A Proposal to Rezone the South Villages R7-2 Zoning District R7-2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
A Proposal to Rezone the South Villages R7-2 Zoning District R7-2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
A Proposal to Rezone the South Villages R7-2 Zoning District R7-2 Zone Dates to 1961 No height limits Meant to encourage high- rises surrounded by open space Large Community Facility bulk bonus 6.5 FAR CF
R7-2 Zone
- Dates to 1961
- No height limits
- Meant to encourage high-
rises surrounded by open space
- Large Community Facility
bulk bonus
- 6.5 FAR CF
- 3.44 FAR residential
Contextual Zones
- Height limits
- Streetwall requirements
- Eliminate Community
Facility bulk bonus
- Inappropriate New Development
NYU’s Kimmel Center NYU Law School’s Furman Hall
159 Bleecker Street
Allowable development under R7-2 zoning
- n St. Anthony’s site :
290 ft. to top of mechanicals
Allowable development on St. Anthony’s site under R7-2 zoning: 290 ft. to top of mechanicals
Allowable development on St. Anthony’s site under R7-2 zoning: 290 ft. to top of mechanicals
Allowable development at 130-148 West Houston Street next to MacDougal-Sullivan Gardens, under R7-2 zoning: 263 ft. to top of mechanicals
Allowable development at 130-148 West Houston Street, next to MacDougal-Sullivan Gardens, under R7-2 zoning: 263 ft. to top of mechanicals
Allowable development at 130-148 West Houston Street, next to MacDougal- Sullivan Gardens under R7-2 zoning: 263 ft. to top of mechanicals
300 ft. to top of mechanicals
300 ft. to top of mechanicals
Key Factors for Rezoning
- The simpler the better
- Use changes complicate things
- Using existing zoning designations, rather
than creating new ones, much easier
- Look for precedents – similar areas where
the City has agreed to do similar things
Original C6-1 Zoning: 6.5 FAR for Community Facilities 6 FAR Commercial 3.44 FAR (max) Residential No height limits became C1-6A Zoning: 4 FAR Community Facilities 4 FAR Residential 2 FAR Comercial R7-A equivalent height limits (40-65 ft streetwall, 80 ft max ht.)
Potential Routes for Rezoning
IDEAL:
- City Planning is applicant
- Goes through ULURP process
- Swifter, cheaper, greater likelihood of
success
- Downside – you lose control
NEXT STEPS:
- Community Board support
- Elected officials’ support
- Meet with DCP
Potential Routes for Rezoning
LESS IDEAL:
- Private applicant (could be GVSHP)
- DCP decides scope of review, can make it very
long and difficult
- If gets through scoping, goes through ULURP
process
- Longer, more expensive, no guarantee of approval
- Upside – you control the application
NEXT STEPS:
- Community Board support
- Elected officials’ support
- Meet with DCP