2010 2012 electric and gas energy efficiency programs
play

2010-2012 Electric and Gas Energy Efficiency Programs: Three-Year - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2010-2012 Electric and Gas Energy Efficiency Programs: Three-Year Review and Trend Analysis EEAC Consultants September 10, 2013 (draft) Introduction Review of the performance of the first Three-Year Plan, specifically the EE programs in


  1. 2010-2012 Electric and Gas Energy Efficiency Programs: Three-Year Review and Trend Analysis EEAC Consultants September 10, 2013 (draft)

  2. Introduction • Review of the performance of the first Three-Year Plan, specifically the EE programs in 2010-2012, with comparisons to the Plans and goals • Initial review of the 2010-2012 performance and trends; additional follow up with the PAs is planned • Data are from the PAs (data from the individual PAs plus statewide compilations where available) • There are some remaining data inconsistencies • PAs provided a factual reporting of what happened in 2010-2012 (see PA presentation distributed on 9/6); the EEAC consultants are providing observations and additional trend analysis 2

  3. Key Findings/Observations • Many important program advances in 2010-2012 • Savings and benefits increased significantly each year (higher goals and higher actual achievements) • Savings and benefits were short of 2010-2012 Plan goals (missed savings and benefits relative to the Plan), particularly in the C&I sector in 2011 and 2012 • Missed annual savings add up and have a cumulative effect • When annual savings goals are missed it is challenging to catch up in future years that already have high goals • The underinvestment in 2010-2012 relative to Plan budget was significant, and a portion of the underinvestment could have been used to achieve 100% of the goals • Differences in performance across sectors and PAs 3

  4. Total Benefits, 2010-2012 Planned Versus Achieved Statewide Total Benefits: 2010 ‐ 2012 Electric and Gas $3,000 Significant increases in goals and in benefits achieved each year 2010 ‐ 2012 achieved benefits of $5,468M vs. $5,960M in the Plan (92% of Plan) Missed total electric and gas benefits in 2010 ‐ 2012: $492M $2,500 93%, ($188.0M) Benefits ($, Millions) $2,000 90%, ($207.5M) $1,500 93%, ($97.0M) $1,000 $500 $0 2011 2012 2010 Planned Statewide Electric Benefits Planned Statewide Gas Benefits Achieved Statewide Electric Benefits Achieved Statewide Gas Benefits 4

  5. Electric Benefits, 2010-2012 Planned Versus Achieved Statewide Total Benefits: 2010 ‐ 2012 Electric Missed Total Electric Benefits in 2010 ‐ 2012: $440 Million (9% of Plan) $2,500 Total Benefits ($, Millions) ($198M) $2,000 91 % ($205M) $1,500 88% ($36M) $1,000 97 % $500 $0 2010 2011 2012 Plan Report 5

  6. Electric Annual Savings Planned Versus Achieved Statewide Annual Savings: 2010 ‐ 2012 Electric 1,200,000 (130,048) 1,000,000 88% Annual Savings (MWh) (117,330) 800,000 87% (5,366) 600,000 99% 400,000 200,000 ‐ 2010 2011 2012 Plan Report 6

  7. Cumulative Effect of Missed Annual Savings Cumulative Missed Annual Savings: 2010 ‐ 2012 Electric 300,000 The cumulative annual savings impact missing at the end of 2012 is 252,743 MWh (equivalent to 21% of the 2013 annual savings goal) 252,743 250,000 Missed annual savings in 2010 ‐ 2012: 380,804 MWh (32% of 2013 goal) Missed Annual Savings (MWh) 130,048 *The values for missed savings in this chart will be lower once accounting for the one ‐ year measure life of behavior programs. 200,000 150,000 122,695 117,330 100,000 50,000 5,366 0 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 7

  8. Missed Annual Savings were Mainly in the C&I Sector Over or Under Achievement of Annual Savings Goals: 2010 ‐ 2012 Electric 40,000 7% 10% 20,184 20,000 14,449 2% 5,272 Over or Under Achievement of Savings Goals, MWh ‐ GOAL (2,875) (5,366) (6,125) (10,029) 8% (13,690) (20,000) 26% 1% 33% 3% (40,000) (60,000) (80,000) (100,000) (112,573) (120,000) (117,330) Percentages are Over or Under Achievement 17% 13% as a % of the Annual Savings Goal (130,048) (140,000) 12% (147,356) 19% (160,000) 2010 2011 2012 Residential Low Income C&I Statewide 8

  9. Underinvestment in 2010-2012 Planned Versus Actual Statewide Total PA Costs: 2010 ‐ 2012 Electric Underinvestment in 2010 ‐ 2012: $294 Million (25% of Plan) $600 PA Costs ($, Millions) $500 ($110.7M) $400 ($140.1M) 78% $300 ($42.7M) 66% $200 85% $100 $0 2010 2011 2012 Plan Report 9

  10. Underinvestment in 2010-2012 was Mainly in the C&I Sector Over or Under Expenditure of Plan Budget: 2010 ‐ 2012 Electric $40 The C&I sector accounts for $242M (82%) of the $294M underinvestment in 2010 ‐ 2012. $20 Over or Under Expenditure of Plan Budget ($, Millions) $0 PLAN (2) (8) (8) (9) (11) 1% ($20) (15) 24% 14% 22% 12% (23) 12% 16% ($40) (43) 15% ($60) ($80) ($100) (101) (111) 34% ($120) (117) 22% Percentages are Over or Under 46% Expenditures as a % of the Plan Budget ($140) (140) 34% ($160) 2010 2011 2012 Residential Low Income C&I Statewide 10

  11. Achievement of Electric C&I Annual Savings Goals by PA Over or Under Achievement of C&I Annual Savings Goals: 2010 ‐ 2012 Electric by PA 40,000 222% 20,000 53% 11,924 2% 8,357 4,737 GOAL 0 (1,761) (772) (4,952) (2,795) (7,542) 25% (7,114) 1% 31% 38% (8,352) 21% (13,690) (11,678) 40% (12,906) (20,000) Over or Under Achievement of Savings Goals, MWh 28% 57% 3% 25% (20,418) 42% (32,126) (35,122) (40,000) (36,954) 25% 11% 10% (60,000) (67,339) (70,582) 8% (80,000) 25% (89,749) 28% (100,000) (112,573) (120,000) 17% (140,000) (147,356) ~ 19% (160,000) ~ Percentages are Over or Under Achievement (162,092) 20% as a % of the Annual Savings Goal (180,000) (273,619) 15% (200,000) 2010 2011 2012 2010 ‐ 2012 11 NGRID NSTAR WMECO CLC Unitil Statewide

  12. Underinvestment of Electric C&I Budgets by Individual PA Over or Under Expenditure of C&I Plan Budget: 2010 ‐ 2012 Electric by PA $20 PLAN $0 (1) (0) (0) (2) (1) (2) (3) (2) (2) (5) (6) 15% 21% (8) 7% 31% 22% 33% 27% 11% (9) 25% 13% 54% 13% (12) 34% ($20) 18% (23) Over or Under Expenditure of Plan Budget ($, Millions) 16% ($40) (43) 35% (53) (54) (55) ($60) 49% 46% 37% ($80) ($100) (101) (104) 34% 36% ($120) (117) (121) 46% 36% ~ ($140) 34% ~ Percentages are Over or Under Expenditures as a % of the Plan Budget ($160) (242) ($180) 2010 2011 2012 2010 ‐ 2012 12 NGRID NSTAR WMECO CLC Unitil Statewide

  13. Spending Only a Portion of the Underinvestment Would Achieve Goals 1,200,000 $550 Spending only a portion of the $111M underinvestment in 2012 $500 would have achieved the goals 1,110,161 130,048 $498M 1,000,000 $450 980,113 $41M $400 800,000 $387M Annual Savings (MWh) $350 PA Costs ($ Million) $300 600,000 $250 $200 400,000 $150 $100 200,000 $50 ‐ $0 Plan Savings Plan Budget Actual Savings Actual Expenditures Savings Additional Savings Spending Additional Spending 13

  14. 2013 Trends (Q2 Electric) Q2 % of Plan Numbers, 2012 vs. 2013 Electric 40% 34% 35% 31% Q2 as % of Plan Goal 27% 30% 25% 23% 25% 21% 21% 18% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Total C&I Total C&I Savings Spending 2012 2013 14

  15. 15 Gas Benefits, 2010-2012

  16. 16 Gas Annual Savings

  17. Cumulative Effect of Missed Annual Gas Savings Cumulative Missed Annual Savings: 2010 ‐ 2012 Gas 7,000,000 6,419,981 961,591 6,000,000 5,458,390 Missed Annual Savings (Therms) 3,117,394 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,340,996 2,000,000 1,000,000 ‐ 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 17

  18. Missed Annual Gas Savings were in C&I and Residential Over or Under Achievement of Annual Savings Goals: 2010 ‐ 2012 Gas 1,500 81% For 2010 ‐ 2012, Low Income gas savings were 27% higher than goal. C&I savings were 20% below 1,011 1,000 goal, and Residential savings were 8% below goal. 18% Over or Under Achievement of Savings Goals (Therms, 000) 500 0% 201 32 ‐ GOAL (283) (338) (352) (500) 5% 3% 37% (1,000) (962) 4% (1,500) (1,621) (1,720) (2,000) 14% 26% (2,341) (2,500) 17% (3,000) (3,117) (3,351) 17% (3,500) 36% Percentages are Over or Under Achievement as a % of the Annual Savings Goal (4,000) 2010 2011 2012 Residential Low Income C&I Statewide 18

  19. 19 Gas Expenditures in 2010-2012

  20. Expenditure Patterns Varied; Underinvestment in Gas C&I Over or Under Expenditure of Plan Budget: 2010 ‐ 2012 Gas $10,000 10% The C&I sector accounted for $18.5M (88%) of the $20.9M gas underinvestment in 2010 ‐ 2012. $7,033 19% $5,480 3% $5,000 $3,445 Over or Under Expenditure of Plan Budget ($, 000) 1% $453 $ ‐ PLAN $(4,237) $(4,052) $(5,000) 26% 15% $(5,356) $(5,522) $(5,614) 27% 13% 22% $(9,067) $(9,213) $(10,000) 26% 9% $(15,000) $(15,116) 19% Percentages are Over or Under Expenditures as a % of the Plan Budget $(20,000) 2010 2011 2012 Residential Low Income C&I Statewide 20

  21. 2013 Trends (Q2 Gas) Q2 % of Plan Numbers, 2012 vs. 2013 Gas 45% 42% 40% 36% 34% Q2 as % of Plan Goal 35% 26% 30% 22% 25% 19% 17% 20% 14% 15% 10% 5% 0% Total C&I Total C&I Savings Spending 2012 2013 21

  22. 22 OTHER SLIDES FOR REFERENCE

  23. Missed Electric Lifetime Savings Cumulative Missed Lifetime Savings: 2010 ‐ 2012 Electric 1,800,000 1,652,527 1,600,000 1,514,561 Missed Lifetime Savings (MWh) 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 137,966 84,837 53,129 0 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 23

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend