why curvature in l curve
play

Why Curvature in L-Curve: Analysis of the . . . Additional - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Inverse Problem: A . . . Enter Soft Constraints Regularization How to Determine the . . . Why Curvature in L-Curve: Analysis of the . . . Additional Invariance . . . Combining Soft Constraints Main Result Acknowledgments Proof Anibal


  1. Inverse Problem: A . . . Enter Soft Constraints Regularization How to Determine the . . . Why Curvature in L-Curve: Analysis of the . . . Additional Invariance . . . Combining Soft Constraints Main Result Acknowledgments Proof Anibal Sosa, Martine Ceberio, and Vladik Kreinovich Home Page Title Page Cyber-ShARE Center University of Texas at El Paso ◭◭ ◮◮ 500 W. University El Paso, TX 79968, USA ◭ ◮ usosaaguirre@miners.utep.edu Page 1 of 14 mceberio@utep.edu, vladik@utep.edu Go Back Full Screen Close Quit

  2. Inverse Problem: A . . . Enter Soft Constraints 1. Inverse Problem: A Brief Reminder Regularization • In science & engineering, we are interested in the state How to Determine the . . . of the world, i.e., in the values of different quantities. Analysis of the . . . Additional Invariance . . . • Some of these quantities we can directly measure, but Main Result many quantities are difficult to measure directly. Acknowledgments • For example, in geophysics, we are interested in the Proof density at different depths and different locations. Home Page • In principle, we can drill a borehole and directly mea- Title Page sure these properties, but this is very expensive. ◭◭ ◮◮ • To find the values of such difficult-to-measure quanti- ◭ ◮ ties q = ( q 1 , . . . , q n ), we: Page 2 of 14 – measure auxiliary quantities a = ( a 1 , . . . , a m ) re- Go Back lated to q i by a known dependence a i = f i ( q 1 , . . . , q n ), Full Screen – and then reconstruct the values q j from these mea- surement results. Close Quit

  3. Inverse Problem: A . . . Enter Soft Constraints 2. Enter Soft Constraints Regularization • Objective: describe the constraint that the values q j How to Determine the . . . are consistent with the observations a i . Analysis of the . . . Additional Invariance . . . • Assumption: measurement errors a i − f i ( q 1 , . . . , q n ) are Main Result indep. normal variables with 0 mean and same σ 2 . Acknowledgments • Resulting constraint: s ≤ s 0 , where Proof m � Home Page def ( a i − f i ( q 1 , . . . , q n )) 2 . = s Title Page i =1 ◭◭ ◮◮ • Fact: for each s 0 , there is a certain probability that ◭ ◮ this constraint will be violated. Page 3 of 14 • Soft constraints: such constraints are called soft . Go Back • For convenience: this constraint is sometimes described def in a log scale, as x ≤ x 0 , where x = ln( s ). Full Screen Close Quit

  4. Inverse Problem: A . . . Enter Soft Constraints 3. Regularization Regularization • Methods for taking additional regularity constraints How to Determine the . . . into account are known as regularization methods . Analysis of the . . . Additional Invariance . . . • Example: In geophysics, the density values at nearby Main Result locations are usually close to each other: q j − q j ′ ≈ 0. Acknowledgments • Assumption: differences q j − q j ′ are indep. and normally Proof distributed with 0 mean and the same σ 2 d . Home Page = � def ( q j − q j ′ ) 2 . • Resulting constraint: t ≤ t 0 , where t Title Page ( j,j ′ ) ◭◭ ◮◮ def • In log scale: y ≤ y 0 , where y = ln( t ). ◭ ◮ • How to combine constraints: e.g., we can use the Max- Page 4 of 14 imum Likelihood method. Go Back • Result: we find the values q j that minimize the sum Full Screen s + λ · t , where λ depends on the variances σ 2 and σ 2 d . Close Quit

  5. Inverse Problem: A . . . Enter Soft Constraints 4. How to Determine the Parameter λ Regularization • Fact: for each λ , we can find q j ( λ ), and, based on this How to Determine the . . . solution, compute x ( λ ) and y ( λ ). Analysis of the . . . Additional Invariance . . . • Question: what value λ shall we choose? Main Result • Often: the curve ( x ( λ ) , y ( λ )) has a turning point (is Acknowledgments L-shaped ). Proof • In this case: it is reasonable to select this turning point. Home Page • How to describe it: it is a point where the absolute Title Page value | C | of the curvature C is the largest: ◭◭ ◮◮ x ′′ · y ′ − y ′′ · x ′ def C = (( x ′ ) 2 + ( y ′ ) 2 ) 3 / 2 . ◭ ◮ Page 5 of 14 • Fact: this approach often works well. Go Back • Natural question: explain why curvature works well. Full Screen • What we do: we show that reasonable properties select a class of functions that include curvature. Close Quit

  6. Inverse Problem: A . . . Enter Soft Constraints 5. Analysis of the Problem: Scale-Invariance Regularization • The numerical values of each quantity depend on the How to Determine the . . . selection of a measuring unit a . Analysis of the . . . Additional Invariance . . . • If we change a to a new measuring unit c a times smaller, Main Result then a i and a i − f i ( q 1 , . . . , q n ) get multiplied by c a . Acknowledgments � n ( a i − f i ( q 1 , . . . , q n )) 2 get multiplied by c 2 • So, s = a , Proof i =1 Home Page def = ln( c 2 and x = ln( s ) changes to x + ∆ x , where ∆ x a ). Title Page • If we change a measuring unit q by a new one c q times ◭◭ ◮◮ smaller, then q j and q j − q j ′ get multiplied by c 2 q . • Also t = � ( q j − q j ′ ) 2 , and y = ln( t ) get multiplied by ◭ ◮ Page 6 of 14 c 2 q , and y = ln( t ) changes to y + ∆ y Go Back • Under these changes x ( λ ) → x ( λ ) + ∆ x and y ( λ ) → Full Screen y ( λ ) + ∆ y , and the curvature does not change. Close Quit

  7. Inverse Problem: A . . . Enter Soft Constraints 6. Additional Invariance and Our Main Idea Regularization • Instead of the original parameter λ , we can use a new How to Determine the . . . parameter µ for which λ = g ( µ ). Analysis of the . . . Additional Invariance . . . • This re-scaling of a parameter does not change the Main Result curve itself and thus, does not change its curvature. Acknowledgments • Our idea: to describe all the functions which are in- Proof variant with respect to both types of re-scalings. Home Page • By a parameter selection criterion we mean a function Title Page F ( x, y, x ′ , y ′ , x ′′ , y ′′ ) of six variables. ◭◭ ◮◮ • F is scale-invariant if for all values ∆ x and ∆ y , ◭ ◮ F ( x + ∆ x , y + ∆ y , x ′ , y ′ , x ′′ , y ′′ ) = F ( x, y, x ′ , y ′ , x ′′ , y ′′ ); Page 7 of 14 • F is invariant w.r.t. parameter re-scaling if for every Go Back function g ( z ) , for � x ( µ ) = x ( g ( µ )) , � y ( µ ) = y ( g ( µ )) , Full Screen x ′ , � y ′ , � x ′′ , � y ′′ ) = F ( x, y, x ′ , y ′ , x ′′ , y ′′ ) . F ( � x, � y, � Close Quit

  8. Inverse Problem: A . . . Enter Soft Constraints 7. Main Result Regularization Main Result. A parameter selection criterion is scale- How to Determine the . . . invariant and invariant w.r.t. parameter re-scaling if and Analysis of the . . . only if it has the form Additional Invariance . . . � � C ( x, y, x ′ , y ′ , x ′′ , y ′′ ) , y ′ Main Result F ( x, y, x ′ , y ′ , x ′′ , y ′′ ) = f Acknowledgments x ′ Proof for some function f ( C, z ) , where Home Page x ′′ · y ′ − y ′′ · x ′ def Title Page C = (( x ′ ) 2 + ( y ′ ) 2 ) 3 / 2 . ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮ Comment. Once a criterion is selected, for each problem, Page 8 of 14 we use the value λ for which the value Go Back F ( x ( λ ) , y ( λ ) , x ′ ( λ ) , y ′ ( λ ) , x ′′ ( λ ) , y ′′ ( λ )) Full Screen is the largest. Close Quit

  9. Inverse Problem: A . . . Enter Soft Constraints 8. Acknowledgments Regularization This work was supported in part: How to Determine the . . . Analysis of the . . . • by the National Science Foundation grants HRD-0734825 Additional Invariance . . . and DUE-0926721, Main Result • by Grant 1 T36 GM078000-01 from the National Insti- Acknowledgments tutes of Health, and Proof Home Page • by UTEP’s Computational Science program. Title Page ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮ Page 9 of 14 Go Back Full Screen Close Quit

  10. Inverse Problem: A . . . Enter Soft Constraints 9. Proof Regularization • For each tuple ( x, y, x ′ , y ′ , x ′′ , y ′′ ), by taking ∆ x = − x How to Determine the . . . and ∆ y = − y , we conclude that Analysis of the . . . Additional Invariance . . . F ( x, y, x ′ , y ′ , x ′′ , y ′′ ) = F (0 , 0 , x ′ , y ′ , x ′′ , y ′′ ) . Main Result • Thus, we conclude that Acknowledgments Proof F ( x, y, x ′ , y ′ , x ′′ , y ′′ ) = F 0 ( x ′ , y ′ , x ′′ , y ′′ ) , Home Page def where we denoted F 0 ( x ′ , y ′ , x ′′ , y ′′ ) = F (0 , 0 , x ′ , y ′ , x ′′ , y ′′ ). Title Page ◭◭ ◮◮ • So, we conclude that the value of the parameter selec- tion criterion does not depend on x and y at all. ◭ ◮ • In terms of the function F 0 , invariance w.r.t. parameter Page 10 of 14 x ′ , � y ′ , � x ′′ , � y ′′ ) = F 0 ( x ′ , y ′ , x ′′ , y ′′ ) . re-scaling means that F 0 ( � Go Back • Re-scaling means that we go from the original function Full Screen x ( λ ) to the new function � x ( µ ) = x ( g ( µ )). Close Quit

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend