ZEPLIN: The Hunt for Dark Matter Blair Edwards Imperial Co ege - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

zeplin the hunt for dark matter
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

ZEPLIN: The Hunt for Dark Matter Blair Edwards Imperial Co ege - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ZEPLIN: The Hunt for Dark Matter Blair Edwards Imperial Co ege London & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Dark Matter Why?? Most of our Universe is missing . What is the other 95 % made of? All current evidence is from the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

ZEPLIN: The Hunt for Dark Matter

Blair Edwards

Imperial Coege London & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Dark Matter

Why?? Most of our Universe is “missing”. What is the other 95% made of? All current evidence is from the gravitational effects DM has on baryonic matter we can observe. WIMPs are best motivated candidate for CDM.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Detection with Two-phase Xenon

Interaction with Xenon atom

  • > Prompt Scintillation, S1 signal

Ionisation electrons drifted to extraction region by electric field

  • > Electroluminescence, S2 signal

Xe* +Xe Xe2

*

Triplet 27ns Singlet 3ns

2Xe 2Xe

175nm 175nm

Xe** + Xe Xe2

+

+e-

(recombination)

Xe+ +Xe

Ionisation Excitation Electron/nuclear recoil

140 mm ~85 µs S1

S2

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Detection with Two-phase Xenon

Interaction with Xenon atom

  • > Prompt Scintillation, S1 signal

Ionisation electrons drifted to extraction region by electric field

  • > Electroluminescence, S2 signal

Xe* +Xe Xe2

*

Triplet 27ns Singlet 3ns

2Xe 2Xe

175nm 175nm

Xe** + Xe Xe2

+

+e-

(recombination)

Xe+ +Xe

Ionisation Excitation Electron/nuclear recoil

140 mm ~85 µs S1

S2

Scintillation Primary (S1) Ionization Secondary (S2)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

ZEPLIN-II: Operations

Searching for very rare and small signals requires a very low background. To achieve this the detector is located within a shielding castle, in the Palmer UG lab at Boulby mine. After a commisioning period, a 31-day high- quality data set was acquired. A blinded analysis procedure was carried out, meaning only 10% of the background data was available for detector characterisation.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

ZEPLIN-II: Results

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 energy, keVee S2/S1 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 energy, keVee S2/S1

Signal (AmBe) and Background (60Co) Calibrations

1 10 10 2 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 energy, keVee S2/S1

Science dataset

  • Detector calibrated for expected signal and

search-box set. Difference in S2/S1 ratio provides discrimination power.

  • Blind science dataset analysed ➙ Unexpected

background population observed from Rn progeny events located at the walls of the detector.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

ZEPLIN-II: Science Result

  • Number of events expected in the box calculated from calibrations

and background data.

  • W

e observed 29 events with a total expectation of 28.6 ± 4.3 events.

  • Giving a limit on cross-section with a minimum of 6.6 x 10-7 pb at

MD= 65 GeV .

1 10 10 2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2

21.88 / 18 constant 133.7 4.588 mean 0.7272 0.2989E-02 sigma 0.1056 0.2616E-02

radius, a.u events/bin

1 10 10 2
  • 0.4
  • 0.2
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 19.64 / 20 P1 1.852 0.6302 P2 27.57 2.335 P3 0.3748 0.1502E-01 P4 0.1939 0.1507E-01

log(S2/S1) 5-10keVee log(S2/S1) 5-10keVee

Limit Plot

WIMP Mass [GeV/c2] Cross-section [cm2] (normalised to nucleon) 10

1

10

2

10

3

10

  • 45

10

  • 44

10

  • 43

10

  • 42

10

  • 41

10

  • 40

Roszkowski/Ruiz de Austri/Trotta 2007, CMSSM Markov Chain Monte Carlos (mu>0): 95% contour Roszkowski/Ruiz de Austri/Trotta 2007, CMSSM Markov Chain Monte Carlos (mu>0): 68% contour XENON10 2007 (Net 136 kg-d) CDMS 2008 Ge CDMS (Soudan) 2004 + 2005 Ge (7 keV threshold) ZEPLIN II (Jan 2007) result ZEPLIN I (2005) DATA listed top to bottom on plot

“First Limits on WIMP nuclear recoil signals in ZEPLIN-II...” G.J. Alner et al., Astroparticle Physics 28 (2007) 287-302

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Single Electron Emission

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2

This work Fonseca et al. (2004) [14] Aprile et al. (2004) [15]

Pressure, bar Mean Single Electron Response, phe

5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5

Xe Number Density (x1025 m-3)

First quantitative measurements of single ionisation electron emission in noble liquid detectors. Agreement of signal size with predictions from electroluminescence yield measurements provides strong evidence.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Single Electron Production

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 10 20 30 40 50

Energy, keV Electron rate, %

Radial and depth distributions suggest source/production throughout the bulk of the liquid. Clear link between number of scintillation photons and rate of single electron production. ➙ Likely source: Photoionisation What is being photoionised? Most probable candidates are impurities in the liquid. Although, none can be confirmed or ruled out.

“Measurement of single electron emission in two-phase xenon”

  • B. Edwards et al., arXiv:0708.0768v1

(submitted to Astroparticle Phys.)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

ZEPLIN-II: Related Work

Alpha emanation from Getters

  • Alpha rates monitored and decay

time constants calculated.

  • Confirmed Rn emanating from

SAES getters.

  • Results confirmed by experimental

test. S1-S2 Anti-correlation

  • Applied combination of S1 and

S2 signals to improve energy

  • resolution. E* = S1 + k.S2
  • Used to resolve 40 keV

inelastic feature from AmBe.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

ZEPLIN-III: Design

Same operating principle as ZEPLIN-II, but with high-field operation and surface-free geometry. 31 PMTs in the liquid phase provide better precision position reconstruction and better light yield. Low-background components and construction throughout. Ultra low background PMT upgrade in preparation. Detector fully shielded, with calibration source delivery system and detector levelling mechanism.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

ZEPLIN-III: Commissioning

Size of secondary signal as a function of electric field can be predicted from parameterisations

  • f different processes.

Preliminary dataset to test this shows excellent agreement with prediction. Preliminary AmBe and 137Cs calibrations appear to show improved separation of populations at higher field.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

ZEPLIN-III: Commissioning

Size of secondary signal as a function of electric field can be predicted from parameterisations

  • f different processes.

Preliminary dataset to test this shows excellent agreement with prediction. Preliminary AmBe and 137Cs calibrations appear to show improved separation of populations at higher field.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

ZEPLIN-III: Commissioning

Size of secondary signal as a function of electric field can be predicted from parameterisations

  • f different processes.

Preliminary dataset to test this shows excellent agreement with prediction. Preliminary AmBe and 137Cs calibrations appear to show improved separation of populations at higher field.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

ZEPLIN-III: Operations

First science data run underway. ~300 kg.days

  • f science data collected to date. ~600-700

kg.days will be collected. Aim: reach ~1 x 10-7 pb level. Daily monitoring carried out for detector tilt, energy calibrations, background rates and xenon purity.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Summary

  • ZEPLIN-II operated underground from 2005 to 2007.

One tonne day of raw data collected, giving final exposure of 225 kg.days.

  • ZEPLIN-II set a limit of 6.6 x 10-7 pb at MD = 65 GeV

.

  • Additional work done highlighting areas of interest for

future experiments: Single electron emission, alpha emanation and S1/S2 anti-correlation.

  • ZEPLIN-III fully commissioned and shielded. First

science run underway, with ~300 kg.days of data acquired so far.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Thanks to the ZEPLIN-III Collaboration

slide-18
SLIDE 18

ZEPLIN-II: Analysis

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 10 10 2

energy, keVee relative rate, keVee-1

Am-Be CAL/GEANT4 Co-60 CAL/GEANT4 Calculated

Scintillation Electroluminescence

Radius

57Co Energy and

Position Calibrations

  • Detector characterised with

calibrations and an unblinded sample of background data.

  • Position reconstruction using a simple

centroid method, giving resolution of about 1 cm.

  • Efficiencies for all cuts carefully

calculated.