Winnable Battles Angie Cradock, ScD CHOICES- Why are we doing this? - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

winnable battles
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Winnable Battles Angie Cradock, ScD CHOICES- Why are we doing this? - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CHOICES Project: Leveraging June 21, 2016 Opportunities to Address Denver, Colorado Winnable Battles Angie Cradock, ScD CHOICES- Why are we doing this? Childhood obesity Best results Public policy, prevention for dollars public health,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

CHOICES Project: Leveraging Opportunities to Address Winnable Battles Angie Cradock, ScD

June 21, 2016 Denver, Colorado

slide-2
SLIDE 2

CHOICES- Why are we doing this?

Childhood

  • besity

prevention policies and programs Best results for dollars invested Public policy, public health, general public

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Cost Effectiveness Analysis

Cost Effectiveness Analysis compares the costs and outcomes of:

One policy or program intervention with no intervention Two policy or program interventions

OR vs. vs.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Costs & Outcomes

Difference in Effectiveness Difference in Cost + + – – Lower costs Better outcome Higher costs Better outcome Higher costs Worse outcome Lower costs Worse outcome

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Costs & Outcomes

Difference in Effectiveness Difference in Cost + + – – Lower costs Better outcome Higher costs Better outcome Higher costs Worse outcome Lower costs Worse outcome

slide-6
SLIDE 6

How Can CHOICES Methods/Results Help You?

Provide evidence for action Explain impact on population Uncover effective implementation strategies Guide resource investment Cultivate alliances and support

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Opportunity to Partner w/CHOICES

CHOICES partnership work in year 2

States Large cities Large counties

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Overview of CHOICES

slide-9
SLIDE 9

CHOICES Model Outcomes

Reach

Who will benefit?

Effect

How much will they benefit?

Cost

How much will a program/policy change cost and will healthcare savings be more than implementation costs?

Focus on obesity-related initiatives

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Who will benefit?

  • Who?
  • How many?
  • Criteria to narrow

description and number?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

How much will they benefit?

  • How much will the

intervention reduce BMI?

  • Peer-reviewed

articles/evidence

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Cost to make change?

  • Activities and resources to achieve effect
  • All costs regardless of payer
  • Value for all necessary resources
  • Not intervention participants’ time
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Population - CHOICES Model

Virtual population = 1 million people

  • Matches state population
  • Accounts for personal characteristics

like dietary intake, body growth, and behaviors like smoking

slide-14
SLIDE 14

How many people benefit? Differences in BMI changes? Healthcare cost savings?

Ten-Year Trends - CHOICES Model

From 2015-2025, no intervention vs. intervention: 2015 2025

slide-15
SLIDE 15

How the Model Works

OUTCOMES Simulate to: 2025 Healthcare Costs Mortality Obesity HEALTH STATUS Obesity INDIVIDUAL FACTORS Body Growth Personal Characteristics

(e.g. dietary intake)

Smoking POPULATION FACTORS Population Growth BMI Trends Start: 2015 VIRTUAL POPULATION

From 2010 U.S. Census Data

BASELINE SCENARIO

slide-16
SLIDE 16

OUTCOMES Simulate to: 2025 Healthcare Costs Mortality Obesity HEALTH STATUS Obesity

How the Model Works

INTERVENTION SCENARIO

INTERVENTION

Dietary Intake/Physical Activity

INDIVIDUAL FACTORS Body Growth Personal Characteristics

(e.g. dietary intake)

Smoking POPULATION FACTORS Population Growth BMI Trends Start: 2015 VIRTUAL POPULATION

From 2010 U.S. Census Data

INTERVENTION SCENARIO

slide-17
SLIDE 17

575,936 SSB Tax $14.17 billion NET COST SAVINGS AFTER 10 YEARS CASES OF CHILDHOOD OBESITY PREVENTED IN 2025 TV Ads $260 million 129,061 Smart Snacks $792 million 344,649 NET COST AFTER 10 YEARS School Meals* $6.44 billion 1,815,966 Early Childcare $731 million 38,385 Bariatric Surgery $303 million Not applicable

Interventions That Reduce Childhood Obesity

*The 95% uncertainty interval for the estimate includes zero (Gortmaker et al., Health Affairs, Nov. 2015.)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

CHOICES State Partnership

  • ASTHO connects states and other partner
  • rganizations to work with CHOICES team
  • ASTHO advised on framework and logistics

for the state learning community partnership +

slide-19
SLIDE 19

CHOICES State Partnership

Partner w/ state health agencies to: Identify and assess 2-3 interventions Apply state-specific implementation scenarios Communicate results to inform decision making

slide-20
SLIDE 20

State Models

Who will benefit? How much will they benefit? How much does it cost to make a program change?

State-specific intervention profiles Input state-specific data for cost-effective analysis

slide-21
SLIDE 21

States Use of CHOICES Model

Washington Example: Active Recess Program Mississippi Example: Early Care and Education Screen Time Policy and Programs

slide-22
SLIDE 22

More Info on Year 2 Partnerships

Application process:

  • Application materials on http://choicesproject.org/work-with-us/
  • FAQ webinar July 14th 12 pm EST
  • Proposals due Aug 5th
  • Awardees notified Aug 31st

Project year: Oct 1, 2016 - Sept 30, 2017 Includes financial assistance to health agencies to complete work For additional information: www.choicesproject.org, cgiles@hsph.harvard.edu