3 RD PARTY CAMPAIGN: HOW AND WHY REGULATE? Lolita Cigane Campaign - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

3 rd party campaign
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

3 RD PARTY CAMPAIGN: HOW AND WHY REGULATE? Lolita Cigane Campaign - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

3 RD PARTY CAMPAIGN: HOW AND WHY REGULATE? Lolita Cigane Campaign Finance Expert Member of Parliament 2010-2018 Chisinau, 6 December 2018 Campaign finance: a long personal journey of 18 yrs Latvia a former communist state, now EU


slide-1
SLIDE 1

3RD PARTY CAMPAIGN: HOW AND WHY REGULATE?

Lolita Cigane Campaign Finance Expert Member of Parliament 2010-2018 Chisinau, 6 December 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Campaign finance: a long personal journey of 18 yrs

  • Latvia – a former communist state,

now EU member

  • Worked as journalist 1997 – 1999
  • Campaign finance projects: 2001 –

2007

  • Member of Parliament 2010-2018
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Concepts of campaign resources

  • Campaign expenditure = paid publicity – legitimate
  • Administrative resources – usage of the official post for

publicity purposes = grey zone

  • Vote buying – illegal

Is charity charity? Is there such thing as “political” charity? UK Corrupt and Illegal Practices Act of 1883: bribery, such as buying food and drink for potential supporters, was banned.

  • 3rd party participation in campaign – legitimate but need to be

regulated

slide-4
SLIDE 4

3rd parties: basics

  • I. Lack of regulation - incentive to use NGOs, individuals

and legal entities for campaign purposes

  • II. If they place campaign advertisements on behalf of a

candidate, this opens a possibility to circumvent the campaign expenditure ceiling, and the regulation in general

  • regulation needed to make regulation meaningful
  • III. Need to differentiate between:
  • Legitimate freedom of speech
  • Wish to channel campaign funds thus increasing publicity
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Campaign finance as water

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Main elements of the LV campaign finance system

Detailed disclosure: income/expenditure Enforcement Ceiling on expenditures Defined campaign period Definition of “hidden advertising” Caps on donations, bans for legal entities to donate Ban on paid TV advertising Declaration of prices by media outlets Regulated 3rd party campaigning

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Latvia case: detailed and well-developed system OSCE/ODIHR assessmen

https://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/latvia/387665?download=true

I.

Enforcement The KNAB [Anti-corruption agency] supervises campaign finance provisions, exercising investigative and enforcement powers. Donors are obliged to provide information on their income, savings, and property upon the request of the KNAB, as well as documents proving the legality of the sources of donations given.

  • II. Disclosure

Political parties are required to submit general financial reports for the previous calendar year by 31 March. By law, the deadline for declaration of campaign income and expenditures is 30 days after election day. KNAB also requests additional party income reports, which must disclose all donations within 15 days of receipt, and which are published on an ongoing basis on the KNAB website.

  • III. Sanctions

If an election contestant exceeds the campaign expenditure ceiling, the KNAB is empowered to prohibit further campaign activities.

  • IV. Trust

Despite noting some gaps in existing provisions, most ODIHR NAM interlocutors expressed confidence in the party and campaign finance rules, including the oversight role of the KNAB.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Latvia case: how we achieved this

From “wild jungle” in 2001 to a well regulated system in 2018

  • Strong civil society involvement – 1st monitoring project in

2001

  • Strong media interest
  • EU and NATO accession
  • Right decisions about control and enforcement
  • Politicians - champions
  • Political “windows of opportunity”
slide-9
SLIDE 9

International examples

  • I. Hungary: no concept of “third parties”

BUT: Activities of non-governmental organizations, individuals or companies during the campaign through, e.g. placement of paid advertisements on behalf of - or with an aim to promote - a political party or a candidate in the campaign context - high. ➔ Campaign finance ceiling has lost its meaning.

  • II. Canada a “third party”- a person or group other than a candidate, registered political party
  • r an electoral district association of a registered political party. Individuals, corporations, or

groups not contesting an election can spend on election advertising. Such entities must register with Elections Canada if they incur or intend to incur election advertising expenses of more than US$376. A base limit of $3,000 can be incurred to promote or oppose the election

  • f one or more candidates in a particular electoral district.

➔ Transparency and comparatively low spending

  • III. In the USA, the so-called electioneering communication, i.e. advertisements that expressly

call for the election of a candidate and are sponsored by Political Action Committees or individuals, also have to be disclosed to the Federal Election Commission. Additionally, all these groups must disclose their expenditures to any individual who requests this. ➔ Only disclosure

  • IV. In Britain a cap on pressure groups of 1 million EUR each.

➔ Issues, not a party or a candidate

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Regulation good-practice: principles

  • I. Non-coordination
  • A person not related to political organizations, associations and candidates has the right to

participate in the pre-election campaign

  • 3rd parties are not related, not coordinating their activities with the political organizations,

associations or candidates. Can be an individual, a legal person or a registered association

  • f such persons who conduct pre-election campaign on their behalf and not in coordination

with the respective political organization, association or candidate.

  • II. Involvement of public entities
  • A company in which more than one per cent of capital shares (stocks) belongs to the State,

local government or another public person is prohibited to conduct pre-election campaign.

  • III. Clarity of party expenditures
  • all bills for campaign expenditures should be paid by political parties or candidates directly
  • IV. Centralization of election spending

Expenditure by individual candidates is not 3rd party spending, it has to be counted in political party expenditure. Parties should not be allowed to create other legal bodies.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Legal provisions: LV

(1) Unrelated person has the right to conduct pre-election campaign in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Law. (2) Pre-election campaign conducted by an unrelated person shall not be considered a campaign conducted (3) Financial resources or property that is used for pre- election campaign conducted by unrelated persons shall not be considered as a gift (donation) to a political party (4) State authorities and authorities of derived public persons and capital companies are prohibited from conduct of pre-election campaign.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Legal provisions: LV

(2) Unrelated person for pre-election campaign may use resources not exceeding 15 minimum monthly wages - 6450 (3) The amount shall consist of the expenses by the relevant person during the period of pre-election campaign regardless of the date on which a document confirming a transaction (bill, contract or other document) was written out, or payment was received or made for: 1) placement of an advertisement: a) in the television programmes and broadcasts of the public electronic mass medium, b) in the radio programmes and broadcasts of the public electronic mass medium, c) in the television programmes and broadcasts of the commercial electronic mass medium, d) in the radio programmes and broadcasts of the commercial electronic mass medium, e) in newspapers, magazines, bulletins and other periodicals registered in accordance with the procedures laid down in the law, produced by print technology and widely circulated throughout the whole territory of the State, f) in newspapers, magazines, bulletins and other periodicals registered in accordance with the procedure laid down in the law, produced by print technology and mostly circulated within the territory

  • f one city or municipality,

g) on the Internet, except website of an unrelated person, h) in premises and public places (in squares, streets, on bridges and in other similar places) regardless of the ownership; 2) utilisation of postal services (also electronic mail) in order to send the pre-election campaign materials with the help of it; 3) financing, sponsoring charity events, disbursing benefits and making gifts (donations) if they are of the nature of a pre-election campaign.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Legal provisions: LV

(4) All financial resources, which are used for pre-election campaign conducted by unrelated persons and exceed one minimum monthly wage, shall be transferred into the bank account of the recipient directly and without mediators. (5) If the total payment would exceed the amount of the expenses set out in Paragraph two of this Section, the relevant electronic mass medium, publication, person, who agrees with the campaigner on the placement of materials of pre-election campaign on the Internet, as well as the person or authority, which allocates premises and public places for payment for conducting the pre-election campaign (regardless of ownership),

  • r provides postal (including electronic mail) services to send the

materials of pre-election campaign, shall refuse entering into a contract for the unrelated person.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

3rd party regulation: a painful journey

  • 2004 – introduction of campaign expenditure

limits 

  • 2006 – crude violation by 2 party campaign managers 
  • Serious fines 2 parties bankrupt 
  • 2010 – negative “newspapers” 
  • 2012 – clear, consolidated definition of 3rd status+limits
  • 2014 More negative “newspapers” 
  • Additional amendments to the law (hidden advertising) 
  • Circulation of a negative newspaper and a “taken over”

newspaper stopped  Success=clear provisions+enforcement

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Who should enforce:

CEC

Neutral Administrative

“Special” agency

Strong:

  • perative/inve

stigative Potentially biased