A case for Learning and A case for Learning and U sing the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a case for learning and a case for learning and u sing
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A case for Learning and A case for Learning and U sing the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A case for Learning and A case for Learning and U sing the Standards U sing the Standards Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation Evaluation Arlen Gullickson Gullickson, Chair ,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A case for Learning and A case for Learning and U sing the Standards U sing the Standards

Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation Evaluation Arlen Arlen Gullickson Gullickson, Chair , Chair

Presented to ERCB Conference at Tunica Presented to ERCB Conference at Tunica February, 2006 February, 2006

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The Joint Committee on The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Standards for Educational Evaluation Evaluation

  • ASCD

ASCD

  • AIHEC

AIHEC

  • CCSSO

CCSSO

  • NAESP

NAESP

  • NLPES

NLPES

  • CES

CES

  • CREATE

CREATE

  • NEA

NEA

  • AAC

AAC

  • AEA

AEA

  • AERA

AERA

  • NSBA

NSBA

  • CSSE

CSSE

  • AASA

AASA

  • NCME

NCME

  • APA

APA

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Mission Mission

The Joint Committee is incorporated The Joint Committee is incorporated exclusively for setting evaluation exclusively for setting evaluation standards and promoting their use standards and promoting their use… … The standards it creates are certified The standards it creates are certified as American National Standards as American National Standards

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Purpose Purpose-

  • objectives
  • bjectives
  • Provision of

Provision of training and technical training and technical assistance assistance

  • Research and development

Research and development associated associated with the interpretation and use of the with the interpretation and use of the standards standards

  • Dissemination

Dissemination of and clearinghouse for

  • f and clearinghouse for

information information

  • Revision

Revision of the Standards as needed, and

  • f the Standards as needed, and

expansion of their use in new directions expansion of their use in new directions

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Who developed these Who developed these standards? standards?

  • Joint Committee

Joint Committee – –members representing members representing practitioners and researchers practitioners and researchers

  • Hundreds of teachers, administrators,

Hundreds of teachers, administrators, board members and others involved in board members and others involved in evaluation evaluation

  • National Panel of Writers appointed by

National Panel of Writers appointed by Committee Committee

  • Validation Panel

Validation Panel

slide-6
SLIDE 6

A few assertions to show why A few assertions to show why these standards are so important these standards are so important

slide-7
SLIDE 7

In Cognition In Cognition

Evaluation is ranked as the highest, most complex skill (Bloom’s Taxonomy)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

IN EDUCATION

Everyone evaluates! Everyone evaluates!

slide-9
SLIDE 9

IN EDUCATION

Everyone thinks their own evaluative judgments are sound A majority don’t know that their evaluative judgments are sound

slide-10
SLIDE 10

IN EDUCATION

When evaluations are conducted and used in sound ways they can be of substantial benefit

slide-11
SLIDE 11

IN EDUCATION

When evaluations are conducted in unsound ways they can be extremely detrimental to all affected parties

slide-12
SLIDE 12

IN EDUCATION

Knowledge and use of the evaluation standards can make all the difference in assuring sound rather than unsound evaluations–whether you are the evaluator, evaluatee, or just a concerned stakeholder

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Standards Books & Chronology of Standards Books & Chronology of Development Development

  • Program Evaluation Standards

Program Evaluation Standards

  • 1981, 1994

1981, 1994

  • 3

3rd

rd edition currently under revision

edition currently under revision

  • Personnel Evaluation Standards

Personnel Evaluation Standards

  • 1988

1988

  • 2

2nd

nd edition currently under revision

edition currently under revision (See (See jc.wmich.edu jc.wmich.edu— —Field Trial Materials) Field Trial Materials)

  • Student Evaluation Standards

Student Evaluation Standards

  • 2003

2003

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Purpose and Use of Standards Purpose and Use of Standards

  • To

To improve practice improve practice of educational

  • f educational

evaluation (program, personnel and evaluation (program, personnel and student) student)

  • To present criteria for judging

To present criteria for judging evaluation evaluation plans plans, , procedures and reports procedures and reports

  • To provide guidelines for institutions

To provide guidelines for institutions concerned with education (pre concerned with education (pre-

  • K through

K through graduate schools) graduate schools)

  • To reduce errors and poor evaluation

To reduce errors and poor evaluation practices practices

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Who Can Use the Standards Who Can Use the Standards

  • School

School Boards and Superintendents to Boards and Superintendents to select, monitor, and implement plans select, monitor, and implement plans

  • Administrators

Administrators to implement plans to implement plans

  • K

K-

  • 16

16 educators to inform their practice educators to inform their practice

  • Researchers/consultants

Researchers/consultants to develop plans to develop plans

  • f education evaluation
  • f education evaluation
  • Any person

Any person involved in or affected by involved in or affected by educational evaluation educational evaluation

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Definitions by Joint Definitions by Joint Committee Committee… …

  • Standard:

Standard:

“Principle commonly agreed to by people Principle commonly agreed to by people engaged in the professional practice of engaged in the professional practice of evaluation for the measurement of the evaluation for the measurement of the value or the quality of an evaluation value or the quality of an evaluation” ”

(Joint Committee, 1981)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Standards Standards’ ’ Substance Substance

  • Standards serve 4 attributes of sound

Standards serve 4 attributes of sound evaluation: evaluation:

  • Propriety

Propriety

  • Utility

Utility

  • Feasibility

Feasibility

  • Accuracy

Accuracy

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Components of a Standard Components of a Standard

1. 1.

Statement of the Standard Statement of the Standard

2. 2.

Explanation Explanation

3. 3.

Rationale Rationale

4. 4.

Guidelines for application Guidelines for application

5. 5.

Common errors Common errors

6. 6.

Illustrative cases with discussion Illustrative cases with discussion

7. 7.

Supporting documentation Supporting documentation

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Propriety Standards Propriety Standards

Propriety Standards help to ensure that Propriety Standards help to ensure that evaluations will be evaluations will be conducted legally, conducted legally, ethically, and with due regard for the welfare ethically, and with due regard for the welfare

  • f those involved in the evaluation, as well
  • f those involved in the evaluation, as well

as those affected by its results. as those affected by its results.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Propriety Standards Propriety Standards

Student Student

  • P1 Service to Students

P1 Service to Students

  • P2 Appropriate Policies

P2 Appropriate Policies and Procedures and Procedures

  • P3 Access to

P3 Access to Evaluation Information Evaluation Information

  • P4 Treatment of

P4 Treatment of Students Students

  • P5 Rights of Students

P5 Rights of Students

  • P6 Balanced

P6 Balanced Evaluation Evaluation

  • P7 Conflict of Interest

P7 Conflict of Interest Program Program

  • P1 Service Orientation

P1 Service Orientation

  • P2 Formal Agreements

P2 Formal Agreements

  • P3 Rights of Human

P3 Rights of Human Subjects Subjects

  • P4 Human Interactions

P4 Human Interactions

  • P5 Complete and Fair

P5 Complete and Fair Assessment Assessment

  • P6 Disclosure of

P6 Disclosure of Findings Findings

  • P7 Conflict of Interest

P7 Conflict of Interest

  • P8 Fiscal Responsibility

P8 Fiscal Responsibility