2 Thanks Thanks to the organizers for the invitation to speak - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2 thanks
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

2 Thanks Thanks to the organizers for the invitation to speak - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Meson Investigations by the MAMI A2 Collaboration 15th International Workshop on Meson Physics Philippe Martel Krakow, Poland - 12 June 2017 Institute for Nuclear Physics Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz A 2 Thanks Thanks to the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Meson Investigations by the MAMI A2 Collaboration

15th International Workshop on Meson Physics

Philippe Martel

Krakow, Poland - 12 June 2017 Institute for Nuclear Physics Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz

2 A

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Thanks

  • Thanks to the organizers for the invitation to speak

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 1/26

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Thanks

  • Thanks to the organizers for the invitation to speak
  • Thanks to all of you for still being here (perhaps to the rain for

‘encouraging’ you all to come to the last day)

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 1/26

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Thanks

  • Thanks to the organizers for the invitation to speak
  • Thanks to all of you for still being here (perhaps to the rain for

‘encouraging’ you all to come to the last day)

  • Since we’re here, let’s talk about some meson physics at MAMI

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 1/26

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Outline

  • 1. What should we do
  • 2. What can we do
  • 3. What have we done
  • 4. What are we doing

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 2/26

slide-6
SLIDE 6

What should we do

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Should we study mesons?

  • We’ve had four days of talks regarding this...

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What should we do 3/26

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Should we study mesons?

  • We’ve had four days of talks regarding this...
  • If you are not already convinced, I’m not going to change your mind

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What should we do 3/26

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Should we study mesons?

  • We’ve had four days of talks regarding this...
  • If you are not already convinced, I’m not going to change your mind
  • Preferred stance of experimentalists: “Just let me go measure things.”

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What should we do 3/26

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Should we study mesons?

  • We’ve had four days of talks regarding this...
  • If you are not already convinced, I’m not going to change your mind
  • Preferred stance of experimentalists: “Just let me go measure things.”
  • Of course it’s always nice if your work is beneficial, so what would the

theorists like to have...

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What should we do 3/26

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Observables

Beam Target Recoil x y z x′ y′ z′ Unpolarized σ T P Linear Σ H P G Ox′ T Oz′ Circular F E Cx′ Cz′ Beam Target/Recoil x y z x′ y′ z′ x′ y′ z′ x′ y′ z′ Unpolarized Tx′ Tz′ Σ Lx′ Lz′ Linear Lz′ E Lx′ Cz′ σ Cx′ Tz′ F Tx′ Circular G Oz′ Ox′ H

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What should we do 4/26

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Observables

Beam Target Recoil Both x y z x x′ z′ x′ z′ Unpolarized σ T Tx′ Tz′ Linear Σ H P G Ox′ Oz′ Lz′ Lx′ Circular F E Cx′ Cz′ As L. Tiator described:

  • 16 total observables
  • 8 observables without recoil polarization
  • 8 observables without target polarization
  • Do not need all 16 to have complete picture

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What should we do 4/26

slide-13
SLIDE 13

What can we do

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Mainz Microtron (MAMI) e− Beam

  • Injector → 3.5 MeV
  • RTM1 → 14.9 MeV
  • RTM2 → 180 MeV
  • RTM3 → 883 MeV
  • HDSM → 1.6 GeV

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What can we do 5/26

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Polarized Photon Beam

A high energy electron can produce Bremsstrahlung (‘braking radiation’) photons when slowed down by a material.

  • Longitudinally polarized electron

beam produces circularly polarized photon beam (helicity transfer)

  • Pe measured with a Mott

polarimeter before the RTMs.

  • Circular beam helicity flipped by

alternating the e− beam polarization (≈ 1 Hz).

(MeV)

γ

E 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

e

/P

γ

P 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Pγ = Pe 4EγEe − E 2

γ

4E 2

e − 4EγEe + 3E 2 γ

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What can we do 6/26

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Polarized Photon Beam

A high energy electron can produce Bremsstrahlung (‘braking radiation’) photons when slowed down by a material.

  • Diamond radiator produces

linearly polarized photon beam (coherent Bremsstrahlung)

  • Polarization determined by fitting

the Bremsstrahlung distribution.

  • Linear beam orientation typically

flipped every two hours.

energy [MeV] γ Incident 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 Normalised Enhancement 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What can we do 6/26

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Photon Tagging

  • e− beam with energy E0,

strikes radiator producing Bremsstrahlung photon beam with energy distribution from 0 to E0.

  • Residual e− paths are

bent in a spectrometer magnet.

  • With proper magnetic

field, array of detectors determines the e− energy, and ‘tags’ the photon energy by energy conservation.

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What can we do 7/26

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Targets

Polarized frozen spin butanol target

  • Dynamic Nuclear Polarization (DNP)
  • Butanol (C4H9OH) for polarized protons
  • r D-Butanol (C4D9OD) for polarized

deuterons

  • Pmax

T

> 90%, τ > 1000 h Unpolarized targets

  • LH2/LD2
  • 4He
  • Solid targets (C, Al, Pb, etc.)

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What can we do 8/26

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Detectors

CB NaI PID MWPC Target TAPS BaF2 PbWO4

Crystal Ball (CB)

  • 672 NaI Crystals
  • 24 Particle Identification

Detector (PID) Paddles

  • 2 Multiwire Proportional

Chambers (MWPCs) Two Arms Photon Spectrometer (TAPS)

  • 366 BaF2 and 72 PbWO4

Crystals

  • 384 Veto Paddles

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What can we do 9/26

slide-20
SLIDE 20

What have we done

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Busy Two Years

  • Since Meson2016, we’ve been quite productive...

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 10/26

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Busy Two Years

  • Since Meson2016, we’ve been quite productive...
  • Taken
  • 3 weeks polarized target data
  • 6 weeks recoil polarimeter data
  • 6 weeks 4He target data
  • 3 weeks LD2 data
  • 16 weeks LH2 data
  • 2 weeks of tests
  • Total = 36 weeks (feels like more)

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 10/26

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Busy Two Years

  • Since Meson2016, we’ve been quite productive...
  • Taken
  • 3 weeks polarized target data
  • 6 weeks recoil polarimeter data
  • 6 weeks 4He target data
  • 3 weeks LD2 data
  • 16 weeks LH2 data
  • 2 weeks of tests
  • Total = 36 weeks (feels like more)
  • 1 EPJA, 1 PRL, 1 PLB, and 5 PRCs published
  • 1 PRC and 1 PRD accepted
  • 1 PLB submitted

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 10/26

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Σ - γp → π0p [S. Gardner, EPJA 52, 333 (2016)]

Well that’s a lot of data.

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 11/26

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Σ - γp → π0p [S. Gardner, EPJA 52, 333 (2016)]

That’s a little bit better.

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 11/26

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Σ - γp → π0p [S. Gardner, EPJA 52, 333 (2016)]

ˇ Σ(W , θ) = σ0(W , θ)Σ(W , θ) = q

k 2lmax

  • n=2

n (W )P2 n(cosθ)

2

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 11/26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

γp → ηp/γp → η′p [V. Kashevarov, PRL 118, 212001 (2017)]

0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3

  • 1
  • 0.5

0.5 1 -1

  • 0.5

0.5 1 W=1888 MeV W=1888 MeV

dσ/dΩ [μb/sr]

W=1888 MeV W=1888 MeV W=1938 MeV W=1938 MeV W=1956 MeV W=1956 MeV

cosΘη

*

(a) (b) (c) (d)

0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08

  • 1
  • 0.5

0.5 1 W=1925 MeV W=1925 MeV

dσ/dΩ [μb/sr]

W=1938 MeV W=1938 MeV W=1944 MeV W=1944 MeV W=1956 MeV W=1956 MeV

cosθη′

  • 1
  • 0.5

0.5 1

Present A2 data in magenta, previous in blue, CLAS [M. Williams et al., PRC 80, 045213 (2009)] in black crosses, CBELSA/TAPS [V. Crede et al., PRC 80 055202 (2009)] in open circles

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 12/26

slide-28
SLIDE 28

γp → ηp/γp → η′p [V. Kashevarov, PRL 118, 212001 (2017)]

1 2 3 1.65 1.7 1.75 1.8 1.85 1.9 1.95 2 2.05

W [GeV] σ [μb]

Run I Run II Run III CBELSA/TAPS-09 0.5 1 1.5 1.9 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 Run III CBELSA/TAPS-09 SAPHIR-98 ABBHHM-68 AHHM-76

W [GeV] σ [µb]

Present A2 data in magenta, CBELSA/TAPS [V. Crede et al., PRC 80 055202 (2009)] in open circles, with ηMAID-2003 [Nucl. Phys. A700, 429 (2002)] (black dotted), SAID-GE09 [Phys. Rev. C 82, 035208 (2010)] (blue), BG2014- 2 [EPJA 47, 153 (2011); EPJA 48, 15 (2012)] (magenta)

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 12/26

slide-29
SLIDE 29

π0 → e+e−γ [S. Prakov, PRC 95, 025202 (2017)]

Transition Form Factors (see talk by L. Heijkenskjoeld in Parallel Session B4)

  • Pion-exchange term aπ0

µ in HLbL scattering

  • Decay width of π0 → e+e−

]

2

[GeV/c

  • e

+

e

m

0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12

2

|

γ π

|F

0.9 0.95 1 1.05 1.1 1.15 1.2 1.25 1.3

p0 0.01709 ± 0.03113 p0 0.01709 ± 0.03113 p0 0.01709 ± 0.03113 p0 0.01709 ± 0.03113

(a)

This Work: Run I This Work: Fit I approxim. e Pad DA

]

2

[GeV/c

  • e

+

e

m

0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.9 0.95 1 1.05 1.1 1.15 1.2 1.25 1.3 p0 0.0115 ± 0.02924 p0 0.0115 ± 0.02924 p0 0.0115 ± 0.02924 p0 0.0115 ± 0.02924

(b)

This Work: Run II This Work: Fit II approxim. e Pad DA

]

2

[GeV/c

  • e

+

e

m

0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.9 0.95 1 1.05 1.1 1.15 1.2 1.25 1.3

p0 0.009552 ± 0.02983 p0 0.009552 ± 0.02983 p0 0.009552 ± 0.02983 p0 0.009552 ± 0.02983

(c)

This Work: Data This Work: Fit approxim. e Pad DA

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 13/26

slide-30
SLIDE 30

η → e+e−γ [S. Prakov, PRC 95, 035208 (2017)]

]

2

) [GeV/c

  • l

+

l m(

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

2

|

η

|F

1

p0 0.01086 ± 1.006 p1 0.1502 ± 1.931 p0 0.01086 ± 1.006 p1 0.1502 ± 1.931 p0 0.01086 ± 1.006 p1 0.1502 ± 1.931 p0 0.01086 ± 1.006 p1 0.1502 ± 1.931

(a)

This Work: Run I This Work: Run II This Work: Fit I DA (no a2) DA (with a2)

]

2

) [GeV/c

  • l

+

l m(

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 1

p0 0.01181 ± 1.001 p1 0.167 ± 2.015 p0 0.01181 ± 1.001 p1 0.167 ± 2.015 p0 0.01181 ± 1.001 p1 0.167 ± 2.015 p0 0.01181 ± 1.001 p1 0.167 ± 2.015

(b)

This Work: Run I This Work: Run II This Work: Fit II DA (no a2) DA (with a2)

]

2

) [GeV/c

  • l

+

l m(

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

2

|

η

|F

1

p0 0.008032 ± 1.004 p1 0.1138 ± 1.968 p0 0.008032 ± 1.004 p1 0.1138 ± 1.968 p0 0.008032 ± 1.004 p1 0.1138 ± 1.968 p0 0.008032 ± 1.004 p1 0.1138 ± 1.968

(a)

This Work: Data This Work: Fit A2, 2014 A2, 2011 TL calculation

  • appr. (2014)

e Pad

]

2

) [GeV/c

  • l

+

l m(

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 1

(b)

This Work: Data This Work: Fit NA60, In-In NA60, p-A DA (with a2)

  • appr. (2015)

e Pad Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 14/26

slide-31
SLIDE 31

ω → π0e+e− [S. Prakov, PRC 95, 035208 (2017)]

]

2

) [GeV/c

  • l

+

l m(

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

2

|

π ω

|F

1 10

p0 0.06585 ± 1.006 p1 0.2483 ± 1.96 p0 0.06585 ± 1.006 p1 0.2483 ± 1.96 p0 0.06585 ± 1.006 p1 0.2483 ± 1.96 p0 0.06585 ± 1.006 p1 0.2483 ± 1.96

(a)

This Work: Run I This Work: Run II This Work: Fit I (s)] Ω (s)=a

1

DA [f ] π 3 → ω DA [full

]

2

) [GeV/c

  • l

+

l m(

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 1 10

p0 0.07699 ± 1.009 p1 0.2758 ± 2.014 p0 0.07699 ± 1.009 p1 0.2758 ± 2.014 p0 0.07699 ± 1.009 p1 0.2758 ± 2.014 p0 0.07699 ± 1.009 p1 0.2758 ± 2.014

(b)

This Work: Run I This Work: Run II This Work: Fit II (s)] Ω (s)=a

1

DA [f ] π 3 → ω DA [full

]

2

) [GeV/c

  • l

+

l m(

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

2

|

π ω

|F

1 10

2

10

p0 0.05113 ± 1.006 p1 0.2057 ± 1.988 p0 0.05113 ± 1.006 p1 0.2057 ± 1.988 p0 0.05113 ± 1.006 p1 0.2057 ± 1.988 p0 0.05113 ± 1.006 p1 0.2057 ± 1.988

(a)

This Work: Data This Work: Fit NA60, In-In VMD TL calculation Caprini, N/D Canterbury appr.

]

2

) [GeV/c

  • l

+

l m(

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 1 10

2

10

(b)

This Work: Data This Work: Fit NA60, p-A Lepton-G ] π 3 → ω DA [full Caprini, DA

]

2

) [GeV/c

  • l

+

l m(

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 1 10

2

10

(c)

This Work: Data This Work: Fit NA60, In-In JPAC, F

NA60 1

+F JPAC, F

NA60 1,2

+F JPAC, F

A2 1

+F JPAC, F

A2 1,2

+F JPAC, F

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 15/26

slide-32
SLIDE 32

E - γd → ηX [L. Witthauer, PRC 95 055201 (2017)]

Easier to study protons than neutrons, sometimes neutron results unexpected

  • Narrow structure previously seen in γn → ηn at W≈1685 MeV
  • Seems to only appear in σ1/2 (S11/P11 partial waves)
  • Large N(1675)5/2− (MAID) or BnGa with narrow P11 ruled out

η p → p γ

vers (1) vers (2) MAID BnGa

η n → n γ

vers (1) vers (2) MAID BnGa (a) 1500 1600 1700 1800 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 0.5 1

W [MeV] E asymmetry

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 16/26

slide-33
SLIDE 33

E - γd → ηX [L. Witthauer, PRC 95 055201 (2017)]

p 1/2

σ

vers (1) vers (2) vers (3) free MAID BnGa

p 3/2

σ

1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 20

  • 2

2 4

W [MeV] b] µ [ σ

n 1/2

σ

vers (1) vers (2) vers (3) MAID BnGa (a)

n 3/2

σ

1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 10 20

  • 2

2 4

W [MeV] b] µ [ σ

  • FIG. 13. Helicity-dependent cross sections

and for the proton (left) and the neutron (right) as a function of the reconstructed

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 16/26

slide-34
SLIDE 34

E - γd → ηX [L. Witthauer, PRC 95 055201 (2017)]

p 1/2

σ 10 ×

p 3/2

σ

n 1/2

σ 10 ×

n 3/2

σ A

1

A

2

A

MAID BnGa (a) BnGa (b) BnGa (c) 3

A

1500 1600 1700 1800 1500 1600 1700 1800 1500 1600 1700 1800 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2 4 6 8

  • 0.5

0.5

  • 0.5

0.5 1

  • 1.5
  • 1
  • 0.5

0.5 1

W [MeV] b/sr] µ [

i

A

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 16/26

slide-35
SLIDE 35

σ - γd → π0X [M. Dieterle, PRC (Accepted)]

γp→pπo γn→nπo γp→nπ+ γn→pπ- 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2

  • 1

1

W[GeV]

  • 1

1 -1 1

cos(Θπ) *

  • 1

1

Lots of proton data, often missing neutron data

  • No free neutron target (I think you’ve heard)
  • Can use deuterium (or helium, or...), but FSI
  • If FSI are similar for protons and neutrons in deuterium, perhaps the

former can be used to correct the latter

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 17/26

slide-36
SLIDE 36

σ - γd → π0X [M. Dieterle, PRC (Accepted)]

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 2 4 6 8 10 12

p(n)) π ( σ fit MAID SAID BnGa

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 2 4 6 8 10 12 W=1312 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 2 4 6 8 10 12 1324 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 2 4 6 8 10 12 1336 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 2 4 6 8 10 12 1348 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 2 4 6 8 10 12 1360 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 1372 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 1384 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 1396 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 1408 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 1420 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 1432 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 5 1444 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 5 1456 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 5 1468 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 5 1480 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 5 1492 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 5 1504 MeV 1 2 3 4 5 6

1516 MeV

1 2 3 4 5 6

1528 MeV

1 2 3 4 5 6

1540 MeV

1 2 3 4 5 6

1552 MeV

1 2 3 4 5 6

1564 MeV

1 2 3 4 5 6

1576 MeV

1 2 3 4

1588 MeV

1 2 3 4

1600 MeV

1 2 3 4

1612 MeV

1 2 3 4

1624 MeV

1 2 3 4

1636 MeV

1 2 3 4

1648 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 1660 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 1672 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 1684 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 1696 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 1708 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 1720 MeV 0.5 1 1.5 2 1732 MeV 0.5 1 1.5 2 1744 MeV 0.5 1 1.5 2 1756 MeV 0.5 1 1.5 2 1768 MeV 0.5 1 1.5 2 1780 MeV 0.5 1 1.5 2 1792 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 1804 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 1816 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 1828 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 1840 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 1852 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 1864 MeV
  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5

2 4 6 8 10 12 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 1 2 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1

* )

π

θ cos( b/sr] µ [ Ω /d σ d

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 5 10 15

n(p)) π ( σ fit MAID SAID BnGa

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 5 10 15

W=1312 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 5 10 15

1324 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 5 10 15

1336 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 5 10 15

1348 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 5 10 15

1360 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 2 4 6 8 1372 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 2 4 6 8 1384 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 2 4 6 8 1396 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 2 4 6 8 1408 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 2 4 6 8 1420 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 2 4 6 8 1432 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 1444 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 1456 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 1468 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 1480 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 1492 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 1504 MeV 1 2 3 4 1516 MeV 1 2 3 4 1528 MeV 1 2 3 4 1540 MeV 1 2 3 4 1552 MeV 1 2 3 4 1564 MeV 1 2 3 4 1576 MeV 1 2 3 1588 MeV 1 2 3 1600 MeV 1 2 3 1612 MeV 1 2 3 1624 MeV 1 2 3 1636 MeV 1 2 3 1648 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1660 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1672 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1684 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1696 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1708 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1720 MeV 0.5 1 1.5 1732 MeV 0.5 1 1.5 1744 MeV 0.5 1 1.5 1756 MeV 0.5 1 1.5 1768 MeV 0.5 1 1.5 1780 MeV 0.5 1 1.5 1792 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 1804 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 1816 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 1828 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 1840 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 1852 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 1864 MeV
  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5

5 10 15 2 4 6 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 0.5 1 1.5 2 0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5

* )

π

θ cos( b/sr] µ [ Ω /d σ d

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 17/26

slide-37
SLIDE 37

σ - γd → π0X [M. Dieterle, PRC (Accepted)]

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 5 10 15

n(p)) π ( σ fit MAID SAID BnGa

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 5 10 15

W=1312 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 5 10 15

1324 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 5 10 15

1336 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 5 10 15

1348 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 5 10 15

1360 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 2 4 6 8 1372 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 2 4 6 8 1384 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 2 4 6 8 1396 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 2 4 6 8 1408 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 2 4 6 8 1420 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 2 4 6 8 1432 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 1444 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 1456 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 1468 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 1480 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 1492 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 1504 MeV 1 2 3 4 1516 MeV 1 2 3 4 1528 MeV 1 2 3 4 1540 MeV 1 2 3 4 1552 MeV 1 2 3 4 1564 MeV 1 2 3 4 1576 MeV 1 2 3 1588 MeV 1 2 3 1600 MeV 1 2 3 1612 MeV 1 2 3 1624 MeV 1 2 3 1636 MeV 1 2 3 1648 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1660 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1672 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1684 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1696 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1708 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1720 MeV 0.5 1 1.5 1732 MeV 0.5 1 1.5 1744 MeV 0.5 1 1.5 1756 MeV 0.5 1 1.5 1768 MeV 0.5 1 1.5 1780 MeV 0.5 1 1.5 1792 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 1804 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 1816 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 1828 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 1840 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 1852 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 1864 MeV
  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5

5 10 15 2 4 6 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 0.5 1 1.5 2 0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5

* )

π

θ cos( b/sr] µ [ Ω /d σ d

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 5 10 15

n) π ( σ fit MAID SAID BnGa

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 5 10 15 W=1312 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 5 10 15 1324 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 5 10 15 1336 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 5 10 15 1348 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 5 10 15 1360 MeV 2 4 6 8 1372 MeV 2 4 6 8 1384 MeV 2 4 6 8 1396 MeV 2 4 6 8 1408 MeV 2 4 6 8 1420 MeV 2 4 6 8 1432 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 1444 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 1456 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 1468 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 1480 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 1492 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 1504 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 1516 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 1528 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 1540 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 1552 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 1564 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3 4 1576 MeV 1 2 3 1588 MeV 1 2 3 1600 MeV 1 2 3 1612 MeV 1 2 3 1624 MeV 1 2 3 1636 MeV 1 2 3 1648 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1660 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1672 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1684 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1696 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1708 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1720 MeV 0.5 1 1.5 1732 MeV 0.5 1 1.5 1744 MeV 0.5 1 1.5 1756 MeV 0.5 1 1.5 1768 MeV 0.5 1 1.5 1780 MeV 0.5 1 1.5 1792 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 1804 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 1816 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 1828 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 1840 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 1852 MeV
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 1864 MeV
  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5

5 10 15 2 4 6 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 0.5 1 1.5 2 0.5 1 0.5 1 1.5

* )

π

θ cos( b/sr] µ [ Ω /d σ d

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 17/26

slide-38
SLIDE 38

σ - γd → π0X [M. Dieterle, PRC (Accepted)]

1400 1600 1800 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

* ) < -0.9

π

θ

  • 1.0 < cos(
1400 1600 1800 1

* ) < -0.8

π

θ

  • 0.9 < cos(
1400 1600 1800 0.5 1 1.5 2.5

*) < -0.7

π

θ

  • 0.8 < cos(
1400 1600 1800 1

* ) < -0.6

π

θ

  • 0.7 < cos(
1400 1600 1800 0.5 1 1.5 2.5

* ) < -0.5

π

θ

  • 0.6 < cos(
1400 1600 1800 1 2 3

* ) < -0.4

π

θ

  • 0.5 < cos(
1400 1600 1800 1

* ) < -0.3

π

θ

  • 0.4 < cos(
1400 1600 1800 1

* ) < -0.2

π

θ

  • 0.3 < cos(
1400 1600 1800 1

* ) < -0.1

π

θ

  • 0.2 < cos(
1400 1600 1800 1

* ) < 0.0

π

θ

  • 0.1 < cos(
1400 1600 1800 1 2 3

* ) < 0.1

π

θ 0.0 < cos(

1400 1600 1800 1

* ) < 0.2

π

θ 0.1 < cos(

1400 1600 1800 1

* ) < 0.3

π

θ 0.2 < cos(

1400 1600 1800 1

* ) < 0.4

π

θ 0.3 < cos(

1400 1600 1800 1

* ) < 0.5

π

θ 0.4 < cos(

1400 1600 1800 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

* ) < 0.6

π

θ 0.5 < cos(

1400 1600 1800 1

* ) < 0.7

π

θ 0.6 < cos(

1400 1600 1800 0.5 1 1.5 2.5

* ) < 0.8

π

θ 0.7 < cos(

1400 1600 1800 1

* ) < 0.9

π

θ 0.8 < cos(

1400 1600 1800 0.5 1 1.5 2.5

p(n) π n(p) π MAID SAID BnGa

1400 1600 1400 1600 1400 1600 1400 1600 1400 1600 1800 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1 2 3 1 2 3 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

W [MeV] b/sr] µ [ Ω /d σ d

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 17/26

slide-39
SLIDE 39

σ - γd → π0X [M. Dieterle, PRC (Accepted)]

1400 1600 1800 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

* ) < -0.9

π

θ

  • 1.0 < cos(
1400 1600 1800 1

* ) < -0.8

π

θ

  • 0.9 < cos(
1400 1600 1800 0.5 1 1.5 2.5

*) < -0.7

π

θ

  • 0.8 < cos(
1400 1600 1800 1

* ) < -0.6

π

θ

  • 0.7 < cos(
1400 1600 1800 0.5 1 1.5 2.5

* ) < -0.5

π

θ

  • 0.6 < cos(
1400 1600 1800 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

* ) < -0.4

π

θ

  • 0.5 < cos(
1400 1600 1800 1

* ) < -0.3

π

θ

  • 0.4 < cos(
1400 1600 1800 0.5 1 1.5 2.5

* ) < -0.2

π

θ

  • 0.3 < cos(
1400 1600 1800 1

* ) < -0.1

π

θ

  • 0.2 < cos(
1400 1600 1800 0.5 1 1.5 2.5

* ) < 0.0

π

θ

  • 0.1 < cos(
1400 1600 1800 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

* ) < 0.1

π

θ 0.0 < cos(

1400 1600 1800 1

* ) < 0.2

π

θ 0.1 < cos(

1400 1600 1800 0.5 1 1.5 2.5

* ) < 0.3

π

θ 0.2 < cos(

1400 1600 1800 1

* ) < 0.4

π

θ 0.3 < cos(

1400 1600 1800 0.5 1 1.5 2.5

* ) < 0.5

π

θ 0.4 < cos(

1400 1600 1800 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

* ) < 0.6

π

θ 0.5 < cos(

1400 1600 1800 1

* ) < 0.7

π

θ 0.6 < cos(

1400 1600 1800 0.5 1 1.5 2.5

* ) < 0.8

π

θ 0.7 < cos(

1400 1600 1800 1

* ) < 0.9

π

θ 0.8 < cos(

1400 1600 1800 0.5 1 1.5 2.5

n π MAID SAID BnGa

1400 1600 1400 1600 1400 1600 1400 1600 1400 1600 1800 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

W [MeV] b/sr] µ [ Ω /d σ d

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 17/26

slide-40
SLIDE 40

σ - γd → π0X [M. Dieterle, PRC (Accepted)]

W [MeV]

1400 1600 1800

b] µ [ σ

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

W [MeV]

1400 1600 1800

p

σ /

n

σ

0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

b] [ W [MeV]

1400 1600 1800

b] µ [ σ

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

W [MeV]

1400 1600 1800

p

σ /

n

σ

0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 17/26

slide-41
SLIDE 41

σ - γd → π0X [M. Dieterle, PRC (Accepted)]

  • 1
1

/B

1

B

  • 1
1

/B

2

B

  • 1
1

/B

3

B

  • 1
1

/B

4

B

  • 1

/B

5

B

  • 1

/B

6

B

1400 1600 1800 1400 1600 1800

  • 1

1

  • 1

1

  • 1

W [MeV] /B

i

B

  • 1
1

/B

1

B

  • 1
1

/B

2

B

  • 0.5
0.5

/B

3

B

0.5

/B

4

B

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5

/B

5

B

  • 1
0.5

/B

6

B

1400 1600 1800 1400 1600 1800

  • 1

1

  • 0.5

0.5

  • 1
  • 0.5

0.5

W [MeV] /B

i

B

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 17/26

slide-42
SLIDE 42

γp → π0ηp [V. Sokhoyan, PRC 97 055212 (2018)]

Three body final states (decay modes and missing resonances)

[GeV] γ E 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 b] µ p) [ η π → p γ (

tot

σ 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5

A2 data (△/), CBELSA/TAPS (⋆/△), GRAAL (♦), old A2 () data; BnGa: total (dash-dotted), ∆(1232)η (dashed), N(1535)π0 (dotted), and a0(980)p (long-dash-dotted); and Mainz: total (solid), resonant (long-dashed), background (dash-double-dotted), and Born (dash-triple-dotted)

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 18/26

slide-43
SLIDE 43

γd → π0ηX [A. Kaeser, PLB (Submitted)]

  • 1
  • 0.5

0.5 1 1700 1800 1900 W[MeV] E

γd→pπ0η(n) E (A) γd→pπ0η(n) E (B)

  • 0.5

E 1900

  • 1
  • 0.5

0.5 1 1700 1800 1900 W[MeV] E

γd→nπ0η(p) E (A) γd→nπ0η(p) E (B)

  • The two helicity components contribute identically
  • True for both participant protons and neutrons
  • Absolute couplings for protons and neutrons are identical
  • Contributing nucleon resonances (threshold up to inv. masses of 1.9

GeV) have almost equal electromagnetic helicity couplings An,p

1/2 and An,p 3/2

  • Typical for ∆ resonances, identical A1/2 and A3/2 components for any

nucleon target only possible for J ≥ 3/2 states, constrains possible

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 19/26

slide-44
SLIDE 44

γd → π0ηX [A. Kaeser, PLB (Submitted)]

1 2 3 1600 1700 1800 1900 W[MeV] σ[µb] γd→pπ0η(n) σ1/2 (1) γd→pπ0η(n) σ1/2 (2) γd→pπ0η(n) σ1/2 (3) 1 2 3 1600 1700 1800 1900 W[MeV] σ[µb] γd→pπ0η(n) σ3/2 (1) γd→pπ0η(n) σ3/2 (2) γd→pπ0η(n) σ3/2 (3) 1 2 3 1600 1700 1800 1900 W[MeV] σ[µb] γd→nπ0η(p) σ1/2 (1) γd→nπ0η(p) σ1/2 (2) γd→nπ0η(p) σ1/2 (3) 1 2 3 1600 1700 1800 1900 W[MeV] σ[µb] γd→nπ0η(p) σ3/2 (1) γd→nπ0η(p) σ3/2 (2) γd→nπ0η(p) σ3/2 (3)

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 19/26

slide-45
SLIDE 45

γd → π0ηX [A. Kaeser, PLB (Submitted)]

1 2 3 1600 1700 1800 1900 W[MeV] σ1/2,σ3/2[µb]

γd→pπ0η(n) σ1/2 γd→pπ0η(n) σ3/2

σ ,σ [µb] 1900 1 2 3 1600 1700 1800 1900 W[MeV] σ1/2,σ3/2[µb]

γd→nπ0η(p) σ1/2 γd→nπ0η(p) σ3/2

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What have we done 19/26

slide-46
SLIDE 46

What are we doing

slide-47
SLIDE 47

G - γp → π0p (K. Spieker, Bonn, Preliminary)

Preliminary results

A2 and CBELSA/TAPS [PRL 109 (2012) 102001] data, with BnGa 2014-02 and BnGa 2014-01 [EPJA 50 (2014) 74], MAID-07 [EPJA 34 (2007) 69], and SAID-CM12 [PRC 86 (2012) 015202]

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What are we doing 20/26

slide-48
SLIDE 48

G - γp → π0p (K. Spieker, Bonn, Preliminary)

Preliminary results

A2 and CBELSA/TAPS [PRL 109 (2012) 102001] data, with BnGa 2014-02 and BnGa 2014-01 [EPJA 50 (2014) 74], MAID-07 [EPJA 34 (2007) 69], and SAID-CM12 [PRC 86 (2012) 015202]

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What are we doing 20/26

slide-49
SLIDE 49

G - γp → π+n (K. Spieker, Bonn, Preliminary)

Preliminary results

A2 data, with BnGa 2014-02 and BnGa 2014-01 [EPJA 50 (2014) 74], MAID-07 [EPJA 34 (2007) 69], and SAID-CM12 [PRC 86 (2012) 015202]

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What are we doing 21/26

slide-50
SLIDE 50

G - γp → π+n (K. Spieker, Bonn, Preliminary)

Preliminary results

A2 data, with BnGa 2014-02 and BnGa 2014-01 [EPJA 50 (2014) 74], MAID-07 [EPJA 34 (2007) 69], and SAID-CM12 [PRC 86 (2012) 015202]

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What are we doing 21/26

slide-51
SLIDE 51

E - γp → π0p (F. Afzal, Bonn, Preliminary)

Preliminary results

A2 and CBELSA/TAPS [PRL 112 (2014) 012003] data, with BnGa 2014-02 and BnGa 2014-01 [EPJA 50 (2014) 74], JuBo 2016-3.1, and SAID-CM12 [PRC 86 (2012) 015202]

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What are we doing 22/26

slide-52
SLIDE 52

E - γp → π0p (F. Afzal, Bonn, Preliminary)

Preliminary results

A2 and CBELSA/TAPS [PRL 112 (2014) 012003] data, with BnGa 2014-02 and BnGa 2014-01 [EPJA 50 (2014) 74], JuBo 2016-3.1, and SAID-CM12 [PRC 86 (2012) 015202]

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What are we doing 22/26

slide-53
SLIDE 53

E - γp → π0p (F. Afzal, Bonn, Preliminary)

A2 and CBELSA/TAPS [PRL 112 (2014) 012003] data, with BnGa 2014-02 and BnGa 2014-01 [EPJA 50 (2014) 74], JuBo 2016-3.1, and SAID-CM12 [PRC 86 (2012) 015202]

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What are we doing 22/26

slide-54
SLIDE 54

E - γp → ηp (F. Afzal, Bonn, Preliminary)

Preliminary results

A2 and CBELSA/TAPS [PRL 112 (2014) 012003] data, with BnGa 2014-02 and BnGa 2014-01 [EPJA 50 (2014) 74], JuBo 2016-3.1, and SAID-GE09 [PRC 86 (2012) 015202]

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What are we doing 23/26

slide-55
SLIDE 55

E - γd → π0X (F. Cividini, Mainz, Preliminary)

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What are we doing 24/26

slide-56
SLIDE 56

E - γd → π0X (F. Cividini, Mainz, Preliminary)

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What are we doing 24/26

slide-57
SLIDE 57

E - γd → π0X (F. Cividini, Mainz, Preliminary)

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What are we doing 24/26

slide-58
SLIDE 58

E - γd → π0X (F. Cividini, Mainz, Preliminary)

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What are we doing 24/26

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Talks maybe you now wish you had seen

  • F. Cividini (E - γd → π0X - Parallel Session A6)
  • C. Collicott (Symmetry violating η decays - Parallel Session C5)
  • D. Ghosal (γd → π0π+/−X - Parallel Session A6)
  • L. Heijkenskjoeld (Transition Form Factors - Parallel Session B4)

Special shout-out to P. Adlarson, whose paper on η′ → π0π0η was just accepted by PRD, and whose results I did not have time to show after realizing that he was not presenting them here...

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What are we doing 25/26

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Conclusions

  • We’ve measured a bunch of stuff
  • σ, Σ, T, F, E, G
  • Looking at proton and neutron (via deuterium, studying FSI)
  • Investigating multi-meson final states
  • We’re still measuring stuff
  • E and G on proton and neutron
  • Recoil observables
  • We’ll continuing measuring stuff
  • Transition Form Factors
  • Future end-point-tagger runs for η′
  • Active targets to improve threshold region

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What are we doing 26/26

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Conclusions

  • We’ve measured a bunch of stuff
  • σ, Σ, T, F, E, G
  • Looking at proton and neutron (via deuterium, studying FSI)
  • Investigating multi-meson final states
  • We’re still measuring stuff
  • E and G on proton and neutron
  • Recoil observables
  • We’ll continuing measuring stuff
  • Transition Form Factors
  • Future end-point-tagger runs for η′
  • Active targets to improve threshold region
  • Thank you for your attention!

Philippe Martel - Meson A2 - What are we doing 26/26

slide-62
SLIDE 62

σ - γd → π0X [M. Dieterle, PRC (Accepted)]

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

np,π

0d

π → d γ this work et al. Krusche

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 2 4 6

=530 MeV

γ

E

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

590 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

660 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

705 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

765 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

832 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1 2 3

938 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

1028 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

1118 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

1208 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

1312 MeV

  • 0.5 0

0.5

  • 0.5 0

0.5

  • 0.5 0

0.5

  • 0.5 0

0.5

  • 0.5 0

0.5

  • 0.5 0

0.5 2 4 6 1 2

*)

π

θ cos( b/sr] µ [ Ω /d σ (1/A)d

Philippe Martel - Meson A2

slide-63
SLIDE 63

σ - γd → π0X [M. Dieterle, PRC (Accepted)]

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

(np,d) π0 n(p) π0 p(n)+ π

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

=488 MeV

γ

E

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

502 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

518 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

532 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

548 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

562 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

578 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

592 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

608 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

622 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

638 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

652 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

668 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

682 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

698 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

712 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

728 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

742 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

758 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

772 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

788 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

802 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

818 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

832 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

848 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

862 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

878 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

892 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

908 MeV 922 MeV 938 MeV 952 MeV 968 MeV 982 MeV 998 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

1012 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

1028 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

1042 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

1058 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

1072 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

1088 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

1102 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

1118 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

1132 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

1148 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

1162 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

1178 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

1192 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

1208 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

1222 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

1238 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1

1252 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1

1268 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

1282 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

1298 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

1312 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1

1328 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1

1342 MeV

  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1

1358 MeV

  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5
  • 0.5 0 0.5

5 10 15 5 2 4 6 2 4 6 2 4 2 2 4 2 1 2 1 2

* )

π

θ cos( b/sr] µ [ Ω /d σ d

Philippe Martel - Meson A2

slide-64
SLIDE 64

σ - γd → π0X [M. Dieterle, PRC (Accepted)]

600 800 1000 1200 1

* ) < -0.9

π

θ

  • 1.0 < cos(
600 800 1000 1200 1

* ) < -0.8

π

θ

  • 0.9 < cos(
600 800 1000 1200

*) < -0.7

π

θ

  • 0.8 < cos(
600 800 1000 1200 1 2 3

* ) < -0.6

π

θ

  • 0.7 < cos(
600 800 1000 1200 1

* ) < -0.5

π

θ

  • 0.6 < cos(
600 800 1000 1200 1

* ) < -0.4

π

θ

  • 0.5 < cos(
600 800 1000 1200 1

* ) < -0.3

π

θ

  • 0.4 < cos(
600 800 1000 1200

* ) < -0.2

π

θ

  • 0.3 < cos(
600 800 1000 1200 1 2 3 4

* ) < -0.1

π

θ

  • 0.2 < cos(
600 800 1000 1200 1

* ) < 0.0

π

θ

  • 0.1 < cos(
600 800 1000 1200 1

* ) < 0.1

π

θ 0.0 < cos(

600 800 1000 1200 1

* ) < 0.2

π

θ 0.1 < cos(

600 800 1000 1200

* ) < 0.3

π

θ 0.2 < cos(

600 800 1000 1200 1 2 3 4

* ) < 0.4

π

θ 0.3 < cos(

600 800 1000 1200 1

* ) < 0.5

π

θ 0.4 < cos(

600 800 1000 1200 1

* ) < 0.6

π

θ 0.5 < cos(

600 800 1000 1200 1

* ) < 0.7

π

θ 0.6 < cos(

600 800 1000 1200

* ) < 0.8

π

θ 0.7 < cos(

600 800 1000 1200 1 2 3

* ) < 0.9

π

θ 0.8 < cos(

600 800 1000 1200 1

(np,d) π n(p) π p(n)+ π

800 1000 800 1000 800 1000 800 1000 800 1000 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2

[MeV]

γ

E b/sr] µ [ Ω /d σ d

Philippe Martel - Meson A2

slide-65
SLIDE 65

σ - γd → π0X [M. Dieterle, PRC (Accepted)]

[MeV]

γ

E

600 800 1000 1200

b] µ [ σ

20 40 60 80 100 120 140

[MeV]

γ

E

500 1000

p+n

σ /

np

σ

1 1.05 1.1 1.15 Philippe Martel - Meson A2

slide-66
SLIDE 66

γp → π0ηp [V. Sokhoyan, PRC 97 055212 (2018)]

  • 1
  • 0.5

0.5 1 H

W

0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 =0.95-1.00 GeV

γ

E

  • 1
  • 0.5

0.5 1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 =1.00-1.05 GeV

γ

E

  • 1
  • 0.5

0.5 1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 =1.05-1.10 GeV

γ

E

  • 1
  • 0.5

0.5 1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 =1.10-1.15 GeV

γ

E

  • 1
  • 0.5

0.5 1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 =1.15-1.20 GeV

γ

E

π

θ cos

  • 1
  • 0.5

0.5 1 H

W

0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 =1.20-1.25 GeV

γ

E

π

θ cos

  • 1
  • 0.5

0.5 1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 =1.25-1.30 GeV

γ

E

π

θ cos

  • 1
  • 0.5

0.5 1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 =1.30-1.35 GeV

γ

E

π

θ cos

  • 1
  • 0.5

0.5 1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 =1.35-1.40 GeV

γ

E

π

θ cos

  • 1
  • 0.5

0.5 1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 =1.40-1.45 GeV

γ

E

Philippe Martel - Meson A2

slide-67
SLIDE 67

γp → π0ηp [V. Sokhoyan, PRC 97 055212 (2018)]

0.5 1 1.5 2 H

W

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 =0.95-1.00 GeV

γ

E 0.5 1 1.5 2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 =1.00-1.05 GeV

γ

E 0.5 1 1.5 2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 =1.05-1.10 GeV

γ

E 0.5 1 1.5 2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 =1.10-1.15 GeV

γ

E 0.5 1 1.5 2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 =1.15-1.20 GeV

γ

E

] π [rad/

π

φ

0.5 1 1.5 2 H

W

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 =1.20-1.25 GeV

γ

E

] π [rad/

π

φ

0.5 1 1.5 2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 =1.25-1.30 GeV

γ

E

] π [rad/

π

φ

0.5 1 1.5 2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 =1.30-1.35 GeV

γ

E

] π [rad/

π

φ

0.5 1 1.5 2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 =1.35-1.40 GeV

γ

E

] π [rad/

π

φ

0.5 1 1.5 2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 =1.40-1.45 GeV

γ

E

Philippe Martel - Meson A2

slide-68
SLIDE 68

γp → π0ηp [V. Sokhoyan, PRC 97 055212 (2018)]

0.5 1 1.5 2

  • I
  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.2 0.4 =0.95-1.00 GeV

γ

E 0.5 1 1.5 2

  • 0.2
  • 0.1

0.1 0.2 =1.00-1.05 GeV

γ

E 0.5 1 1.5 2

  • 0.2
  • 0.1

0.1 0.2 =1.05-1.10 GeV

γ

E 0.5 1 1.5 2

  • 0.2
  • 0.1

0.1 0.2 =1.10-1.15 GeV

γ

E 0.5 1 1.5 2

  • 0.2
  • 0.1

0.1 0.2 =1.15-1.20 GeV

γ

E

] π [rad/

π

φ

0.5 1 1.5 2

  • I
  • 0.15
  • 0.1
  • 0.05

0.05 0.1 0.15 =1.20-1.25 GeV

γ

E

] π [rad/

π

φ

0.5 1 1.5 2

  • 0.15
  • 0.1
  • 0.05

0.05 0.1 0.15 =1.25-1.30 GeV

γ

E

] π [rad/

π

φ

0.5 1 1.5 2

  • 0.15
  • 0.1
  • 0.05

0.05 0.1 0.15 =1.30-1.35 GeV

γ

E

] π [rad/

π

φ

0.5 1 1.5 2

  • 0.15
  • 0.1
  • 0.05

0.05 0.1 0.15 =1.35-1.40 GeV

γ

E

] π [rad/

π

φ

0.5 1 1.5 2

  • 0.15
  • 0.1
  • 0.05

0.05 0.1 0.15 =1.40-1.45 GeV

γ

E

Philippe Martel - Meson A2

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Frozen Spin Target

How are the protons actually polarized? Through Dynamic Nuclear Polarization (DNP):

  • Cool target to 0.2 Kelvin.
  • Use 2.5 Tesla magnet to align electron spins.
  • Pump ≈ 70 GHz microwaves (just above, or below, the Electron Spin

Resonance frequency), causing spin-flips between the electrons and protons.

  • Cool target to 0.025 Kelvin, ‘freezing’ proton spins in place.
  • Remove polarizing magnet.
  • Energize 0.6 Tesla ‘holding’ coil in the cryostat to maintain the

polarization.

  • Relaxation times > 1000 hours.
  • Polarizations up to 90%.

Philippe Martel - Meson A2

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Crystal Ball - Charged Particle Detection

Particle Identification Detector (PID)

  • Barrel of 24 plastic paddles
  • Each covers 15 < θ < 159◦, and

15◦ in φ

  • Plot ∆E in PID vs E in NaI

Multiwire Proportional Chamber (MWPC)

  • Two chambers: anode wires

sandwiched by two layers of cathode strips

  • Voltage between wires and strips

increases when gas is ionized

Philippe Martel - Meson A2

slide-71
SLIDE 71

TAPS - Charged Particle Detection

Veto scintillators

  • 5mm plastic scintillators in front
  • f each crystal
  • Same method as PID (plot ∆E vs

E) Time of Flight

  • Given its increased distance from

the target, massive particles take noticeably longer to reach TAPS

  • Plot time vs E, identify nucleons

Philippe Martel - Meson A2

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Active Target

Requirements

  • Polarizable Scintillator
  • High light output
  • High rate capability
  • Low thermal energy input
  • Detectors working at 4K

Targets from UMass Amherst Tested at MAMI - Pol > 50%

Neutral Pion Phi (deg) 150 − 100 − 50 − 50 100 150 )

  • +N

+

)/(N

  • N

+

(N 0.015 − 0.01 − 0.005 − 0.005 0.01 0.015

Philippe Martel - Meson A2