2017 Update A long term community-based vision regarding: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
2017 Update A long term community-based vision regarding: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
2017 Update A long term community-based vision regarding: Demographics Housing Economy Transportation Active Living (already done) Parks & Recreation Physical Features & Natural Resources Community Facilities
A long term community-based vision regarding:
Demographics Housing Economy Transportation
- Active Living (already done)
Parks & Recreation Physical Features & Natural Resources Community Facilities Infrastructure
Water System Sanitary Sewer System Utilities
Energy Present and Future Land Use
1 to 2 meetings per chapter
Comprehensive Plan Committee:
Steve Nasby – City Administrator Dominic Jones – Mayor/ Economic Development
Authority Liaison
Brent Brown – Electrical & Street Department Drew Hage – Economic Development Authority &
Development Office (Planning)
Wayne Wormstadt – Superintendent : Windom Public
Schools
Bryan Joyce – Council Member Marv Grunig – Council Member Kevin Stevens – County Commissioner (Donna Gravley
– Alternate)
A Comprehensive Housing Market Analysis and Demand Estimate (Housing Study) was finalized for the City of Windom on May 13, 2014, by Viewpoint Consulting Group. This study identified a 3.7 percent vacancy rate in Windom. This vacancy rate includes market rate units and affordable rental units. In November 2016, the vacancy rate in Windom was 2.3 percent.
Locations for new multi-family housing developments Locations for new single-family housing developments Housing issues in Windom
The housing study identified the need for
approximately 130 new housing units in Windom from 2014 to the end of the decade. Of the demand, roughly 95 to 100 units will be for rental and senior housing.
The housing study was done prior to Fast Global
Solutions expansion and planned expansion
The housing study was done prior to Prime Pork
Based on incomes in Windom, the majority of
demand for single family homes is for those priced below $150,000.
This demand is met by resale
- r
Through housing subsidies
- Grants through MN Housing
Affordability Gap
Possible Goal
- Encourage age appropriate housing to increase
turnover of some of Windom’s old less expensive housing
- Maintain an adequate supply of vacant lots
Various sizes Various costs
Development Plan #1 (9 lots – 2 for duplex)
Lot 1 .45 Acres 135’x146 Lot 9 .47 Acres 140’x146 Lot 8 .47 Acres 140’x146 Lot 2 .45 Acres 135’x146
Lot 3 140’x14 6
Lot 3 .45 Acres 130’x150 Lot 7 .47 Acres 120’x170 Lot 6 .47 Acres 120’x170 Lot 4 .55 Acres 150’x160 Lot 5 .50 Acres 146’x150’
Development Plan #2 (10 lots)
Lot 1 .34 Acres 100’x146’ Lot 2 .34 Acres 100’x146’ Lot 3 .34 Acres 100’x146’ Lot 4 .34 Acres 100’x146’ Lot 5 .53 Acres 135’x170’ Lot 8 .39 Acres 100’x170’ Lot 9 .34 Acres 100’x146’ Lot 10 .5 Acres 180’x146’ Lot 7 .47 Acres 120’x170 Lot 6 .46 Acres 135’x150’
Development Plan #3 (7 lots) Lot 3 .7 Acres Lot 1 .5 Acres Lot 6 .5 Acres Lot 4 .6 Acres Lot 5 .6 Acres Lot 2 .5 Acres Lot 7 .5 Acres
LaCanne & Hoffmann Development 7th Street Buildable: 5 lots @ .4 acres each
Prairie Meadow 10 lots – Phase I 13 lots – Phase II
Kruse Property Parcel Number 250230100 26 Acres
Mews Property Parcel Number 080230501 10 Acres
Mews Property New Parcel 5.3 Acres
Development Plan #1 Phase I 12 – larger lots (duplexes & larger homes) 31 – regularly sized lots Phase II 2 – larger lots (duplexes & larger homes) 19 – regularly sized lots
Development Plan #2 2 – larger lots (duplexes & larger homes) 24 – regularly sized lots
Development Plan #3 2 – larger lots (duplexes & larger homes) 9 – regularly sized lots
Lot 10 .4 Acres Lot 9 .4 Acre s Lot 8 .4 Acre s Lot 7 .4 Acre s Lot 6 .6 Acre s Lot 1 .5 Acre s Lot 2 .5 Acre s Lot 3 .5 Acre s Lot 4 .5 Acre s Lot 5 .6 Acre s
9th Avenue North
It is the goal of the City of Windom to
promote safe, sanitary, and decent housing and a quality living environment for all present and future residents of the community.
Encourage development of housing to meet the needs of
all residents of the City, including the elderly, handicapped, low-income, and students.
Enforce building codes in order to improve the quality of
housing.
Promote housing rehabilitation and ownership incentive
programs through state and federal housing programs.
Utilize zoning ordinances designating density patterns in
residential areas to allow for a variety of residential development districts.
Encourage preservation of the residential character and
integrity of individual neighborhoods.
Locate residential uses adjacent to compatible uses, or
when this is impossible, buffer zones should be used.
Encourage the development of housing in areas that can
most economically be serviced by public sewer and water.
Encourage innovation and flexibility in housing design and
development.
Encourage and promote housing development
- pportunities within the City including multiple-family