wreath product of set valued functors and tensor
play

Wreath product of set-valued functors and tensor multiplication - PDF document

Wreath product of set-valued functors and tensor multiplication Valdis Laan January 30, 2004, Kok o Wreath product of monoids and acts Def. 1 (Act) Let A be a monoid. A nonempty set M is called a left A -act (notation A M ), if there is a


  1. Wreath product of set-valued functors and tensor multiplication Valdis Laan January 30, 2004, Kok˜ o

  2. Wreath product of monoids and acts Def. 1 (Act) Let A be a monoid. A nonempty set M is called a left A -act (notation A M ), if there is a mapping A × M → M , ( k, m ) �→ km , such that 1. k 1 ( k 2 m ) = ( k 1 k 2 ) m for every k 1 , k 2 ∈ A and m ∈ M ; 2. 1 m = m for every m ∈ M . Def. 2 (WP of monoids) Let A , B be monoids and B N a left B -act. On the set A N × B we define a multiplication by (Ψ , g )(Φ , f ) = ( f Ψ ∗ Φ , gf ) , Φ , Ψ : N → A , f, g ∈ B , where ( f Ψ ∗ Φ)( n ) = Ψ( fn )Φ( n ) for every n ∈ N . With this multiplication A N × B becomes a monoid, which is called the wreath prod- uct of A and B through B N and denoted A wr N B .

  3. Def. 3 (WP of acts) Let A , B be monoids and A M, B N left acts. Then M × N becomes a left ( A wr N B )-act if we define (Φ , f )( m, n ) = (Φ( n ) m, fn ) , Φ : N → A , f ∈ B , m ∈ M, n ∈ N . This act is called the wreath product of acts A M and B N and is denoted by M wr N . Theorem 4 (Normak) M wr N is pullback flat iff A M and B N are pullback flat and • A is right collapsible, or • A is left reversible and for all f 1 , f 2 ∈ B , n ∈ N with f 1 n = f 2 n there exists g ∈ B such that f 1 g = f 2 g and gN = { n } , or • for all f 1 , f 2 ∈ B , n 1 , n 2 ∈ N with f 1 n 1 = f 2 n 2 there exist g 1 , g 2 ∈ B such that f 1 g 1 = f 2 g 2 and g 1 N = { n 1 } , g 2 N = { n 2 } .

  4. Wreath product of categories Def. 5 (WP of categories) Given small categories A and B and a functor B : B → Set , the (discrete) wreath product A wr B B is a category defined as follows: WP1 The objects of A wr B B are pairs ( α, b ), where b is an object of B and α : B ( b ) → Ob( A ) is a mapping. WP2 A morphism (Φ , f ) : ( α, b ) → ( α ′ , b ′ ) of A wr B B has f : b → b ′ a morphism of B and Φ = (Φ n ) n ∈ B ( b ) where Φ n : α ( n ) → ( α ′ ◦ B ( f ))( n ) in A . WP3 If (Φ , f ) : ( α, b ) → ( α ′ , b ′ ) and (Ψ , g ) : ( α ′ , b ′ ) → ( α ′′ , b ′′ ) are morphisms of A wr B B , then (Ψ , g ) ◦ (Φ , f ) = ( f Ψ ∗ Φ , g ◦ f ) : ( α, b ) → ( α ′′ , b ′′ ) , where ( f Ψ ∗ Φ) n = Ψ B ( f )( n ) ◦ Φ n . for every n ∈ B ( b ).

  5. � � � � � � Wreath product of Set-valued functors Def. 6 (WP of functors) Given small categories A and B and functors A : A → Set and B : B → Set , the wreath product A wr B is a functor A wr B B → Set , defined as follows: WF1 For an object ( α, b ) of A wr B B , ( A wr B )( α, b ) = { ( l, n ) | n ∈ B ( b ) , l ∈ A ( α ( n )) } . WF2 If (Φ , f ) : ( α, b ) → ( α ′ , b ′ ) is a morphism of A wr B B and ( l, n ) ∈ ( A wr B )( α, b ) then ( A wr B )(Φ , f )( l, n ) = ( A (Φ n )( l ) , B ( f )( n )) . � ( A wr B )( α, b ) ( α, b ) ( α, b ) ( A wr B )( α, b ) ∋ ( l, n ) � (Φ ,f ) ( A wr B )(Φ ,f ) ( α ′ , b ′ ) ( α ′ , b ′ ) ( A wr B )( α ′ , b ′ ) ( A wr B )( α ′ , b ′ ) ∋ ( A (Φ n )( l ) , B ( f )( n ))

  6. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Limits and colimits Let F : D → A be a functor and denote I = Ob( D ). ( L, ( p i ) i ∈ I ) = lim F : M M M � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � m � � � � � � � � � � q i ′ � q i � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � L L L � � � � � � � � � � � p i ′ � � � � p i � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � F ( i ′ ) F ( i ′ ) F ( i ′ ) F ( i ) F ( i ) F ( i ) F ( d ) i ′ i d ( L, ( s i ) i ∈ I ) = colim F : M M M � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � m � � � � � � � � � � t i ′ � t i � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � L L L � � � � � � � � � � � s i ′ � � � � s i � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � F ( i ′ ) F ( i ′ ) F ( i ′ ) F ( i ) F ( i ) F ( i ) F ( d )

  7. Lemma 7 If D is a small category, I = Ob( D ) and F : D → Set is a functor then lim F = { ( x i ) i ∈ I | x i ∈ F ( i ) , ∀ d : j → i in D F ( d )( x j )= x i } , with the obvious projections. A zig-zag connecting objects c and c ′ in a category C : f 1 g 1 f 2 g 2 f n g n − c ′ . c − → b 1 ← − a 1 − → b 2 ← − . . . − → b n ← If there is a zig-zag connecting two objects, we say that these objects are connected . Connectedness is an equivalence relation on the set of objects of a small category C , we denote it by ∼ and the equivalence class of an object c by [ c ] . Lemma 8 If C is a small category and F : C → Set is a functor then colim F = Ob(el( F )) / ∼ , where the injections s c : F ( c ) → colim F , c ∈ Ob( C ) , are defined by s c ( x ) = [( c, x )] , where x ∈ F ( c ) and [( c, x )] is the equivalence class of ( c, x ) ∈ Ob(el( F )) by ∼ .

  8. Preservation of limits Let ( L, ( p i ) i ∈ I ) be the limit of a functor F : D → A , where I = Ob( D ). A functor G : A → Set preserves it if ( G ( L ) , ( G ( p i )) i ∈ I ) is the limit of GF. Category of elements of a functor Consider a functor J : C → Set. The category of elements of J ( denoted by el( J )) has: • objects: pairs ( c, x ) , c ∈ Ob( C ), x ∈ J ( c ), → ( c ′ , x ′ ) are C -morphisms • morphisms ( c, x ) − f : c → c ′ such that J ( f )( x ) = x ′ . There is a forgetful functor E J : el( J ) → C , E J ( c, x ) = c, E J ( f ) = f, and a functor E op : el( J ) op → C op . J

  9. � � � � � � � � � � � Tensor products −◦ E op F � Fun( C op , Set ) J Fun( C op , Set ) Fun( C op , Set ) Fun(el( J ) op , Set ) Fun(el( J ) op , Set ) D � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � colim � � � −⊗ J � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Set Set We are interested in the situation where C is small, A = Fun( C op , Set), J : C → Set , and G = −⊗ J = colim ◦ ( −◦ E J ) : Fun( C op , Set) − → Set is the functor of tensor multiplication by J . −◦ E op Fun( B op , Set ) B Fun(el( B ) op , Set ) � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � −⊗ B � F colim � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Set D � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � −⊗ ( A wr B ) � � � � � � � � � T � colim � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � −◦ E op Fun(( A wr B ) op , Set ) A wr B Fun(el( A wr B ) op , Set )

  10. Results Let D be a small category. Theorem 9 If the functor − ⊗ ( A wr B ) preserves D -limits, then the functor −⊗ B preserves D -limits. Theorem 10 1. If the functor − ⊗ ( A wr B ) pre- serves D -limits of representables, then the func- tor − ⊗ A preserves D -limits of representables. 2. If the functor −⊗ ( A wr B ) preserves D -limits of representables, then the functor −⊗ B preserves D -limits of representables.

  11. If a ∈ Ob( A ) and b ∈ Ob( B ), then δ b a : B ( b ) → Ob( A ) denotes the constant mapping on a . If b ∈ Ob( B ) and k : a → a ′ is a morphism in A , then denoting Γ k = ( k ) n ∈ B ( b ) a ′ , b ) in A wr B B . we have (Γ k , 1 b ) : ( δ b a , b ) → ( δ b (*) For every functor T : D → Fun(( A wr B B ) op , Set ), a , b ) → ( δ b ′ a , b ′ ) in A wr B B every morphism (Λ , f ) : ( δ b (that is, f : b → b ′ in B and Λ = (Λ n ) n ∈ B ( b ) where Λ n : a → a for every n ∈ B ( b )) and every i ∈ I = Ob( D ) � (Λ , f ) op � � (Γ 1 a , f ) op � T i = T i . (**) For every functor T : D → Fun(( A wr B B ) op , Set ), every morphism k : a → a in A and every object b ∈ Ob( B ) (Γ k , 1 b ) op � � T i = 1 T i ( δ b a ,b ) . Theorem 11 Suppose that Ob( A ) = { a } and A wr B B satisfies (*) and (**). If − ⊗ A and − ⊗ B preserve D -limits, then − ⊗ ( A wr B ) preserves D - limits.

  12. References 1 G. Kelly, On clubs and doctrines , in Proceedings of Sydney Category Theory Sem- inar 1972/1973, G. Kelly, editor, volume 420 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag. 2 M. Kilp, U. Knauer, A. V. Mikhalev, Monoids, Acts and Categories , Walter de Gruyter, Berlin New York, 2000. 3 P. Normak, Strong flatness and projectivity of the wreath product of acts, in Abelevy Gruppy i Moduli, Tomsk, 1982. 4 M. Barr, Ch. Wells, Electronic supplement to Category Theory for Computing Science , http://www.cwru.edu/artsci/math/wells/pub /papers.html

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend