2020
play

2020? Jonathan Perraton Department of Economics University of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Corbynomics A Vision for 2020? Jonathan Perraton Department of Economics University of Sheffield Corbyns Vision Changing the terms of economic debate Austerity has held back growth, but also led to an unbalanced and unequal


  1. Corbynomics – A Vision for 2020? Jonathan Perraton Department of Economics University of Sheffield

  2. Corbyn’s Vision • Changing the terms of economic debate • Austerity has held back growth, but also led to an unbalanced and unequal economy over-reliant on debt-fuelled consumption and characterised by weak investment, low skills and a large external deficit. Gains from growth are skewed towards richest groups and regions • Higher productivity economy needed to raise wages; this is also needed to reduce the deficit • Prosperity requires a new partnership between government, businesses and workers

  3. G7 Investment Rates

  4. Key Policy Proposals • Ending austerity – cutting in a downturn does not produce growth. Now reject Osborne’s fiscal charter. Case for spending on infrastructure and skills (adult and further education; HE) • Creation of a National Investment Bank as part of strategy to up- grade UK’s industrial structure and encourage investment and innovation; particular emphasis on key industries including green technologies • Shift in taxation to finance this; possible ‘People’s QE’ • Possible state ownership, although not clear beyond rail

  5. ‘People’s QE’? • The National Investment Bank could issue bonds, these could then be purchased by the Bank of England directly to support this • The BoE QE, they purchase govt bonds indirectly (from private holders of these assets); unequal and of questionable effectiveness • Latterly John McDonnell appears to have distanced himself from this

  6. Tax and Spend • Have now rejected fiscal charter – a downturn, with very low interest rates exactly the time to spend on infrastructure etc. Grow the economy to solve the deficit • Tax burden to shift (make more progressive, possible changes to higher income tax rates, corporation tax, inheritance tax) • Key proposals to increase tax take: improve collection of tax owed (increase HMRC staff); close loopholes; tackle underground economy; reduce expenditure on ‘corporate welfare’

  7. Question Marks • Much of the analysis of the problems of British economy is widely shared • Austerity has been widely criticised by economists; Osborne’s fiscal charter also rejected • QE – undermining BoE independence (McDonnell denies this and arguably already compromised); unnecessary with very low interest rates anyway? • Tax – estimates of potential take from these measures appear high; ‘corporate welfare’ covers a wide range of activities, not all of which a Corbyn govt would wish to discourage

  8. The Capital Dilemma • Democratic left governments wish to intervene in markets to change outcomes, redistribute income, build a welfare state • But prosperity still depends on private investment; investment has been low despite low interest rates, relatively buoyant profits • Investment has been weak in the UK even before the financial crisis; firms overall have accumulated large cash surpluses, rather than borrowing to invest • Corbyn plan sees a sustained recovery in investment as central – higher demand from an end to austerity and the NIB may help • But in general there is little detail here on how investment might be encouraged, and some proposals that might discourage it • Keynes wrote of ‘socialisation of investment’ by the state if private investment was insufficient to guarantee full employment • Return of the dormant bond market vigilantes?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend