1099 1099 1099 1099 New Y New York rk Av Avenue W W - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1099 1099 1099 1099 new y new york rk av avenue
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

1099 1099 1099 1099 New Y New York rk Av Avenue W W - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1099 1099 1099 1099 New Y New York rk Av Avenue W W Washing ashington, ton, D D.C. D C D William William lliam D lliam D D. Cox D Cox Cox Cox Constructi Construction Management on Management April 14 April 14, 2008 ,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1099 1099 1099 1099 New Y New York rk Av Avenue

W D W D C Washing ashington, ton, D D.C.

William lliam D D Cox Cox William lliam D

  • D. Cox

Cox

Constructi Construction Management

  • n Management

April 14 April 14, 2008 2008 Penn State AE Senior Thesis ,

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Presentation Outline

A d Agenda

Project Overview LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy Analysis (Mechanical Breadth) Green Roof Structural Analysis (St

t l B dth)

Green Roof Structural Analysis (Structural Breadth) Process Mapping MEP Coordination with Building Information Modeling Information Modeling Summary & Conclusions

William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

Questions

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Project Overview

A d

j

Agenda

LEED Project Overview LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination

173,260 Square Feet of Premier Office and Retail Space 11 Stories Above Grade, 4 Stories Below Grade Parking Construction Costs: $31,600,000

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

Project Duration: June 2006 through March 2008

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Project Team

A d

j

Agenda

LEED Project Overview Owner LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis Architect Structural Engineer General Contractor MEP Engineer Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination James G. Davis Construction Tadjer‐Cohen‐Edelson Syska Hennesy Group Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Project Features

A d

j

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Foundation rests on 3,000psi Grade Beams and Spread Footings

Structure

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

Beams and Spread Footings Parking Deck Structure comprised of combination 4”, 8” and 12”

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

reinforced concrete decks Building frame is 4,000 psi post‐ tensioned concrete with an Effective

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination

tensioned concrete with an Effective Post Tensioning Strength between 100 and 1000 kips

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Project Features

A d

j

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

(2) 1440 GPM 500 ton Cooling ( ) lf d

Mechanical

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

Towers serve (15) Self‐Contained Water Cooled Air Conditioning Units at each level

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

VAV Boxes with Reheat Coils to distribute air throughout occupied spaces

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Project Features

A d

j

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Building Serviced by a 3φ, 4‐Wire, /

Electrical

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

460/265 Volt, 4000A Main Bus that steps down through (3) 30KVA, 3φ, 460/120V Transformers

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

Emergency Power Supplied by (1) 350/438 KW/KVA 480/277V G t

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination

Generator

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Project Features

A d

j

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

South and West facades are

Curtainwall

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

constructed of a high performance, low‐e coated insulated glass system “Fish‐scale” assembly, each panel

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

Fish scale assembly, each panel lies in a separate geometric plane North and East facades composed of f b i k d h t i d

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination

face brick and punch‐out windows

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Ac Achieving Sust Sustainability ainability

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Ac Achieving Sust Sustainability ainability

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Achieving Sustainability

A d

g y

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Problem

After construction for 1099 New York Avenue had

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

already been underway, Tishman Speyer enacted a new policy that state all new construction projects must be a minimum of LEED Silver

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

Objective

Investigate project as designed to determine the

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination

credits already earned Develop guidelines for areas of improvement on 1099 New York Avenue and Future Projects

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Achieving Sustainability

A d

g y

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

LEED Silver

United States Green Building Council states that

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

a core and shell construction project must earn a minimum of 28 Credits to be rated LEED Silver Six areas of focus

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

Six areas of focus

  • 1. Sustainable Sites
  • 2. Water Efficiency
  • 3. Energy & Atmosphere

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination

  • 4. Materials & Resources
  • 5. Indoor Environmental Quality
  • 6. Innovation & Design process

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Achieving Sustainability

A d

g y

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Evaluation of Current Credits Obtained

Sustainable Sites (3 Credits)

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

Water Efficiency (2 Credits) Energy & Atmosphere (3 Prerequisites)

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

Energy & Atmosphere (3 Prerequisites) Materials & Resources (2 Credits)

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination

Indoor Environmental Quality (1 Prerequisite, 2 Credits)

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Achieving Sustainability

A d

g y

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Evaluation of Credits to be Obtained Target Areas

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

Target Areas

Sustainable Sites (5 Credits) Water Efficiency (1 Credit) Energy & Atmosphere (3 Credits)

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

Materials & Resources (1 Prerequisite, 4 Credits) Indoor Environmental Quality (1 Prerequisite, 6 Credits)

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination

9 Previously Earned + 19 To be Earned Total: 28 Credits

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

Total: 28 Credits

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Achieving Sustainability

A d

g y

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

How can these credits be obtained?

