a a tr truly g gree een g gree eenhouse
play

A A TR TRULY G GREE EEN G GREE EENHOUSE A A PRES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A A TR TRULY G GREE EEN G GREE EENHOUSE A A PRES RESENTATION B BY Michael R R. . Stile les P Ph.D .D. C . CEM L&S E Energy Se Servi vices, s, I Inc. c. A TR A TRULY GR GREE EEN GR GREE EENHOUSE BACKGROUND


  1. A A TR TRULY G GREE EEN G GREE EENHOUSE A A PRES RESENTATION B BY Michael R R. . Stile les P Ph.D .D. C . CEM L&S E Energy Se Servi vices, s, I Inc. c.

  2. A TR A TRULY GR GREE EEN GR GREE EENHOUSE  BACKGROUND  HOW IT WORKS  MODELING / DESIGN SPECS  TECH TRANSFER

  3. BACKGR GROUND Larry Kinney of Synergistic Building Technologies, a long-time colleague of the presenter, developed the green greenhouse design. His concerns arose from the following realities: • Most of the food Americans eat, particularly in winter, endures trips of up to thousands of miles from the field to the table. • Food destined for such journeys must be harvested well before it is eaten, packed for shipment, and jostled around in trucks (or even airplanes) on its way to distribution centers, grocery stores, and pantry shelves. • The result is less-than-tasty-or-fresh food whose embodied energy for transportation alone can be substantial. This presentation is part of a continuing series of collaborations that seek solutions to these dilemmas.

  4. BACKGR GROUND Greenhouses have long been used to extend the growing season, enabling later harvests in the fall and earlier starts in the spring. However, conventional greenhouses like this hoop house require lots of auxiliary heat to keep crops from freezing on cold nights ($100s to $10,000s/year). Further, growth rates in mid winter are low. This is because they are poorly insulated and have very little thermal mass.

  5. BACKGR GROUND In 2010, Synergistic Building Technologies (SBT) initiated a demonstration project for a greenhouse that combined the best practices of building energy design and organic farming; ~ 1,000 square feet The project was sponsored by the Colorado Department of Agriculture’s Advancing Colorado’s Renewable Energy Program Motivated by the high energy costs of traditional greenhouses, SBT’s design takes the next step in “greening” greenhouses This presentation overviews the Green Greenhouse and outlines an initiative to transfer the greenhouse technology to New York State and the Northeast

  6. HOW IT IT WO WORKS: Des esign F Fea eatures es Design features that won’t be detailed in this presentation: • Insulation (R-20 min; demo’s average of ceiling and walls is R-35) • Air sealing (710 CFM50 blower door test) • Ventilation (existing systems OK) • Moisture regulation (depends on location, crops, etc)

  7. Most Greenhouses Don’t Take Ground Temperature, Lower ADKs Advantage of What the Earth 65 Has to Offer 60 55 Temperature (deg F)  Surface temperatures follow air temperatures 50 45  The deeper you go, temperature 40 fluctuations are dampened and delayed 35 30 15-Jul 15-Aug 15-Sep 15-Oct 15-Nov 15-Dec 15-Jan 15-Feb 15-Mar 15-Apr 15-May 15-Jun  The goal is to couple to deep-earth 0 ft below grade 2.5 5 7.5 10 temperatures while decoupling from the surface temperature

  8. Perimeter Foundation Insulation for Deep Earth Temperature Coupling • Originally engineered for residential structures • Most heat loss occurs horizontally through the edge of the foundation slab or walls • Photo on right shows lower plate bolted in place; note R-20 perimeter insulation

  9. Perimeter Foundation Insulation for Deep Earth Temperature Coupling Greenhouse Innovations • Prevents heat loss through the lateral margin of the enclosed soil volume • Enclosed volume is thermal mass, storing about 25 Btu per o F above interior air temperature per cubic foot of soil • A “thermal bubble” develops within a year that brings the temperature of the enclosed soil volume to at least 60 o F – ideal for roots year-round • This combination of form and function has never before been used in a greenhouse design

  10. Design Feature: Light Shelves and Glass Selection • Roof surfaces and light shelves in front of windows, metal painted with high- gloss white paint, enhances net gain, partially diffuses light. • The combination of high Solar Heat Gain of inexpensive glass and reflectivity from white surfaces raises the light-and-heat-gathering per unit of fenestration area by almost a factor of 2X This allows for less fenestration (and • more wall insulation), so lowers overall energy losses while ensuring adequate light for plants.

  11.  Insulating shutters of several varieties, R value 12+, close tightly over each glazing surface on winter nights.  In winter, shutters are automated to open when solar gains exceed thermal losses, to close when thermal losses exceed solar gains.  May be partially closed in the summer to control for overheating in coordination with venting. Shutter surfaces are highly reflective, as are Pocket shutter on roller ready for install other surfaces in greenhouse except for earth and plants.  Net effect is to ensure that most solar light entering the greenhouse falls on plants and earth but is both diffuse and controllable.

  12. Design Feature: Greenhouse Earth Thermal Storage (GETS) System When the greenhouse is closed and the sun is not shining, there is • little temperature difference between the ground and top of the greenhouse. When sun is shining, the top goes to • 100F + and is humid. GETS fan pulls air from top and distributes it in • network pipes in the soil. Air dumps moisture and heat in earth, cool dry air emerges at ground level. Stores heat in earth mass, modulates temperatures in all seasons, waters • plants from underneath.

  13. Sum Summary of Des esign Fea eatures Heavy W Wall and R Roof In Insulation: Mi Minimizes es w winter er-time h e heat losses es; High S Solar ar Heat eat Gai ain G Glaz azing allows f for year-roun und harvest sts and L Light ht S She helves: Minimizes t the e ar area o ea of windo dows n neede ded f d for v vigorous plant g growth Automated Insulating S g Shutters: Red educes h heat eat loss at at night an and heat eat g gai ain i in the e summer er Thermal al Ma Mass: : Holds h heat a and prev even ents dras astic t temper erat ature s e swings Perimet eter er F Foundat ation I Insulation: Creat ates es a a 65 o F+ “t “thermal b bubble” Controls, Controls, Controls: for s soil t temper erat ature y e year-roun und; F or all sub-syste m ope rations GET ETS s system (ve ntilation, shutte rs, CO2 le ve ls, e tc )

  14. Comp mparison o of Gr Greenhouse D Designs and sources of info presented on the next slide -- Present State of the Art -- -- The Green Greenhouse -- “Shed” Style Hoop House • CO Department of Agriculture Reports • National Sustainable Agriculture Information http://www.colorado.gov/cs/Satellite/Agriculture- Main/CDAG/1184661927876 Service (NSAIS) http://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/solar-gh.html#heat • Ongoing performance monitoring at multiple sites • Alward, Ron, and Andy Shapiro. 1981. Low-Cost Passive Solar Greenhouses, National Center for • Design simulations Appropriate Technology, Butte, MT. • Publications and tech transfer in • NRAES-33_Ithaca Greenhouse Guide.pdf progress http://host31.spidergraphics.com/nra/doc/Fair%20Use%20Web%20P DFs/NRAES-33_Web.pdf

  15. Design Feature Hoop Shed Green Greenhouse Perimeter Foundation None None Standardized Insulation Difficult to protect "Thermal bubble" Variable depending on Thermal Mass: Soil Capacity from exterior maintains 60-65 degrees builder conditions year round Variable depending on Generally minimized due to Thermal Mass: Wall Very low builder soil capacity; add as needed 0.7 to 1.5 sq ft per sq ft ~ 0.5 sq ft per sq ft floor Window Area N/A floor area area Variable depending on Standardized, US Patent Insulating Shutters None builder 8,165,719 Optimized for crops and Light Shelves None None location Extremely variable; best Wall Insulation Very low R35 or better case ~ R20 Centralized Monitoring & Variable depending on Minimal Standardized Control System builder Subterranean Moisture Variable depending on Standardized & integrated None Circulation builder with central controls

  16. Temperature re P Performance ( (Colora rado) Col old S Snap D Dow own to o -18 o F Sole e Heating S Source: e: Sunlight Green een G Green enhouse n e never er g gets colder er t than an 5 50 o F; note m e moder erat ate day aytime t e temper erat ature s e swings Conventional hoop house * is at the mercy of outdoor temperature and spends a lot of time below freezing * T The hoop house is a a p plastic-cover ered ed frame a e adjac acen ent to to SBT’s d demo green enhouse

  17. Crop P Performanc nce e Plant nting ng P Plan (plant nted o on Thanksgiving ving D Day 2 2010)

  18. Crop P Performanc nce e 16 Days s after S Seeding

  19. Crop P Performanc nce e Outsi side: de: Snowy J January Day Inside: de: Summer er-Like C Con onditi tions The only source of heat needed in Colorado is sunlight

  20. Crop P Performanc nce e The tom tomato v vines fou our m mon onths a afte ter s seeding Perennials capable of bearing fruit continuously

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend