$70 Mil illion Annually Pri riority Li Listing (R (Ranking) ) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶

Aug 25, 2023 531 likes •647 views

HUD Continuum of Care Funding $70 Mil illion Annually Pri riority Li Listing (R (Ranking) ) Recommendations Chicago System & HUD CoC Funding CHICAGO HOUSING INVENTORY FUNDING SOURCE 48% 52% HUD CoC Non-HUD CoC Funded Funded

SLIDE 1

HUD Continuum of Care Funding $70 Mil illion Annually

Pri riority Li Listing (R (Ranking) ) Recommendations

SLIDE 2

Chicago System & HUD CoC Funding

52% HUD CoC Funded Projects 48% Non-HUD CoC Funded Projects

CHICAGO HOUSING INVENTORY FUNDING SOURCE

SLIDE 3

CES-SSO HMIS Joint TH & PH-RRH Non CES-SSO PSH RRH SH TH

FY2019 GIW Inventory Breakdown [by component type]

The Chicago CoC

Program Model Types # of Projects (149) % PSH 115 77% TH 18 12% RRH 4 3% CE-SSO 5 3% SH 3 2% TH-RRH 2 1% Non- CE-SSO 1 1% HMIS 1 1%

SLIDE 4

2019 System Goals

Reduce the number of persons who are homeless and are in the

homeless system (One List), overall and for identified subpopulations.

Subpopulations: chronic homeless, street homeless, families, youth, veterans.
Reduce the time persons remain homeless.
Homeless dedicated units should all be filled utilizing the coordinated

entry system (CES).

Increase the earned income and/or other income of adults served in

the homeless services system.

Increase persons who exit street homelessness to enter sheltered

destination (ES, SH, TH, PH)

SLIDE 5

CoC Funding Advancing Local Priorities to Align with HUD Priorities

Local Priorities HUD Program Type Chronic & Street Homelessness Permanent Housing Families Temporary & Permanent Housing Youth Temporary & Permanent Housing Veterans Temporary & Permanent Housing Domestic Violence Temporary & Permanent Housing Coordinated Response System Coordinated Entry Data-Driven Decision Making HMIS

SLIDE 6

CoC Board’s Role to Prepare for CoC Funding

Approve system goals that guide prioritization
Board is final stop on any appeals
Approve formal prioritization policy to guide ranking
f projects

SLIDE 7

Considerations & Rationale

Prioritize Rapid Rehousing (RRH) projects (RRH and Joint

Transitional Housing-Rapid Rehousing) for both renewals and new projects – Pipeline Expansion

Significant changes in the 2019 Local Evaluation Instrument

process – SPEC; Evaluation Tool Subcommittee

Implementation of Monitoring and Technical Assistance (TA)

protocols – Performance/Data/Research; Monitoring Workgroup

Focus on priority populations – Coordinated Entry

SLIDE 8

2019 Ranking Policy Recommendation

1. System-level Projects
2. Renewal Projects
a. RRH/Joint TH-RRH
b. PSH
c. Safe Havens
d. TH
e. SSO
3. New Projects
1. RRH/Joint TH-RRH
2. PSH

SLIDE 9

Project Prioritization Work Group Members

Fred Friedman – LEC Gwendolyn Turner – LEC Chris O’Hara – LEC Renita White – At-large Khen Nickle – At-large Adriana Camarda - DFSS Emily Metz – Urban Labs Jackie Lorens Harris – Chicago Lights Rosemary Mendez – Thresholds Ann Bihrle – Mercy Housing Millicent Ntiamoah – Catholic Charities Shannon Stewart – Inspiration Corporation

SLIDE 10