- a look at the existing standards WEBINAR Kim Christiansen - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a look at the existing standards
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

- a look at the existing standards WEBINAR Kim Christiansen - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Life Cycle Assessment & Environmental footprinting - a look at the existing standards WEBINAR Kim Christiansen Mathilde Crpy ECOS Expert Programme Manager, ECOS ecostandard.org 14 November 2018 ECOS - European Environmental Citizens'


slide-1
SLIDE 1

ecostandard.org

  • a look at the existing standards

14 November 2018

Life Cycle Assessment & Environmental footprinting

WEBINAR

Mathilde Crêpy

Programme Manager, ECOS

Kim Christiansen

ECOS Expert

slide-2
SLIDE 2

ecostandard.org

ECOS - European Environmental Citizens' Organisation for Standardisation

slide-3
SLIDE 3

ecostandard.org

  • LCA: what is it and what is it for?
  • ISO standards for LCA: the basics
  • ISO standards for LCA: the limitations
  • Policy use of LCA: recommendations
  • Q&A

TODAY ON THE

AGENDA

slide-4
SLIDE 4

ecostandard.org

LIFE-CYCLE ASSEMENT W H A T & W H Y

Mathilde Crêpy Programme Manager, ECOS

slide-5
SLIDE 5

ecostandard.org

Technique for assessing the environmental impacts of a product in a holistic way

Life Cycle Assessment – a brief introduction

i.e. product system & environmental impacts

slide-6
SLIDE 6

ecostandard.org

A QUICK P O L L !

slide-7
SLIDE 7

ecostandard.org

LCA of… pasta

Raw materials… and use!

20 40 60 80 100 120 Climate Change Land Use Fossil fuels Air Quality

Life Cycle Assessment of pasta

Raw Materials Production Use End of Life

Results based on ‘Life Cycle Assessment of Pasta Production in Italy’, 2007, Maurizio Bevilacqua et al, Journal of Food Quality: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1745-4557.2007.00170.x

slide-8
SLIDE 8

ecostandard.org

  • Assess “modelled” vs. “assumed” impacts
  • Inform decision makers
  • Improve performance / reduce impacts
  • Avoid burden shifting
  • Compare similar products
  • Marketing

What do we use LCA for?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

ecostandard.org

What NOT to use LCA for?

  • Create non-tariff trade barriers
  • Set legal obligations
  • Compare different products
slide-10
SLIDE 10

ecostandard.org

ISO STANDARDS FOR LCA T H E B A S I C S

Kim Christiansen ECOS Expert

slide-11
SLIDE 11

ecostandard.org

  • Developed in the 1990’s
  • First version in 1997
  • “Revised” in 2006, not

revised since!

  • Other standards based
  • n 14040/44:
  • carbon footprint (2013,

revised 2018)

  • water footprint (2014)

ISO 14040 and 14044: some history

slide-12
SLIDE 12

ecostandard.org

LCA: based on the input and the outputs to the system and understanding their relationship with the environment

ISO 14040 and 14044: the basics

slide-13
SLIDE 13

ecostandard.org

ISO 14040 and 14044: the basics

slide-14
SLIDE 14

ecostandard.org

ISO STANDARDS FOR LCA T H E L I M I TAT I O N S

Kim Christiansen ECOS Expert

slide-15
SLIDE 15

ecostandard.org

ISO standards and their limitations

  • ISO standards are old & updated information on the

different existing methodologies and approaches is needed

  • Data coverage limitations
  • Vague terminology
  • Meaning of science based
  • “no weighting for comparative assertion to the public”
  • “Not intended for contractual or regulatory

purposes or registration and certification”, and yet…

  • No list of essential impact categories
slide-16
SLIDE 16

ecostandard.org

TIME FOR A QUIZ!

slide-17
SLIDE 17

ecostandard.org

POLICY USE OF LCA RECOMMENDATIONS

Mathilde Crêpy Programme Manager, ECOS

slide-18
SLIDE 18

ecostandard.org

Many tools to choose from…

slide-19
SLIDE 19

ecostandard.org

Use of LCA: examples from EU product policy instruments

  • Policies developed based on life cycle approach
  • Ecodesign
  • Construction Products Regulation
  • EU Ecolabel
  • Policies whose implementation rests upon LCAs
  • Environmental Product Declaration
  • Product Environmental Footprint
slide-20
SLIDE 20

ecostandard.org

LCA in policy: shortcomings & recommendations Main shortcomings

  • Aspects and/or impacts partially considered

(biodiversity, toxicity) or not at all (nanomaterials)

  • Limited involvement from NGOs and civil society
  • Communication on certain environmental aspects

and impacts only (subjective)

Recommended applications

  • Common methodology (EU Ecolabel,

ecodesign/energy labelling, sustainability of construction products, GPP)

  • Communication platform for B2B only
  • Communicate on better performance only if

unequivocally better

slide-21
SLIDE 21

ecostandard.org

OVER TO YOU! Q & A

slide-22
SLIDE 22

ecostandard.org

Registration is free of charge and open for all!

Join us for our December conference!

slide-23
SLIDE 23

ecostandard.org

Mathilde Crêpy Programme Manager, ECOS mathilde.crepy@ecostandard.org Kim Christiansen ECOS Expert kim@kimconsult.dk

Thank you!