A Primer on Relativity and CANDI Presentation to OMA Council, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a primer on relativity and candi
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A Primer on Relativity and CANDI Presentation to OMA Council, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A Primer on Relativity and CANDI Presentation to OMA Council, October 21, 2018 Presented by Jasmin Kantarevic, OMA Economics, Policy and Research 1 Overview 1. Overview of relativity and OMA past initiatives 2. Primer on CANDI More


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A Primer on Relativity and CANDI

Presentation to OMA Council, October 21, 2018

Presented by Jasmin Kantarevic, OMA Economics, Policy and Research

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Overview

  • 1. Overview of relativity and OMA past initiatives
  • 2. Primer on CANDI
  • More details available at:

https://www.oma.org/sections/billings-and-agreement/research-analytics/relativity/

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

What is Relativity?

  • Equal pay for equal work
  • Two main types:
  • 1. Fee-based relativity: e.g. equal pay for services that have equal time requirement, intensity, complexity, risk, overhead cost, etc.
  • 2. Income-based relativity: e.g. equal pay for physicians with equal hours of work, overhead, length of training, etc.
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

OMA Experience with Relativity

Fee Based

  • 1992 – 1997 : OMA Resource-Based Relative Value Scales (RBRVS)
  • 1997 - 2002 : RBRVS Commission

Income Based

  • 2003 – 2009: Relative Value Implementation Committee (RVIC) model
  • 2009 – 2018: Comparison of Adjusted Net Daily Income (CANDI) model
slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

History of CANDI

  • 2008-2009: RVIC Methodology Review Committee
  • CANDI approved by Council
  • 2009-2012: CANDI Relativity Implementation Committee
  • October 2011: PricewaterhouseCoopers Study
  • Revisions to hours of work and overhead
  • 2017-2018: Relativity Review Committee
  • recommendations based on technical reports and new data on after-hours
  • 2018 -

: Relativity Advisory Committee

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

CANDI Allocation in 2008 PSA

Income-Based Inter-Sectional Relativity Fee-Based Intra-Sectional Relativity

  • Each Specialty receives

CANDI score

  • Based on CANDI score,

each Specialty receives funding allocation

  • Each Specialty proposes changes

to their fee codes

  • Proposals based on fee relativity
  • Proposals assessed by bilateral

members of MSPC

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

CANDI Formula

Gross Income Overhead Training Premium Adjusted Net Daily Income

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Gross Income: Income Sources

Included

  • Professional fee-for-service billings ($7.1B)
  • Clinical Primary Care payments (e.g. capitation, access bonus, CCM fee) ($1.8B)
  • Clinical Alternative Payment Plans payments ($1.125B)
  • Hospital On-Call Coverage (HOCC) payments ($223M)
  • Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) payments ($25M)
  • Other Specialty-Specific payments (e.g. psychiatric sessional payments) ($137M)

Excluded

  • Technical billings
  • Non-clinical payments
  • Private, non-insured income

Data Source: MOHLTC Administrative Data Files ($10.4B)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Gross Income: Time Period

Weekday (Monday to Friday) daytime (7:00-17:00) standardized daily income

Exclude Weekends and Holidays Exclude After-Hours Payments

7:00 – 16:59 00:00 – 6:69 17:00 – 23:59

Based on Schedule

  • f Benefits fee

codes/RRC Survey Based on Schedule

  • f Benefits fee

codes/RRC Survey

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Gross Income: Hours of Work

Weekday (Monday to Friday) daytime (7:00-17:00) standardized daily income

7:00 Start time: e.g. 8:30 Finish time: e.g. 16:00

Hours of Work Data Source

  • PricewaterhouseCoopers 2010 Study
  • Questions about start time, finish time, percent of work that

is strictly clinical

  • OHIP specialties with low response rates assigned average

hours of work for their respective Assembly

16:59

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Overhead

Data Sources

  • 2009 OMA Human Resources Committee Survey
  • 2011 OMA Human Resources Committee Survey
  • PricewaterhouseCoopers 2010 Study

Validation

  • 400 site visits for PwC Study
  • 1997 Canada Revenue Agency

(overhead within ± 20% of CRA)

Weighted average of three surveys

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Training Premium: Concept

PGY1 PGY2 PGY5

A

Retirement

B

A = lost opportunity cost B = opportunity cost + skill premium

PARO earnings for Family Physician PARO earnings for Specialist Practice earnings for Family Physician Practice earnings for Specialist Specialist Family Physician

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Training Premium: Estimates

Opportunity Cost Premium

  • Actuarial study (Prof. Hyatt, Rotman)
  • About 2.4 percent for additional year

Skill Acquisition Premium

  • 4 percent per additional year

Years of Training CANDI Specialties Average Training Premium (relative to Family Medicine) 3 Emergency Medicine 6% 4.2 Pediatrics Internal Medicine 13% 5.1-5.3 All Other 19-20% 6.2 – 6.4 Cardiac Surgery Neurosurgery Cardiology 26-28%

Overall training premium  6.4% per year

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Adjusted Net Daily Income and CANDI Scores

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Additional Resources:

https://www.oma.org/sections/billings-and-agreement/research-analytics/relativity

15

Questions?

relativity@oma.org