Abdu dullra llrahman hman Al Al-Muqb Muqbal ali Supervisor Dr. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

abdu dullra llrahman hman al al muqb muqbal
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Abdu dullra llrahman hman Al Al-Muqb Muqbal ali Supervisor Dr. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sultan Qaboos University College of Science Department Of Mathematics and ============================= Presentation on: Abdu dullra llrahman hman Al Al-Muqb Muqbal ali Supervisor Dr. Anton Purnama Model studies of sea outfall effluent


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Abdu dullra llrahman hman Al Al-Muqb Muqbal ali

Supervisor Dr. Anton Purnama

Presentation on: Sultan Qaboos University College of Science Department Of Mathematics and =============================

Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge

5/19/2019 1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Sea outfall discharge

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Contents of the Presentation

1) Far field model ( Mathematical Model)

  • Single point source discharge
  • Two point sources discharges
  • Multiple point sources discharges

2) Near field model (3-D)

  • CORMIX
  • VISJET

Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 4

5/19/2019

Desalination brine discharged plumes

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Far field model (Mathematical model)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 5

 

my y h 

Uniformly sloping beach U Shoreline Diagram of multiple point sources

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Far field model (Mathematical model)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 6

In far field model we use a two – dimensional advection diffusion equation on sloping beach for a point source where , Where : C : Concentration (vertically well-mixed) h : water depth Q : rate of discharge δ: Dirac delta function (point source)

 

k k

y x , h k xk   

  0

h k yk    

     

n k k k k k k

c hUc hD Q x x y y x y y  

                 With boundary conditions , and

) 0,

k y

c i hD y y    

 

) , 0 ,

k

ii c x y y  

D : Coefficient of dispersivity (proportional to )

3 2

h

U : drift current (proportional to )

1 2

h

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Far field model (Mathematical model)

Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 7

   

) lim , lim ,

k k

k k y y y y

i c x y c x y

 

 

)

k k

ii hUc dy Q

There are two matching conditions :

5/19/2019

 

                y c hD y hUc x

k k

k

y y  

Outfall Point source

k

y y   

Region A Region B

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Far field model (Mathematical model)

In terms of dimensionless quantities Equation is reduced to

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 8

2 * * * 0 * *

, , ( , ) ( , )

h k k

y y x x h c x y c x y Q h U   

2 * * * * 2 * * *

5 2 c c c y y x y          

where h U D  

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Far field model (Mathematical model)

By using Laplace transform Equation is reduced a second –ordinary differential equation Which can be simplified further to the modified Bessel’s equation By writing

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 9

 

___ * * * * * * *

, ( , )

px k k xk

c p y e c x y dx

 

 

2 * * * * 2 * *

5 2

k k k

d c dc y p c dy dy    

 

3 4 * * * *

, ( ) 2

k

c p y y u z with z py 

 

2 2 2 2

9 ( ) 4 d u du z z z u dz dz    

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Far field model (Mathematical model)

To obtain the particular solution, the functions and can be determined from the matching conditions

and

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 10

 

 

 

 

3 4 * * 3 2 * * 3 4 * * 3 2 * *

, ( ) 2 , , ( ) 2 ,

k k k k

c p y A p y I py for y y c p y B p y K py for y y  

 

                 

( ) 3 2 3 2 * * * * * * * * ( )

, ,

k k k k k

q y c p y dy y c p y dy pm

      

 

 

the general solution in the two regions is given by

 

 

 

 

* * * * * *

lim , lim ,

k k y k y k

c p y c p y

       

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Far field model (Mathematical model)

It is found that and the inversion of the Laplace transform

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 11

 

3 2 3 4

2 ( ) 2 ( ) ( )

k

q A p K p k m k       

 

3 2 3 4

2 ( ) 2 ( ) ( )

k

q B p I p k m k       

we obtain the exact analytical solution in the form

3 4 * * * * * 3 2 * * * *

2 ( ) ( ) 1 ( , ) exp ( ) [ ]

k k

k y y k c x y q I m x k k y x k x k                                   

After summing for all concentration from the n+1 multiport sources, the analytical solution of Equation is given by

* * *

( , )

k

c x y

3 4 * * * * * 3 2 * * * *

2 ( ) ( ) 1 ( , ) exp ( ) [ ]

n n k k

k y y k c x y q I m x k k y x k x k      

                            

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Far field model (Mathematical model)

