A Hybrid Simulation Model for Studying the Acute Inflammatory - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a hybrid simulation model for studying the acute
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A Hybrid Simulation Model for Studying the Acute Inflammatory - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A Hybrid Simulation Model for Studying the Acute Inflammatory Response ADS 2007/SpringSim 2007 Monday, March 26, Norfolk, VA Wayne Wakeland, PhD Portland State University Louis Macovsky, DVM Dynamic Biosystems Gary An, MD Northwestern


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A Hybrid Simulation Model for Studying the Acute Inflammatory Response

ADS 2007/SpringSim 2007 Monday, March 26, Norfolk, VA Wayne Wakeland, PhD

Portland State University

Louis Macovsky, DVM

Dynamic Biosystems

Gary An, MD

Northwestern School of Medicine

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/Multiple Organ Failure (SIRS/MOF)

  • “Sepsis”
  • A Leading Cause of death in the ICU
  • Disease of the ICU => “Unexplored State”
  • Pathologic state of Acute Inflammation
  • Physiologic manifestations result from

endogenous mediators => Disorder of Homeostasis

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Acute Inflammatory Response (AIR)

  • Initial defense and repair mechanism
  • Specialized cellular/molecular pathways
  • Diffusely distributed/Tissue Nonspecific
  • Activation is non-specific to insult
  • Precedes Adaptive Immune response

(self/non-self distinction=>Antibodies)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Basic Sequence of Events

  • Initial Insult (bacteria, tissue damage)
  • Activating mediators
  • Activation of inflammatory cells
  • Cellular functions/Mediator Effects

– Positive feedback – Negative feedback

  • Clearance of damaged tissue/Healing
slide-5
SLIDE 5

SIRS/MOF cont.

  • Pathologic manifestation of

inflammation, BUT no pre-existing abnormality of inflammatory system!

  • Dependent on initial degree of

perturbation/insult

  • SIRS/MOF represents a phase

transition of dynamics beyond “design parameters” of the AIR

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Treatment of SIRS/MOF

  • Physiologic support
  • Molecular/mediator manipulation

– Anti-inflammatory drugs – Anti-cytokine/Anti-mediator drugs

  • Except for Activated Protein C attempts at

mediator manipulation have been unsuccessful, even detrimental

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Challenge of SIRS/MOF

  • Gap between Pathophysiology and

Diagnosis

  • Gap between Mechanisms and

Treatment

  • Gap between Basic Science and

Clinical Implementation

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Basic Science Paradigm

  • Examines a system via reduction and

isolation of its components

  • “Good” experiment=>solves for one

variable=>linear analysis

  • Reconstructs system behavior by

summing the results of the linear experiments

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Organ Function

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Organ Function

Cell Cell Cell Cell Cell Cell Cell

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Organ Function

Cell Cell Cell Cell Cell Cell Cell m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Basic Science Research is...

  • Reductionist Paradigm
  • Distributed
  • Compartmentalized
  • Reductionism Necessary! => The
  • nly way we can know what things

do => Mechanisms!

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Revisiting Reductionism: Analysis vs. Synthesis

  • Analysis

– Reductionist Scientific Method – Identifies Mechanism through Experiment

  • Synthesis

– Not well formalized=>”Intuitive” – Hypothesis Formation = Modeling – Intuition inadequate for Complex Systems

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Formalizing Synthesis with Mathematical Modeling

  • Common Framework for Integrating

Hypotheses

–Formal Rules –Explicit –Transparent

  • Re-establish lost interconnections =>

System-level Behavior

slide-15
SLIDE 15

What is Modeling (to me)?

  • Modeling = Formalization
  • Modeling = Abstraction
  • Modeling = Synthesis
  • Modeling = Hypothesis

Generation

  • Models = Formalized

Knowledge Representation

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Modelling Techniques

  • “Population Down”

–Equation Based (EBMs) –Differential Equations (Ordinary and Partial) –Systems Dynamics (SD)

  • “Component Up”

–Object/Event Based –Agent Based Models (ABMs)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Why use ABM to model AIR/SIRS/MOF?

  • Lots of information about potential agents

(cells and molecules)

  • Process is driven by local interactions
  • Dynamics may be too complex for top-

down modeling

  • Multiple possible levels of model validation
  • Integration of Models => Total System
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Why use EBM/SD to model AIR/SIRS/MOF?

  • Lots of information about populations of

cells and levels of mediators => Fluxes

  • These can be measured at multiple time

points => Validation and Calibration

  • Global Dynamics may be adequate to

describe system

  • Integration of Models => Total System
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Molecules Cells Tissues Organs Human Organism Agents Agent Rules Agent Populations Aggregate Populations Overall Model Molecular Biology Cellular Biology Tissue Biology/ Physiology Organ Physiology Clinical Setting

Biological Structure Research Organization ABM Architecture

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Why focus on Cells?

  • Border Between Chemistry and Biology
  • “Wrapper” for Biochemical Processes
  • Stochastic Objects
  • Heterogeneous Population Behavior
  • Aggregate Behavior Determines

Physiology and Pathophysiology

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Architecture of Cellular Level ABM

Cells as Agents Agent Rules Aggregate Agent Behavior

Milieu Variables Surface Receptors Protein Synthesis Intracellular Signaling Receptors Secrete Apoptosis Move Synthesize Morph Tissue Function Organ Function Function

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Doing Science with ABM

  • In-Silico Experiments => Virtual

control and experimental populations –Apply standard statistical tools –Use Pattern Oriented Analysis

  • Formalize mental model

building/testing hypotheses

  • Develop Theories
slide-23
SLIDE 23

How Much Detail Needed?

  • Level of Potential Manipulation

determines Resolution of Model

  • But difficult to determine a priori the

levels of effects

  • Therefore need capacity to be

inclusive in modeling structure

  • Emulation vs. Simulation
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Hierarchies of ABMs of Acute Inflammation

  • Single Cell model

– Intracellular Processes – “Back Validated”

  • Tissue Model

– In-vitro Wet Lab

  • Multi-tissue Model

– Ex-vivo Wet Lab

  • Global Model of Inflammation

– In-silico Clinical trials

slide-25
SLIDE 25

ABM of Global Systemic Inflammation

  • Endothelial/Blood interface
  • Activation/Propagation of Inflammation
  • Endothelial Cells and White Blood Cells
  • Dynamics of Pathophysiology
  • Proto-Testing Platform for Systemic

Therapies

  • Very Abstract!
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Current Model of Global Inflammation

Cell types

Endothelial cells, neutrophils, monocytes, TH0, TH1, TH2, bacteria, white blood cell generative cells

Cell Receptors and Functions

L-selectin, E/P-selectin, CD-11/18, ICAM, TNFr, IL- 1r, adhesion, migration, respiratory burst, phagocytosis, apoptosis

Mediators

Endotoxin, PAF, TNF, IL-1, IL-4, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IFN- g, sTNFr, IL-1ra, GCSF

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Validation Strategies

  • Agent Rules=>Transparency wrt code
  • Pattern Oriented Analysis/Modeling

– Behavior of Individual wrt global response to injury=>Individual Dynamics – Behavior of Population wrt cytokine patterns=>Population Dynamics – Behavior of Population wrt outcome to intervention=>Population Response

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Simulating Anti-inflammatory Interventions

  • Any mediator represented as a variable

can be manipulated

  • Modified based on published effects
  • No other modifications of the ABM other

than simulated intervention

  • Results all generated prospectively
slide-29
SLIDE 29

List of In-Silico Experiments

Phase III Clinical Trials

3 day anti-TNF (Reinhart) 3 day rhIL-1ra (Opal) 7 day GCSF (Root)

Smaller Clinical Trials 1 dose anti-CD18 (Rhee) Animal Studies

3 day combination anti- TNF and IL-1ra (Remick)

Hypothetical Multi- modal Regimes

anti-CD-18/anti-TNF/IL- 1ra GCSF/anti-TNF/IL-1ra

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Problems with ABMs

  • Computationally Intensive
  • Requires extensive mechanistic

information (may not be available)

  • “Unnecessarily” Complex/Complicated
  • Difficult to Calibrate
  • Less ability to formally analyze
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Improving Computational Efficiency

  • Code Optimization
  • Decreasing the Number of Agents
  • Removing “Unnecessary” Complexity*
  • Parameter Sensitivity Analysis
  • * Don’t know what is “Unnecessary”

until you do this step => Need to have component first to remove it!

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Reduced ABM of Global Inflammation

  • Grid Space Reduced x 4
  • N (“cases”) per experiment Reduced x 10
  • Iterations per “case” Reduced x 4
  • “Code Cleaned Up”
  • Increased Efficiency ~ 5x Total Run Time
  • Parameter Sensitivity Analysis

– Varied/Removed T-cells

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Identification of “Zone of Interest”

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Parameter Sensitivity Analysis wrt Presence of T-Cells

  • N = 10 for each Parameter Set Value
  • No Statistical Difference between parameter

sets (p<0.05)

  • No influence by T-cells (either pro- or anti-)
  • *May be suggested in literature (early effects)
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Limitations of Reduced ABM

  • Too Coarse Grained

– Spatial – Components

  • Abstracted to Homogeneous

Populations

  • Loss of Fidelity to “Real World”

– Limits Potential Applications

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Hybrid ABM/EBM

  • Where do spatial considerations

matter?

– Cannot make Mean Field approximations – Don’t want to use PDEs – Retain some benefits of ABM approach

  • “Binding” of Multiple Components
  • Improve Computational Efficiency
  • Improve Calibration/Validation
slide-37
SLIDE 37

Hybrid ABM/EBM of AIR

  • What the “Edge” between the two?
  • Local Insult => ABM Component

– Spatially discrete perturbation => Trauma

  • r Infection

– Focus on Cellular Mechanisms

  • System-wide Dynamics => SD

Component

– Focus on Global Reponses – Circulating Mediators and their effects

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Hybrid ABM/EBM of AIR

  • ABM Component =>

– Reduced ABM – Retains area of Injury/Infection – Local Cellular Responses – Moved “Off screen Effects” to SD Component

  • SD Component =>

– Control of Circulating Populations of Inflammatory Cells (PMNs, Monocytes, T-cells) – Generation Determined by Maturation Mediators produced in ABM

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Flow Diagram of SD Submodel

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Behavior Comparison: Hybrid vs. ABM

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Parameter Sensitivity Analysis wrt T-cells in Hybrid Model

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Another Option

  • Dynamic Agent Compression

– Wendel and Dibble at University of Maryland – “Compressed” agents are internally homogeneous groupings within a heterogeneous population – Determination of “compression” is updated per step – Lossless Method (lossy methods also exist

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Eventual Goals

  • Multiple aspects of Biomedical Systems

maybe modeled with different methods (ABM/SD/Stochastic)

  • Common Means of Communicating

between and Integrating Models => “Articulated” Models

  • Functional Unit Representation Method

(FURM) => Hunt at UCSF

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Eventual Goals, cont.

  • Create simplified models that maintain

behavioral richness => high detail and then deconstruct

  • Use SD as a “wrapper” for ABM submodels

=> organ-organ crosstalk / multi-hierarchies

  • Identification of different “edges” between SD

and ABM to best utilize respective strengths

  • Dynamic “shifting” of edges between SD and

ABM to optimize computational efficiency

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Eventual Goals, cont.

  • Develop Multi-scale, Multi-hierarchical

Modeling Framework

  • Multiple Models of same processes/level
  • “Fertile” Hypothesis Environment =>

Competition and Concatenation

  • “Ecology”of Ideas
  • Use Natural Selection to refine Community

Knowledge

slide-46
SLIDE 46

SCAI SCAI

Society for Complexity in Society for Complexity in Acute Illness Acute Illness h http://www.scai-med.com ttp://www.scai-med.com