SLIDE 12 7/3/2018 12
Conflict of inter est laws
– Re mo ve o r limit the po ssibility o f pe rso na l influe nc e tha t mig ht b e a r upo n a n o ffic ia l’ s de c isio n
Ye tman v. Naumann, 16 Ariz. App. 314, 317, 492 P.2d 1252, 1255 (1972)
– Pre ve nt se lf-de a ling b y pub lic o ffic ia ls
Mauc he rv. City o f E lo y, 145 Ariz. 335, 338, 701 P.2d 593, 596 (App. 1985)
f yo u ha ve a “pe c unia ry o r pro prie ta ry” inte re st in a c a se , yo u ma y no t pa rtic ipa te
– Pe c unia ry: fina nc ia l inte re st; mo ne y in o r o ut o f yo ur po c ke t – Pro prie ta ry: pro pe rty inte re st; he lps o r hurts pro pe rty yo u o wn o r ha ve a n inte re st in
34
Conflict of inter est laws
xc e ptio ns
– No nsa la rie d o ffic e r o f a no npro fit c o rpo ra tio n – Owne rship o f le ss tha n 3% o f the sha re s o f a c o mpa ny fro m whic h yo u re c e ive le ss tha n 5% o f yo ur inc o me – I nte re st no diffe re nt tha n a la rg e c la ss o f pe rso ns (e .g ., utility c usto me r) – Othe rs to o nume ro us to me ntio n (c he c k with the L e g a l De pa rtme nt a he a d o f time !)
35
Conflict of inter est laws
- Whe n yo u ha ve a c o nflic t o f inte re st
– F ile a c o nflic t o f inte re st disc lo sure fo rm with the T
Cle rk – E xpla in tha t yo u ha ve a c o nflic t o f inte re st whe n the ma tte r is a nno unc e d – Do no t pa rtic ipa te a s a me mb e r o f the BOA in the disc ussio n o f the ma tte r – Ste p do wn fro m the da is
36