1 - My Organization is a… Number of Survey Responses Received 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Pipeline Operator 17 Service Provider 32 0 Government Agency
2 - We run (or support) PODS on these platforms… % of Operators 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Oracle 8 Oracle 10 Oracle 11 SQL Server 2008 SQL Server 2010 ESRI Geodatabase Other
2 - We run (or support) PODS on these platforms… % of Service Providers 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Oracle 8 Oracle 10 Oracle 11 SQL Server 2008 SQL Server 2010 ESRI Geodatabase Other
2 – Other and Comment Responses Operator SQL 2005 Operator ArcSDE9.x, plans to upgrade to 11g Operator SQL Server 2000 Operator SQL Server 2005 Service Provider Oracle 9 Service Provider SQL 2003 Service Provider Used Share point for an arte‐fact based on PODS data models Service Provider sybase
3 - We utilize PODS to support assets in these industry sectors… % of Operators 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Transmission Gathering DistribuTon Other
3 - We utilize PODS to support assets in these industry sectors… % of Service Providers 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Transmission Gathering DistribuTon Other
3 – Other and Comment Responses Operator working to establish the use of PODS in transmission and distribuTon Operator Supply Service Provider IT Capability presentaTons to Oil and Gas prospects, Provide IT consultancy Service Provider Engineering/Design
4 - We currently utilize these GIS programs to visualize PODS data… % of Operators 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% ESRI Autodesk Intergraph Smallworld CADMap Other
4 - We currently utilize these GIS programs to visualize PODS data… % of Service Providers 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% ESRI Autodesk Intergraph Smallworld CADMap Other
4 – Other and Comment Responses Operator MapInfo Operator Delorme Xmap Operator MicrostaTon Operator C‐Map (customized), PDAT (Eagle InformaTon Mapping), Google Earth Service Provider Bentley Systems, Inc. Service Provider In House So_ware Service Provider self‐developed so_ware Service Provider Oracle APEX
5 and 6 - Our company currently utilizes these PODS tables… % of Operators 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Loca:on Sta:oned Centerline US Regulatory Compliance Risk Work Inline Inspec:ons Geographic Features Event Reports Pipeline Facili:es Physical Inspec:ons Boundary Tables Opera:ng Measures Alignment Sheet SCC Poten:al Close Interval Survey Cathodic Protec:on Cathodic Protec:on Facili:es Leak Damage Preven:on Offshore Pipeline Tables Offline Events Site Facili:es Compression One Call Boundaries One Call Tickets
5 and 6 - Our company currently utilizes these PODS tables… % of Service Providers 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Loca:on Sta:oned Centerline US Regulatory Compliance Risk Work Inline Inspec:ons Geographic Features Event Reports Pipeline Facili:es Physical Inspec:ons Boundary Tables Opera:ng Measures Alignment Sheet SCC Poten:al Close Interval Survey Cathodic Protec:on Inspec:ons Cathodic Protec:on Facili:es Leak Damage Preven:on Offshore Pipeline Tables Offline Events Site Facili:es Compression One Call Boundaries One Call Tickets
5 & 6 ‐ Other and Comment Responses Use of PODS currently limited in applicaTon to single business unit, but is a Operator requirement for future development projects in 2012 Operator We are on PODS 3.2 Service Provider Nothing checked due to our company being new to PODS We uTlize non of the tables but have to export data from Smallworld systems into Service Provider PODS. Any PODS table can be of concern. We use PODS data models to create POC around it. This helps us in showcasing our Service Provider deep domain understanding of Pipeline domain, along with technology capabiliTes. Service Provider Only used in engineering services support and is conTngent on the client's needs We are looking into useing PODS. Currently we are using APDM and are espically Service Provider interested in PODS SpaTal. We uTlize non of the tables but have to export data from Smallworld systems into Service Provider PODS. Any PODS table can be of concern. Service Provider Only used in engineering services support and is conTngent on the client's needs
7 and 8 - Our company does not currently utilize, but plans to utilize these PODS tables in the future… % of Operators 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Loca:on Sta:oned Centerline US Regulatory Compliance Risk Work Inline Inspec:ons Geographic Features Event Reports Pipeline Facili:es Physical Inspec:ons Boundary Tables Opera:ng Measures Alignment Sheet SCC Poten:al Close Interval Survey Cathodic Protec:on Inspec:ons Cathodic Protec:on Facili:es Leak Damage Preven:on Offshore Pipeline Tables Offline Events Site Facili:es Compression One Call Boundaries One Call Tickets
7 and 8 - Our company does not currently utilize, but plans to utilize these PODS tables in the future… % of Service Providers 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Loca:on Sta:oned Centerline US Regulatory Compliance Risk Work Inline Inspec:ons Geographic Features Event Reports Pipeline Facili:es Physical Inspec:ons Boundary Tables Opera:ng Measures Alignment Sheet SCC Poten:al Close Interval Survey Cathodic Protec:on Inspec:ons Cathodic Protec:on Facili:es Leak Damage Preven:on Offshore Pipeline Tables Offline Events Site Facili:es Compression One Call Boundaries One Call Tickets
7 & 8 ‐ Other and Comment Responses Working with business partners to incorporate the use of PODS into their Operator business processes and uTlize the informaTon indicated above We uTlize non of the tables but have to export data from Smallworld systems into Service Provider PODS. Any PODS table can be of concern. Service Provider Only used in engineering services support and is conTngent on the client's needs Service Provider We would like a module of PODS for engineering & design. Service Provider Modified Risk based inspecTon based on API581 a_er Muhlbauer We uTlize non of the tables but have to export data from Smallworld systems into Service Provider PODS. Any PODS table can be of concern. Service Provider Only used in engineering services support and is conTngent on the client's needs
9 and 10 - Our company has elected to maintain data in these categories primarily outside of PODS… % of Operators 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Loca:on Sta:oned Centerline US Regulatory Compliance Risk Work Inline Inspec:ons Geographic Features Event Reports Pipeline Facili:es Physical Inspec:ons Boundary Tables Opera:ng Measures Alignment Sheet SCC Poten:al Close Interval Survey Cathodic Protec:on Inspec:ons Cathodic Protec:on Facili:es Leak Damage Preven:on Offshore Pipeline Tables Offline Events Site Facili:es Compression One Call Boundaries One Call Tickets
Recommend
More recommend