11 November 2011 1 The importance of price signals Does current - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

11 november 2011
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

11 November 2011 1 The importance of price signals Does current - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Network Rail views on Schedule 4 11 November 2011 1 The importance of price signals Does current regime provide the right signals? Reflects both revenue loss and costs Signals rather than precise values Exact pre-estimates of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Network Rail – views on Schedule 4

11 November 2011

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

The importance of price signals

Does current regime provide the right signals?

  • Reflects both revenue loss and costs
  • Signals rather than precise values

– Exact pre-estimates of Schedule 4 are difficult – Benefit of “piggybacking” possessions is clear but this also makes it harder to transmit explicit signals to work planners

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Are the incentives right?

  • As an incentive, Schedule 4 is well understood

– Incentive to disrupt less and book possessions early is clear* – Other mechanisms provide additional incentive to plan effectively

  • Does the incentive structure reflect how passengers get

their information and plan their journeys in the 2010s?

– Are the discounts set at the right level? – What message should the discount structure give to Network Rail?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Design of the Schedule 4 regime

  • Importance of liquidated sums regime
  • Access Charge Supplements (ACS)

– Does not set accurate expectations at TOC level – How should this be managed?

  • Free possessions allowance

– Impact on price signals? – Incentive to find least disruptive access?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Other issues

Avoid perverse incentives in times of extreme disruption

– Joint Restriction of Use in extreme weather?

Review contractual wording to

– Encourage the right collaborative behaviour (as above) – Improve understanding of Sustained Planned Disruption (SPD) or late changes to possessions

Reviewing cost compensation data for CP5

– Validate assumed responses to possessions in Appendix B (external support needed?)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Freight Schedule 4 regime

This is working as intended

– Clear signals about the impact of disruption – Straightforward to administer – Minor clarifications required on some of the qualifying criteria for payments

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Schedule 4 under alliances

Keep simple default regime at national level

– Recognise there may be challenge to default regime at local levels and potential to work together on e.g. access planning – Leave significant amendments to alliancing discussions (unless there’s consensus on a change) – ACS arrangements can make it difficult to “turn Schedule 4 off”