26:010:557 / 26:620:557 Social Science Research Methods Dr. Peter - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

26 010 557 26 620 557 social science research methods
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

26:010:557 / 26:620:557 Social Science Research Methods Dr. Peter - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

26:010:557 / 26:620:557 Social Science Research Methods Dr. Peter R. Gillett Associate Professor Department of Accounting & Information Systems Rutgers Business School Newark & New Brunswick Dr. Peter R Gillett April 21, 2006 1


slide-1
SLIDE 1

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

1

26:010:557 / 26:620:557 Social Science Research Methods

  • Dr. Peter R. Gillett

Associate Professor Department of Accounting & Information Systems Rutgers Business School – Newark & New Brunswick

slide-2
SLIDE 2

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

2

Overview

I Ethical Considerations I Survey Research I Verbal Protocol Analysis I Field Studies I Case Studies I Clinical Studies I Proposals & Presentations next week

slide-3
SLIDE 3

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

3

Ethical Considerations

I Two main issues

Treatment of subjects

N Informed consent N Deception N Debriefing

Honesty and integrity of the research process

N Academic fraud

I Institutional Review Boards I Tuskegee Study

Withheld treatment from subjects for 40 years to

study effects of disease

I Cyril Burt’s studies on intelligence in twins

slide-4
SLIDE 4

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

4

Ethical Considerations

I Recall our discussions of research

communities

Consider the effect a study might have on the

possibility or success of future research

I Coercion

Grades Extra credit Etc.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

5

Ethical Considerations

I Milgram Study

Subjects were deceived as to their roles and

purpose of study

Subjects were easily induced to impose

“cruel” treatment on secret confederates of researcher believed to be other subjects

Did the ends justify the means? In fact, subjects were extensively debriefed

and evaluated in follow-up studies

slide-6
SLIDE 6

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

6

Ethical Considerations

I General Rules

Do not put people at risk Do not violate the norms of informed consent Do not convert public resources to private

gains

Do not damage the environment Do not conduct biased research

slide-7
SLIDE 7

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

7

Ethical Considerations

I APA Guidelines

General Considerations Participant at Minimal Risk Fairness, Responsibility and Informed Consent Deception Debriefing Freedom from Coercion Protection of Participants Confidentiality

slide-8
SLIDE 8

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

8

Ethical Considerations

I Ethics of Animal Research

General Personnel Facilities Acquisition Care and Housing Justification of Research Experimental Design Experimental Procedure Field Research Educational Use Disposition

slide-9
SLIDE 9

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

9

Ethical Considerations

I Hawthorne Study

Factory workers informed of study of productivity Workers, eager to please, worked harder, were more

punctual, took shorter breaks, etc.

No true measure of productivity This has given its name to the “Hawthorne Effect” Deception is used to misdirect subjects Creates need for debriefing

slide-10
SLIDE 10

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

10

Survey Research

I Survey research studies large and small

populations (or universes) by selecting and studying samples chosen from the population to discover the relative incidence, distribution, and interrelations of sociological and psychological variables (K&L p. 599)

I Field studies with a quantitative orientation I Scientific research NOT status surveys, opinion

polls, etc.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

11

Survey Research

I Sociological facts I Opinions I Attitudes I Behavior I Relevance of sampling theory

slide-12
SLIDE 12

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

12

Survey Research

I Types of Surveys

Interviews

N Schedules

Panels Telephone Surveys Mail Questionnaires

N Low response rates

² Follow-up

slide-13
SLIDE 13

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

13

Survey Research

I Methodology

Flow plan

N Specific questions N Operationalization N Sample and sampling plan

² Multistage and areas sampling ² Quota sampling – avoid

N Interview schedule N Measuring instruments N Research design – cross-sectional v. longitudinal N Data collection N Analysis

² Coding ² Tabulation ² Analysis & Interpretation

slide-14
SLIDE 14

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

14

Survey Research

I Checking Survey Data

Re-interview Outside criterion / data

I Relevance to educational research

slide-15
SLIDE 15

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

15

Survey Research

I Advantages and disadvantages

Wide scope Accurate (within sampling error) Often superficial Demanding of time, energy and money Can change social context Requires good research knowledge and

sophistication

slide-16
SLIDE 16

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

16

Survey Research

I Meta-analysis

Surveys of literature on a particular topic Unit of analysis is individual studies Measure effect sizes (using Cohen’s d-

statistic)

Typically report studies, sample sizes and

effect sizes

Try to determine overall effect across studies

slide-17
SLIDE 17

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

17

Survey Research

I Meta-analysis

d-statistic

where is the treatment mean, is the control mean, and is the pooled standard deviation (or the standard deviation for the control group)

c t

M M SD −

t

M

c

M SD

slide-18
SLIDE 18

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

18

Verbal Protocol Analysis

I At least for some cognitive tasks we can provide

information about "what we are thinking" by verbally describing what is going through our mind while performing the task. This type of data is referred to as a verbal protocol

I Newell and Simon pioneered and championed

the use verbal protocols. They felt that the systematic collection of these types of

  • bservations could be used to test information

processing models of human reasoning

slide-19
SLIDE 19

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

19

Verbal Protocol Analysis

I Typically VERY time-consuming and

hence usually small sample sizes

I Requires

Researcher to prompt for verbal protocols Recording of verbal protocols Coding of verbal protocols Analysis

slide-20
SLIDE 20

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

20

Field Studies

I Nonexperimental scientific inquiries aimed

at discovering the relations and interactions among sociological, psychological, and educational variables in real social structures

slide-21
SLIDE 21

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

21

Case Studies

I Researcher Robert K. Yin defines the case study

research method as an empirical inquiry that investigates a contemporary phenomenon within its real-life context; when the boundaries between phenomenon and context are not clearly evident; and in which multiple sources of evidence are used (Yin, 1984, Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, p. 23).

slide-22
SLIDE 22

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

22

Case Studies

I Case study research excels at bringing us to an

understanding of a complex issue or object and can extend experience or add strength to what is already known through previous research.

I Case studies emphasize detailed contextual analysis of

a limited number of events or conditions and their relationships.

I Researchers have used the case study research method

for many years across a variety of disciplines. Social scientists, in particular, have made wide use of this qualitative research method to examine contemporary real-life situations and provide the basis for the application of ideas and extension of methods.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

23

Clinical Studies

I

In addition to the scientific and artistic groups, there is a third group of re- searchers who struggle with the subjective nature of knowledge and practice and who employ descriptive, interpretive, and non-quantitative means in their work and study: the clinicians. Like their counterparts in the sciences, arts, and humanities, these clinical researchers also use qualitative methods in their research and reflection: case study, participant

  • bservation, long interviews, grounded theory, as ways of knowing and not
  • knowing. Unlike the scientists and the artists, these clinicians are organized

by the praxis of their work: They must use methods which produce practical distinctions which can be used in real-time decision making and/or problem

  • solving. This style of applied research is more immediate for the clinician.

A Case for Clinical Qualitative Research by Ronald J. Chenail The Qualitative Report, Volume 1, Number 4, Fall, 1992 (http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR1-4/clinqual.html)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

24

Proposals & Presentations next week

I For final proposals

Select a ‘target journal’ Find their manuscript submission

requirements

Prepare your proposal in this format

(this should already have been done!)

Tell me what you used in the note enclosing

the submission in the drop box

Return drafts with my comments next week!

slide-25
SLIDE 25

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

25

Proposals & Presentations next week

I Presentations

Plan on 5 minutes + some brief set-up There will be no discussants Submit PowerPoint slides to Digital Drop box You may, but do not need to, distribute

handouts, copies of the proposal or other visual aids

slide-26
SLIDE 26

April 21, 2006

  • Dr. Peter R Gillett

26

Proposals & Presentations next week

I Prepare 7 PowerPoint slides covering:

Research Question(s) Model Variables

N Definitions and Measures N Reliability and validity

Hypotheses Research Design Proposed Analyses