7. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on analysis results, the - - PDF document

7
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

7. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on analysis results, the - - PDF document

South 36,h Street Feasibility Study 7. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on analysis results, the conceptual plans shown in Appendix L represent the recommended design and configuration of the proposed improvements for S. 36,h Street, between N-370


slide-1
SLIDE 1

South 36,h Street Feasibility Study

7.

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on analysis results, the conceptual plans shown in Appendix L represent the recommended design and configuration of the proposed improvements for S. 36,h Street, between N-370 and Cornhusker Road.

7.1 Study Findings and Recommendations

Key findings and recommendations of this study are summarized as follows:

'

  • S. 36'h Street is currently a four-lane divided cross section with turn lanes between Twin Creek

DrivdSamson Way and N-370. lt is recommended that this cross section be continued north from Twin Creek Drive/Samson Way to the intersection with Cornhusker Road.

'

With the recommended four-lane divided cross section for S. 36,h Street, the bridges over West

Papillion Creek and Big Papillion Creek will need to be widened. Per the Bellevue Complete Streets Policy, a l0-foot trail on the west side and a S-foot sidewalk on the east side of the bridges are recommended.

.

Access to the Keystone Trail, West Papio Trail, and Marv Holubar Trail should be provided directly

from the proposed trail on the west side of S. 36.h Street.

I

The Keystone Trail does not currently have direct access to S. 36*, Street. The Keystone Trail should be connected to the proposed S. 36,t Street trail on the west side near Cedar lsland Road, approximately 550 feet north of where the trail crosses under the road.

r

The West Papio Trail does not currently have direct access to S. 36o Street. This trail should be extended along the current service vehicle path that follows the top of the levee on the south embankment of the Big Papillion Creek.

r

The preliminary grade of S. 36,h Street at the Marv Holubar Trail access will be approximately 9 feet above the current grade. This will also require the trail to be raised 9 feet and the grade of the trail to be tied back into the existing grade along the current trail path.

r A northbound right-turn crash pattern was identified at the intersection of S. 36s Street and

Cornhusker Road. To reduce the potential for crashes, the approach angle of the channelized island for northbound right-turns should be altered or the island removed.

I

Northbound left-turn and southbound left-turn crash patterns were identified at the intersection of

  • S. 36'h Street with N-370. The protected/permitted phasing for these movements should be

converted to protect only phasing. This improvement could be implemented under the current intersection configuration before the roadway improvements are constructed. NDOT has jurisdiction over this intersection and the signalization.

7.2 Statement of Probable Construction Costs

A Statement of Probable Construction Costs was developed based on the conceptual design discussed in Chapter 4 and shown on the Conceptual Plans in Appendix L. Construction costs from recent projects

in the area were used to develop the cost estimate. At this conceptual level, quantities were grouped based

  • n major construction items, including grading, surfacing, bridges, drainage, and right-of-way acquisitions.

An estimate of 3.0 percent of the construction costs was used to approximate the amount of utility relocations required for the project. A contingency value of 20 percent of construction costs was then

applied to the total to account for changes in quantities or to accommodate unknown conditions that may be identified during preliminary and final design. Based on these assumptions, the Probable Total Project Costs for widening this segment of S. 366 Street is approximately 927.4 million. Tabte 7- I summarizes the

construction costs broken down by major items. Appendix N provides a more detailed summary of the anticipated quantities and construction costs. Page 3 6

slide-2
SLIDE 2

South 36.t Street

Statement of Probable Construction Costs

$4,07 r,000 $3,s09,000 $8,743,000 $ r,980,000

$ r74,000

$s49,000

Feasibility Study

Table 7- 1.

Grading Surfacing Bridges Drainage Right-of-Way

Utilities (3% of Construction) Construction Cost Subtotal

Preli minary Engi neering (l 0% of Construction)

Construction Engineering (l 0% of Construction) Contingencies (20%) Total Probable Construction Costs

$ r9,026,000 $ r,903,000 $ r,903,000 $4,566,000

$27,398,000 ANDERSON E-6139 06t2712018

rtu#

Page 3 7

slide-3
SLIDE 3

36th Street Feasibility Study

Cornhusker Road to Highway 370

The City of Bellevue and Sarpy County have identifjed the need to improve this segment of S. 36th Street to accommodate future growth in traffjc volumes along this corridor and to address the fmoodplain conditions that result in water overtopping the roadway. The purpose

  • f this Feasibility Study was to determine the number of lanes

required on S. 36th Street to accommodate future traffjc, as well as the alignment and confjguration of the proposed improvements. Probable construction costs and quantities have also been developed.

FACT SHEET

PROPOSED SCHEDULE CONSTRUCTION PHASING 4-LANE CROSS-SECTION

A 4-lane roadway provides acceptable levels of service for all segments in Year 2040 and will follow Bellevue’s Complete Street guidance.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS

KEY PROJECT FEATURES

1.4 miles of 4-lane divided roadway 2 new bridges over West Papillion Creek and Big Papillion Creek 10’ trail and 5’ sidewalk for bike & pedestrian traffjc New access to Keystone Trail and West Papio Trail Design accommodates 100-Year Flood Elevation

= P

Prepared by

Cornhusker Rd

P P P P +

$19.0M Construction Cost $ 8.4M Engineering & Contingencies

$27.4 Million Total Project Cost

ESTIMATED COSTS

slide-4
SLIDE 4

HIGHWAY 370 TO RAYNOR PARKWAY RAYNOR PARKWAY TO OLD 36TH STREET OLD 36TH STREET TO CORNHUSKER ROAD

36th Street Feasibility Study

Cornhusker Road to Highway 370

FOUR-LANE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN

slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Feasibility Study Purpose

To determine the impacts and costs of widening 36th street to a four-lane divided roadway

36th Street Improvements

Highway N-370 to Cornhusker Road

slide-7
SLIDE 7

36th Street

Project Limits

Begin Project End Project

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Environmental Constraints

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2017 Average Daily Traffic

36th Street 16,100 12,000 11,500

slide-10
SLIDE 10

36th Street 20,800 16,700 13,900

2040 Average Daily Traffic

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Traffic Analysis Summary

  • Evaluated 2-lane, 3-lane and 4-lane cross sections
  • 4-lane roadway provides LOS B for all segments in Year 2040
  • 3-lane roadway on north end provides LOS E in Year 2040
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Traffic Analysis Summary

  • Evaluated 2-lane, 3-lane and 4-lane cross sections
  • 4-lane roadway provides LOS B for all segments in Year 2040
  • 3-lane roadway on north end provides LOS E in Year 2040
  • Follow Bellevue’s Complete Street guidance
slide-13
SLIDE 13

PLAN AND PROFILE

slide-14
SLIDE 14

PLAN AND PROFILE

slide-15
SLIDE 15

PLAN AND PROFILE

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Construction Phasing

slide-17
SLIDE 17

PROJECT SCHEDULE and CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE

36th Street Improvements

Highway N-370 to Cornhusker Road

Preliminary Design Final Design/Permitting Right-of-Way Acquisition Begin Construction 2019 2020 2021 2022 Anticipated Letting Conceptual Cost Estimate

  • 1.4 miles of 4-lane divided roadway
  • 2 new bridges
  • 10’ trail and 5’ sidewalk
  • 100-year flood elevation

Estimated Costs: $19.0 Million Construction $8.4 Million Engineering & Contingencies $27.4 Million Total

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Agenda Item Request

2/7/2019

Date Submitted:

Agenda Item Information

Commissioners Agenda Type: Mark Meisinger, PE, PTOE, Felsburg Holt & Ullevig, (402) 445-4405 Speaker Information: Administration Requesting Department: 2/12/2019 Date of Meeting: Presentation: 36th Street Feasibility Study Agenda Item:

Fiscal Administration Review

Total County cost of project: Total cost is up to $27MM. Sarpy County's share has not been determined. Is the item funded in the current budget?

Summary

Agenda Section: Regular FHU to present the feasibility study which identified the need to improve the segment of S. 36th Street between Cornhusker Road to Highway 370. Identified needs were to accommodate future growth in traffic volumes along this corridor and to address the floodplain conditions that result in water overtopping the roadway. The purpose of this Feasibility Study was to determine the number of lanes required on S. 36th Street to accommodate future traffic, as well as the alignment and configuration of the proposed improvements. Probable construction costs and quantities have also been developed. Summary/Background Information NO.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

If approved will this commit the county to future budget costs? The presentation of the study itself will not commit the County to future budget costs. An Interlocal Cooperation Agreement would have to be approved by the County Board to commit the County to future costs.

Attorney Approval & Contract Information

Yes No Is attorney approval required? Yes No Is contract being submitted?

Document Attachment(s)

Agenda Item Documents:

  • 1. Must be in PDF format
  • 2. Only submit ONE file, do not submit multiple attachments.
  • 3. Place documents in the following order within your PDF: Resolution, Memo, Agreement/Contract, and Further Supporting Documentation.
  • 4. Name your attachment with the following information in the following order: Date of Meeting, Resolution (if applicable), Name of Individual or Entity, Name of

Project/Agreement/Grant etc., Location (zoning or project location), Type of Document/Action (contract, bid opening, grant, addendum, application etc.)

Distribution

The County’s policy is to distribute items electronically. Contracts and agreements should be pre-signed by outside entities.

Email Options Resolution Instruction: Request Resolution from Attorneys Resolution Included (REQUIRES ATTORNEY REVIEW) Resolution Included (DOES NOT REQUIRE ATTORNEY REVIEW) N/A This page is used for reviewers ONLY. This page will not be presented to the County Board. Save Save Print Print

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Additional Instructions None

Submit Form

Beth Garber Name: bgarber@sarpy.com Email:

Administration & Fiscal Review/Approval

*Provide any additional information that you would like the County Board to see that is not included on the cover sheet (page one), fill in your name, and click save (located at the bottom of this page) before selecting the APPROVE workflow action*

Additional Comments from Admin Name: Additional Comments from Fiscal Name:

Save Save

slide-21
SLIDE 21

SAVE SAVE

Reviewer(s) ONLY

Comments: Name: Date: Name: Comments: Date: Name: Comments: Date: Name: Date: Comments:

This page is used to generate emails between the reviewers and submitters ONLY. Submitters do not have access to the form once it has been submitted. Reviewers can request clarification/additional information by providing their request in the comment section(s) below, click save, click 'Place on Hold'. An email will be generated and sent to the submitter with the comments provided. It is the reviewers responsibility to make the changes in the form. The County Board will NOT see this page.

County Clerk Assigned Reviewer

SAVE SAVE

Administration

SAVE SAVE SAVE SAVE