A Comparative Readability Analysis of Online Patient Information - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a comparative readability analysis of online patient
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A Comparative Readability Analysis of Online Patient Information - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A Comparative Readability Analysis of Online Patient Information Regarding Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy Harun Khan , BSc, School of Medicine, Imperial College London Nothing to disclose Objective The internet is widely-used by


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A Comparative Readability Analysis of Online Patient Information Regarding Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy

Harun Khan, BSc, School of Medicine, Imperial College London Nothing to disclose

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Objective The internet is widely-used by patients to seek surgical

  • information. It may influence

societal expectations of surgical interventions1 High quality resources should not exceed a 7th grade reading level

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Objective Our aim: To undertake a comparative readability assessment of online patient information regarding breast reconstruction following mastectomy

  • 1. McKinley J, Cattermole H , Oliver CW. The quality of surgical information on the Internet. J R Coll

Surg Edinb. 1999; 44:265-8.2. Walsh TM1, Volsko TA. Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information. Respir Care. 2008 Oct; 53:1310-5.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Materials and Methods

  • January 2016: 7 websites were

selected.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Materials and Methods (Tests)

  • Automated Readability Index,

Coleman-Liau Index, SMOG Index, Gunning-Fog score, Flesch-Kincaid Grade level and Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease using the Readability Studio program

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Results

  • Ideal reading level: 7th grade
  • Mean reading level: 12th grade
  • Flesch-Kincaid Score: >16 years old

Highest reading level: >12th grade (John Hopkins) Lowest reading level: 11th grade (Mayo Clinic)

41.9%

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Results

2 4 6 8 10 12

Reading Level (grade)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Conclusion

  • Mean reading levels were

considerably higher than recommended

  • Simpler, clearer materials more

suited to general US public and internationally