Why Are 401(k)/IRA Balances Substantially Below Potential? Andrew G. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

why are 401 k ira balances substantially below potential
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Why Are 401(k)/IRA Balances Substantially Below Potential? Andrew G. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Why Are 401(k)/IRA Balances Substantially Below Potential? Andrew G. Biggs, Alicia H. Munnell, and Anqi Chen American Enterprise Institute and Center for Retirement Research at Boston College 21 st Annual Retirement and Disability Research


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Andrew G. Biggs, Alicia H. Munnell, and Anqi Chen American Enterprise Institute and Center for Retirement Research at Boston College 21st Annual Retirement and Disability Research Consortium Meeting August 1-2, 2019 Washington, DC

Why Are 401(k)/IRA Balances Substantially Below Potential?

slide-2
SLIDE 2

1

An excel spreadsheet shows that the average worker could have close to $350,000 in their 401(k)/IRAs.

Potential Balances for a Median Worker Ages 55-64, 2014

Notes: Excludes money contributed directly to IRAs. Assumes the average worker earns $58,000 near retirement, consistently contributes 9 percent of earnings, and earns average market returns. Source: Authors’ calculations.

$364,000 $0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 Potential

slide-3
SLIDE 3

2

But in reality, the average worker has only accumulated $92,000 in their accounts.

Potential vs Actual Balances for Workers Ages 55-64, 2014

Note: Excludes money contributed directly to IRAs. Source: Authors’ calculations using U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF), 2016.

$364,000 $92,000 $0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 Potential Actual

slide-4
SLIDE 4

3

One reason for this gap is that those approaching retirement today were covered by an immature system.

Workers with Pension Coverage by Type of Plan, 1983-2016

Source: Authors’ calculations based on SCF (1983-2016).

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 1983 1989 1995 2001 2007 2013 Defined contribution only Defined benefit only Both

Percentage of Time Workers Spend Contributing to a Retirement Account, By Age Group

Note: Contributions are projected for younger cohorts. Source: Authors’ calculations using SIPP-linked Administrative Tax Data.

44.0% 42.1% 34.6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 35-44 45-54 55-64

slide-5
SLIDE 5

4

Percentage of Private Sector Workers Ages 25-64 Participating in an Employer-sponsored Plan, 1980-2013

A second reason is that, even while 401(k) plans have expanded, workers move in and out of coverage.

Source: Authors’ calculations from U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey (1980-2014).

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

slide-6
SLIDE 6

5

A third reason for the gap is that workers have the ability to tap accounts before retirement.

Annual Leakages Out of Defined Contribution Accounts as a Percentage of Assets, 2013

Sources: Authors’ estimates based on Vanguard (2014); and Munnell and Webb (2015).

0.6% 0.3% 0.2% 0.2% 1.5% 0.0% 0.4% 0.8% 1.2% 1.6% Cashed-out Hardship withdrawl Post 59 1/2 withdrawal Loan Total Post 59½

slide-7
SLIDE 7

6

A fourth reason is that fees erode net returns on investments.

Average Expense Ratios for Long-Term Mutual Funds, By Asset Type, 1996-2017

Source: Investment Company Institute (2018).

0.59 0.48 0.25 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 1996 2001 2006 2011 2016 Equity Bond Money market

slide-8
SLIDE 8

7

  • Factors like the system’s immaturity will dissipate, while inconsistent contributions

are likely to continue.

  • Understanding the role of each factor can provide insight into the best ways to

encourage more saving.

This paper explores the relative importance of each factor.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

8

  • The analysis uses Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) linked to W-2

and Schedule C records on earnings and contributions.

  • The focus of the analysis is workers from the 2008 SIPP panel who were ages 55-64

in 2014 and made a tax-deferred contribution.

  • Account balances include 401(k)s and rollover IRAs.

Data

slide-10
SLIDE 10

9

  • Step 1: Estimate potential balances based on universal coverage and consistent

contributions of 9 percent of earnings (6 percent employee plus 3 percent employer).

  • Step 2: Document actual balances, as reported in the SIPP.
  • Step 3: Calculate actual lifetime contributions and accumulated balances for each

individual in the SIPP sample, assuming no leakages or fees.

  • Step 4: Use the contributions of younger cohort to separate the lack of contributions

from the immaturity of the system.

  • Step 5: Divide remaining difference between fees and leakages using ICI fees data.

Methodology

slide-11
SLIDE 11

10

The main culprits are the immaturity of the system and inconsistent coverage/contributions.

Impact of Various Factors on 401(k)/ IRA Balances for a Typical Worker Ages 55-64 in 2014

Note: Individuals must have worked at some point between ages 55-64 and contributed at least $1 to a 401(k) plan over their careers. Sources: Authors’ calculations using SIPP (1984-1986); and SIPP-linked Administrative Tax Data.

$364,000 $247,800 $136,200 $122,800 $92,000 $0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 Potential Actual Immature system Inconsistent coverage/ contributions Fees Leakages

slide-12
SLIDE 12

11

In a mature system, inconsistent coverage/contributions is the main reason for the gap.

Estimated Impact of Various Factors on 401(k)/ IRA Balances for a Typical Worker Ages 55-64 in a Mature System

Note: Individuals must have worked at some point between ages 55-64 and contributed at least $1 to a 401(k) plan over their careers. Sources: Authors’ calculations using SIPP (1984-1986); and SIPP-linked Administrative Tax Data.

$364,000 $252,400 $227,568 $170,490 $0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 Potential Actual Inconsistent coverage/ contributions Fees Leakages

slide-13
SLIDE 13

12

Even in a mature system, young workers still are not contributing earlier in their career...

Percentage of Workers Contributing Over Working Lives, By Age Group in 2014

Note: Individuals must have worked at some point and contributed at least $1 to a 401(k) plan over their careers. Sources: Authors’ calculations using SIPP (1984-1986); and SIPP-linked Administrative Tax Data.

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 35-44 45-54 55-64

slide-14
SLIDE 14

13

…and workers in lower quintiles may still fall short.

Percentage of Workers Ages 55-64 Contributing, By Income Quintile, 2014

Sources: Authors’ calculations using SIPP (1984-1986); and SIPP-linked Administrative Tax Data.

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Highest Fourth Middle Second Lowest

slide-15
SLIDE 15

$270,100 $172,100 $120,500 $108,100 $90,000 $0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 Potential Actual Immature system Inconsistent coverage/ contributions Fees Leakages

14

One could question whether all workers need to save

  • aggressively. Sensitivity analysis, excluding workers with a

DB and the very young, still shows a large gap.

Impact of Various Factors on 401(k)/ IRA Balances for a Typical Worker Ages 55-64 in 2014

Note: Assumes contributions start at age 30 and excludes workers with DB plans between ages 55-64. Sources: Authors’ calculations using SIPP (1984-1986); and SIPP-linked Administrative Tax Data.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

15

  • 401(k)/IRA plans give households the potential to accumulate substantial retirement assets.
  • But, in reality, the typical worker has less than $100,000 in 401(k)/IRA assets, instead of the

$364,000 from an excel spreadsheet.

  • The immaturity of the system and inconsistent contributions are the main culprits, followed

by leakages and fees.

  • Today’s near-retirees typically spent only about one third of their working careers

participating, and the portion of workers without coverage has stagnated and remains large.

  • The lack of universal coverage means that – even once the system matures – 401(k)/IRA

plans will continue to fall substantially below their potential.

Conclusion