A Tale of Two Anomalies: from LHCb to ANITA Speaker: Yicong Sui In - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
a tale of two anomalies from lhcb to anita
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A Tale of Two Anomalies: from LHCb to ANITA Speaker: Yicong Sui In - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nov 13, 2022 168 likes •969 views

A Tale of Two Anomalies: from LHCb to ANITA Speaker: Yicong Sui In collaboration with: Wolfgang Altmannshofer, Bhupal Dev, Amarjit Soni Introduction of B-anomaly Introduction of B-anomaly Introduction of B-anomaly Gregory Ciezarek, etl, ,

slide-1
SLIDE 1

A Tale of Two Anomalies: from LHCb to ANITA

Speaker: Yicong Sui In collaboration with: Wolfgang Altmannshofer, Bhupal Dev, Amarjit Soni

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction of B-anomaly

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction of B-anomaly

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction of B-anomaly

Gregory Ciezarek, etl, , 1703.01766

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction of B-anomaly

Gregory Ciezarek, etl, , 1703.01766 Florian U. Bernlochner, etl, 1703.05330

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Introduction of B-anomaly

Gregory Ciezarek, etl, , 1703.01766 PDG2018 Florian U. Bernlochner, etl, 1703.05330

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Introduction of B-anomaly

Gregory Ciezarek, etl, , 1703.01766 PDG2018 Florian U. Bernlochner, etl, 1703.05330

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Introduction of B-anomaly

Gregory Ciezarek, etl, , 1703.01766 PDG2018 Florian U. Bernlochner, etl, 1703.05330

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Introduction of B-anomaly

Gregory Ciezarek, etl, , 1703.01766 PDG2018 Florian U. Bernlochner, etl, 1703.05330

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Introduction of B-anomaly

Gregory Ciezarek, etl, , 1703.01766 PDG2018 Florian U. Bernlochner, etl, 1703.05330 Marzia Bordone, Gino Isidori, Andrea Pattori, 1605.07633

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Introduction of B-anomaly

Gregory Ciezarek, etl, , 1703.01766 LHCb collaboration, 1903.09252 PDG2018 Florian U. Bernlochner, etl, 1703.05330 Marzia Bordone, Gino Isidori, Andrea Pattori, 1605.07633 LHCb collaboration, 1705.05802

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Introduction of B-anomaly

Gregory Ciezarek, etl, , 1703.01766 LHCb collaboration, 1903.09252 PDG2018 Florian U. Bernlochner, etl, 1703.05330 Marzia Bordone, Gino Isidori, Andrea Pattori, 1605.07633 LHCb collaboration, 1705.05802

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The ANITA detection concepts, figure from Cosmin Deaconu

Introduction of ANITA anomaly

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The ANITA detection concepts, figure from Cosmin Deaconu

Table from ANITA, 1803.05088

Introduction of ANITA anomaly

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The ANITA detection concepts, figure from Cosmin Deaconu

Table from ANITA, 1803.05088

Properties of the anomalous upward events 1.Large Elevation Angle, going upwards. 2.No Polarity Reverse Relative to Geomagnetic Field. 3.Both have large energy~0.5EeV 4.Both interpreted as tau events by ANITA

Introduction of ANITA anomaly

slide-16
SLIDE 16

The ANITA detection concepts, figure from Cosmin Deaconu

Table from ANITA, 1803.05088

Properties of the anomalous upward events 1.Large Elevation Angle, going upwards. 2.No Polarity Reverse Relative to Geomagnetic Field. 3.Both have large energy~0.5EeV 4.Both interpreted as tau events by ANITA

Introduction of ANITA anomaly

slide-17
SLIDE 17

The ANITA detection concepts, figure from Cosmin Deaconu

Table from ANITA, 1803.05088

Properties of the anomalous upward events 1.Large Elevation Angle, going upwards. 2.No Polarity Reverse Relative to Geomagnetic Field. 3.Both have large energy~0.5EeV 4.Both interpreted as tau events by ANITA

Introduction of ANITA anomaly

slide-18
SLIDE 18

The ANITA detection concepts, figure from Cosmin Deaconu

Table from ANITA, 1803.05088

Properties of the anomalous upward events 1.Large Elevation Angle, going upwards. 2.No Polarity Reverse Relative to Geomagnetic Field. 3.Both have large energy~0.5EeV 4.Both interpreted as tau events by ANITA

Introduction of ANITA anomaly

slide-19
SLIDE 19

The ANITA detection concepts, figure from Cosmin Deaconu

Table from ANITA, 1803.05088

Properties of the anomalous upward events 1.Large Elevation Angle, going upwards. 2.No Polarity Reverse Relative to Geomagnetic Field. 3.Both have large energy~0.5EeV 4.Both interpreted as tau events by ANITA

Introduction of ANITA anomaly

slide-20
SLIDE 20

The ANITA detection concepts, figure from Cosmin Deaconu

Table from ANITA, 1803.05088

Properties of the anomalous upward events 1.Large Elevation Angle, going upwards. 2.No Polarity Reverse Relative to Geomagnetic Field. 3.Both have large energy~0.5EeV 4.Both interpreted as tau events by ANITA

Introduction of ANITA anomaly

slide-21
SLIDE 21

The ANITA detection concepts, figure from Cosmin Deaconu

Table from ANITA, 1803.05088

Properties of the anomalous upward events 1.Large Elevation Angle, going upwards. 2.No Polarity Reverse Relative to Geomagnetic Field. 3.Both have large energy~0.5EeV 4.Both interpreted as tau events by ANITA

Introduction of ANITA anomaly

l

S M

~ 300 km (in rock)

R ~ 6400 km D = 2R cos(θ) > 5700 km

slide-22
SLIDE 22

The ANITA detection concepts, figure from Cosmin Deaconu

Table from ANITA, 1803.05088

Properties of the anomalous upward events 1.Large Elevation Angle, going upwards. 2.No Polarity Reverse Relative to Geomagnetic Field. 3.Both have large energy~0.5EeV 4.Both interpreted as tau events by ANITA

Introduction of ANITA anomaly

Psurvival ~ 10-6

l

S M

~ 300 km (in rock)

R ~ 6400 km D = 2R cos(θ) > 5700 km

slide-23
SLIDE 23

The ANITA detection concepts, figure from Cosmin Deaconu

Table from ANITA, 1803.05088

Properties of the anomalous upward events 1.Large Elevation Angle, going upwards. 2.No Polarity Reverse Relative to Geomagnetic Field. 3.Both have large energy~0.5EeV 4.Both interpreted as tau events by ANITA

Introduction of ANITA anomaly

Psurvival ~ 10-6

= 0.0001% l

S M

~ 300 km (in rock)

R ~ 6400 km D = 2R cos(θ) > 5700 km

slide-24
SLIDE 24

New Phyiscs Interpretation to ANITA-anomaly

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Jack Collins and Bhupal Dev, Yicong Sui, 1810.08479

Long-lived neutral particle + TeV level mediator particle

New Phyiscs Interpretation to ANITA-anomaly

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Jack Collins and Bhupal Dev, Yicong Sui, 1810.08479

Long-lived neutral particle + TeV level mediator particle

New Phyiscs Interpretation to ANITA-anomaly

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Jack Collins and Bhupal Dev, Yicong Sui, 1810.08479

λ geff Long-lived neutral particle + TeV level mediator particle

  • M. Carena, D. Choudhury, S. Lola, C. Quigg, Hep-ph/9804380;
  • P. S. Bhupal Dev, Dilip Kumar Ghosh, Werner Rodejohann.1605.09743

New Phyiscs Interpretation to ANITA-anomaly

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Jack Collins and Bhupal Dev, Yicong Sui, 1810.08479

λ geff Long-lived neutral particle + TeV level mediator particle

  • M. Carena, D. Choudhury, S. Lola, C. Quigg, Hep-ph/9804380;
  • P. S. Bhupal Dev, Dilip Kumar Ghosh, Werner Rodejohann.1605.09743

New Phyiscs Interpretation to ANITA-anomaly

slide-29
SLIDE 29

RPV-SUSY

Jack Collins and Bhupal Dev, Yicong Sui, 1810.08479

λ geff Long-lived neutral particle + TeV level mediator particle

  • M. Carena, D. Choudhury, S. Lola, C. Quigg, Hep-ph/9804380;
  • P. S. Bhupal Dev, Dilip Kumar Ghosh, Werner Rodejohann.1605.09743

New Phyiscs Interpretation to ANITA-anomaly

slide-30
SLIDE 30

RPV-SUSY

Jack Collins and Bhupal Dev, Yicong Sui, 1810.08479

λ geff Long-lived neutral particle + TeV level mediator particle

  • M. Carena, D. Choudhury, S. Lola, C. Quigg, Hep-ph/9804380;
  • P. S. Bhupal Dev, Dilip Kumar Ghosh, Werner Rodejohann.1605.09743

New Phyiscs Interpretation to ANITA-anomaly

slide-31
SLIDE 31

RPV-SUSY

Jack Collins and Bhupal Dev, Yicong Sui, 1810.08479

λ geff Long-lived neutral particle + TeV level mediator particle

  • M. Carena, D. Choudhury, S. Lola, C. Quigg, Hep-ph/9804380;
  • P. S. Bhupal Dev, Dilip Kumar Ghosh, Werner Rodejohann.1605.09743

New Phyiscs Interpretation to ANITA-anomaly

slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33

LLE senario

Jack Collins and Bhupal Dev, Yicong Sui, 1810.08479

slide-34
SLIDE 34

LLE senario

Jack Collins and Bhupal Dev, Yicong Sui, 1810.08479

LQD senario

slide-35
SLIDE 35

RPV-SUSY Interpretation to B-anomaly: RD RD*

slide-36
SLIDE 36

RPV-SUSY Interpretation to B-anomaly: RD RD*

slide-37
SLIDE 37

RPV-SUSY Interpretation to B-anomaly: RD RD*

slide-38
SLIDE 38

RPV-SUSY Interpretation to B-anomaly: RD RD*

N.G. Deshpande, Xiao-Gang He, 1608.04817

  • W. Altmannshofer, P. S. Bhupal Dev and A. Soni, 1704.06659

Sokratis Trifinopoulos, 1807.01638

slide-39
SLIDE 39

RPV-SUSY Interpretation to B-anomaly: RD RD*

N.G. Deshpande, Xiao-Gang He, 1608.04817

  • W. Altmannshofer, P. S. Bhupal Dev and A. Soni, 1704.06659

Sokratis Trifinopoulos, 1807.01638

slide-40
SLIDE 40

RPV-SUSY Interpretation to B-anomaly: RD RD*

N.G. Deshpande, Xiao-Gang He, 1608.04817

  • W. Altmannshofer, P. S. Bhupal Dev and A. Soni, 1704.06659

Sokratis Trifinopoulos, 1807.01638

slide-41
SLIDE 41

RPV-SUSY Interpretation to B-anomaly: RK RK*

slide-42
SLIDE 42

RPV-SUSY Interpretation to B-anomaly: RK RK*

Diganta Das, Chandan Hati, Girish Kumar, and Namit Mahajan, 1705.09188 Kevin Earla, Thomas Gr´egoirea, 1806.01343

slide-43
SLIDE 43

RPV-SUSY Interpretation to B-anomaly: RK RK*

Diganta Das, Chandan Hati, Girish Kumar, and Namit Mahajan, 1705.09188 Kevin Earla, Thomas Gr´egoirea, 1806.01343

slide-44
SLIDE 44

RPV-SUSY Interpretation to B-anomaly: RK RK*

Diganta Das, Chandan Hati, Girish Kumar, and Namit Mahajan, 1705.09188 Kevin Earla, Thomas Gr´egoirea, 1806.01343

slide-45
SLIDE 45

RPV-SUSY Interpretation to B-anomaly: RK RK*

Diganta Das, Chandan Hati, Girish Kumar, and Namit Mahajan, 1705.09188 Kevin Earla, Thomas Gr´egoirea, 1806.01343

slide-46
SLIDE 46

RPV-SUSY Interpretation to B-anomaly: RK RK*

Diganta Das, Chandan Hati, Girish Kumar, and Namit Mahajan, 1705.09188 Kevin Earla, Thomas Gr´egoirea, 1806.01343

slide-47
SLIDE 47

RPV-SUSY Interpretation to B-anomaly: RK RK*

Diganta Das, Chandan Hati, Girish Kumar, and Namit Mahajan, 1705.09188 Kevin Earla, Thomas Gr´egoirea, 1806.01343

slide-48
SLIDE 48

RPV-SUSY Interpretation to B-anomaly: RK RK*

Diganta Das, Chandan Hati, Girish Kumar, and Namit Mahajan, 1705.09188 Kevin Earla, Thomas Gr´egoirea, 1806.01343

slide-49
SLIDE 49

RPV-SUSY Interpretation to B-anomaly: RK RK*

Diganta Das, Chandan Hati, Girish Kumar, and Namit Mahajan, 1705.09188 Kevin Earla, Thomas Gr´egoirea, 1806.01343 Sokratis Trifinopoulos, 1807.01638

slide-50
SLIDE 50

B, Anomaly Anita, Anomaly

Hey, B. Are we related?

slide-51
SLIDE 51

B, Anomaly Anita, Anomaly

Hey, B. Are we related?

slide-52
SLIDE 52
slide-53
SLIDE 53
slide-54
SLIDE 54
slide-55
SLIDE 55
slide-56
SLIDE 56
slide-57
SLIDE 57

independents

slide-58
SLIDE 58

independents

slide-59
SLIDE 59

independents parameters

slide-60
SLIDE 60

independents parameters

slide-61
SLIDE 61

independents parameters

slide-62
SLIDE 62

independents parameters

slide-63
SLIDE 63

independents parameters

Possible Constraints

slide-64
SLIDE 64

independents parameters

Possible Constraints

Sokratis Trifinopoulos, 1807.01638

slide-65
SLIDE 65

independents parameters

Possible Constraints

Sokratis Trifinopoulos, 1807.01638

slide-66
SLIDE 66

independents parameters

Possible Constraints

Dario Buttazzo, etl, 1706.07808 Sokratis Trifinopoulos, 1807.01638

slide-67
SLIDE 67

independents parameters

Possible Constraints

Dario Buttazzo, etl, 1706.07808 Sokratis Trifinopoulos, 1807.01638

slide-68
SLIDE 68

independents parameters

Possible Constraints

Dario Buttazzo, etl, 1706.07808 Heavy Flavor Averaging Group, etl, 1612.07233 Sokratis Trifinopoulos, 1807.01638

slide-69
SLIDE 69

independents parameters

Possible Constraints

Dario Buttazzo, etl, 1706.07808 Heavy Flavor Averaging Group, etl, 1612.07233 Sokratis Trifinopoulos, 1807.01638

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Conclusion:

1.Under the framework of RPV-SUSY, ANITA anomaly has quite large parameter space, which is in the simlar range demanded by RD and RK. 2.Rk Rk* and RD RD* anomalies could be explained simultaneously after a “fourth term” is included in the traditional RPV-SUSY Rk Rk* expression. 3.Under the simplified parameter setup, we find that there exist parameter spaces that could satisfy RK-RD-ANITA altogether. 4.Relaxing the parameter setup and letting more lambda’ running free could possibly lead to larger preferred region for the parameters. 5.This framework could also be expanded to include muon g-2 anomaly

slide-71
SLIDE 71
slide-72
SLIDE 72

BK slides-Constraints

slide-73
SLIDE 73

BK slides-Constraints

slide-74
SLIDE 74

BK slides-Constraints

1706.07808 eq 50

slide-75
SLIDE 75

BK slides-Constraints

1706.07808 eq 50

slide-76
SLIDE 76

BK slides-Constraints

1706.07808 eq 50 1807.01638

slide-77
SLIDE 77

BK slides-Constraints

1706.07808 eq 50 1807.01638

slide-78
SLIDE 78

BK slides-Constraints

1706.07808 eq 50 1807.01638 1807.01638