2017 nw iowa research
play

2017 NW Iowa Research Farm and On-Farm Project Results 2018 Crop - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2017 NW Iowa Research Farm and On-Farm Project Results 2018 Crop Advantage Series Joel DeJong, ISU Extension Field Agronomist Andrew Weaver, On-farm coordinator, NW Research Farm http://farms.ag.iastate.edu/content/northwest-research-and-


  1. 2017 NW Iowa Research Farm and On-Farm Project Results 2018 Crop Advantage Series Joel DeJong, ISU Extension Field Agronomist Andrew Weaver, On-farm coordinator, NW Research Farm http://farms.ag.iastate.edu/content/northwest-research-and- demonstration-farm

  2. NW Iowa On-Farm Projects 2017 Cooperators who completed projects: Gary Trei Dordt College - Mike Schouten Steve Abma Wes & Wade DeGroot Rodney & Ross Mogler Russ Glade On-farm project coordinator Dean Meyer Bruce Zomermaand - Andrew Weaver Dave Rossman Steve Agar Morris Metzger & Marty Knobloch

  3. Iowa Fungicide Efficacy Trials - 2017 NWRF NERF NRF A&AE SWRF SERF

  4. Corn Fungicide Summary 2010-2016 40.00� V5-V6 (N=168) 30.00� Mean = 0.4 bu/A 20.00� 10.00� 0.00� -10.00� -20.00� -30.00� -40.00� 40.00� VT-R2 (N=N= 287) 30.00� Mean = 3.5 bu/A 20.00� 10.00� 0.00� -10.00� -20.00� -30.00� -40.00� 40.00� V5-6 + VT-R2 30.00� (N=N= 287) 20.00� 10.00� Mean = 3.5 bu/A 0.00� -10.00� -20.00� -30.00� -40.00�

  5. Location x Timing 2010-2016 SERF b SWRF b Boone NERF NRF a NWRF 1.3 3.9 0.5 -0.6 -3.1 1.2 V5-V6 (N=37) (N=31) (N=24) (N=31) (N=20) (N=25) 3.0 2.1 0.9 6.1 3.4 5.2 VT-R2 (N=38) (N=43) (N=60) (N=52) (N=40) (N=53) V5-V6 + -0.2 5.1 3.5 7.7 0.2 2.7 VT-R2 (N=32) (N=32) (N=25) (N=31) (N=20) (N=26) a No 2010 data b No 2016 data

  6. 2017 Effect of timing on disease severity V5 application NO effect on disease NS 1-9 Up

  7. Effect of timing on yield response NWRF NRF NERF AEA SWRF SERF P0157AMX Mycogen Hybrid P0157AMX P0969AM P0937AM P1197AMXT 2A627 GLS score 4 6 4 3 5 5 224.8 257.4 234.9 248.5 216.0 269.0 Yield check Overall -2.3 1.9 1.2 4.7 -0.9 18.6 V5 0.0 4.9 -0.8 3.1 -6.1 15.6 R1 -3.7 2.2 1.5 7.0 1.4 19.2 V5+R1 -0.3 -2.9 0.8 0.0 -5.0 19.3 V12 -1.8 5.2 2.5 4.1 1.0 17.8 ALL non-significant P<0.1

  8. Corn Fungicide, NW Iowa, V-6 to V-8 stage, 2010 - 2016 8 Treated 6 minus Untreated, 4 Bu/A N = 30 2 0 -2 AVE. = 0.53 bu/a -4 -6 -8

  9. Corn Fungicide, NW Iowa, Ground Application, 2008 - 2016 25 20 Treated minus 15 Average = 5.82 bu/a Untreated, Bu/A N = 42 10 5 0 -5

  10. Can fungicides improve standability? Treatments Fungicide applied: 1. Yes (Headline Amp 10 oz/A) 2. No Harvest date: 1. Slightly early 2. ~1 week later 3. ~2 weeks later 4. ~3 weeks later 5. ~ 4 weeks later

  11. Effect of harvest date on lodging - 2017 45 a 40 a 35 b b 30 bc cd Lodging (%) a d 25 c a c a a a b 20 15 b b d bc b c 10 bc c dd cd c 5 c d d 0 NWRF NRF NERF AEA SWRF SERF

  12. Effect of fungicide on lodging - 2017 40 a 35 NS 30 25 Lodging (%) 20 a a 15 a NS b b b 10 b 5 0 NWRF NRF NERF AEA SWRF SERF No fungicide Fungicide

  13. 2017 Soybean Fungicide Trial • Sioux County, Aproach fungicide • No-till, planted 5-13-17, 4 reps • Treated: 63.47 bu/a ave • Untreated: 63.59 bu/a ave 13

  14. Summary data from 60 Soybean Fungicide Trials, through 2017 • Overall average: – Treated = 64.73 bu/a – Untreated = 62.37 bu/a • Other notes of interest: – None had the treated more than 1 bu/a less – 16 had more than a 3 bu/a increase with fungicide (27%) – 5 total Monona County trials, 4 had a greater than 3 bu/a increase Sites were located in included Osceola, Lyon, Osceola, Buena Vista, Clay and Monona counties 14

