Workforce Perceptions: Workforce Perceptions: Employer Assessment - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

workforce perceptions workforce perceptions
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Workforce Perceptions: Workforce Perceptions: Employer Assessment - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Workforce Perceptions: Workforce Perceptions: Employer Assessment of the Employer Assessment of the Workforce in a Mississippi Delta Workforce in a Mississippi Delta County County


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Workforce Perceptions: Workforce Perceptions:

Employer Assessment of the Employer Assessment of the Workforce in a Mississippi Delta Workforce in a Mississippi Delta County County

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Purpose of the Study Purpose of the Study

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Mississippi Delta County Mississippi Delta County

  • !"#$

!"#$

  • %"$&!$&

%"$&!$&

  • '

'("!#" ("!#"

  • )*$!+$+

)*$!+$+

  • "$&

"$& , ,

  • .-/* 0
  • .-/* 0
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Hypotheses Hypotheses

  • (

(

  • ,

,

  • 11

11, ,

  • *

*

  • ,

,

  • !1

!1

  • ,

,

  • "

"

  • 11,

11, )211 )211

  • 11,

11,

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Methods Methods

  • %

%

  • 1

1

  • 3

3' '1 1

  • 4

4

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Independent Variables Independent Variables

  • 5

5

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Dependent Variables Dependent Variables

  • 46

46

  • 6
  • 6
  • 716

716

  • 16

16

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Analysis Analysis

  • '

'

  • )8

)8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Results Results

Perceptions of Availability of Workers by Introduction of New Technology 3.3 3.3 312.5 312.5 p p < < 0.90 0.90 3.3 3.3 24.0 24.0 3.3 3.3 23.2 23.2 Mean Mean Mean Rank Mean Rank MWU MWU 11.9 11.9 21.6 21.6 17.6 17.6 23.5 23.5 25.5 25.5 100.0 100.0 (n=51) (n=51) X X2

2=1.14, p

=1.14, p< <0.89 0.89 10.7 10.7 25.0 25.0 14.3 14.3 21.4 21.4 28.6 28.6 100.0 100.0 (n=28) (n=28) 13.0 13.0 17.4 17.4 21.7 21.7 26.1 26.1 21.7 21.7 100.0 100.0 (n=23) (n=23) Poor Poor Fair Fair Average Average Good Good Excellent Excellent Total Total Yes Yes No No Total Total New New Technology Technology Perception of Perception of Availability of Availability of Workers Workers

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Results Cont… Results Cont…

Perceptions of Quality of Workers by Introduction of New Technology 2.8 2.8 208.5 208.5 p p< <0.04 0.04 2.5 2.5 22.0 22.0 3.0 3.0 30.0 30.0 Mean Mean Mean Rank Mean Rank MWU MWU 12.0 12.0 24.0 24.0 46.0 46.0 16.0 16.0 2.0 2.0 100.0 100.0 (n=50) (n=50) X X2

2=16.6, p

=16.6, p< <0.03 0.03 17.9 17.9 35.7 35.7 28.6 28.6 14.3 14.3 3.6 3.6 100.0 100.0 (n=28) (n=28) 4.5 4.5 9.1 9.1 68.2 68.2 18.2 18.2 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 (n=22) (n=22) Poor Poor Fair Fair Average Average Good Good Excellent Excellent Total Total Yes Yes No No Total Total New Technology New Technology Perception of Perception of Quality of Quality of Workers Workers

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Results Cont… Results Cont…

Perceptions of Stability of Workers by Introduction of New Technology 3.29 3.29 278.5 278.5 p p< <.38 .38 3.14 3.14 24.5 24.5 3.43 3.43 27.9 27.9 Mean Mean Mean Rank Mean Rank MWU MWU 3.9 3.9 15.7 15.7 35.3 35.3 39.2 39.2 5.9 5.9 100.0 100.0 (n=51) (n=51) X X2

2=2.6 p

=2.6 p< <.63 .63 7.1 7.1 17.9 17.9 32.1 32.1 39.3 39.3 3.6 3.6 100.0 100.0 (n=28) (n=28) .0 .0 13.0 13.0 39.1 39.1 39.1 39.1 8.7 8.7 100.0 100.0 (n=23) (n=23) Poor Poor Fair Fair Average Average Good Good Excellent Excellent Total Total Yes Yes No No Total Total New New Technology Technology Perception of Perception of Stability of Stability of Workers Workers

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Results Cont… Results Cont…

Perceptions of Productivity of Workers by Introduction of New Technology 3.65 3.65 244.0 244.0 p p< <.67 .67 3.68 3.68 24.2 24.2 3.62 3.62 22.6 22.6 Mean Mean Mean Rank Mean Rank MWU MWU 2.2 2.2 4.3 4.3 39.1 39.1 34.8 34.8 19.6 19.6 100.0 100.0 (n=46) (n=46) X X2

2=5.05 p

=5.05 p< <.28 .28 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 36.0 36.0 44.0 44.0 16.0 16.0 100.0 100.0 (n=25) (n=25) 0.0 0.0 9.5 9.5 42.9 42.9 23.8 23.8 23.8 23.8 100.0 100.0 (n=21) (n=21) Poor Poor Fair Fair Average Average Good Good Excellent Excellent Total Total Yes Yes No No Total Total New New Technology Technology Perception of Perception of Productivity of Productivity of Workers Workers

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Results Cont… Results Cont…

Perceptions of Availability of Workers by Years in the Community 3.38 3.38 233.5 233.5 p p< <0.20 0.20 3.09 3.09 24.0 24.0 3.67 3.67 29.5 29.5 Mean Mean Mean Rank Mean Rank MWU MWU 11.8 11.8 21.6 21.6 17.6 17.6 23.5 23.5 25.5 25.5 100.0 100.0 (n=51) (n=51) X X2

2=6.82, p

=6.82, p< <0.15 0.15 18.2 18.2 24.2 24.2 15.2 15.2 15.2 15.2 27.3 27.3 100.0 100.0 (n=33) (n=33) 0.0 0.0 16.7 16.7 22.2 22.2 38.9 38.9 22.2 22.2 100.0 100.0 (n=18) (n=18) Poor Poor Fair Fair Average Average Good Good Excellent Excellent Total Total 26 or more years 26 or more years 25 years or less 25 years or less Total Total Years Company Years Company in the Community in the Community Perception of Perception of Availability of Availability of Workers Workers

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Results Cont… Results Cont…

Perceptions of Quality of Workers by Years in the Community 2.70 2.70 295.5 295.5 p p< <0.98 0.98 2.78 2.78 26.0 26.0 2.61 2.61 24.6 24.6 Mean Mean Mean Rank Mean Rank MWU MWU 12.0 12.0 24.0 24.0 46.0 46.0 16.0 16.0 2.0 2.0 100.0 100.0 (n=50) (n=50) X X2

2=4.63, p

=4.63, p< <0.33 0.33 6.3 6.3 28.1 28.1 50.0 50.0 12.5 12.5 3.1 3.1 100.0 100.0 (n=32) (n=32) 22.2 22.2 16.7 16.7 38.9 38.9 22.2 22.2 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 (n=18) (n=18) Poor Poor Fair Fair Average Average Good Good Excellent Excellent Total Total 26 or more years 26 or more years 25 years or less 25 years or less Total Total Years Company in the Community Years Company in the Community Perception of Perception of Quality of Quality of Workers Workers

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Results Cont… Results Cont…

Perceptions of Stability of Workers by Years in the Community 3.63 3.63 272.5 272.5 p p< <0.74 0.74 3.24 3.24 26.0 26.0 3.33 3.33 26.0 26.0 Mean Mean Mean Rank Mean Rank MWU MWU 3.9 3.9 15.7 15.7 35.3 35.3 39.2 39.2 5.9 5.9 100.0 100.0 (n=51) (n=51) X X2

2=3.41, p

=3.41, p< <0.49 0.49 5.1 5.1 18.2 18.2 27.3 27.3 42.4 42.4 6.1 6.1 100.0 100.0 (n=33) (n=33) 0.0 0.0 11.1 11.1 50.0 50.0 33.3 33.3 5.6 5.6 100.0 100.0 (n=18) (n=18) Poor Poor Fair Fair Average Average Good Good Excellent Excellent Total Total 26 or more years 26 or more years 25 years or less 25 years or less Total Total Years Company Years Company in the Community in the Community Perception of Perception of Stability of Stability of Workers Workers

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Results Cont… Results Cont…

Perceptions of Productivity of Workers by Years in the Community 3.29 3.29 226.0 226.0 p p< <0.73 0.73 3.70 3.70 24.0 24.0 3.56 3.56 22.6 22.6 Mean Mean Mean Rank Mean Rank MWU MWU 2.2 2.2 4.3 4.3 39.1 39.1 34.8 34.8 19.6 19.6 100.0 100.0 (n=46) (n=46) X X2

2=3.17, p

=3.17, p< <0.53 0.53 0.0 0.0 6.7 6.7 36.7 36.7 36.7 36.7 20.0 20.0 100.0 100.0 (n=30) (n=30) 6.3 6.3 0.0 0.0 43.8 43.8 31.3 31.3 18.8 18.8 100.0 100.0 (n=16) (n=16) Poor Poor Fair Fair Average Average Good Good Excellent Excellent Total Total 26 or more years 26 or more years 25 years or less 25 years or less Total Total Years Company Years Company in the Community in the Community Perception of Perception of Productivity of Productivity of Workers Workers

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Results Cont… Results Cont…

Perceptions of Worker Availability by Type of Company 3.35 3.35 237.0 237.0 p p< <0.82 0.82 3.41 3.41 24.1 24.1 3.28 3.28 23.2 23.2 Mean Mean Mean Rank Mean Rank MWU MWU 10.9 10.9 23.9 23.9 15.2 15.2 21.7 21.7 28.3 28.3 (n=46) (n=46) X X2

2=4.75, p

=4.75, p< <0.31 0.31 0.0 0.0 29.4 29.4 23.5 23.5 23.5 23.5 23.5 23.5 100.0 100.0 (n=17) (n=17) 17.2 17.2 20.7 20.7 10.3 10.3 20.7 20.7 31.1 31.1 100.0 100.0 (n=29) (n=29) Poor Poor Fair Fair Average Average Good Good Excellent Excellent Total Total Service Provider Service Provider Manufacturer Manufacturer Total Total Type of Type of Company Company Perception of Perception of Availability of Availability of Workers Workers

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Results Cont… Results Cont…

Table 10: Perceptions of Worker Quality by Type of Company 2.73 2.73 196.0 196.0 p p< <0.30 0.30 2.59 2.59 20.5 20.5 2.86 2.86 24.5 24.5 Mean Mean Mean Rank Mean Rank MWU MWU 11.1 11.1 24.4 24.4 44.4 44.4 17.8 17.8 2.2 2.2 100.0 100.0 (n=45) (n=45) X X2

2=4.04, p

=4.04, p< <0.40 0.40 17.6 17.6 29.4 29.4 35.3 35.3 11.8 11.8 5.9 5.9 100.0 100.0 (n=17) (n=17) 7.1 7.1 21.4 21.4 50.0 50.0 21.4 21.4 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 (n=28) (n=28) Poor Poor Fair Fair Average Average Good Good Excellent Excellent Total Total Service Provider Service Provider Manufacturer Manufacturer Total Total Type of Type of Company Company Perception of Perception of Quality of Quality of Workers Workers

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Results Cont… Results Cont…

Perceptions of Worker Stability by Type of Company 3.35 3.35 238.0 238.0 p p< <0.84 0.84 3.35 3.35 23.0 23.0 3.34 3.34 23.8 23.8 Mean Mean Mean Rank Mean Rank MWU MWU 2.2 2.2 15.2 15.2 34.8 34.8 41.3 41.3 6.5 6.5 100.0 100.0 (n=46) (n=46) X X2

2=2.22, p

=2.22, p< <0.70 0.70 0.0 0.0 11.8 11.8 47.1 47.1 35.3 35.3 5.9 5.9 100.0 100.0 (n=17) (n=17) 3.4 3.4 17.2 17.2 27.6 27.6 44.8 44.8 6.9 6.9 100.0 100.0 (n=29) (n=29) Poor Poor Fair Fair Average Average Good Good Excellent Excellent Total Total Service Provider Service Provider Manufacturer Manufacturer Total Total Type of Type of Company Company Perception of Perception of Stability of Stability of Workers Workers

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Results Cont… Results Cont…

Perceptions of Worker Productivity by Type of Company 3.68 3.68 184.5 184.5 p p< <0.78 0.78 3.67 3.67 20.3 20.3 3.69 3.69 21.4 21.4 Mean Mean Mean Rank Mean Rank MWU MWU 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 39.0 39.0 36.6 36.6 19.5 19.5 100.0 100.0 (n=41) (n=41) X X2

2=2.05, p

=2.05, p< <0.73 0.73 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.7 46.7 40.0 40.0 13.3 13.3 100.0 100.0 (n=15) (n=15) 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 34.6 34.6 34.6 34.6 23.1 23.1 100.0 100.0 (n=26) (n=26) Poor Poor Fair Fair Average Average Good Good Excellent Excellent Total Total Service Provider Service Provider Manufacturer Manufacturer Total Total Type of Type of Company Company Perception of Perception of Productivity of Productivity of Workers Workers

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Summary of Findings Summary of Findings

Summary of Workforce Perceptions Man > Man > Serv Serv. . New < Old New < Old No < Yes No < Yes Productivity Productivity Man Man ~ ~ Serv Serv. . New > Old New > Old No > Yes No > Yes Stability Stability

  • Man. >
  • Man. > Serv

Serv. . New < Old New < Old No > Yes* No > Yes* Quality Quality

  • Man. <
  • Man. < Serv

Serv. . New > Old New > Old No No ~ ~ Yes Yes Availability Availability Manufacturing/Service Manufacturing/Service 25 or less/26 or 25 or less/26 or more more No/Yes No/Yes Type of Type of Company Company Years in Years in Community Community New New Technology Technology Perceptions of Perceptions of Workforce Workforce

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Significance of the Study Significance of the Study

  • .

.

  • 2

2

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Limitations of the Study Limitations of the Study

  • 1

1