1 hadronic top rejection 0 9 0 8 0 7 0 6 0 5 0 4
play

1 Hadronic top rejection 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 68% mass - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sep 19, 2022 •277 likes •626 views

1 Hadronic top rejection 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 68% mass window, 350 < p < 500 GeV 0.3 T JC2 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JD2 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JFoxWolfram3 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JFoxWolfram4 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JLogDipExcl12 + (2

  1. 1 Hadronic top rejection 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 68% mass window, 350 < p < 500 GeV 0.3 T JC2 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JD2 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JFoxWolfram3 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JFoxWolfram4 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JLogDipExcl12 + (2 b-tags at 70%) 0.2 JPlanarFlow + (2 b-tags at 70%) JSphericity + (2 b-tags at 70%) JTau21 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JTau21wta + (2 b-tags at 70%) 0.1 JThrustMin + (2 b-tags at 70%) 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Higgs-jet efficiency

  2. dijet rejection 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 68% mass window, 350 < p < 500 GeV T JC2 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JD2 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JFoxWolfram3 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JFoxWolfram4 + (2 b-tags at 70%) 0.1 JLogDipExcl12 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JPlanarFlow + (2 b-tags at 70%) JSphericity + (2 b-tags at 70%) JTau21 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JTau21wta + (2 b-tags at 70%) 0.05 JThrustMin + (2 b-tags at 70%) 0 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1 Higgs-jet efficiency

  3. 1 Hadronic top rejection 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 68% mass window, 1000 < p < 1500 GeV 0.3 T JC2 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JD2 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JFoxWolfram3 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JFoxWolfram4 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JLogDipExcl12 + (2 b-tags at 70%) 0.2 JPlanarFlow + (2 b-tags at 70%) JSphericity + (2 b-tags at 70%) JTau21 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JTau21wta + (2 b-tags at 70%) 0.1 JThrustMin + (2 b-tags at 70%) 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Higgs-jet efficiency

  4. 1 Hadronic top rejection 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 68% mass window, 350 < p < 500 GeV 0.3 T JC2 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JD2 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JFoxWolfram3 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JFoxWolfram4 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JLogDipExcl12 + (2 b-tags at 70%) 0.2 JPlanarFlow + (2 b-tags at 70%) JSphericity + (2 b-tags at 70%) JTau21 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JTau21wta + (2 b-tags at 70%) 0.1 JThrustMin + (2 b-tags at 70%) 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Higgs-jet efficiency

  5. 0.35 Hadronic top rejection 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 68% mass window, 350 < p < 500 GeV T JC2 + (2 b-tags at 70%) 0.1 JD2 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JFoxWolfram3 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JFoxWolfram4 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JLogDipExcl12 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JPlanarFlow + (2 b-tags at 70%) JSphericity + (2 b-tags at 70%) 0.05 JTau21 + (2 b-tags at 70%) JTau21wta + (2 b-tags at 70%) JThrustMin + (2 b-tags at 70%) 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1 Higgs-jet efficiency

  6. Significance 0.135 68% mass window, 2 b-tags at 70% JC2 JD2 JFoxWolfram3 0.13 JFoxWolfram4 JLogDipExcl12 JPlanarFlow JSphericity 0.125 JTau21 JTau21wta JThrustMin 0.12 0.115 0.11 0.105 0.1 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p [GeV] T

  7. Significance 0.14 68% mass window, 2 b-tags at 85% JC2 JD2 0.135 JFoxWolfram3 JFoxWolfram4 JLogDipExcl12 0.13 JPlanarFlow JSphericity JTau21 JTau21wta 0.125 JThrustMin 0.12 0.115 0.11 0.105 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p [GeV] T

  8. 0.3 Significance 68% mass window, 2 b-tags at 70% JC2 JD2 JFoxWolfram3 JFoxWolfram4 0.25 JLogDipExcl12 JPlanarFlow JSphericity JTau21 JTau21wta JThrustMin 0.2 0.15 0.1 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p [GeV] T

  9. Significance 68% mass window, 2 b-tags at 85% 0.2 JC2 JD2 JFoxWolfram3 JFoxWolfram4 JLogDipExcl12 0.18 JPlanarFlow JSphericity JTau21 JTau21wta JThrustMin 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 p [GeV] T

  10. 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 J D 2

  11. 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 J D 2

  12. 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 J D 2

  13. 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 J D 2

  14. 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 J D 2

  15. 1 Arbitrary Units η | | < 2.0, m > 50 GeV 0.9 Higgs-Jet M =500 GeV RSG Higgs-Jet M =1000 GeV RSG 0.8 Higgs-Jet M =1500 GeV RSG Multi-jet Hadronic top 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 p [GeV] T

  16. 1.2 Arbitrary Units η | | < 2.0, m > 50 GeV Higgs-Jet M =500 GeV RSG Higgs-Jet M =1000 GeV 1 RSG Higgs-Jet M =1500 GeV RSG Multi-jet Hadronic top 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Number of track jets

  17. 7 10 Multi-jet rejection η p > 250 GeV, | | < 2.0, m > 50 GeV T 6 10 Single b-tagging Double b-tagging 5 Asymm. b-tagging 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 10 1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Higgs-jet efficiency

  18. 12 10 Multi-jet rejection 11 10 η p > 250 GeV, | | < 2.0, m > 50 GeV T 10 light-jet 10 c-jet 9 10 b-jet 8 10 cc-jet bc-jet 7 10 bb-jet 6 10 5 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 10 1 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Higgs-jet efficiency

  19. 7 10 Hadronic top rejection η p > 250 GeV, | | < 2.0, m > 50 GeV T 6 10 Single b-tagging Double b-tagging 5 Asymm. b-tagging 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 10 1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Higgs-jet efficiency

  20. 12 10 Hadronic top rejection 11 10 η p > 250 GeV, | | < 2.0, m > 50 GeV T 10 light-jet 10 c-jet 9 10 b-jet 8 10 cc-jet bc-jet 7 10 bb-jet 6 10 5 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 10 1 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Higgs-jet efficiency

  21. 0.3 Arbitrary Units η | | < 2.0, m > 50 GeV, 2 b-tags at 70% µ 350 < p < 500 GeV, before -corr, 0.25 T µ 350 < p < 500 GeV, after -corr T µ 1000 < p < 1500 GeV, before -corr T µ 1000 < p < 1500 GeV, after -corr T 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 Mass [GeV]

  22. 0.5 Arbitrary Units η 0.45 | | < 2.0, m > 50 GeV, 350 < p < 500 GeV, 2 b-tags at 70% T Higgs-Jet 0.4 Multi-jet Hadronic top 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 Mass [GeV]

  23. 0.5 Arbitrary Units η 0.45 | | < 2.0, m > 50 GeV, 350 < p < 500 GeV, 2 b-tags at 70% T Higgs-Jet 0.4 Multi-jet Hadronic top 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 Mass [GeV]

  24. 0.9 Arbitrary Units 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 β =1 D 2

  25. 0.9 Arbitrary Units 68% mass window, 2 b-tags at 70% 0.8 Higgs-Jet Multi-jet 0.7 Hadronic top 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 β =1 C 2

  26. 0.9 Arbitrary Units 68% mass window, 2 b-tags at 70% 0.8 Higgs-Jet Multi-jet 0.7 Hadronic top 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 wta Tau 21

  27. 7 10 Multi-jet rejection 68% mass window, 350 < p < 500 GeV T 6 10 Double b-tagging β =1 D + (2 b-tags at 70%) 2 β =1 5 C + (2 b-tags at 70%) 10 2 Tau + (2 b-tags at 70%) 21 wta Tau + (2 b-tags at 70%) 21 4 10 3 10 2 10 10 1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Higgs-jet efficiency

  28. 7 10 Multi-jet rejection 68% mass window, 1000 < p < 1500 GeV T 6 10 Double b-tagging β =1 D + (2 b-tags at 70%) 2 β =1 5 C + (2 b-tags at 70%) 10 2 Tau + (2 b-tags at 70%) 21 wta Tau + (2 b-tags at 70%) 21 4 10 3 10 2 10 10 1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Higgs-jet efficiency

  29. 7 10 Multi-jet rejection 68% mass window, 350 < p < 500 GeV T 6 10 Double b-tagging β =1 D + (2 b-tags at 85%) 2 β =1 5 C + (2 b-tags at 85%) 10 2 Tau + (2 b-tags at 85%) 21 wta Tau + (2 b-tags at 85%) 21 4 10 3 10 2 10 10 1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Higgs-jet efficiency

  30. 7 10 Multi-jet rejection 68% mass window, 1000 < p < 1500 GeV T 6 10 Double b-tagging β =1 D + (2 b-tags at 85%) 2 β =1 5 C + (2 b-tags at 85%) 10 2 Tau + (2 b-tags at 85%) 21 wta Tau + (2 b-tags at 85%) 21 4 10 3 10 2 10 10 1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Higgs-jet efficiency

  31. 7 10 Hadronic top rejection 68% mass window, 350 < p < 500 GeV T 6 10 Double b-tagging β =1 D + (2 b-tags at 70%) 2 β =1 5 C + (2 b-tags at 70%) 10 2 Tau + (2 b-tags at 70%) 21 wta Tau + (2 b-tags at 70%) 21 4 10 3 10 2 10 10 1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Higgs-jet efficiency

  32. 7 10 Hadronic top rejection 68% mass window, 1000 < p < 1500 GeV T 6 10 Double b-tagging β =1 D + (2 b-tags at 70%) 2 β =1 5 C + (2 b-tags at 70%) 10 2 Tau + (2 b-tags at 70%) 21 wta Tau + (2 b-tags at 70%) 21 4 10 3 10 2 10 10 1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Higgs-jet efficiency

  33. 7 10 Hadronic top rejection 68% mass window, 350 < p < 500 GeV T 6 10 Double b-tagging β =1 D + (2 b-tags at 85%) 2 β =1 5 C + (2 b-tags at 85%) 10 2 Tau + (2 b-tags at 85%) 21 wta Tau + (2 b-tags at 85%) 21 4 10 3 10 2 10 10 1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Higgs-jet efficiency

  34. 7 10 Hadronic top rejection 68% mass window, 1000 < p < 1500 GeV T 6 10 Double b-tagging β =1 D + (2 b-tags at 85%) 2 β =1 5 C + (2 b-tags at 85%) 10 2 Tau + (2 b-tags at 85%) 21 wta Tau + (2 b-tags at 85%) 21 4 10 3 10 2 10 10 1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Higgs-jet efficiency

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend

7 STEPS TO CRUSHING YOUR #REJECTION &amp; GETTING BACK ON TRACK - FAST!

7 STEPS TO CRUSHING YOUR #REJECTION &amp; GETTING BACK ON TRACK - FAST!

7 STEPS TO CRUSHING YOUR #REJECTION &amp; GETTING BACK ON TRACK - FAST! www.bulletproofactor.com www.actonthis.tv #REJECTION DEALING WITH REJECTION, IS PROBABLY ONE OF THE HARDEST TASKS FOR AN ACTOR. OUR INDUSTRY IS RIFE WITH REJECTION,

727 views • 13 slides
Acceptance-Rejection method The acceptance-rejection method is usually used when the inverse

Acceptance-Rejection method The acceptance-rejection method is usually used when the inverse

Acceptance-Rejection Method Acceptance-Rejection method The acceptance-rejection method is usually used when the inverse transform method is not directly applicable or is inefficient. To simulate a sample x of X with pdf f X . Aim: 1 Consider a

930 views • 26 slides
Hadronic Physics in Geant4 http://cern.ch/geant4 The full set of lecture notes of this Geant4

Hadronic Physics in Geant4 http://cern.ch/geant4 The full set of lecture notes of this Geant4

Hadronic Physics in Geant4 http://cern.ch/geant4 The full set of lecture notes of this Geant4 Course is available at http://www.ge.infn.it/geant4/events/nss2003/geant4course.html 1 Outline Processes and hadronic physics Hadronic cross

416 views • 28 slides
Investigation of the Hadronic Decay + 0 with CLAS 01.02.2017 7th Workshop of

Investigation of the Hadronic Decay + 0 with CLAS 01.02.2017 7th Workshop of

Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Investigation of the Hadronic Decay + 0 with CLAS 01.02.2017 7th Workshop of the APS Topical Group Hadronic Physics 2017 Institute for Nuclear Physics - J ulich Research Center One

713 views • 35 slides
Updates on 0 rejection and cosmic ray simulation in ProtoDUNE-DP Andrea Scarpelli APC - Paris

Updates on 0 rejection and cosmic ray simulation in ProtoDUNE-DP Andrea Scarpelli APC - Paris

ProtoDUNE sim/reco meeting 14/06/2017 Updates on 0 rejection and cosmic ray simulation in ProtoDUNE-DP Andrea Scarpelli APC - Paris Universit Paris Diderot (VII) Give some updates on preliminary results on 0 rejection based on gap

444 views • 19 slides
Limit laws of anticipated rejection and related algorithms Axel Bacher Coauthors: Olivier

Limit laws of anticipated rejection and related algorithms Axel Bacher Coauthors: Olivier

Limit laws of anticipated rejection and related algorithms Axel Bacher Coauthors: Olivier Bodini, Alice Jacquot, Andrea Sportiello Universit Paris Nord October 9th, 2017 Outline Anticipated rejection 1 Recovering algorithms 2

1.12k views • 59 slides
Hadronic physics of EDMs Vincenzo Cirigliano Los Alamos National Laboratory 1 Lecture VII

Hadronic physics of EDMs Vincenzo Cirigliano Los Alamos National Laboratory 1 Lecture VII

ACFI EDM School November 2016 Hadronic physics of EDMs Vincenzo Cirigliano Los Alamos National Laboratory 1 Lecture VII outline Status of hadronic matrix elements Lattice QCD: results and prospects Impact on phenomenology and the

587 views • 46 slides
Rejection Rates Author: Yoo Joon Kim Advisor: Dr. Chris Caplice MIT SCM Research Fest May

Rejection Rates Author: Yoo Joon Kim Advisor: Dr. Chris Caplice MIT SCM Research Fest May

Analysis of Truckload Prices and Rejection Rates Author: Yoo Joon Kim Advisor: Dr. Chris Caplice MIT SCM Research Fest May 22-23, 2013 Agenda Introduction: The Truckload Industry Tender Rejection Research Question The

520 views • 24 slides
Discussion on I-976 11/21/19 I-976 ST3 53% rejection in 54% yes Sound Transit

Discussion on I-976 11/21/19 I-976 ST3 53% rejection in 54% yes Sound Transit

Discussion on I-976 11/21/19 I-976 ST3 53% rejection in 54% yes Sound Transit 46% no District* 53% approval statewide * Estimate; full precinct-level data not yet available for King County 2 Current service Link light

496 views • 21 slides
Gust Rejection Properties of VTOL Multirotor Aircraft James Whidborne &amp; Alastair K. Cooke

Gust Rejection Properties of VTOL Multirotor Aircraft James Whidborne &amp; Alastair K. Cooke

Gust Rejection Properties of VTOL Multirotor Aircraft James Whidborne &amp; Alastair K. Cooke Dynamics, Simulation and Control Group Centre for Aeronautics Cranfield University Friday December 8, 2017 Gust Rejection Properties of VTOL

304 views • 17 slides
Empowered Community Administration Update 12 - 13 March 2019, Kobe Activities Since Barcelona

Empowered Community Administration Update 12 - 13 March 2019, Kobe Activities Since Barcelona

Empowered Community Administration Update 12 - 13 March 2019, Kobe Activities Since Barcelona Board Approval of FY20 IANA Budget - Triggered Rejection Action (31 January 2019) - No Rejection Action Petitions submitted during the Rejection

85 views • 4 slides
Progress on hadronic molecules from strangeness to charm and beauty Bing-Song Zou Institute of

Progress on hadronic molecules from strangeness to charm and beauty Bing-Song Zou Institute of

Progress on hadronic molecules from strangeness to charm and beauty Bing-Song Zou Institute of Theoretical Physics, CAS, Beijing Sino-German CRC110 F.K.Guo, C.Hanhart, Ulf-G.Meissner, Q.Wang, Q.Zhao, B.S.Zou, Hadronic Molecules, Rev.

499 views • 34 slides
Outline Motivation Front-end architecture and interference rejection concept Circuit

Outline Motivation Front-end architecture and interference rejection concept Circuit

A 0 . 35 m SiGe BiCMOS Ultrawideband Receiver Front-End with Integrated Interference Rejection A. Bevilacqua, A. Gerosa and A. Neviani U NIVERSITY OF P ADOVA UWB for Sensor Network Workshop Lausanne 4 November 2005 A 0 . 35 m SiGe

557 views • 17 slides
Chiral magnetic effect in the hadronic phase Shota Imaki PRD 101, 074024 (2020) 1 /12 Summary

Chiral magnetic effect in the hadronic phase Shota Imaki PRD 101, 074024 (2020) 1 /12 Summary

Chiral magnetic effect in the hadronic phase Shota Imaki PRD 101, 074024 (2020) 1 /12 Summary Summary : - Chiral magnetic e ff ect in the hadronic phase involves pseudoscalar mesons. - Form of the CME current in the hadronic phase is

138 views • 12 slides
Heat Rejection Cycle Testing Kenneth Hennon CleanAir Engineering Performance Group Clean Coal

Heat Rejection Cycle Testing Kenneth Hennon CleanAir Engineering Performance Group Clean Coal

Heat Rejection Cycle Testing Kenneth Hennon CleanAir Engineering Performance Group Clean Coal International Conference November 2013 Overview Heat Rejection Cycle Testing Combining Tests Water Flow Rate Cost of Malperformance

847 views • 43 slides
Early searches for supersymmetry at the LHC in the all-hadronic channel Tom Whyntie Imperial

Early searches for supersymmetry at the LHC in the all-hadronic channel Tom Whyntie Imperial

Early searches for supersymmetry at the LHC in the all-hadronic channel Tom Whyntie Imperial College London / CMS experiment Introduction How do we look for supersymmetry at the LHC? What are the challenges of the all-hadronic channel? How

569 views • 12 slides
Search for Heavy Resonances with CMS Kerstin Hoepfner, RWTH Aachen, III. Phys. Inst. A On behalf

Search for Heavy Resonances with CMS Kerstin Hoepfner, RWTH Aachen, III. Phys. Inst. A On behalf

Search for Heavy Resonances with CMS Kerstin Hoepfner, RWTH Aachen, III. Phys. Inst. A On behalf of the CMS collaboration SEARCH2012: Workshop on Characteristics of New Physcis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, March 17-19 K.Hoepfner,

679 views • 36 slides
FOUNDATIONS OF SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGIES RDFS Rule-based Reasoning Sebastian Rudolph Dresden,

FOUNDATIONS OF SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGIES RDFS Rule-based Reasoning Sebastian Rudolph Dresden,

FOUNDATIONS OF SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGIES RDFS Rule-based Reasoning Sebastian Rudolph Dresden, 16 April 2013 Content Overview &amp; XML 9 APR DS2 Hypertableau II 7 JUN DS5 Introduction into RDF 9 APR DS3 Tutorial 5 11 JUN DS2 RDFS

1.28k views • 80 slides
On Transaction Costs in Insurance some work in progress Stefan Thonhauser Johann Radon Institute

On Transaction Costs in Insurance some work in progress Stefan Thonhauser Johann Radon Institute

On Transaction Costs in Insurance some work in progress Stefan Thonhauser Johann Radon Institute for Computational and Applied Mathematics (RICAM) Special Semester on Stochastics with Emphasis on Finance Concluding Workshop Outline

433 views • 18 slides
Wonder of sine-Gordon Y-systems (joint with T. Nakanishi) Salvatore Stella Department of

Wonder of sine-Gordon Y-systems (joint with T. Nakanishi) Salvatore Stella Department of

Wonder of sine-Gordon Y-systems (joint with T. Nakanishi) Salvatore Stella Department of Mathematics Northeastern University Boston, MA stella.sa@husky.neu.edu April 20, 2013 Y -systems Systems of functional algebraic relations coming

636 views • 29 slides
Shunsaku Horiuchi Virginia Tech

Shunsaku Horiuchi Virginia Tech

Shunsaku Horiuchi Virginia Tech Image credit: NASA/ESA Outline Opportunities with Galactic supernovae: transient (a selection) Beyond the Milky Way: diffuse Multi-messenger

496 views • 37 slides
Toward Detection of First Supernovae - - Masaomi Tanaka

Toward Detection of First Supernovae - - Masaomi Tanaka

Toward Detection of First Supernovae - - Masaomi Tanaka L ~ 10 6 - 10 7.5 Lsun First Star (for 100-1000 Msun) Pop III 300 Msun 50 (2 um) m AB 45 40 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

570 views • 40 slides
Airport Master Plan Update Public Information Meeting # 2 October 14, 2020 1 AGENDA

Airport Master Plan Update Public Information Meeting # 2 October 14, 2020 1 AGENDA

Burlington International Airport Airport Master Plan Update Public Information Meeting # 2 October 14, 2020 1 AGENDA Introductions Master Plan Update Status Facility Review Airport Layout Plan Terminal Building Hotel

684 views • 30 slides
ESS &amp; Regional Sources/CANS M. Strobl ESS Deputy Head of Instrument Division Prof. X-ray

ESS &amp; Regional Sources/CANS M. Strobl ESS Deputy Head of Instrument Division Prof. X-ray

ESS &amp; Regional Sources/CANS M. Strobl ESS Deputy Head of Instrument Division Prof. X-ray and Neutron Imaging Techniques (NBI, KU) www.europeanspallaOonsource.se CANS DTU Nov 2016 ESS construcOon status milestone: 20% construcOon complete

420 views • 27 slides

More recommend