Developing an Internationalization Strategy without Sacrificing the Unique Identity:
- Prof. Dr. Cem Tanova
without Sacrificing the Unique Identity: A strategic priority for - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Developing an Internationalization Strategy Prof. Dr. Cem Tanova without Sacrificing the Unique Identity: A strategic priority for governments around the world because of the economic, political, social, and academic benefits associated with
A strategic priority for governments around the world because of the economic, political, social, and academic benefits associated with it.1 More than 90% of universities have internationalization mentioned in their mission/strategic plan.2 Number of international students globally increased from 2 to 5.3 million according to
the home country and motivate the students to leave their home country to undertake international study
country and draw the students to the destination
Push factors had strength in the initial reasons for studying abroad, Pull factors dominated the choices of a host country and a host institution
Soon attracted international students
English Language education Accessibility
Quality of education Safe environment
To educate local Turkish Cypriot youth after the separation of the two communities in Cyprus. Eastern Mediterranean University established as a Higher Technological Institute in 1979
Internationalization
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Doğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi Girne Amerikan Üniversitesi Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi Lefke Avrupa Ünivers… Uluslararası Kıbrıs Üniversitesi ODTÜ Kuzey Kıbrıs Kampüsü İTÜ-KKTC Eğitim Araştırma Yerleşkeleri Akdeniz Karpaz Üniversitesi Girne Üniversitesi Kıbrıs İlim Üniversitesi Arkın Yaratıcı Sanatlar ve Tasarım Üniversitesi Kıbrıs Batı Üniversitesi Onbeş Kasım Kıbrıs Üniversitesi Uluslararası Final Üniversitesi Rauf Denktaş Üniversitesi Kıbrıs Sosyal Bilimler Üniversitesi Ada Kent Üniversitesi Kıbrıs Amerikan Üniversitesi Kıbrıs Sağlık ve Toplum Bilimleri Üniversitesi Bahçeşehir Kıbrıs Üniversitesi 5 10 15 20 25
10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000
1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2018-19 Titolo del grafico Local Turkey International
Mean Ranking SD Not being able to be placed in the academic program in my country 3.19 1.56 The high cost of the educational program in my country 2.61 1.51 Desire to learn about other cultures 2.53 1.35 Limited scholarship opportunities in my country 2.52 1.50 Quality of education in my country is lower 2.06 1.34 Lower status of graduates of universities in my country 1.87 1.21 Lower quality of life in my country 1.84 1.19
Factors Push / Obligatory Pull / Choice Not being able to be placed in the academic program in my country .381
The high cost of the educational program in my country
.788 Desire to learn about other cultures
.538 Limited scholarship opportunities in my country .773 .068 Quality of education in my country is lower .748 .260 Lower status of graduates of universities in my country .139 .794 Lower quality of life in my country .149 .760
issues by students.
context of international good practice.
resources
by foreign institutions
Universalist approach “best practice” there are some standards that all universities should apply Universalism One size fits all Contingency/Best Fit “Fit” with external environment Classical strategy. Strategy is aligned with and contingent upon the demands of the
Resource Based View A paradigm shift, Focuses on internal resources “Uniqueness” leads to competitive advantage Internally focused/Inside
Benchmarking Accreditation Bodies Ranking Systems Institutional Theory - Isomorphisim
Coercive Mimetic Normative
SWOT PESTLE Analyze the environment Assess the competititive forces Choose between
Cost Leadership – Ease of Access, entry, etc Differentiation – Offer high quality and demand more
Resist the temptation to change course in the process
In the context of managing people, we are most interested in how human resources management policy choices and
These resources can be
tangible (e.g. physical and fnancial)
intangible (organisational, patents and skilled human resources).
The key focus of the RBV is to create SCA through investing in and organising their resources and capabilities
VALUE RARITY IMITABLE (NOT) ORGANISATION
Do not imitate Find your institution’s unique value proposition Do not kill the goose that lays the golden eggs Think long term
Internationalization: A Global Comparative Perspective BT - European Higher Education Area: The Impact of Past and Future
Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Evolving Landscape, Locally and Globally IAU 5 th Global Survey Executive summary.