11 november 2011
play

11 November 2011 1 The importance of price signals Does current - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Network Rail views on Schedule 4 11 November 2011 1 The importance of price signals Does current regime provide the right signals? Reflects both revenue loss and costs Signals rather than precise values Exact pre-estimates of


  1. Network Rail – views on Schedule 4 11 November 2011 1

  2. The importance of price signals Does current regime provide the right signals? • Reflects both revenue loss and costs • Signals rather than precise values – Exact pre-estimates of Schedule 4 are difficult – Benefit of “piggybacking” possessions is clear but this also makes it harder to transmit explicit signals to work planners 2

  3. Are the incentives right? • As an incentive, Schedule 4 is well understood – Incentive to disrupt less and book possessions early is clear* – Other mechanisms provide additional incentive to plan effectively • Does the incentive structure reflect how passengers get their information and plan their journeys in the 2010s? – Are the discounts set at the right level? – What message should the discount structure give to Network Rail? 3

  4. Design of the Schedule 4 regime • Importance of liquidated sums regime • Access Charge Supplements (ACS) – Does not set accurate expectations at TOC level – How should this be managed? • Free possessions allowance – Impact on price signals? – Incentive to find least disruptive access? 4

  5. Other issues Avoid perverse incentives in times of extreme disruption – Joint Restriction of Use in extreme weather? Review contractual wording to – Encourage the right collaborative behaviour (as above) – Improve understanding of Sustained Planned Disruption (SPD) or late changes to possessions Reviewing cost compensation data for CP5 – Validate assumed responses to possessions in Appendix B (external support needed?) 5

  6. Freight Schedule 4 regime This is working as intended – Clear signals about the impact of disruption – Straightforward to administer – Minor clarifications required on some of the qualifying criteria for payments 6

  7. Schedule 4 under alliances Keep simple default regime at national level Recognise there may be challenge to default regime at local – levels and potential to work together on e.g. access planning – Leave significant amendments to alliancing discussions (unless there’s consensus on a change) – ACS arrangements can make it difficult to “turn Schedule 4 off” 7

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend