About prior saturation points for affine control systems
T´ erence Bayen (Universit´ e de Montpellier) (collaboration avec O. Cots)
JOURN´
EES MODE 2018 - AUTRANS 28 mars 2018
- T. Bayen (Universit´
e de Montpellier) 1 / 25
About prior saturation points for affine control systems T erence - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
About prior saturation points for affine control systems T erence Bayen (Universit e de Montpellier) (collaboration avec O. Cots) J OURN EES MODE 2018 - A UTRANS 28 mars 2018 T. Bayen (Universit e de Montpellier) 1 / 25 Outline
e de Montpellier) 1 / 25
1
2
3
e de Montpellier) 2 / 25
Preliminary results for affine controlled systems
1
2
3
e de Montpellier) 3 / 25
Preliminary results for affine controlled systems
We suppose classical hypotheses ensuring existence of an optimal control.
e de Montpellier) 4 / 25
Preliminary results for affine controlled systems
e de Montpellier) 5 / 25
Preliminary results for affine controlled systems
@ @u d2 dt2 Hu > 0 (i.e. it is a turnpike), and such that the singular arc becomes non-admissible i.e.
e de Montpellier) 6 / 25
Preliminary results for affine controlled systems
Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, issue No 05, vol. 26, pp. 901-929, 2016.
. Mairet, M. Mazade, Analysis of an optimal control problem connected to bioprocesses involving a saturated singular arc, DCDS, series B, vol. 20, 1, pp.39–58, 2015.
imaging problem in nuclear magnetic resonance, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 57 (2012), no 8, pp. 1957–1969.
arcs, Forum Mathematicum, 5, (1993), pp. 203–241.
attler, Anti-angiogenic therapy in cancer treatment as an optimal control problem, SIAM J. on Control and Optimization, 46, 3, pp. 1052–1079, 2007.
attler, Geometric Optimal Control : Theory, Methods and Examples, Springer, 2012.
e de Montpellier) 7 / 25
Preliminary results for affine controlled systems
@ @u d2 dt2 Hu > 0 is satisfied.
e de Montpellier) 8 / 25
Preliminary results for affine controlled systems
e de Montpellier) 9 / 25
Saturation phenomenon in a fed-batch model
1
2
3
e de Montpellier) 10 / 25
Saturation phenomenon in a fed-batch model
X,S Outlet pump when V = vmax Feed pump Sin Agitation system,
Temperature θ,... sensors
v x,
v (sin s),
e de Montpellier) 11 / 25
Saturation phenomenon in a fed-batch model
+ ; s sref and v = ¯
v + sin s
u2U Tu,
v + sin s
v (sin s),
¯ µs k+s+k0s2 with a
e de Montpellier) 12 / 25
Saturation phenomenon in a fed-batch model
v (s sin)
e de Montpellier) 13 / 25
Saturation phenomenon in a fed-batch model
2 4 6 1 3 5 2 1 3 0.5 1.5 2.5
Substrate Volume
e de Montpellier) 14 / 25
Saturation phenomenon in a fed-batch model
2004.
e de Montpellier) 15 / 25
Saturation phenomenon in a fed-batch model
2 4 6 1 3 5 2 4 6 1 3 5 7
Substrate Volume
Figure: Singular arc until va < v⇤ (in red) and switching curve emanating from (¯ s, va) (in green).
e de Montpellier) 16 / 25
Saturation phenomenon in a fed-batch model
2 4 6 1 3 5 2 4 6 1 3 5 7
Substrate Volume
e de Montpellier) 17 / 25
Saturation phenomenon in a fed-batch model
20 10 2 4 6 8 12 14 16 18 2 4 6 1 3 5 7
Substrate Volume
e de Montpellier) 18 / 25
Determination of prior saturation points and the notion of bridge
1
2
3
e de Montpellier) 19 / 25
Determination of prior saturation points and the notion of bridge
1 2 3 4 5 6 s 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 v
e de Montpellier) 20 / 25
Determination of prior saturation points and the notion of bridge
1 2 3 4 5 6 s 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 v
e de Montpellier) 21 / 25
Determination of prior saturation points and the notion of bridge
8 > > > > > < > > > > > : ⌦p(0), g(x(0))↵ = 0, ⌦p(0), [f, g](x(0))↵ = 0, ⌦p(tc), g(x(tc))↵ = 0 and x(tc) 2 T , H = 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 s 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 v
target point (sref , ¯ v)
(s(tc), va) ; “free” terminal condition
e de Montpellier) 22 / 25
Determination of prior saturation points and the notion of bridge
and Application in Magnetic Resonance Imaging https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01721845/
e de Montpellier) 23 / 25
Determination of prior saturation points and the notion of bridge
8 > > > > > > < > > > > > > : ⌦(0), g(x(0))↵ = 0, ⌦(0), [f, g](x(0))↵ = 0, ⌦(tc), g(x(tc))↵ = 0, ⌦(tc), [f, g](x(tc))↵ = 0, H = 0
e de Montpellier) 24 / 25
Determination of prior saturation points and the notion of bridge
e de Montpellier) 25 / 25