Who we are: Tom Walker // @thomwithoutanh Privacy The right to - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

who we are
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Who we are: Tom Walker // @thomwithoutanh Privacy The right to - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Beneficial ownership transparency, Title Page privacy and data protection 23 October Presented by Tom Walker tom@theengineroom.org @thomwithoutanh Who we are: Tom Walker // @thomwithoutanh Privacy The right to privacy : individuals should be


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Title Page

Beneficial ownership transparency, privacy and data protection

23 October Presented by Tom Walker tom@theengineroom.org @thomwithoutanh

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Who we are:

Tom Walker // @thomwithoutanh

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The right to privacy: individuals should be free from arbitrary or unlawful interference with their privacy, home, correspondence and family. Includes protection of personal data + its processing Fundamental right BUT not an absolute right - can be restricted or limited in certain circumstances

Privacy

Tom Walker // @thomwithoutanh

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Data protection

Common principles:

  • Collection of data should be limited
  • Data must be collected for a specific purpose
  • Onward use of the data requires consent or legal authority
  • Data should be accurate and kept up to date if necessary
  • Individuals can obtain data about them held by others
  • Individuals can require correction or erasure of personal data

Tom Walker // @thomwithoutanh

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Assessing privacy arguments

Necessary to achieve a legitimate aim?

2

  • Water availability is sparse and also unpredictable
  • Water represents political tensions and bargains in which we have limited agency
  • Difficulty connecting the quality of water to how much we pay
  • Work done to tackle broken water services go unnoticed

Lawful?

Proportionate?

3 1

  • Possess phone number of tap managers / calendering / alarm clocks
  • Mobilise riots to threaten no votes / dismiss future dialogues
  • Consuming only packed water / cooking / complaining
  • Boycott water rates, discontinue attempts to fix things, strengthen community efforts

Tom Walker // @thomwithoutanh

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Applying this to beneficial ownership:

  • Possess phone number of tap managers / calendering / alarm clocks
  • Mobilise riots to threaten no votes / dismiss future dialogues
  • Consuming only packed water / cooking / complaining
  • Boycott water rates, discontinue attempts to fix things, strengthen community efforts

Is disclosing beneficial

  • wnership data

a necessary way to achieve a legitimate aim?

3

  • Project objectives and priorities
  • Project financial and time resources
  • Technology capabilities of context and implementers

How can a register be structured so that its benefits are balanced against potential harms?

4

Tom Walker // @thomwithoutanh

1

  • Water availability is sparse and also unpredictable
  • Water represents political tensions and bargains in which we have limited agency
  • Difficulty connecting the quality of water to how much we pay
  • Work done to tackle broken water services go unnoticed

Is it lawful to disclose the personal details of beneficial

  • wners of

companies?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Is it lawful?

Tom Walker // @thomwithoutanh

Often, yes - Various models worldwide show that it is compatible with data protection and other relevant

  • bligations.

Legal basis needed can come from: Legal obligation - applies if a country has passed beneficial ownership disclosure legislation - provided that data disclosed limited to what is relevant + necessary, and that individuals can request correction Consent - from beneficial owners themselves

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Examples

Tom Walker // @thomwithoutanh

  • 1. Beneficial ownership legislation ✓ and data

protection legislation✓? Can publish under ‘lawful authority’ exception

  • 2. Data protection legislation ✓ but no beneficial
  • wnership legislation ⤫?

Can disclose data with consent

  • 3. No beneficial ownership legislation ⤫ or data

protection legislation ⤫? Companies can disclose if this doesn’t violate general law (eg risk of breach of confidence)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Is publishing BO data publicly an interference with privacy rights?

Legally speaking, yes. BUT ‘interference’ doesn’t mean ‘illegal’ - (privacy is not an absolute right) ...it means that it needs to be justified.

Tom Walker // @thomwithoutanh

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Not enough evidence to judge (yet). BUT public registers:

  • allow greater public oversight and scrutiny
  • deter criminals by increasing the risk of lying
  • give companies and authorities more efficient, reliable

access to data they need. Verification of data is a problem - but this is also true

  • f closed registers.

ls it necessary to combat illegal financial activity?

Tom Walker // @thomwithoutanh

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Understanding the risks

Tom Walker // @thomwithoutanh

We haven’t found concrete evidence of harms (yet). Potential threats:

  • Identity theft
  • Security (eg kidnapping in Central America)
  • Association with high-risk groups (eg LGBT+ issues)
  • Combining with data from other sources
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Depends on what is published, and how it is published. + Do not collect and disclose data beyond the minimum necessary to achieve the aims described above + Assess the risk of harm in specific contexts and adjust exemptions accordingly. + Publish only a subset of the data that is disclosed to law enforcement authorities (see above). .

How can these potential harms be mitigated?

Tom Walker // @thomwithoutanh

slide-13
SLIDE 13

tom@theengineroom.org @thomwithoutanh

Questions?