10- YE AR T RANSIT DE VE L OPME NT PL AN HART Legislative - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

10 ye ar t ransit de ve l opme nt pl an
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

10- YE AR T RANSIT DE VE L OPME NT PL AN HART Legislative - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

10- YE AR T RANSIT DE VE L OPME NT PL AN HART Legislative and Strategic Planning Committee April 2017 PRE SE NT AT ION OVE RVIE W HART TDP overview Impact of concurrent efficiency review Ongoing efforts to set course


slide-1
SLIDE 1

10- YE AR T RANSIT DE VE L OPME NT PL AN

HART Legislative and Strategic Planning Committee April 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

PRE SE NT AT ION OVE RVIE W

  • HART TDP overview
  • Impact of concurrent efficiency review
  • Ongoing efforts to set course
  • What we have learned so far
  • Transit Planning Continuum
  • Next steps
slide-3
SLIDE 3

HART T DP

  • 10-year strategic plan for transit
  • Evaluates existing conditions
  • Determines future needs
  • Outlines phased service & implementation plans
  • Florida Department of Transportation requirement
  • Incorporates best practices
slide-4
SLIDE 4

HART T DP

  • Reflects community’s vision for transit
  • Identifies funded & unfunded needs
  • Collaborative process, consistent with other regional & local

plans/programs

  • Helps set transit service/capital priorities
  • Updated every five years
  • Due September 1, 2017
  • Covers FY 2018-2027
slide-5
SLIDE 5

IMPACT OF COA E F F ICIE NCY RE VIE W

  • What is a Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA)?
  • A transit planning function with detailed route-level and system-wide analyses

that is designed to identify opportunities for improving service productivity and

  • efficiency. Often identify cost savings, underserved areas, and/or efficiencies to

improve performance metrics, ridership, and customer satisfaction

  • Impact on the TDP
  • Integrate specific operational improvements with TDP’s larger strategic vision

for transit service development

  • Help re-imagine the transit network, mobility solutions, and technological
  • pportunities for HART for the next 10 years and beyond
slide-6
SLIDE 6

HART T DP/ COA

  • Team
slide-7
SLIDE 7

HART T DP

  • Components of the HART TDP

Evaluate baseline conditions Assess existing transit options

  • Conduct public outreach
  • Determine transit needs
  • Develop service & implementation plans
  • Develop financial plan
slide-8
SLIDE 8

SE T T ING COURSE

  • Analyze baseline data
  • Review/compare past performance
  • Assess current planning environment
  • Consult our most important resource =

current/potential riders

slide-9
SLIDE 9

PUBL IC INVOL VE ME NT

  • Phase I
  • Review and learn from recent outreach efforts
  • Phase II (ongoing)
  • Discussion group workshops
  • Public workshops & grassroots outreach
  • Stakeholder interviews
  • Major employer & employee outreach
  • Online & printed surveys
  • Bus operator/supervisor interviews
  • Phase III (May/June)
  • Public workshops & surveys
slide-10
SLIDE 10

WHAT WE HAVE L E ARNE D

  • Situation appraisal
  • Existing network or services
  • Key data-based findings
  • Public input
  • What our current &

potential future riders say

slide-11
SLIDE 11

27 Local Routes 12 Express Routes 5 Flex Routes

  • Brandon
  • South County
  • Northdale
  • Town N’ Country
  • South Tampa

3 HyperLINK Zones

  • University Area
  • Carrollwood
  • Brandon

MetroRapid Downtown Circulator TECO Streetcar Service Highlights

  • 10-60 min. frequency
  • 21 hours a day
  • Monday to Sunday
  • $1-3 Adult one-way fare

Existing Network of Services

slide-12
SLIDE 12

ISSUE S WIT H CURRE NT NE T WORK (E F F ICIE NCY RE VIE W ONGOING)

  • Lack of high frequency east-west connections
  • Transfers focused on few centers, creating circuitous routes & longer

travel times

  • Lack of frequent connectivity between major activity centers

(Downtown, USF, Airport)

  • Competing services on corridors where service stops short of or travels

around activity centers/trip generators

slide-13
SLIDE 13

T ODAY’S POPUL AT ION 2017

slide-14
SLIDE 14

F UT URE POPUL AT ION 2027

slide-15
SLIDE 15

T ODAY’S E MPL OYME NT 2017

slide-16
SLIDE 16

F UT URE E MPL OYME NT 2027

slide-17
SLIDE 17

AGE 65 & OL DE R 2015

slide-18
SLIDE 18

BE L OW POVE RT Y 2015

slide-19
SLIDE 19

L IMIT E D E NGL ISH PROF ICIE NCY 2015

slide-20
SLIDE 20

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%

20- YE AR RIDE RSHIP T RE ND

Data sources: NTD, BEBR BEA and EDR Growth rates calculated using 1996 as base year

HART ridership has grown almost two times faster rate than County population!

slide-21
SLIDE 21

PE RF ORMANCE T RE NDS

21.3 20.2 20.4 23.2 25.0 25.0 24.2 23.7 21.8 5 10 15 20 25 30 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017

Passengers per Revenue Hour Actual Passengers per Revenue Hour Goal

6.5 6.9 6.7 6.7 6.6 6.8 6.8 7.3 7.1 $5.00 $5.50 $6.00 $6.50 $7.00 $7.50 $8.00 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017

Operating Cost per Revenue Mile Actual Operating Cost per Revenue Mile Goal

67.0% 67.9% 69.3% 70.6% 70.5% 72.0% 75.3% 62% 64% 66% 68% 70% 72% 74% 76% FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 YTD

On-Time Performance

Ridership Productivity Operating Cost per Revenue Mile On-Time Performance

slide-22
SLIDE 22

PE E R COMPARISON

slide-23
SLIDE 23

PE E R COMPARISON

Riders per Revenue Hour Operating Cost per Trip

5 10 15 20 25 30

HART, FL HRT, Hampton, VA MATA, Memphis, TN CATS, Charlotte, NC TARC, Louisville, KY PSTA, St. Petersburg, FL JTA, Jacksonville, FL KCATA, Kansas City, MO Passenger Trips Per Revenue Hour Linear (Peer Mean)

$0 $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8

HART, FL HRT, Hampton, VA MATA, Memphis, TN CATS, Charlotte, NC TARC, Louisville, KY PSTA, St. Petersburg, FL JTA, Jacksonville, FL KCATA, Kansas City, MO Operating Expense Per Passenger Trip Linear (Peer Mean) Peer Mean Peer Mean

slide-24
SLIDE 24

JOB/ ACCE SS T O KE Y HUBS

< 10 Minutes 1 Hour 2 Hours

slide-25
SLIDE 25

JOB/ ACCE SS T O KE Y HUBS

< 10 Minutes 1 Hour 2 Hours

slide-26
SLIDE 26

PUBL IC INPUT

Work, 71% Medical, 12% Education, 8% Shopping, 6% Leisure/Social, 3%

Wave 1 Wave 2 Wave 3 Wave 4

Where Riders are Going Top Priorities for Riders

Source: HART Voice of the Customer Survey, Wave 3

slide-27
SLIDE 27

PUBL IC INPUT

Yes, 76% No, 24%

Have You Used HART Transit Services? What is The Most Important Improvement?

2% 4% 5% 7% 16% 32% 33% More HART Flex More HART HyperLINK More early/later service More weekend service More coverage area added Premium transit More frequent bus service

slide-28
SLIDE 28

PUBL IC INPUT

1% 5% 19% 25% 30% 38% 48% 52% 66% 72% No benefits would occur Other Improves air quality Saves energy, gasoline Less need for parking Improves local economy Less traffic on area roads More travel options Increases mobility More access to jobs

Yes, 45% No, 29% Not sure, 26%

What Benefits Could More Transit Provide? Reduce Service in Sparsely Populated Areas to Have Fast, Frequent Service in Densely Populated/High Ridership Areas?

(Services may still be available in sparsely populated/low ridership areas with HyperLINK to bring you to the faster & frequent bus network)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

SE RVICE ARE A COVE RAGE VS. CORE SE RVICE E NHANCE ME NT

Equity

Efficiency

Area Coverage Core Enhancement

Transit Planning Continuum

slide-30
SLIDE 30

COVE RAGE

  • VS. F

RE QUE NCY

  • PUBL

IC INPUT

I want a bus service that comes every 10-20 min, even if it means I have to walk more (or ride-hail or drive to a park and ride) I want bus coverage area to stay as is or even expand, even if it means a bus would run every 30-60 min.

A B

Neutral Agree with A Agree with B

79% 9% 11%

slide-31
SLIDE 31

WHE RE DO WE NE E D T O F OCUS IN T HE NE XT 10 YE ARS?

High Frequent Service in Key Areas

  • Bus every 10-20 minutes
  • In high density/high ridership areas

Fast Connections Between Major Hubs/Points

  • Connect USF, Downtown, Tampa Airport
  • Express run mostly on freeway/toll lanes

HyperLINK in More Areas

  • First mile-last mile HART ride-hailing app
  • May replace some low-performing local routes

Premium/Enhanced Transit on Selected Corridors

  • Feasibility study to identify corridors/mode

Uber/Lyft for Off Service Hours

  • Vouchers to cut your cost
  • To your doorstep
  • May replace some late/early hours

Affordable Ferry Service Connecting Region

  • Connecting downtowns
  • Expanded to South Shore/Manatee

27% 22% 10% 25% 12% 4%

slide-32
SLIDE 32

WHAT IS NE XT ?

  • Review and incorporate your input
  • Continue public outreach
  • Develop 10-year transit plan
  • Needs Plan
  • Cost Constrained Plan
  • Present TDP report
  • August/September 2017
slide-33
SLIDE 33