1 Impact Assessment Study Sample HANDS Intervention Area was - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1

Impact Assessment Study Sample HANDS Intervention Area was Included in this Study Provinces (Sindh, Punjab and Baluchistan) 03 13Districts 13 81 Villages 81 404 Households (5 HH in each village) 404 Population 91365 Average Population per Village 1128

HANDS MISALI Interventions S# District 1 Jacobabad 2 Jaffarabad 3 Jamshoro 4 Karachi Rural 5 Karachi Urban 6 Matiari 7 Muzaffargarh 8 Sanghar 9 Shaheed Benazir Abad 10 Tando Allahyar 11 Thatta 12 Tando Muhammad Khan 13 Umerkot

Impact Assessment Study Sample Thematic Areas of the Survey Health • Maternal Health • Child vaccination • Growth Monitoring • Nutrition Livelihood • PSC • Assets IDEAS • Shelter • Infrastructure • Energy WASH • Water • Sanitation • Hygiene Education • ECE • Primary & Secondary • Adult Literacy

Impact Assessment Study Sample % of Population Comparison in Villages n=91365 26% 39% Male Female Children 35%

Impact Assessment Study Sample Detail about CBOs n=81 Yes 80 70 60 50 40 76 30 20 39 31 10 0 CBO Formed CBO Registration CBO Account

Impact Assessment Study Sample % of Types of Road Access n=81 40.0 35.8 34.6 35.0 29.6 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 Metaled Gravel Earth (Bricked) Earthen Link Road

Impact Assessment Study Sample % of Schools within 5 Kilometers in Villages n=81 70.0 58.0 60.0 51.9 50.0 40.0 33.3 30.0 24.7 19.8 20.0 14.8 10.0 0.0 Boys Primary Girls Primary Mix Primary Boys Girls ECE Secondary Secondary

Impact Assessment Study Sample % of Enrolled Students in Schools of the Villages (3 to 18 Years) n=81 11% 16% 9% Boys Primary 10% Girls Primary Mix Primary Boys Secondary 16% 38% Girls Secondary ECE

Impact Assessment Study Sample % of Drop out Students n=81 0% 1% 5% 17% Boys Primary Girls Primary 9% Mix Primary Boys Secondary Girls Secondary ECE 68%

Impact Assessment Study Sample % of Health Facility available in the village 50.0 45.7 45.0 40.0 35.0 30.0 25.0 19.8 18.5 20.0 14.8 14.8 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 DHQ/ THQ Rural Health Basic Health UnitGovt. Dispensary Private Clinic Centre

Impact Assessment Study Sample % of Health worker in a village 120.0 96.3 100.0 80.0 60.0 40.0 21.0 19.8 20.0 13.6 2.5 0.0 0.0 MARVI LHW CMW TBA LHV Doctor worker

Impact Assessment Findings

Impact Assessment Findings Lime applied on Shelter 80 71.6 70 60 48.8 50 40 30 20 10 0 HANDS Survey 2017 HANDS Survey 2018

Impact Assessment Findings Availability of Electricity 2017 2018 82% 89% Average Load Shedding per Day 11.9 hours Average Expenses on Alternate source 2017 2018 774 1233

Impact Assessment Findings Main Source of Water(%) n=404 80 74.5 74.1 70 61.5 60 50 40 30 19.5 20 15 13.5 10.2 10 5.3 4.7 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.1 2.9 2 1.5 1.0 1 0 Home Water Community Tap Tube Well Hand Pump Dug Well Water Tanker Supply Stand/Pipe PDHS 2012-13 HANDS Survey 2017 HANDS Survey 2018

Impact Assessment Findings Water Treatment Methods (%) n=404 120.0 96.6 100.0 80.0 60.0 50.2 36.6 40.0 31.1 26 13.3 13.4 20.0 8.4 5 4.4 3.4 3.2 2.9 2.2 1.2 1.4 0.5 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 0.0 Boiling Add bleach Stain through Use water Other No treatment Solar /Cholorine/ a cloth filter Alum PDHS 2012-13 HANDS Survey 2017 HANDS Survey 2018

Impact Assessment Findings Results of Water Test n=76 80.0 73.7 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 26.3 20.0 10.0 0.0 Biological Contamination No Biological Contamination

Impact Assessment Findings Status of Sanitation Facilities n=404 50 43.8 45 39.7 40 36.4 36 36 34.4 35 28 30 23.9 25 21.8 20 15 10 5 0 Flush to Sewerage Pit Latrine Open Defecation PDHS 2012-13 HANDS Survey 2017 HANDS Survey 2018

Impact Assessment Findings Hand Washing Practices (%) n=404 90 77.5 76.4 80 71.5 71 68 67 70 60 58.7 57 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Before Cooking Before Preparing Food After using Toilet /Child rearing USAID PSDW-HPP 2011 HANDS Survey 2017 HANDS Survey 2018

Impact Assessment Findings Solid Waste Management 60 53.1 50 40 34.6 30 20 11.1 10 1.2 0 Open Dumping Land filling Burning Other specify HANDS Survey 2018

Impact Assessment Findings Social Protection (%) HANDS Survey 2017 HANDS Survey 2018 90.0 80.8 80.0 75.2 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 26.75 30.0 24.0 16.8 20.0 9.3 10.0 0.0 CNIC B-Form/Birth Certificate Nikkah Nama

Impact Assessment Findings Agriculture Land Status n=404 90.0 84.2 76.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 19.0 20.0 13.5 10.0 5.0 2.3 0.0 Cultivated Non Cultivated No Agriculture Land HANDS Survey 2017 HANDS Survey 2018

Impact Assessment Findings Household Land Ownership (%) n=404 80.0 68.1 70.0 65.6 60.0 50.0 40.0 29.9 27.7 30.0 20.0 10.0 6.7 1.0 1.0 0 0.0 Owner Landlord Government Rented HANDS Survey 2017 HANDS Survey 2018

Impact Assessment Findings % Household Assets n=404 100.0 90.6 87.4 90.0 80.0 70.0 56.1 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.6 30 27.0 30.0 16.4 15.6 14.5 20.0 9.2 7.0 6.2 5.7 10.0 4.9 2.5 1.2 0.0 Refrigerator, Air Conditioner, At least one At least one NO car/tractor Neither One Stove, Own TV Freezer or Air Cooler, car/tractor and car/tractor but but at least one car/tractor Nor Cooking Range, Washing Water Geyser or at least one NO motor motor motor cycle/ Microwave Machine Heater motor cycle/ scooter cycle/scooter scooter Oven cycle/scooter HANDS survey 2017 HANDS survey 2018

Impact Assessment Findings Comparison of Live Stock n= 40 4 80.0 68.1 70.0 56.1 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.6 27.0 30.0 20.0 7.0 6.2 10.0 4.7 .2 0.0 At least One Buffalo/ At least One Buffalo/ NO Buffalo/ Bullock but Neither Buffalo/ Bullock and at least one Bullock but NO at least one Bullock nor cow/goat/sheep cow/goat/sheep cow/goat/sheep cow/goat/sheep HANDS Survey 2017 HANDS Survey 2018

Impact Assessment Findings Comparison of Poverty Ranking (%) n=404 120.0 98 100.0 83.6 80.0 60.0 40.0 12.7 20.0 3.6 1 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0-11 12-18 19-23 24-100 Ultra Poor Vulnerable Poor Above Poverty Line HANDS Survey 2017 HANDS Survey 2018

Impact Assessment Study Sample % of Type of Cooking Fuel 1% 17% Coal 9% Cow dunk Gas 73% Wooden Stick

Impact Assessment Study Sample % of Type of Stoves used 1% 6% 5% None Gas Stove Smokeless stove Traditional Stove 88%

Impact Assessment Study Sample

Impact Assessment Study Sample % of awareness about DRR Committee Formed village Aware 50 50 Unaware

Impact Assessment Study Sample % Awareness about of DRR in villages in case of any Disaster 60.0 54.0 50.0 44.1 41.3 40.0 37.1 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 Safer Places Emergency contact Blood donor list vehicle /taxi driver details of Police, DC, number availability DHO, Fire Brigade, Darul Aman etc

Impact Assessment Study Sample % of awareness that how to keep safe important documents CNIC, Nikah Nama, Property Documents etc. during disaster 70.0 58.7 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 24.0 20.0 12.6 10.0 4.7 0.0 at Inaccessible Place In Safe Locker Plastic Coding Other Places

Impact Assessment Findings Early Childhood Mortality Comparison per 1000 Live Births 80 74 70 62 60 50 45 42 40 28 30 20.3 20 10 0 NMR IMR Child Mortality PDHS 2017-18 HANDS Survey 2018

Impact Assessment Findings Percentage of children (12-23 months) who received BCG, PCV3 and Measles vaccine (%) 75.3 80.0 70.0 60 60.0 54 51.5 50.5 46.2 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 BCG PCV 3 Measles PDHS 2017-18 HANDS Survey 2018

Impact Assessment Findings Percentage of children under age 5 Care seeking with ARI symptoms and Diarrhea treated with ORT in the last 2 weeks 16 14 14 12 11 10 8 6 3.75 4 1.2 2 0 Diarrhoea Prevlance Care seeking for children with ARI symptoms PDHS 2017-18 HANDS Survey 2018

Impact Assessment Findings Nutritional status of children 6-59 months through MUAC State of Nutrition HANDS Survey 2018 MICS 2014 Normal (>12.5 cm) 82 58 Moderately Acute Malnutrition (MAM) (11.5- 12.2 25 12.5 cm) Severely Acutely Malnutrition (SAM) (<11.5 5.8 17 cm) Total 100 100

Impact Assessment Findings Maternal Health Care (%) 100 n=433 86.6 90 84.2 79 75 80 71.8 70 64 60.0 60 52.5 47 50 41 40 30 20 10 0 Four or more 2 or more TT Institutional SBA attended PNC availed last ANC Visits shots deliveries last delivery delivery MICS Sindh 2014 HANDS Survey 2018

Impact Assessment Findings

Impact Assessment Findings Nutritional status of Pregnant and Lactating Women through MUAC in (%) HANDS 2018 NNS 2011 Well Nourished (MUAC >21 cm) 79.8 81 Malnourished (MUAC 20.2 19 <21 cm) Total 100 100

Impact Assessment Findings Status of Family Planning FP Methods HANDS 2018 HANDS 2017 PDHS 2017-18 Current CPR 47.80% 43.60% 25% Unmet need 28% 10% 17%