2 nd threshold of error field penetration in n 1 and n 2
play

2 nd threshold of error field penetration in n=1 and n=2 mixed NA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 2 nd threshold of error field penetration in n=1 and n=2 mixed NA field experiment 2014 KSTAR Conference February 26, 2014 Jayhyun Kim (jayhyunkim@nfri.re.kr) 1 , Y.In 1 , G. Kim 2 , G. Yun 2 , Junyoung Kim 3 , J.W. Yoo 3 , J. Seol 1 , J.K.


  1. 1 2 nd threshold of error field penetration in n=1 and n=2 mixed NA field experiment 2014 KSTAR Conference February 26, 2014 Jayhyun Kim (jayhyunkim@nfri.re.kr) 1 , Y.In 1 , G. Kim 2 , G. Yun 2 , Junyoung Kim 3 , J.W. Yoo 3 , J. Seol 1 , J.K. Park 4 , Y. Park 5 , S.A. Sabbagh 5 and the KSTAR team Acknowledgement to C. Paz-Soldan (General Atomics, United states) 1 National Fusion Research Institute, Korea 2 Pohang University of Science and Technology, Korea 3 University of Science and Technology, Korea 4 Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, United states 5 Columbia University, United states

  2. 2 Motivation of work ITER and also KSTAR plan to use various non-axisymmetric (NA) field controls such • as EF correction (n=1, 2), RWM (n=1, 2…), and ELM (n=4, 3). The fields used in the controls have their own optimal spectra. • They affect each other as resonant and also non-resonant way. • We should address the effect of overlap (especially among different toroidal modes) • In theory ( A.J. Cole et al., 2007 Phys. Rev. Letters ): • The plasma is less susceptible to error-field penetration and locking, by a factor that – depends on the non-resonant error-field amplitude. In experiment ( M.E. Fenstermacher et al., 2008 Phys. Plasmas ): • ELM suppression is obtained over an increasing range of q 95 by adding n=1 perturbations – to “fill in” gaps between islands across the edge plasma. Multi-purpose in-vessel control coil (IVCC) in KSTAR is a good tool for validating the • effect of overlap.

  3. 3 Configuration of Field Error Correction (FEC) in KSTAR n=2 (even) + n=1 Port L P D H 0 ° 90 ° 180 ° 270 ° + - + - Top - + + - Mid + - + - Bot n=2 (odd) + n=1 Port L P D H 0 ° 90 ° 180 ° 270 ° + - + - Top - + + - Mid Y. M. Jeon on, IAEA EA FEC 2012 12, EX/3-3 Bot - + - + All the coils are internal thus NA field could be effectively coupled to plasmas. • n=1 or 2 field is applicable per each row with various toroidal phase. • Three rows of FEC coils can provide various poloidal magnetic spectra. •

  4. 4 Spectrum of field Reference plasma (KSTAR no. 8889): I p =600 kA, B T =2 T, pure Ohmic, limited Vacuum analysis based on the equilibrium n=2 even only with magnetic diagnostics (no MSE) q=2 n=1 n=2 odd q=2 q=2

  5. 5 Typical procedure of error field penetration n=1 field is gradually increased to cause the disruption. • n=2 field is constantly applied during n=1 field increase. • Locking Minor disruption Locking Minor disruption Density pump-in(?) Slide- away

  6. 6 Error field penetration has two thresholds. 1 st threshold 2 nd threshold 1 st threshold 2 nd threshold Density pump-in(?) Slide- away

  7. 7 ECEI location and Poincare map n=1 field ( exaggerated ) ECEI (L,H) q=2 surface Poincare map Top view with ECEI window from H port

  8. 8 ECEI catches island opening and minor disruption. Island opening Minor disruption

  9. 9 Plasma is locked earlier under higher n=2 field regardless of poloidal spectra of n=2 field. Late locking: #9338 (1 kA/t, odd) #9367 (1 kA/t, even) Early locking: #9339 (2 kA/t, odd) #9368 (2 kA/t, even)

  10. 10 Plasma is less susceptible to minor disruption under higher n=2 even field. Early No #8889 (no n=2) > #9367 (n=2, 1 kA/t) > #9368 (n=2, 2 kA/t) disruption disruption Slide - away Relative change

  11. 11 Higher n=2 even field seems to hinder the growth of n=1 mode amplitude. Pure n=1 field discharge (blue trace) without applying n=2 field • does not show the change of growth rate after locking phase. No n=2 field n=2 even 1 kA/t n=2 even 2 kA/t

  12. 12 n=2 odd field shows almost same minor disruption among different n=2 field strengths. #9338 (n=2, 1 kA/t) and #9339 (n=2, 2 kA/t) exhibit similar minor disruption. • They are still robust to minor disruption when compared with #8889 (no n=2). • Slide - away Relative change

  13. 13 n=2 odd field also hinders the growth of n=1 mode although the effect is less effective than n=2 even field. #9338 (n=2, 1 kA/t) catches up #9339 (n=2, 2 kA/t) despite of late locking. • No n=2 field n=2 odd 1 kA/t n=2 odd 2 kA/t

  14. 14 Just before final disruption, the mode amplitude shows rapid growth again. After the locking phase, the growth rate of the mode amplitude decreases. • This kind of growth pattern is common in both n=2 even and odd discharges • although the saturation (?) level is different. 2 nd threshold of error field penetration Locking phase Saturation (?) Final growing phase phase

  15. 15 Summary and future work Application of n=2 even field makes plasma less susceptible to minor disruption by • n=1 field. The delay of minor disruption by n=1 field is proportional to n=2 field strength in • n=2 even configuration. n=2 odd field does not show the proportionality to the field strength in preventing • minor disruption. However, when compared with no n=2 field discharge, they still exhibit the robustness against minor disruption by n=1 field. The investigation of mode amplitude reveals that n=2 field hinders the growth of • n=1 mode after locking phase. In the mixed NA field discharges, the mode amplitude shows rapid growth again • just before final disruption. The timing of locking (density pump-in, T e drop, and rotation change) looks related • to n=2 field strength regardless of n=2 field configuration (even or odd). The experiments will be conducted at various q 95 values. • If mode-mode coupling/competition really matters, it could affect on the coupling. –

  16. 16 Supplements

  17. Spectrogram of 17 n=1 + n=2 even 1 kA/t Mirnov coil: Locking no n=2 and n=2 even n=2 field on m/n=?/1 m/n=?/1 n=2 field on n=1 only Almost same frequency but long-lasting in n=2 even 2 kA/t (?) m/n=?/1 n=1 + n=2 even 2 kA/t Pre-existing mode before applying NA field n=2 field on m/n=?/1 m/n=?/2 m/n=?/1 Locking

  18. Spectrogram of 18 n=1 + n=2 odd 1 kA/t Mirnov coil: Locking n=2 odd n=2 field on m/n=?/1 m/n=?/1 Almost same frequency but eventually disappear before disruption n=1 + n=2 odd 2 kA/t Pre-existing mode n=2 field on m/n=?/1 before applying NA field m/n=?/1 Locking

  19. 19 Sawtooth activities disappear when plasma locks. Electron temperatures in core region are dropped with locking. •

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend