a global view of x ray time lags in seyfert galaxies
play

A Global View of X-ray time lags in Seyfert Galaxies Erin Kara - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ESAC Meeting 9 June 2015 Madrid, Spain A Global View of X-ray time lags in Seyfert Galaxies Erin Kara ekara@ast.cam.ac.uk Collaborators: Will Alston, Andy Fabian, Ed Cackett, Phil Uttley, Abdu Zoghbi, Giorgio Matt, Andrea Marinucci, Dom


  1. ESAC Meeting 9 June 2015 Madrid, Spain A Global View of X-ray time lags in Seyfert Galaxies Erin Kara ekara@ast.cam.ac.uk Collaborators: Will Alston, Andy Fabian, Ed Cackett, Phil Uttley, Abdu Zoghbi, Giorgio Matt, Andrea Marinucci, Dom Walton, Fiona Harrison, Michael Parker

  2. Reverberation with XMM-Newton between 0.3-1 keV and 1-4 keV ➊ 600 ➋ Propagation Reverberation ➊ 400 Lag (s) ➋ 200 0 − 200 10 − 4 5 × 10 − 4 10 − 3 Frequency (Hz) Kotov+04 1500 100 Arevalo+06 [0.6-1.6] × 10 -4 Hz 1250 1000 0 Lag (s) 750 Lag (s) 500 250 0 [3.2-5.2] × 10 -3 Hz − 200 − 250 1 5 10 1 5 10 Energy (keV) Energy (keV) EK+13, also Zoghbi+12,13 Cackett+13, De Marco+13, Emmanoloupolous+14, Uttley+14 for a review

  3. Reverberation with NuSTAR Swift J2127.4+5654 800 1.3 Lag 600 1.2 ratio data/model 400 Lag (s) 1.1 200 1 0 0.9 Spectrum − 200 5 10 20 50 5 10 20 50 Energy (keV) Energy (keV) EK+15, see also Zoghbi+14

  4. A Growing Sample of Reverberation Lag 1 10 Energy (keV) Uttley+14, adapted from EK+14

  5. A Growing Sample of Reverberation Soft excess lag iron K lag Fe K lag 1000 100 lag (s) | τ | (s) 100 10 6 r g 9 r g 2 r g 1 r g 6 r g 1 r g 10 0.1 1 10 0.1 1 10 M BH (10 7 M O . ) M BH (10 7 M ⊙ ) De Marco+13 EK+13

  6. A Global View The Sample • All public XMM-Newton ✔ observations of Seyfert Galaxies • Must be >40 ks exposure • Must have some x variability… González-Martín & Vaughan 12

  7. 1 0.3-10 keV F var 0.1 45 sources 0.01 10 5 10 6 10 7 0.3-10 keV total counts

  8. 1 0.3-10 keV F var 0.1 25 S1-S1.2 Seyfert Type 12 S1.5 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 8 S1.8-2 0.01 10 5 10 6 10 7 0.3-10 keV total counts

  9. 1 0.3-10 keV F var 0.1 0.01 10 5 10 6 10 7 0.3-10 keV total counts

  10. 1 0.3-10 keV F var 0.1 13 confirmed iron K lags 0.01 10 5 10 6 10 7 0.3-10 keV total counts

  11. 1 NGC4051 IRAS13224-3809 1H0707-495 NGC7314 ARK564 PG1244+026 0.3-10 keV F var MRK335 SWIFTJ2127.4+5654 MS22549-3712 NGC1365 0.1 REJ1034+396 MCG-05-23-16 NGC4151 13 confirmed iron K lags 0.01 10 5 10 6 10 7 0.3-10 keV total counts

  12. 1 NGC4051 IRAS13224-3809 1H0707-495 NGC7314 ARK564 PG1244+026 0.3-10 keV F var MRK335 SWIFTJ2127.4+5654 MS22549-3712 NGC1365 0.1 REJ1034+396 MCG-05-23-16 NGC4151 13 tentative iron K lags 0.01 10 5 10 6 10 7 0.3-10 keV total counts

  13. Tentative iron K lags Best case NGC 5506 300 750 400 [3-8] × 10 -5 Hz [8-30] × 10 -5 Hz ** 300 500 200 counts s -1 keV -1 200 250 1 100 Lag (s) Lag (s) Lag (s) 100 0 0 0 −250 −100 −100 −500 0.1 −200 −200 5×10 −5 10 −4 2×10 −4 5×10 −4 1 10 1 10 1 10 Energy (keV) Freq (Hz) Energy (keV) Energy (keV) Worst case NGC 3783 500 1500 200 10 [2-6] × 10 -5 Hz [6-40] × 10 -4 Hz 400 150 1000 300 counts s -1 keV -1 100 200 Lag (s) Lag (s) Lag (s) 1 500 50 100 0 0 0 −50 −100 0.1 −500 −200 −100 10 −4 10 −3 1 10 1 10 1 10 Energy (keV) Freq (Hz) Energy (keV) Energy (keV)

  14. 1 NGC4051 IRAS13224-3809 1H0707-495 NGC7314 ARK564 PG1244+026 0.3-10 keV F var MRK335 SWIFTJ2127.4+5654 MS22549-3712 NGC1365 0.1 REJ1034+396 MCG-05-23-16 NGC4151 26 total iron K lags 0.01 10 5 10 6 10 7 0.3-10 keV total counts

  15. Lag-mass relation 1000 Iron K amplitude (s) 9 r g 100 6 r g 1 r g assuming 10 10 6 10 7 10 8 disc inclination Black hole mass (M/M ⊙ ) of 45 deg

  16. Reverberation lag—mass relation 1000 Iron K amplitude (s) 9 r g 100 6 r g 1 r g 10 10 6 10 7 10 8 Black hole mass (M/M ⊙ )

  17. 1 NGC4051 IRAS13224-3809 1H0707-495 NGC7314 ARK564 PG1244+026 0.3-10 keV F var MRK335 SWIFTJ2127.4+5654 MS22549-3712 NGC1365 0.1 REJ1034+396 MCG-05-23-16 NGC4151 26 total iron K lags 0.01 10 5 10 6 10 7 0.3-10 keV total counts

  18. 1 NGC4051 IRAS13224-3809 1H0707-495 Mrk766 MCG-6-30-15 NGC7314 ARK564 PG1244+026 0.3-10 keV F var MRK335 SWIFTJ2127.4+5654 MS22549-3712 NGC1365 0.1 REJ1034+396 MCG-05-23-16 NGC4151 26 total iron K lags 0.01 10 5 10 6 10 7 0.3-10 keV total counts

  19. MCG-6-30-15 evidence for light bending? First broad iron line Tanaka+95, Fabian+03, Vaughan+03, Miniutti+04, Brenneman+06, Chiang+11, Miyakawa+12, Marinucci+14, …

  20. MCG-6-30-15 100 75 50 Lag (s) 25 0 − 25 Emmanoloupolous+11 − 50 Papadakis+05 2 × 10 − 4 5 × 10 − 4 10 − 3 2 × 10 − 3 5 × 10 − 3 Frequency (Hz) 40 40 (a) [0.7-1.3] × 10 -3 Hz (b) [1.7-3] × 10 -3 Hz 20 20 Lag (s) Lag (s) 0 0 − 20 − 20 old observation old observation − 40 − 40 1 10 1 10 Energy (keV) Energy (keV) EK+14

  21. MCG-6-30-15 mean spectrum 0.01 keV 2 (Photons cm -2 s -1 ) ratio mean/covariance 20 10 10 − 3 5 old observations 1 10 1 10 Energy (keV) Energy (keV) covariance spectra: uncorrelated and/or spectrum contributing to lags non-varying component

  22. Mrk 766

  23. 0.8 FPMA 1.4 FPMB 1.2 Ratio 0.6 1 Count rate (s -1 ) pcfabs*pcfabs 0.8 0.4 1.4 1.2 XRT Coverage 0.2 Ratio 1 0 Xillver 0.8 5×10 4 10 5 1.5×10 5 0 Time (s) 1.4 1.2 Ratio Recent 100 ks NuSTAR observation Mrk 766 1 Parker, EK+ in prep Relxilllp 0.8 5 10 20 50 0.1 Energy (keV) data Normalized counts s -1 keV -1 powerlaw model 0.01 10 −3 LF 0.02 10 −4 0.01 normalised excess variance 5 × 10 − 3 1.2 MF Ratio 1 2 × 10 − 3 0.8 5 10 20 50 HF Energy (keV) 10 − 3 0.25 5 × 10 − 4 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 energy [keV] 0.15 F var 0.1 Frequency-resolved rms spectra Arevalo+08 0.05 0 5 10 20 Energy (keV)

  24. Conclusions • Global study of time lags in Seyferts is ongoing • Reverberation (confirmed+tentative) found in 26/45 sources • Most non-detections clearly due to lack of statistics, but two sources—MCG-6-30-15 and Mrk 766—have “should” show reverberation • Further evidence for light bending?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend