A Comparative View on the European Parliament Arthur Benz - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a comparative view on the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A Comparative View on the European Parliament Arthur Benz - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

What Kind of Parliament? A Comparative View on the European Parliament Arthur Benz 25.11.2010 | Benz, Politikwissenschaft | 1 Basic structure: A parliament like others? Functions : Co-election of commission Co-legislation


slide-1
SLIDE 1

25.11.2010 | Benz, Politikwissenschaft | 1

What Kind of Parliament? A Comparative View on the European Parliament

Arthur Benz

slide-2
SLIDE 2

25.11.2010 | Benz, Politikwissenschaft | 2

Basic structure: A parliament like

  • thers?

Functions:

  • Co-election of commission
  • Co-legislation
  • Control
  • Public debate

Organization:

  • Plenary
  • President, Conference of Presidents
  • Party groups
  • Committees

Decision rules: simple or absolute majority of votes/members

slide-3
SLIDE 3

25.11.2010 | Benz, Politikwissenschaft | 3

A changing institution

  • before 1979: Assembly of delegates of national parliaments
  • 1979: election of European Parliament: a deliberating institution
  • Since 1986: extension of legislative powers, co-decision

procedures

  • Enlargement: growing number of seats, national groups

Evolution of a European party system Dynamics of inter-institutional politics Multilevel politics

  • Lisbon Treaty: a new balance of power
slide-4
SLIDE 4

25.11.2010 | Benz, Politikwissenschaft | 4

EP compared to Westminster system

  • no European government responsible to the EP
  • no duality between majority and opposition
  • limited party discipline
  • increasing role of parties, but fragmented party system
  • crosscutting lines of conflicts
slide-5
SLIDE 5

25.11.2010 | Benz, Politikwissenschaft | 5

EP compared to US Congress

  • Two legislative “chambers”, with different (supranational and

intergovernmental) modes of decision-making

  • no president as counterpart, no clear division of powers
  • less influence of local electorate
  • multilevel party system: incongruent, less integrated
slide-6
SLIDE 6

25.11.2010 | Benz, Politikwissenschaft | 6

EP in a particular consensus democracy

Consensus between legislative institutions

  • increasing need for joint decision-making with the Council of

Ministers and the Commission

  • Lisbon Treaty: “Co-decision” as ordinary legislative procedure

Consensus inside the European Parliament

  • “Political balance” (proportionality) between party groups
slide-7
SLIDE 7

25.11.2010 | Benz, Politikwissenschaft | 7

Ordinary legislative procedure

  • Initiative by Commission
  • 1st reading
  • if EP and Council agree, act is adopted
  • if EP and Council do not agree →
  • 2nd reading, based on Council position
  • amendments required by EP (majority of seats) → qualified

majority in the Council

  • in case of disagreement: Conciliation procedure
slide-8
SLIDE 8

25.11.2010 | Benz, Politikwissenschaft | 8

EP-Council agreements

Source: http://ec.europa.eu/codecision/statistics/docs/report_statistics_public_draft_en.pdf

slide-9
SLIDE 9

25.11.2010 | Benz, Politikwissenschaft | 9

EP in a particular consensus democracy

  • issue specific negotiations of majorities
  • legislation as committee work
  • powerful rapporteurs, selected by parties, but specialized in

policy fields

  • less deliberation more bargaining
slide-10
SLIDE 10

25.11.2010 | Benz, Politikwissenschaft | 10

Inter-parliamentary relations

  • Subsidiarity control: Coordination with national parliaments
  • inter-institutional agreement with Commission: Cooperation on

legislative initiatives

  • presumably strengthening of national groups in EP
slide-11
SLIDE 11

25.11.2010 | Benz, Politikwissenschaft | 11

Conclusion

Three basic trends

  • increasing power of EP

 party politics

  • Enlargement, multilevel parliaments

 national diversity

  • Inter-institutional coordination; inter-parliamentary relations

 specialisation (committees; rapporteurs)  fluctuating, cross-cutting “policy coalitions”  non-hierarchical structure in party groups  considerable extent of informality  importance of inter-institutional cooperation