Contours of concentration for single point source when and

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 12

3   4   One point source

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Far field model (Mathematical model) Value of shoreline’s concentration

In the limit as We obtain

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 13

*

y 

 

5 2 * * * *

4 ( ,0 exp 3

k n

q k c x x k x k m                           

slide-14
SLIDE 14

By differentiation Equation the maximum value of concentration is which occurs at the position at This maximum value inversely proportional to the point source

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 14

Far field model (Mathematical model)

The concentration at the beach for a single point source

5 2 5 2

4 5 5 exp 2 2 3

m

c m               

*

2 5

m

x  

𝛽

Maximum value

  • f concentration

3 1.96 4 0.95

slide-15
SLIDE 15

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 15

Two point sources discharges

Diagram of two sea outfalls

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Far field model (Mathematical model)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 16

Contours of concentration for two point sources when α=3 and ħ=2 : left, ℓ = 3 and right, ℓ = 8 Two point sources

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Far field model (Mathematical model)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 17

Compounded concentration at the beach for two point sources

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Far field model (Mathematical model)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 18

Merging of contours of concentration for five points sources when

6  

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Near field model (Computational model)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 19

VISJET CORMIX Scenario I Scenario II Positively buoyant plume (heated brine discharges) for single port and multiport discharges. Negatively buoyant plume (dense brine discharges) for single port and multiport discharges.

Plume Plume

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Near field model (Computational model)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 20

Thanks for person Dr. Doneker for given me a permission to use CORMIX in this study.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Near field model (CORMIX)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 21

Table3.1: Input data for CORMIX simulations of single port discharges

Parameter Heated brine discharge Dense brine discharge Outfall type Single Ambient (unbounded coastal environmental) Velocity of the currents (m/s) 0.3 Depth at discharge (m) 8.73 Wind speed (m/s) 2.5 Temperature (degree C ) 27 Salinity (ppt) 35 Manning or Darcy –Weisbach f 0.025 (Uniform) Density (kg/m3) 1022.72 Brine effluent Flow rate (m3/s) 0.7 Temperature (degree C ) 40 30 Salinity (ppt) 37 50 (Uniform) density(kg/m3) 1019.45 1032.64 Distance to shoreline ( m) 500 Number of ports 1 Port height (m) 1 Port diameter (m) 0.7 Shoreline location Right Vertical angle (degrees) 30 Horizontal angle (degrees) 90 Mixing zone Water Quality Standard (degree C ) 1

  • Water Quality Standard (ppt)
  • 2

Regulatory Mixing Zone (m) 150 Region of Interest (m) 1000 Output steps per module 50

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Near field model (CORMIX)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 22

3.1.1 Scenario I: Heated brine discharges

The positively buoyant plume from single port discharges

500m  

Density (kg/m3) Ambient

1022.72

Effluent

1019.45

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Near field model (CORMIX)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 23

Side view of the positively plume in Figure 3.2

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Near field model (CORMIX)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 24

3.1.2 Scenario I I: Dense brine discharges The negatively buoyant plume from single port discharges

500m  

Density (kg/m3) Ambient

1022.72

Effluent

1032.64

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Near field model (CORMIX)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 25

Side view of the negatively buoyant plume in Figure 3.6

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Near field model (CORMIX)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 26

Table 3.4: Input data for CORMIX simulations of multiport discharges

Parameter Heated brine discharge Dense brine discharge Outfall type Multiport Ambient (unbounded coastal environment) Velocity of the currents (m/s) 0.3 Depth at discharge (m) 8.73 Wind speed (m/s) 2.5 Temperature (degree C) 27 Salinity (ppt) 35 Manning or Darcy –Weisbach f 0.025 (Uniform) Density (kg/m3) 1022.72 Brine effluent Flow rate (m3/s) 0.7 Temperature (degree C) 40 30 Salinity (ppt) 37 50 (Uniform) density (kg/m3) 1019.45 1032.64 Distance to shoreline (m) 500 Number of ports 7 Port height ( m) 1 Port diameter (m) 0.7 Shoreline location Right Contraction ratio (m) 1 Alignment angle (degrees) 90 Undirectional Vertical angle (degrees) 30 Horizontal angle (degrees) 90 Relative orientation angle BETA (degrees) Nozzle Direction Same direction Mixing Zone Water quality standard (degree C) 1

