01 Increase number of Maintain and increase Welcome and - PDF document

27/09/2016 Updates and progress since May CLOCS Champions • +109 new CLOCS champions in 2016 Working Group • 39 since June meeting • 14% clients, 83% operators, 3% others London 26 th September 2016 • 4 fatalities since May • All pedestrians Agenda Updates and progress since May 1. Welcome and update • New contract awarded 2. Meet the new CLOCS team • Secretariat and admin team appointed 3. Insights from first calls to client champions – your comments • Construction sector focused 4. Effective monitoring by champions and the team – what do • New energy, ideas and connections you really want implemented, and how? • Changes at TfL Comfort & refreshment break • Safety and Environment team 5. TfL programmes update • Freight & Fleet team 6. Traffic marshal training – what are your needs? 7. Effective investigation of incidents & near misses – your needs • New Mayor 8. Next meeting, summary and close • First 100 days • Manifesto commitments - update Looking out for vulnerable road users CLOCS secretariat and administration • Tender published on OJEU on 22 March 2016 • Process ongoing – to be awarded Summer 2016 • Requirements designed to ensure both consistency and progress: “Normalise the 01 “Increase number of “Maintain and increase Welcome and management of work specifying client CLOCS Champion related road risk” update levels” champions” “Credible governance “Maintain CLOCS and a voice for working group levels” CLOCS” “Grow and maintain “Ensure CLOCS is “Maintain momentum meaningful and engagement and and continue the unbiased” existing relationships” positive movement” 1

27/09/2016 Issues from first calls to CLOCS clients Why? • Inform CLOCS strategy development • Identify key people & issues Who? • Mostly clients and contractors 02 Meet the new team How? • Confidential – anonymized for sharing What issues? • Why implement CLOCS • Implementation success & challenges • Marketing & communication • Policies & procurement requirements • Monitoring & reporting compliance • Vision & levers for CLOCS success Meet the Team Why are you championing CLOCS? • Responded to TfL Commissioner ‘invitation’ – to address ‘perfect storm’ (more construction + modal shift = bad) • Right thing to do • Fits with company ethos • Protect our staff & supply chain – from harrowing experience • Protect reputation – years to build, seconds to lose • Procurement requirement – to win work • Planning condition e.g. Camden Implementation successes & challenges • What was your implementation plan? • 1 year to 1 month (project driven!) • Policy development – all • Communications – internally - all; externally – most…. 03 • Monitoring? Mixed bag Insights from calls • Successes: to CLOCS clients • Generally well received - by most • Easier when corporate policies exist – Derek Rees, aligns well with HSEQ roles CLOCS Project Director • Procurement drove adoption & probably right behaviours • Challenges • Confusion between CLOCS & FORS – despite key differences & ownerships • Monitoring – resource constraints 2

27/09/2016 Marketing & Communication Vision and levers for CLOCS success • Internally – policy briefings, intranets • Suppliers - workshops, PQQ and ITT CLOCS will really have succeeded when…. clauses • Zero accidents & incidents from • Clients – errr….no one mentioned this construction traffic • Public – websites and some hoardings – • National standard is implemented by all but client/planning restrictions? • Construction sector owns & drives it • CLOCS materials Key actions/levers required to deliver that • Welcome Pack good success….. • Needed: 1 page summary & slides • Procurement • Hoardings poster/banner • Planning • Quick check: • Publicity • All receive CLOCS Alerts? • All receive CLOCS bulletins? • Who else should receive? Policies & Procurement requirements Issues from first calls to CLOCS clients Your insights & thoughts? Policies 20 mins round table discussion – facilitator to chair/help. • All have aligned corporate policies – few also had specific CLOCS adoption policy 1. Do the insights reflect your experience? 2. If not, what are the key differences/issues Procurement we need to understand? • All have ITT or PQQ clauses Please record the issues for collation then review by the CLOCS team to inform action Sharing • All happy to share their policies & Key issues were: • Why implement CLOCS procurement docs if helpful • Implementation success & challenges • Marketing & communication • Policies & procurement requirements • Monitoring & reporting compliance – defer 5 mins! • Vision & levers for CLOCS success Monitoring & reporting compliance Current actions by contractors • Compliance • Most do desk-based PQQ checks • Site space restrictions make difficult • Proactive traffic marshals needed • Monitoring 04 Effective Monitoring • Gate checks varied – rigour & actions by champions and • Data use – limited as mostly kept at site level the team Current actions by clients • Monitoring – mix of trust & checks Andy Brooks, CCS General Manager Actions suggested for CLOCS team • Use CCS monitors • Collate & share – regular offenders & benchmark data 3

27/09/2016 Monitoring & reporting compliance Current actions by contractors • Compliance • Most do desk-based PQQ checks • Site space restrictions make difficult • Proactive traffic marshals needed • Monitoring Break • Gate checks varied – rigour & actions • Data use – limited as mostly kept at site level Current actions by clients • Monitoring – mix of trust & checks Actions suggested for CLOCS team • Use CCS monitors • Collate & share – regular offenders & benchmark data Do our targets really know Your recommendations for effective monitoring of CLOCS implementation what CLOCS stands for? What does good monitoring by a CLOCS client / contractor look like? • Desktop assessment of formal compliance ??% during procurement? Of pedestrian fatalities in 2016 • On-site checks of actual compliance? involved an HGV • vehicles and drivers? ??% • site arrangements incl. traffic marshalling? • Data collection & use? Of cyclist fatalities in 2016 involved an HGV What does good monitoring by the CLOCS team look like? • Independent monitoring? New name agreed by New name agreed by • Identifying & sharing best practice? widespread consent of all at • Helping companies compare performance? 26/9 CLOCS WG meeting: 26/9 CLOCS WG meeting: 05 TfL programme update 4

27/09/2016 TfL - update Latest research - update Today 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 • IAA Show 2016 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D • Hannover 22-29 September Construction Logistics and Cyclist Safety • Mercedes Benz and Safer Trucks Benefits of blindspot technology and driver cognitive workload Evaluating HGV blind -spot safety devices • International audience HGV blind -spot modelling Understanding off -road capable HGVs Definition of direct vision standards for HGVs • European Lobbying Truck safety Independent test protocol for HGV blind -spot safety devices • European Business Case Road safety benefits of eye contact between drivers and vulnerable road users Cost -benefit analysis for mandating HGV direct vision requirements (Phase 1) • Meetings in Brussels in October High vision HGV fleet evaluation Investigating the safety imbalance Investigation & evaluation Understanding regulatory non -compliance in London • Forthcoming consultations CLOCS programme evaluation • ULEZ – second stage consultation FORS safety training and toolkits evaluation due early October Road safety standards for construction and waste sites Latest research - update • Site Standards • Deliverables being finalised • Waste and supply site database • Preliminary CLOCS site rating 05 TfL programme • Direct Vision Standard update • 5 star rating system developed- industry first • Next step – vehicle modelling of current fleet • Mayoral commitment • Benefits of Direct Vision ‘Eyeballs’ • Literature review and experiments complete • Emerging findings positive Communication material • Film • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZ ANXmNfmYk • Google Glasses • ‘Exchanging Places’ comparison • Standard vs increased direct vision CONSTRUCTION LOGISTICS PROGRAMME • Infographic CLOCS Meeting 26 th September 2016 • The evidence for change Mark Starosolsky • The right vehicle for the right job 5