  15. NW Iowa Row Spacing Trials Current Research Location Year Site Target Seeding Rate Hybrid Year (1000 sds/ac) Sac County 2009 1 30, 35, 40 DeKalb 61-69 Sac County 2009 2 30, 35, 40 DeKalb 61-69 Sac County 2010 3 30, 35, 40 Mycogen 2A551 Sac County 2010 4 30, 35, 40 Mycogen 2J597 Lyon County 2014 5 30, 36, 42 Pioneer P0193 & P0297 Lyon County 2015 6 30, 36, 42 Pioneer P0157 & P0297 O’Brien County 2015 7 30, 36, 42 DeKalb 52-84 & 53-36 O’Brien County 2015 8 30, 36, 42 Pioneer P0157 & P0297 O’Brien County 2016 9 30, 34, 38, 42 DeKalb 52-84 & 53-36 O’Brien County 2016 10 30, 34, 38, 42 Pioneer P0157 & P0297

  16. 20” 30” 20” 30” 20” 30” * * * * *

  17. 7.9 bu/a* 16.2 bu/a* 1.4 bu/a -2.0 bu/a 4.9 bu/a* 9.3 bu/a* Lyon – 2014 Lyon 2015 NWRF 2015 NWRF 2015 NWRF 2016 NWRF 2016 * = statistically significant

  18. 30 in. 20 in.

  19. 2017 Soybean Population Trials • Osceola County, conventional, planted 5/13, 30” rows 125K = 70.4 bu/a 150K = 69.9 bu/a 175K = 70.1 bu/a • Sioux County, no- till, planted 5/11, 30” rows 90K = 73.6 bu/a 130K = 74.3 bu/a 110K = 73.9 bu/a 150K = 75.8 bu/a 19

  20. Soybean Plant Population Trials 37 trials through 2016 125K average = 57.3 bu/a 175K = 57.6 bu/a One was statistically different at 3.3 bu/acre 20

  21. 2017 Soybean Row Spacing Trial • Lyon County, Strip-till, planted 5/10, 140K, following corn, 3 reps. • 30” rows averaged 66 bu/acre • 15” rows averaged 61.7 bu/acre • NOTE: Significant white mold in this plot 21

  22. Soybean row spacing trials – ’08 – ‘14 • 14 trials 15” v. 30” – 15” average = 60.64 bu/a – 30” average = 58.24 bu/a • 5 of 14 showed at least a 3+ bu/a increase with narrow rows. • 8 trials 18” v. 36” – 18” average = 59.99 bu/a – 36” average = 55.61 bu/a • 5 of 14 showed at least a 3+ bu/a increase with narrow rows. 22

  23. NWRF Soybean row spacing research – 2016 - Asgrow 23

  24. NWRF Soybean row spacing research – 2017 - Asgrow 24

  25. NWRF Soybean row spacing research – 2016 - Pioneer 25

  26. NWRF Soybean row spacing research – 2017 - Pioneer 26

  27. Tilled v. No-Tilled Soybeans • 17 trials, from 2006 through 2016. – Mostly compared to a single pass tillage • Overall average: Tilled = 60.4 bu/a No-tilled = 60.3 bu/a • 3 of 17 had a 2 bu/a or greater increase with tillage; 2 favored no-till by 2 bu/a or more. 27

  28. Rolling Soybeans, 2009 – 2014, 21 trials Rolled – average = 58.3 bu/acre Not rolled = 57.7 bu/acre 1 < 2 bu/acre 2 > 2 bu/acre Biggest was + 6.3 bu/A Photo from Corn+Soybean Digest, 6/12/15 28

  29. Starter fertilizer on corn • Osceola County – 2 cooperators. Four gallons • 6-24-6-.5Zn in-furrow per acre. Soil test levels optimum or better. Location Starter, bu/a Untreated, bu/a 1 G 214.4 210.4 2 244.8 240.5 3 252.2 250.5 4 246.3 243.4 5 259.4 256.3 6 247.0 244.7 7 219.7 224.6 8 250.9 252.3 Ave: 241.8 240.3 29

  30. Soybean Variety & Herbicide Trial • Sioux County. Authority + Warrant. F/B Liberty (L beans); Flexstar + glyphosate (R beans); or Extendimax + glyphosate (X beans). P22T10L P22T73R P22T24X 69.4 bu/a 75.6 bu/a 74.4 bu/a 30

  31. Aphid tolerant v. non-tolerant soybeans • Sioux County, not treated for aphids, on organic acres • Viking 2188 (tolerant) v. Viking 2065 66.7 bu/a 64.3 bu/a

  32. Corn RW Insecticide trial on continuous corn • Lyon County, planted May 4. Both hybrids contain Herculex Extra traits. • 5 reps With Aztec HC W/out Site 1: 218.1 bu/a 214.5 bu/a Site 2: 236.8 bu/a* 231.0 bu/a * = significant at P < .10

  33. Corn Herbicide Yield Comparison A trial to compare crop yield on corn post treated with either Impact+atrazine+MAS+AMS to Realm Q + glyphosate Impact Realm Q Site #1: 231.6 bu/a 233.1 bu/a Site #2: 252.8 bu/a 254.4 bu/a Site #3: 229.7 bu/a 231.7 bu/a Site #4: 232.7 bu/a 233.7 bu/a

  34. Other trials conducted on NW Iowa farms in 2017 • Encirca with Y-drop N application • Soybean inoculation • Side dress N vs. none with manure • Early v. late planting of soybean

  35. There is more!!! • To find results from additional trials, check these web sites: – http://farms.ag.iastate.edu/farms • OR: – http://www.extension.iastate.edu/plymouth/ crops **But – full results won’t be available in a printed form until February, I think.

  36. What questions do you have for me? Thank you. Joel DeJong, ISUEO Field Agronomist Plymouth Co. Extension Office jldejong@iastate.edu 712-546-7835 @joel_dejong

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend