Key Takeaways