2007 SCE Business Briefing Challenges Integrating Electric - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2007 sce business briefing challenges integrating
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

2007 SCE Business Briefing Challenges Integrating Electric - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2007 SCE Business Briefing Challenges Integrating Electric Generation and Potable Aquifer Usage/Restoration: The Water- Electricity Nexus September 2008 David Asti, CPG 9044 Manager, Corporate Environmental Policy Southern California Edison


slide-1
SLIDE 1

2007 SCE Business Briefing

Challenges Integrating Electric Generation and Potable Aquifer Usage/Restoration: The Water- Electricity Nexus

September 2008

David Asti, CPG 9044 Manager, Corporate Environmental Policy Southern California Edison

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

2007 SCE Business Briefing

Outline

  • Context: Energy Needs vs. Water Supply
  • Overview of Steam Generator Needs
  • Mountainview Power Plant (MPP) as a case

study

  • Waste Disposal Issues
  • Project Benefits
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

2007 SCE Business Briefing

California’s Electricity Issues

  • Barely adequate supply (45,000+ MW needed for

hottest summer days)

  • Conservation techniques help, but...
  • Transmission & Distribution infrastructure needs

to be upgraded (not just a CA issue)

  • Availability of imported power declining
  • Existing base load plants aging and inefficient
  • Increasing demands

– Population increase of 12 million by 2020 – Most growth in hotter inland areas

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

2007 SCE Business Briefing

Typical “Cooler” Summer Day Load Forecast

Today's Outlook

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

2007 SCE Business Briefing

So Cal Water Resource Limitations

  • Climate is predominantly semi-arid to arid
  • State water policy

– strongly discourages use of fresh water for power plant cooling – promotes water conservation

  • Federal and state limits on wastewater

discharge

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

2007 SCE Business Briefing

Typical Power Plant Water Challenges

  • Gas-fired steam power plants require

~4-6,000 acre-ft/year per 1000 MW for wet cooling (MPP ~6,000 gpm at full load)

  • High ambient temperatures during peak

demand

  • Alternatives?

– Dry cooling technologies inefficient during high temperatures – Once-Through Cooling volumes unavailable in inland areas (§316(b) of CWA)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

2007 SCE Business Briefing

Generalized Combined Cycle Power Plant

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

2007 SCE Business Briefing

Mountainview Power Plant

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

2007 SCE Business Briefing

Mountainview Power Plant

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

2007 SCE Business Briefing

Mountainview Power Plant

  • New base load power plant
  • Water supply:

– 50% groundwater (Located in Bunker Hill Basin) – 50% Title 22 reclaimed wastewater

  • Wastewater treatment

– Two-pass reverse osmosis – Precipitation

  • Wastewater disposal

– Industrial brine line – Landfill of water treatment filtercake

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

2007 SCE Business Briefing

Where is this place?

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

2007 SCE Business Briefing

The Bunker Hill Basin

slide-13
SLIDE 13

2007 SCE Business Briefing

Bunker Hill Basin Info

  • Sub-basin of the Upper Santa Ana Valley
  • Surface Area of 89,600 acres (120 mi2)
  • Holocene & Pleistocene alluvial deposits
  • Largely sand, gravel, & boulders; some silt
  • 3 aquifers (lower, middle, upper)
  • Well yields up to 5,000 gpm (1,245 avg.)
  • About 24,000 AF natural recharge +

15,800 AF of artificial recharge

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

2007 SCE Business Briefing

Waste Management—Two Streams

  • Wastewater (300 gpm) discharged to

industrial brine line that drains the Inland Empire

  • Water Treatment filtercake

– Landfilled – Class II designated waste – SCE/City of Redlands cooperative project to double-line landfill

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

2007 SCE Business Briefing

Filtercake Disposal Evaluation

  • Risk management
  • Long-term availability
  • Costs
  • Political/regulatory feasibility

– ClO4 Contamination Protection Act of 2003

  • Proximity to MPP
  • Implementation schedule
slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

2007 SCE Business Briefing

Hauling and Disposal Estimates

Disposal Facility Mileage R/T Costs/Year Costs/30 yr. Lifetime Disposal Approval

Buttonwillow, CA (Hazardous) 370 $948,000 $28.44M Yes Buttonwillow, CA (non Hazardous) 370 $880,000 $26.40M Yes Beatty, NV 550 $921,000 $27.63M Yes San Diego, CA 210 $595,000 $17.85M No, but may be possible w/ negotiation Irvine, CA 98 $455,000 $13.65M No, but may be possible w/ negotiation Redlands Landfill (new facility dedicated to MPP) 4 Yes, after long negotiation

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

2007 SCE Business Briefing

Perspective--MPP to Landfill

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

2007 SCE Business Briefing

Project Benefits

  • Efficiently provide power to Californians

– Efficient use of fuel – limits greenhouse gases – Efficient use of water

  • Expedite remediation of aquifer

– Removing perchlorate

  • Protection of aquifer

– Use of reclaimed wastewater – Double-lined landfill

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

2007 SCE Business Briefing

Thanks for your attention; any questions?