A Sub-National RL Concept Note in TAL Terai Arc Landscape Program - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a sub national rl concept note in tal
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A Sub-National RL Concept Note in TAL Terai Arc Landscape Program - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A Sub-National RL Concept Note in TAL Terai Arc Landscape Program In Technical Support of WWF 18 TH JUNE 2013 WHAT IS RL/REL Forest Reference Emission Levels &/or Forest Reference levels: Benchmarks for assessing a countrys


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A Sub-National RL Concept Note in TAL

18TH JUNE 2013

Terai Arc Landscape Program

In Technical Support of WWF

slide-2
SLIDE 2

WHAT IS RL/REL

Forest Reference Emission Levels &/or Forest Reference levels:

  • Benchmarks for assessing a country’s performance in implementing

REDD+ activities

  • Expressed in tons of CO2 eq/ year
  • Credible ones will be driven by historical data: any projections (while

allowed) will receive substantial more scrutiny and criticism

Benchmarks:

  • Moving from REDD+ readiness – Demonstration- Performance

Based Payments.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

WHAT REALLY IS RL

The most important thing about a REDD+ RL:

  • Basis for determining whether a REDD program or policy is working.

On REDD+, funding that is performance-based:

  • RLs are essential to know the starting point of forest cover change

and emissions in an area.

  • RLs are a combination of empirical data, assumptions, and modeling.
  • RLs are being discussed at project levels, subnational levels,

nationally, internationally (UNFCCC), multilaterally (e.g., World Bank).

slide-4
SLIDE 4

BASIS OF REDD+ RL

The basic math is:

Activity Data (ha loss or ha degraded/per year) X Emissions Factors (tCO2e/ha) = tCO2e/year

  • Activity data will be based on satellite information (past) or

assumptions (future)

  • Emission factors will be based on field measurements & Allometric

equations –they will be net changes in forest carbon between the classes used in the activity data

slide-5
SLIDE 5

CONCEPT NOTE

slide-6
SLIDE 6

PROPOSAL

Approach: Historical RL @ a sub-national scale

  • Base Year 1999
  • Project Area; 12 jurisdictional boundaries

Tools: Img Tools (NDFI) and LiDAR (Arbo-LiDAR and LAMP)

  • Generate activity data (AGC) (1999 to 2011) and emissions

factors (derived from plot data and NDFI)

  • Larger plots for calibration of LiDAR

Allometric Equations

  • Chave et all, Moist Forest- Diameter Model- (Equation: 1.3)
  • Sharma and Pukkala
slide-7
SLIDE 7

PROPOSAL: POOLS

Soil Carbon Herbaceous vegetation Wood products Branches Litter Dead wood Roots

Above Ground Biomass Below Ground Biomass Shrubs Litter Soil Organic Carbon

slide-8
SLIDE 8

LIDAR

  • LAMP computes model-based

estimates that take advantage of field plots, LiDAR, and satellite images like Landsat or RapidEye;

  • It produces an Above-ground biomass

(AGB) map at high spatial resolution, from 1 ha upwards;

  • The AGB estimates are unbiased;
  • The estimates also preserve AGB

variance present in LiDAR blocks;

  • The LAMP process does not depend
  • n subjective expert opinion.
slide-9
SLIDE 9

APPLYING IMG TOOLS FOR NDFI

slide-10
SLIDE 10

NDFI: NORMALIZED DIFFERENTIAL FRACTION INDEX

  • Equations that combines Landsat’s wavelength returns into

a single value to explain forests

  • A significant relationship between NDFI values and field

derived estimates of carbon

  • We binned NDFI into forests with low, medium and high

carbon values

  • These bins are the key pivot points for generating AGC

values

slide-11
SLIDE 11

VALUES

Low: Bin I (1-90 NDFI) Mean C: 25tC/Ha Medium : Bin II (91-147 NDFI) Mean C: 59tC/Ha High: Bin III (148-199 NDFI) Mean C: 145tC/Ha

slide-12
SLIDE 12

APPLYING NDFI and FOREST CHANGE

  • The forest change information
  • Deforestation

(Bin II  Bin I, or Bin III  Bin I)

  • Degradation

(Bin III  Bin II, Bin II-)

  • Regrowth

(Bin I  Bin II, or Bin I  Bin III)

  • Enhancement

(Bin II to Bin III)

  • Can be applied to :
  • a. Available forest classification Sal, Mixed hardwood,

Riverine etc. by overlapping available forest classification

  • ver the FCD Mapper
  • b. Physiographic classification, such as Terai and Siwaliks
slide-13
SLIDE 13

ANALYSIS: BOOKEND APPROACH: 1999-2011: (2.9 MT OF CO2 EQ/YR)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

ANALYSIS: TIME SERIES APPROACH: (2.64 MT OF CO2 EQ/YR)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT

slide-16
SLIDE 16

AGC 1999

slide-17
SLIDE 17

AGC 2011

slide-18
SLIDE 18

CHANGE DECTECTION 1999-2011

slide-19
SLIDE 19

CHANGE DETECTION 1999- 2011

slide-20
SLIDE 20

CENTRAL TERAI IN 12 YEARS: RAUTAHAT & BARA

slide-21
SLIDE 21

WESTERN TERAI IN 12 YEARS: BARDIYA

slide-22
SLIDE 22

WESTERN TERAI IN 12 YEARS: KAILALI

slide-23
SLIDE 23

WESTERN TERAI IN 12 YEARS: KANCHANPUR

slide-24
SLIDE 24

FINANCING

Current Emissions: 2.64 Mt of CO2/yr Performance: Reduce by 50% Rate: $7/Mt of CO2 eq Revenue: 46.2 million in 5 years

slide-25
SLIDE 25

LIDAR AND AGC

  • LiDAR model was correlated

with recently measured 48 field plots with 30m radius

  • LiDAR model has an R2 value
  • f 0.92 and does not saturate

at all.

R2 = 0.92

slide-26
SLIDE 26

AGC- LIDAR AND NDFI

  • NDFI was correlated with

AGB estimated using the LiDAR model developed for TAL

  • NDFI has an R2 value of

0.44 but saturates at 300 tons/ha

R2 = 0.44

slide-27
SLIDE 27

LAMP RESULTS AT 1Ha RESOLUTION

R2 = 0.53

slide-28
SLIDE 28

LEARNINGS IN THE PROCESS

  • NDFI has strong correlation with forest cover change,
  • LiDAR has strong capapcity to pick up AGC,
  • Incorporation of NDFI in LAMP will enhance the capacity
  • f LAMP to detect change and estimate AGC.
  • Choice for Allometry Equations
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Work in progress (LAMP): Carbon difefrence map at 1 ha resolution between 1999 and 2011

slide-30
SLIDE 30

FCPF

  • FCPF is still in the process of designing the

framework

  • Many countries getting ready to line-up for

Carbon Fund, but not many that will be viewed as being READY.

  • It is important for Nepal to not delay in

getting an initial ER-PIN before the fund. Ideally, October meeting, which would require a late September submission to the FMT

slide-31
SLIDE 31

UNFCCC/SB-38

  • DRAFT CONCLUSIONS: Adopted
  • NFMS:

National Forest Monitoring Systems

  • MRV- ICA:

Monitoring Reporting and Verifications- International Consultations and Analysis

  • RL:

Reference Levels: 21 WEEKS REVIEW

  • NMBA:

Non- Market Based Approaches

  • NCB:

Non Carbon Benefits

  • SAFEGUARDS:
  • DRIVERS:
  • REDD FINANCE:
slide-32
SLIDE 32

COMMENTS!