  • Water quality standard (ppt)
  • 2

Regulatory mixing zone (m) 150 Region of interest (m) 1000 Output steps per module 50

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Near field model (CORMIX)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 27

The positive buoyant plume from multiport discharge

7 ports

Scenario I: Heated brine discharges Multiport diffuser

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Near field model (CORMIX)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 28

Figure 3.11: Side view of the positively buoyant plume in Figure 3.10

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Near field model (CORMIX)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 29

Figure 3.14: The negative buoyant plume from multiport discharges Scenario I I: Dense brine discharges

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Near field model (CORMIX)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 30

Figure 3.15: Side view of the negative buoyant plume in Figure 3.14

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Near field model (VISJET)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 31

Why we do VISJET?

VISJET capable to explicitly display group of effluent jets discharged from a multiport

  • diffuser. CORMIX does not have this feature

Therefore VISJET be useful as a tool to effectively design a multiport diffuser effluent discharges.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Near field model (VISJET)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 32

Thanks to SQU for buying this software to use in this study

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Near field model (VISJET)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 33

Parameter Scenario I Scenario II Ambient water Depth below surface (m) 8.73 Salinity (ppt) 35 Temperature (oC) 27 Horizontal current speed (m/s) 0.3 Depth at discharge (m) 7.73 Outfall with riser Depth below surface (m) 8.73 Effluent salinity (ppt) 37 50 Effluent temperature (oC) 40 30 Length of the outfall (m) 500 Width/diameter of the outfall (m) 0.7 Riser Sum of the effluent flow of all risers (m3/s) 0.7 Distance for each riser (m) from the offshore end of the outfall Radius at the bottom of the riser (m) 0.35 Radius at the top of the riser (m) 0.35 Height of the riser (m) 1 Jet for each riser Effluent flow from the port (m3/s) 0.7 Port diameter (m) 0.7 Port height (m) 1 Vertical angle (90o for a vertical port) 30 Horizontal angle (90o for crossflow) 90 Effluent salinity (ppt) 37 50 Effluent temperature (oC) 40 30

Input parameters for VISJET simulations of single outfall discharges

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Near field model (VISJET)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 34

Single port

4.1.1 Scenario I: Heated brine discharges The heated brine discharge rises to the surface from a submerged single port

Density (kg/m3) Ambient

1022.72

Effluent

1019.45

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Near field model (VISJET)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 35

The horizontal plane view of Figure 4.1

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Near field model (VISJET)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 36

Single port

Scenario I I: Dense brine discharges The dense brine discharge sinks to the seabed from a submerged single port

Density (kg/m3) Ambient

1022.72

Effluent

1032.64

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Near field model (VISJET)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 37

The horizontal plan view of Figure 4.4

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Near field model (VISJET)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 38

Parameter Scenario I Ambient water Depth below surface (m) 8.73 Salinity (ppt) 35 Temperature (oC) 27 Horizontal current speed (m/s) 0.3 Depth at discharge (m) 7.73 Outfall with riser Depth below surface (m) 8.73 Effluent salinity (ppt) 30 Effluent temperature (oC) 40 Length of the outfall (m) 515 Width/diameter of the outfall (m) 0.7 Riser R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 Sum of the effluent flow of all risers (m3/s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Distance for each riser (m) from the offshore end of the outfall 5 10 15 20 25 30 Radius at the bottom of the riser (m) 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 Radius at the top of the riser (m) 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 Height of the riser (m) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jet for each riser Jet1 Jet2 Jet3 Jet4 Jet5 Jet6 Jet7 Effluent flow from the port (m3/s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Port diameter (m) 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 Port height (m) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Vertical angle (90o for a vertical port) 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Horizontal angle (90o for crossflow) 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Effluent salinity (ppt) 37 37 37 37 37 37 30 Effluent temperature (oC) 40 40 40 40 40 40 40

Table 4.3: VISJET input parameters for a multiport diffuser for Scenario I

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Near field model (VISJET)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 39

Multiport Diffuser

4.2.1 Scenario I: Heated brine discharges The group of jets rises to the surface from a multiport diffuser discharge

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Near field model (VISJET)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 40

4.2.2 Scenario I I: Dense brine discharges The group of jets sinks to the seabed from a multiport diffuser discharge

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Near field model (VISJET)

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 41

The horizontal plane view of Figure 4.10 Not overlapping plumes

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Comments or questions

5/19/2019 Model studies of sea outfall effluent discharge 42