2020? Jonathan Perraton Department of Economics University of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2020
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

2020? Jonathan Perraton Department of Economics University of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Corbynomics A Vision for 2020? Jonathan Perraton Department of Economics University of Sheffield Corbyns Vision Changing the terms of economic debate Austerity has held back growth, but also led to an unbalanced and unequal


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Corbynomics – A Vision for 2020?

Jonathan Perraton Department of Economics University of Sheffield

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Corbyn’s Vision

  • Changing the terms of economic debate
  • Austerity has held back growth, but also led to an

unbalanced and unequal economy over-reliant on debt-fuelled consumption and characterised by weak investment, low skills and a large external

  • deficit. Gains from growth are skewed towards

richest groups and regions

  • Higher productivity economy needed to raise

wages; this is also needed to reduce the deficit

  • Prosperity requires a new partnership between

government, businesses and workers

slide-3
SLIDE 3

G7 Investment Rates

slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Key Policy Proposals

  • Ending austerity – cutting in a downturn does not

produce growth. Now reject Osborne’s fiscal charter. Case for spending on infrastructure and skills (adult and further education; HE)

  • Creation of a National Investment Bank as part of

strategy to up-grade UK’s industrial structure and encourage investment and innovation; particular emphasis on key industries including green technologies

  • Shift in taxation to finance this; possible ‘People’s QE’
  • Possible state ownership, although not clear beyond

rail

slide-6
SLIDE 6

‘People’s QE’?

  • The National Investment Bank could issue

bonds, these could then be purchased by the Bank of England directly to support this

  • The BoE QE, they purchase govt bonds

indirectly (from private holders of these assets); unequal and of questionable effectiveness

  • Latterly John McDonnell appears to have

distanced himself from this

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Tax and Spend

  • Have now rejected fiscal charter – a downturn,

with very low interest rates exactly the time to spend on infrastructure etc. Grow the economy to solve the deficit

  • Tax burden to shift (make more progressive,

possible changes to higher income tax rates, corporation tax, inheritance tax)

  • Key proposals to increase tax take: improve

collection of tax owed (increase HMRC staff); close loopholes; tackle underground economy; reduce expenditure on ‘corporate welfare’

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Question Marks

  • Much of the analysis of the problems of British

economy is widely shared

  • Austerity has been widely criticised by

economists; Osborne’s fiscal charter also rejected

  • QE – undermining BoE independence (McDonnell

denies this and arguably already compromised); unnecessary with very low interest rates anyway?

  • Tax – estimates of potential take from these

measures appear high; ‘corporate welfare’ covers a wide range of activities, not all of which a Corbyn govt would wish to discourage

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The Capital Dilemma

  • Democratic left governments wish to intervene in markets to

change outcomes, redistribute income, build a welfare state

  • But prosperity still depends on private investment; investment has

been low despite low interest rates, relatively buoyant profits

  • Investment has been weak in the UK even before the financial crisis;

firms overall have accumulated large cash surpluses, rather than borrowing to invest

  • Corbyn plan sees a sustained recovery in investment as central –

higher demand from an end to austerity and the NIB may help

  • But in general there is little detail here on how investment might be

encouraged, and some proposals that might discourage it

  • Keynes wrote of ‘socialisation of investment’ by the state if private

investment was insufficient to guarantee full employment

  • Return of the dormant bond market vigilantes?