Install bicycle racks within close proximity of the fitness center

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

Reserve priority parking spaces for fuel efficient vehicles Reduce water usage by 20%

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

Install a green roof that covers more than 50% of the building footprint Implement a Construction Waste Management Plan

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination

Implement a Construction Waste Management Plan Use materials containing recycled content Control pollution of the indoor environment

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

Control pollution of the indoor environment

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Achieving Sustainability

A d

g y

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Why a Green Roof?

Reduce Stormwater Runoff

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

  • Can retain up to 2” of rainfall

Reduce Urban Heat Island

  • Decreases in the release of greenhouse gases

Increased Service Life of Materials

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

Increased Service Life of Materials

  • Standard life cycle of 50 years

Energy Conservation

  • Up to 50% reduction in consumption on the top floor

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination

Improvement of the Aesthetic Environment

  • Building already has a public access roof, enhance it!

Re‐Green Washington, D.C.

  • Initiative by ASLA for 21 700 000 sq ft of green roofs to be

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

Initiative by ASLA for 21,700,000 sq ft of green roofs to be installed within the District of Columbia in the next 20 years

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Green R Green Roof

  • of

Energ Energy Conser Conservation tion Conser Conservation tion Anal Analysis ysis

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Green Roof Energy Analysis

A d

gy y

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Problem

The performance of a green roof varies upon:

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

  • Material Composition
  • Orientation
  • Area of Coverage
  • Ratio of Coverage Area to Building Area

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

  • Ratio of Coverage Area to Building Area

Objective

  • Analysis

Process Mapping MEP Coordination

Develop an energy model of the building using TRACE 700 that includes the thermal properties of a green roof and compare against an energy model of the building as it was originally designed

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

building as it was originally designed

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Green Roof Energy Analysis

A d

gy y

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Estimated Energy Savings

Description Electric Consumption Water Consumption Total Source Energy

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

(kWh) (1000 gal) (kBtu/yr) Primary Heating 101,605.4 10,404.4 Primary Cooling Cooling Compressor 278,840.5 28,553.3 Tower/Condenser 89 797 1 904 7 9 195 2

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

Tower/Condenser 89,797 1,904.7 9,195.2 Cooling Accessories 8,760 897 Totals 479,002.9 1,904.7 49,049.9 Description Electric Consumption Water Consumption Total Source Energy

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination

(kWh) (1000 gal) (kBtu/yr) Primary Heating 95,785.6 9,808.5 Primary Cooling Cooling Compressor 274,133.8 28,071.4 Tower/Condenser 83,382.0 1,927.2 8,538.3

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

/ , , , Cooling Accessories 8,760.0 897.0 Totals 462,061.0 1,927.2 47,315.2

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Green Roof Energy Analysis

A d

gy y

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Estimated Energy Savings

Total Source Energy as Designed Total Source Energy w/ Green Roof Estimated Savings

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

(kBtu/yr) (kBtu/yr) 49,049.9 47,315.2 3.54%

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

Initial Cost Increase Energy Savings (1 yr) Energy Savings 20 yr Energy Savings 50 yr

Estimated Cost Savings

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination

Initial Cost Increase Energy Savings (1 yr) Energy Savings 20 yr (Life of Mechanical Equip.) Energy Savings 50 yr (Life of Green Roof) $82,700 $845 $16,900 $42,250

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Green Roof Energy Analysis

A d

gy y

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Conclusions & Recommendations

G R f t th i l f i

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

Green Roofs are not the miracle cure for energy savings Less effective on taller buildings

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

Despite small savings in performance, green roofs still offer

  • ther environmental benefits and installation is recommended

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Green R Green Roof

  • of

Structur Structural al Anal Analysis ysis Anal Analysis ysis

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Green Roof Structural Analysis

A d

y

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Problem

The selected green roof system adds a load of

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

26 lbs/sq ft to the roof structure. The lower roof currently supports 22 lbs/sq ft, the penthouse roof only supports 8 lbs/sq ft.

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

Objective

Analyze the current penthouse roof structure to

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination

determine if it can support the increased the load from the extensive green roof system. A slab redesign will be performed if necessary.

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Green Roof Structural Analysis

A d

y

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Current Conditions

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination Factored Loading: 1 2 D + 1 6 (L) + 0 5 (S) = 1 2 (8 psf) + 1 6 (30 psf) + 0 5 (30 psf) = 72 6 psf Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management Factored Loading: 1.2 D + 1.6 (L) + 0.5 (S) = 1.2 (8 psf) + 1.6 (30 psf) + 0.5 (30 psf) = 72.6 psf

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Green Roof Structural Analysis

A d

y

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Proposed Conditions

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination Factored Loading: 1.2 D + 1.6 (L) + 0.5 (S) = 1.2 (26 psf) + 1.6 (30 psf) + 0.5 (30 psf) = 94.2 psf Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Green Roof Structural Analysis

A d

y

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Direct Design Method for Two‐Way Slabs

Location Mu (ft‐k) b (in) d (in) Mu x 12/b (ft‐k) ρ As (in2) Bars

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

(ft k) (in) (in) (ft k) (in ) Long Span (2) Half Col. Strip

  • Int. Neg.

50.3 84 7 7.2 0.0025 0.236 #5@12” O.C.

  • Ext. Neg.

18.7 84 7 2.67 0.0021 0.200 #5@12” O.C. P i i 29 9 84 7 4 3 0 0021 0 200 #5@12” O C

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

Positive 29.9 84 7 4.3 0.0021 0.200 #5@12” O.C.

  • Mid. Strip
  • Int. Neg.

16.8 132 7 1.5 0.0021 0.200 #5@12” O.C.

  • Ext. Neg.

6.2 132 7 0.6 0.0021 0.200 #5@12” O.C. Positive 20 132 7 1.8 0.0021 0.200 #5@12” O.C. Short Span

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination

  • Ext. Col. Strip

Negative 15.5 42 6 4.4 0.0024 0.230 #5@12” O.C. Positive 24.7 42 6 7.1 0.0029 0.280 #5@12” O.C. Middle Negative 13.9 84 6 2.0 0.0024 0.230 #5@12” O.C. Positive 16.5 84 6 2.4 0.0024 0.230 #5@12” O.C. Int Col Strip Negative 41 6 42 6 11 9 0 0050 0 480 #5@7 ½ ” O C

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

  • Int. Col. Strip

Negative 41.6 42 6 11.9 0.0050 0.480 #5@7 ½ O.C. Positive 324.7 42 6 7.1 0.0029 0.280 #5@12” O.C.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Green Roof Structural Analysis

A d

y

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Slab Redesign

The slab was checked for punching shear. The

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

nominal shear strength for the slab was calculated to be фVc = 111.4 kips, factored shear was determined to be Vu = 53.9 kips

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

No additional shear reinforcement was required Existing Drop Panels can be eliminated for savings

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Green Roof Structural Analysis

A d

y

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Cost Comparison

The green roof adds an additional $10 per sq ft

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

Description Cost Original Roof Cost $275,000

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

Additional Cost for Green Roof Material $82,700 Increased Reinforcement $1,000 Concrete Material Savings ($2,100) Concrete Labor Savings (1 day) ($300)

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination

Total Cost $356,300

Total roofing cost is increased by 30%

Total Cost $356,300

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Green Roof Structural Analysis

A d

y

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Schedule Impact

The installation of a green roof would require an

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

additional 2‐3 days beyond the planned 35 days With the drop heads no loner being required, there is over 500 sq ft of formwork that no longer needs to be installed

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

500 sq ft of formwork that no longer needs to be installed, a savings of one day

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Green Roof Structural Analysis

A d

y

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Conclusions & Recommendations

Structural design is simple

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

Structural design is simple Cost to redesign is feasible, in fact it’s less Ch i h d l i i i l

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

Change in schedule is minimal Recommendation for green roof installation remains

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Mapping & Mapping & Testing the sting the MEP MEP MEP MEP Coordina Coordination tion Proces Process

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Thinking Lean

A d

g

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Principles of Lean Thinking

  • 1. Specify what does and does not create value from the

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

customer’s perspective

  • 2. Identify all the steps necessary to design, order, and

produce the products across the whole value stream

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

produce the products across the whole value stream

  • 3. Make those actions that create value flow

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination

  • 4. Only make what is pulled by the customer
  • 5. Strive for perfection by continually removing successive

layers of waste

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

layers of waste

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Thinking Lean

A d

g

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Moving Towards Lean Thinking

  • 1. Understand Waste

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

  • 2. Establish Direction

3 Understand the process

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

  • 3. Understand the process
  • 4. Map the Process

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Process Mapping

A d

pp g

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Alexander’s Dynamic System Model C l

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

Control

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

Input

Process

Output

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

Rework/Maintenance

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Mapping MEP Coordination

A d

pp g

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

The 2D Design Coordination Process

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Mapping MEP Coordination

A d

pp g

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Understand Waste/Establish a Direction

2D Design Coordination

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

  • Developed Design
  • Component Size &

Location

  • Shop Drawings
  • Light Table

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

  • Light Table

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination

  • Inadequate Designs
  • Clashing Components
  • Unapproved Drawings

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Mapping MEP Coordination

A d

pp g

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Mapping the 3D Design Coordination Process

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Mapping MEP Coordination

A d

pp g

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Mapping the 3D Design Coordination Process

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Mapping MEP Coordination

A d

pp g

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Problem

During core construction, it was discovered that although

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

the MEP Systems had been coordinated on the drawings, there was difficulty with fitting all of the components into the available space. This same problem was also noticed in the main lobby

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

in the main lobby.

Objective

  • Analysis

Process Mapping MEP Coordination

Compare the 2D Design Coordination Process against the 3D Process to determine the potential time and cost savings.

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Mapping MEP Coordination

A d

pp g

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Testing the 3D Design Coordination Process

A 3 Dimensional Model of the Main Lobby and its MEP

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

A 3 Dimensional Model of the Main Lobby and its MEP Components was constructed

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Mapping MEP Coordination

A d

pp g

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Testing the 3D Design Coordination Process

The model was imported into Navisworks for the mechanical and

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

The model was imported into Navisworks for the mechanical and plumbing systems were compared against each other

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Mapping MEP Coordination

A d

pp g

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Why was there a collision?

System components with a combined depth of 2’ – 3” must

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

System components with a combined depth of 2 3 must pass through a plenum space that is only 1’ – 9” deep

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Mapping MEP Coordination

A d

pp g

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Finding a Solution

Two possible solutions:

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

Two possible solutions:

  • 1. Resize the pipe
  • 2. Relocate the pipe

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Verifying the Process

A d

y g

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

3D Design Coordination Experience

A i f fi t di h d t d t i th

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

A series of five case studies were researched to determine the average increase in productivity while implementing BIM

Project Description Estimated Increase in Productivity

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

j p y A General Motors Manufacturing Facility 30% B The Camino Medical Group Project 25% C Harborview Medical Center 50% D Alcoa World Alumina Plant 20%

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination

E NLA Federal Building 19% Average Productivity Increase 28.8% Average Productivity Increase 28.8%

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Verifying the Process

A d

y g

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Potential Savings

Planning

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

g Engineering Fabrication Installation

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

Project Start Pl i

28.8%

Project Finish

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination

Planning Engineering Fabrication Installation

Savings

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

Installation Project Start Project Finish

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Mapping MEP Coordination

A d

pp g

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Conclusions & Recommendations

The majority of the projects surveyed were either healthcare or

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

The majority of the projects surveyed were either healthcare or manufacturing facilities 1099 New York Avenue is a Core & Shell Project, not MEP intensive

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

Increased Productivity should be estimated as 60% of observed value

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination

Increase of 17.3% provides a four month schedule acceleration With such potential for efficiency and savings, begin implementing 3D Design Coordination Process as part of the LEED initiative

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

3D Design Coordination Process as part of the LEED initiative

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Summar Summary & & Concl Conclusions usions Concl Conclusions usions

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Summary & Conclusions

A d

y

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Achieving Sustainability

Easy to achieve when implemented at the correct stage of design

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

Easy to achieve when implemented at the correct stage of design Team effort, creating guidelines is the responsibility of the owner

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

Energy Considerations for Green Roofs

Green roofs are not the miracle cure for optimizing energy

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination

performance Still has other environmental benefits

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Summary & Conclusions

A d

y

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

Structural Considerations for Green Roofs

Cost of structural redesign is feasible

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

Cost of structural redesign is feasible A green roof can pay for itself over a period of 20 years

Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

Mapping & Testing the MEP Coordination Process

Potential for 17.3% increase in productivity, 4 month schedule

Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination

acceleration Implement Lean Process as part of the sustainability policy

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Acknowledgements

A d

g

Agenda

LEED Project Overview

James G. Davis Construction Corporation

Bill Moyer Fulya Kocak Jim Dugan Dave Masters Ray Sowers

ONCORE Construction

LEED Evaluation Green Roof Energy

Ti h S P ti

Andy Cecere Dan Hardnock Joel Miller

Prospect Waterproofing

Jay Britton Analysis Green Roof Structural Analysis

Tishman Speyer Properties Syska Hennesey Group

Charlie Yetter Cynthia Bowden

The Pennsylvania State University

  • Dr. Bahnfleth
  • Dr. Riley
  • Dr. Horman
  • M. Kevin Parfitt

Dr Messner Analysis Process Mapping MEP Coordination

Syska Hennesey Group Barton Malow Company

Jim Miller

  • Dr. Messner

Summary & Conclusions William Cox

Penn State AE Senior Thesis

Construction Management Mark Falzarano Corinne Ambler

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Questions? Questions?

Penn State AE Senior Thesis