While youre waiting, mark your calendar for these upcoming CDFA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

while you re waiting mark your calendar for these
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

While youre waiting, mark your calendar for these upcoming CDFA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CDFA Stern Brothers Renewable Energy Finance Webcast Series: Energy Efficiency (EE) & Renewable Energy (RE) Financing Best Practices The Broadcast will begin at 1:45pm (EDT). While youre waiting, mark your calendar for these upcoming


slide-1
SLIDE 1

CDFA: Advancing Development Finance Knowledge, Networks & Innovation www.cdfa.net

CDFA – Stern Brothers Renewable Energy Finance Webcast Series: Energy Efficiency (EE) & Renewable Energy (RE) Financing Best Practices The Broadcast will begin at 1:45pm (EDT).

While you’re waiting, mark your calendar for these upcoming CDFA events:

slide-2
SLIDE 2

CDFA: Advancing Development Finance Knowledge, Networks & Innovation www.cdfa.net

Katie Kramer

Director, Education & Programs Council of Development Finance Agencies Columbus, OH

Are you a CDFA Member? Members receive exclusive access to thousands of resources in the CDFA Online Resource Database. Join today at www.cdfa.net to set-up your unique login.

Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Financing Best Practices

slide-3
SLIDE 3

CDFA: Advancing Development Finance Knowledge, Networks & Innovation www.cdfa.net

Using your telephone will give you better audio quality. Submit your questions to the panelists here.

Want to watch again? You will find a recording of this webcast, as well as all previous CDFA webcasts, in the Online Resource Database at www.cdfa.net.

Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Financing Best Practices

slide-4
SLIDE 4

CDFA: Advancing Development Finance Knowledge, Networks & Innovation www.cdfa.net

Speakers

Les Krone, Moderator Stern Brothers & Co. Doug Lamb McGuire Woods LLP Anita Molino Bostonia Partners LLC Julie Metty Bennett Michigan Saves

Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Financing Best Practices

slide-5
SLIDE 5

CDFA: Advancing Development Finance Knowledge, Networks & Innovation www.cdfa.net

Les Krone

Managing Director Stern Brothers & Co.

  • St. Louis, MO

What are you reading these days? Your development finance toolbox isn’t complete without a set of CDFA reference guides. CDFA Members save 15% or more on every purchase. Order today at www.cdfa.net.

Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Financing Best Practices

slide-6
SLIDE 6

CDFA National Development Finance Summit

Washington D.C.

August 8, 2013

slide-7
SLIDE 7

1) No Construction Risk 2) No Merchant Risk 3) No Technology Risk

  • Commercialized Technology
  • Credit Enhancement

4) Feedstock Strategy (biomass) 5) Meaningful Sponsor ‘Skin-in-the-game’

Project Risk Mitigation Demands

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Bio-Products
  • Chemicals and fuels
  • Waste-to-Energy
  • Private developer and municipal
  • Solar
  • Municipal
  • Biomass Pellets
  • Recycling
  • Anaerobic Digestion
  • Private developer and municipal

Substantial Project Development Activity

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • $2.3 billion solar project (thin film)
  • MidAmerican Energy/Berkshire Hathaway
  • $1.1 billion Sr. Secured Notes
  • Taxable bonds due 2039 rated BBB/Baa2
  • $1.2 billion equity from sponsor (>50% equity)
  • 25-year PPA with PG&E
  • ‘Above market pricing…..’
  • First Solar EPC with fixed price
  • Technology in use for over 15 years
  • Debt service coverage 1.3x to 1.6x (stress scenarios)

Topaz Solar Project

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • $1.8 billion fertilizer project
  • Natural gas feedstock
  • OCI N.V. (Egyptian fertilizer manufacturer)
  • $1.2 billion Midwestern Disaster Area Revenue Bonds
  • Tax-exempt bonds due 2019/2022/2025 rated BB-
  • $600 million equity from sponsor (33% equity)
  • Feedstock and Off-take Agreements
  • 7-year natural gas supply agreement with hedge
  • Merchant off-take risk in commodity fertilizer market
  • EPC with LDs for Schedule and Performance
  • Parent guaranty of completion

Iowa Fertilizer Project

slide-11
SLIDE 11

CDFA: Advancing Development Finance Knowledge, Networks & Innovation www.cdfa.net

Doug Lamb

Partner McGuire Woods LLP Richmond, VA Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Financing Best Practices

Are you a CDFA Member? Members receive discounts to all CDFA events, including training courses and the National Development Finance

  • Summit. Join today at www.cdfa.net , and start saving.
slide-12
SLIDE 12

www.mcguire rewoo

  • ods.

ds.com

  • m

Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Financing Best Practices & Deal Strategies

  • A Legal Perspective -

CDFA – 2013 National Development Finance Summit

Washington, D.C. August 8, 2013 Douglas E. Lamb

slide-13
SLIDE 13

McGuireWoods LLP | 2

Overview - Best Practices & Deal Strategies

  • Identifying the purpose of the project, the goal and any constraints, including

technology risk

  • Determining sources of repayment and credit
  • Assembling a team
  • Optimizing the deal structure, including use of incentives, such as PACE, tax-

advantaged obligations, tax credits and grants

slide-14
SLIDE 14

McGuireWoods LLP | 3

Project Planning and Initial Development

  • Conceptual Diligence and Evaluation
  • Feasibility (technology, regulatory, economic, project dynamics, energy market)
  • Publicly-owned vs. Private?
  • Public-Private Partnership
  • DBOO/DBOOT
  • Financing (revolving loan fund, securitization, tax equity, equity, debt finance, leasing)
  • RFQ/RFP (Contracts, Approvals)

– Prequalification of Vendors – Standard Documentation

  • Technology partner selection

– Development, permitting, partners secured, financing structure, engineering

slide-15
SLIDE 15

McGuireWoods LLP | 4

What Issues Face Emerging Technologies?

  • R&D and Commercialization
  • Venture Capital and Private Equity Investment
  • Project/Corporate Capital Structure
  • Technology, Regulatory Risks
  • Patchwork of Financial Incentives
  • Political, Cultural, Market Tensions & Dynamics
slide-16
SLIDE 16

McGuireWoods LLP | 5

Energy Efficiency Structuring Considerations

  • What type of facilities are being targeted for improvement?

– Commercial, industrial, residential or governmental

  • What is the purpose of the improvement?

– Reduce demand, create jobs or be green

  • What role does the government want to play and what risks will it take?

– Obligor, owner or facilitator

  • What are the sources of financing?

– Grants, bonds and rebate/incentive payments

slide-17
SLIDE 17

McGuireWoods LLP | 6

Energy Efficiency - Common Structures

  • Governmental energy savings performance contracting

– Contract with an energy service company (ESCO) to audit and undertake system wide improvements – ESCO will provide a guarantee of savings – Government borrows funds for improvements that it owns; lender may take a security interest in the project – Terms of repayment vary; savings should exceed repayment

slide-18
SLIDE 18

McGuireWoods LLP | 7

Energy Efficiency - Common Structures (cont’d)

  • Shared savings arrangements

– ESCO installs the efficiency improvements and agrees that its compensation is the savings generated from the improvements – The service recipient’s benefit is stable cash flow with less up front cost

  • Other types: off balance sheet third party financing and power purchase

agreements (PPA)

– Lender, lessor or service provider owns the assets – Leases and service agreements require special attention – Risk of PPAs are rising electricity costs

slide-19
SLIDE 19

McGuireWoods LLP | 8

Common Energy Efficiency Financing Structure

Lender

Proceeds Debt

ESCO Borrower Escrow

Guaranty/ Services Draws Payments

For discussion purposes only; consult your tax advisor

Guaranty of Savings

slide-20
SLIDE 20

McGuireWoods LLP | 9

Renewable Energy Structuring Considerations

  • What are the governmental interests?

– Use of power and control of facility – Reliable power supply at reliable rates – Is there tax equity?

  • What are the tax equity investor interests?

– Maximizing tax incentives and rate of return: bonds, credits, grants and depreciation – Reducing structural risk – Ease of exit upon reaching target IRR

slide-21
SLIDE 21

McGuireWoods LLP | 10

Renewable Energy - Common Structures

  • Governmental ownership

– Tax-exempt governmental bonds – Clean renewable energy bonds – Qualified energy conservation bonds

  • Non-governmental ownership

– Leases and power purchase agreements – Pre-paid power purchase agreements – Tax-exempt pre-pay bonds – Additional subsidies

slide-22
SLIDE 22

McGuireWoods LLP | 11

Ownership Spectrum

Vanilla la PPA Prepaid id PPA True Electr ectric ic Prepay Lease Muni Owned

Owner Developer Developer Developer Developer owns Project /Purchaser

  • wns land

Purchaser (Muni) Debt Issuer Project Co Purchaser (Muni) SPV (no assets) Project Co Muni Debt Risks Full Project Risks Purchaser’s credit Full Project Risks Full Project Risks Purchaser’s Credit

Privately Owned Municipally Owned

slide-23
SLIDE 23

McGuireWoods LLP | 12

Non-Operating Generators of Value

Benefit fit Descri cription ion

Tax Depreciation MACRS or Straight Line depreciation is a income statement deduction to reduce taxable income for a taxpaying entity. Equal to Depr. * tax rate Tax Credits (PTC/ITC) Investment Tax Credit (ITC) taken by taxpayer at in service date. Production Tax Credit (PTC) taken by taxpayer over 10 yrs as electricity is produced and sold to unrelated person. Tax-Exempt Debt Interest in tax-exempt debt provides value to investor, which is in turn passed on the renewable project as a lower interest rate. Lock-in/Pay as You Go Certain financing structures lock-in the electric purchaser to term, while others release the purchaser if electricity is not delivered. Transfer of Asset At the end of the financing term or sooner, the renewable asset can be transferred from developer to purchaser.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

McGuireWoods LLP | 13

What Value is Extracted

Muni Owned Vanilla la PPA Prepaid id PPA True Electr ectric ic Prepay Lease Tax Depreciation Tax Credits (PTC/ITC) Tax Exempt Debt Purchaser Off Balance Sheet Paygo

slide-25
SLIDE 25

McGuireWoods LLP | 14

Tax-advantaged Obligations General Characteristics

Tax-exe exempt mpt New CREBs, s, QECBs, Bs, QZABs s and QSCBs Bs Governm rnmenta tal Issuer (discussed later) Yes Yes, with exceptions for New CREBs Governm rnmenta tal Owners rshi hip Not required for private activity bonds QZABs and QSCBs generally, but not required for all New CREBs and certain QECBs Allocat ation

  • n-Volum

lume e Cap Yes, except not for governmental tax- exempt or 501(c)(3) Yes (discussed later) IRS Filings At closing At closing, and to claim tax credit or direct payment Subsi sidy dy Tax-exempt interest, and private activity bonds are subject to AMT Taxable interest with tax credit or direct payment (except for QZABs with post 2010 allocation – credit only) Types es of Transac acti tions New money, current and advance refundings, except no-advance refundings for certain private activity bonds New money only; and certain refinancings of bridge loans

slide-26
SLIDE 26

McGuireWoods LLP | 15

Governmental Projects

  • Energy transactions:

– Pre-pay transactions: proceeds of bonds are used to pre-purchase gas or electricity from the generator

  • Bond proceeds are used to purchase electricity or natural gas in advance of delivery
  • Purchase is made by or for a governmental utility for use in the utility’s service area

– Output facilities: proceeds of bonds are used for capital expenditures for such facilities (discussed on next slide) – QECBs and New CREBs: for governmental projects, there are fewer restrictions (discussed later)

  • Energy efficiency transactions:

– QECBs, QZABs for rehabilitation and equipment generally and QSCBs for new construction and equipment – Tax-exempt obligations

slide-27
SLIDE 27

McGuireWoods LLP | 16

Governmental Projects (cont’d)

  • Output facilities (e.g., generating, distribution and transmission facilities)

– $15 million limitation: generally, not more than $15 million of an issue for an output facility may be used for a private business use – Private business use is use directly or indirectly in a trade or business that is carried on by any person other than a governmental unit. Governmental use is any use other than a private business use. – Purchase pursuant to a contract by a non-governmental person of available output of an

  • utput facility may be taken into account under the private business tests

– There are numerous special allocation rules

slide-28
SLIDE 28

McGuireWoods LLP | 17

Non-governmental Projects

  • Tax-exempt private activity bonds: solid waste, local furnishing of electricity or

gas, local district heating or cooling, environmental enhancements of hyrdroelectric generation, green building and qualified 501(c)(3)

  • Tax credit obligations: New CREBs, QECBs, QZABs and QSCBs
slide-29
SLIDE 29

McGuireWoods LLP | 18

Private Activity Bonds

  • Solid waste: new treasury regulations eliminate “no value” test and allow for energy conversion

projects subject to limitations – Limitations: first useful product rule or useful energy

  • Sewage facility bonds generally for secondary treatment of wastewater and sludge
  • Local furnishing of electricity or gas: 1997 “in operation” rule is limiting
  • Local district heating or cooling: limited to pipelines and networks providing hot water, chilled

water or steam

  • Environmental enhancements of hyrdroelectric generation: fish ladders and related fish protective

improvements

  • Green building: expired on October 1, 2012; eligible projects reduced traditional electricity

consumption and SO2 emissions, expanded solar PV and used fuel cell energy

  • Qualified 501(c)(3): project must be owned by the 501(c)(3) entity
slide-30
SLIDE 30

McGuireWoods LLP | 19

Eligibility for New CREBs and QECBs - Basics

  • New CREBs

– Projects: wind, solar, geothermal, closed and open loop biomass, landfill gas, trash combustion and hydro, plus functionally related and subordinate facilities – Borrowers: governmental and tribal bodies, mutual and cooperative electric companies and public power providers (“PPPs”)

  • PPPs are state utilities providing electric services

– Issuers: qualified borrowers, certain “CREB lenders” (e.g., CoBank and NRUCFC) and certain not-for-profit electric utilities

  • QECBs

– Projects: qualified conservation purposes (see next slide) – Borrowers: qualified issuers and non-governmental entities subject to limitations

  • No more than 30% of the allocation may be used for non-governmental QECBs except that green

community programs are exempt

  • If the QECB is a private activity bond, a QCP must be for capital expenditures

– Issuers: same as tax-exempt issuers

  • Common Rules: the subsidy (credit) is lesser of interest coupon or 70% of credit rate and each is subject to Davis-Bacon

Act’s prevailing wages

slide-31
SLIDE 31

McGuireWoods LLP | 20

QECBs – Qualified Conservation Purposes

Capital l Expendit nditure ures for: Researc rch Other

  • Reducing energy consumption in publicly-owned

buildings by at least 20% Expenditures for research facilities and research grants to support research in:

  • Mass commuting facilities to reduce energy consumption
  • Demonstration projects including commercialization of green

building technology, agricultural biofuel conversion, advanced battery manufacturing technologies, technologies to reduce peak use of electricity or technologies for the capture & sequestration

  • f carbon dioxide emitted from combusting fossil fuels to

produce electricity

  • Public education campaigns to promote energy efficiency
  • Implementing green community programs, includes “the

use of loans, grants, or other repayment mechanisms to implement such programs”

  • Rural development involving production of electricity

from renewable energy resources

  • New clean renewable energy bonds projects
  • Technologies for the capture &

sequestration of carbon dioxide produced through the use of fossil fuels

  • Cellulosic ethanol & non-fossil fuel

development

  • Increasing in efficiency of existing

technologies for producing non-fossil fuels

  • Automobile battery tech-nologies & other

technologies to reduce fossil fuel consumption in transportation

  • Technologies to reduce energy use in

buildings

slide-32
SLIDE 32

McGuireWoods LLP | 21

QECBs – QCP Recent IRS Guidance

  • 20 percent energy reduction in publicly-owned buildings

– Financed improvement may be a unit of a publicly owned building – Units: single or multiple buildings, a system component (i.e., HVAC, water, lighting

  • r plug load) or any such building and system
  • Green community programs

– Purpose is to promote energy conservation, energy efficiency or environmental conservation initiatives – Relates to property is available for general public use or involves loan or grant program that is broadly available

slide-33
SLIDE 33

McGuireWoods LLP | 22

Traditional Municipal Structure

Debt Investors

Tax-exempt Debt Proceeds

Power Purchaser

MWh $/MWh

LT PPA

Municipal Owner Fuel Supplier

Payment Fuel

For discussion purposes only; consult your tax advisor

slide-34
SLIDE 34

McGuireWoods LLP | 23

Commercial PACE Structure

Lender Governmental Entity ESCO

Debt Pledge of Lien on Assessments Proceeds

Borrower

Services Payment Assessment LIen

For discussion purposes only; consult your tax advisor

slide-35
SLIDE 35

McGuireWoods LLP | 24

Pre-Paid Power Purchase Agreement – “Flip”

Proceeds Tax Exempt

Debt Investors Muni Power Purchaser

MWh Prepayment Post-Flip 5% Pre-Flip 99% Pre-Flip 1% Post-Flip 95%

Developer Tax Equity Project Company

For discussion purposes only; consult your tax advisor

slide-36
SLIDE 36

McGuireWoods LLP | 25

Bond Proceeds Contractual Relationship (e.g., by Sublease) QEI NMTCs NMTCs

CDE

QLICI Debt Debt Service Ownership/ Capital Contribution PPA/Services Agreement

QECBs, NMTCs (Leveraged) and ITC

Lender QALICB Bond Borrower Muni NMTC Tax Equity Investor Borrower Affiliate/ Sponsor Investment Fund Lessee

True Lease

  • f Energy

Property Loan/Grant

ITC Investor

Equity Contribution Tax Credits

slide-37
SLIDE 37

McGuireWoods LLP | 26

Before Proceeding, Ask Yourself …

  • What type of project is being undertaken?
  • What is the purpose of the project?
  • Is the technology proven?
  • What is the credit of the obligor and its counterparties?
  • What role does the government want to play and what risks will it take (i.e., is there political will

and community support)?

  • What are the sources of financing?
  • Will the project cash flow without subsidies?
  • Is the transaction structure simple relative to the size of transaction and the experience of the

transaction parties?

  • Do you have the right team?
slide-38
SLIDE 38

McGuireWoods LLP | 27

Tax-advantaged Obligations

Feature tures Tax-exempt mpt QSCBs 1, 2 QZABs 1,2, 3 New CREBs1, 2 QECBs 1, 2 Purpos pose Governmentally owned and operated subject to exceptions for private use and private activity bonds Public School Facilities, including Construction and Renovation, plus Land Acquisition and Equipment Qualified School Renovation, Related Equipment, School Personnel Training and Course Material Development Electricity Produced from Renewable Energy Sources Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Assets, Programs and Research for Qualified Conservation Purposes Autho thorize rized d Amou

  • unt

t Applicable for non- 501(c)(3) private activity bonds $11 B for 2009 and $11B for 2010 (Total of $22B) $1.4 B for 2009 and 2010; $400 M for 2011 $2.4 B nationally $3.2 B nationally ______________

1Pursuant to the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act (enacted March 18, 2010), an issuer of QSCBs, QZABs (subject to limits), New CREBs and QECBs may

elect that the subsidy be a direct payment from U.S. Treasury as opposed to a tax credit.

2Generally, direct pay/tax credit obligations may not be used to refund prior debt. 3Pursuant to the Tax Relief Act of 2010 (a/k/a extension of Bush tax cuts), QZABs issued under the 2011 allocation may not opt for the direct subsidy.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

McGuireWoods LLP | 28

Features ures Tax-ex exem empt QSCBs Bs QZAB ABs New CREBs QECBs Bs Durat uration ion (term rm) of Issuan uance ce Tax-exempt bonds are subject to general “abuse” limitations regarding

  • verburdening and overissuance.

Private activity bonds’ are also subject to a test that the average maturity cannot exceed 120% of the economic life of financed assets. Maximum Term set by Treasury Monthly4 Maximum Term set by Treasury Monthly4 Maximum Term set by Treasury Monthly4 Maximum Term set by Treasury Monthly4 Expira iration ion of Authorizat

  • rization

ion for Issuan uance ce Not applicable except for certain defined private activity bonds. Must issue before end of calendar year in which alocation received unless pursuant to carry forward. Must have been issued before 1/1/2012 unless pursuant to carryforward which is two calendar years following year in which allocation arose. Expired October 27, 2012. There is guidance suggesting the IRS may reallocate unused amounts. No expiration date. States’ rules may vary. ______________

4Maximum maturities can be found at https://www.treasurydirect.gov/rates/rates-irstcb.htm.

Tax-advantaged Obligations (cont’d)

slide-40
SLIDE 40

McGuireWoods LLP | 29

Features ures Tax-ex exem empt QSCBs Bs QZAB ABs New CREBs QECBs Bs Expen endit ditur ure of Procee eeds Subject to arbitrage limitation of 3 year reasonable expectations test at issuance, including binding commitment for at least 5% within 6 Months, plus applicable rebate matters if yield of proceeds exceeds yield of obligations and rebate exceptions are not satisfied Must Spend Available Project Proceeds (“APP”) within 3 Years 5 Binding Commitment for at least 10% within 6 Months Must Spend APP within 3 Years Binding Commitment for at least 10% within 6 Months Must Spend APP within 3 Years Binding Commitment for at least 10% within 6 Months Must Spend APP within 3 Years Binding Commitment for at least 10% within 6 Months Elig igib ible e Issuers uers State or Local Governments (i.e., political subdivisions and on-behalf of issuers, such as improvement and economic development authorities) Same as tax-exempt issuers Same as tax-exempt issuers State or Local Governmental Entities, CREB Lenders (e.g. CoBank or CFC) and Public Power Providers Same as tax-exempt issuers ______________

5IRC §54A(d)(2) defines “available project proceeds” as sale proceeds less financed costs of issuance (not to exceed 2%) plus earnings thereon.

Tax-advantaged Obligations (cont’d)

slide-41
SLIDE 41

McGuireWoods LLP | 30

Speci cial al Features ures for Tax Credit dit Bonds nds Only QSCBs Bs QZAB ABs New CREBs QECBs Bs Tax Credit dit Amoun

  • unt6/Direc

rect Pay Amou

  • unt

nt Face Amount of Outstanding Obligation X Tax Credit Rate ____________ Lesser of Coupon Interest or Interest Calculated at Tax Credit Rate Face Amount of Outstanding Obligation X Tax Credit Rate ____________ Lesser of Coupon Interest or Interest Calculated at Tax Credit Rate (Available for 2009 and 2010 Allocations Only) Tax Credit - Face Amount of Outstanding Obligation X Tax Credit Rate, Minus 30% ____________ Direct Pay - Lesser of Coupon Interest or 70% of Interest Calculated at Tax Credit Rate Tax Credit - Face Amount of Outstanding Obligation X Tax Credit Rate, Minus 30% ____________ Direct Pay - Lesser of Coupon Interest or 70% of Interest Calculated at Tax Credit Rate Tax Credit dit Rate Set by Treasury Daily7 Set by Treasury Daily7 Set by Treasury Daily7 Set by Treasury Daily7 Stripp ippab able e Credit dits8 Yes Yes Yes Yes

________________________ 6Calculated on each March 15, June 15, September 15 and December 15 and last day bonds are outstanding. The credit is included in gross income. Generally, the credit may be used to
  • ffset AMT liability
7Rates can be found at http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/rates/rates-irstcb.htm. Per IRS Notice 2009-15, all rates are based on Treasury's estimate of the yields on outstanding bonds from

market sectors selected by Treasury with a rating of between A and BBB for bonds of a similar maturity.

8The IRS released stripping guidance on March 23, 2010 in IRS Notice 2010-28.

Tax-advantaged Obligations (cont’d)

slide-42
SLIDE 42

McGuireWoods LLP | 31

Energy Resource or Facility Required Start

  • f

Construction Date Amount of PTC or ITC 1 PTC Period or ITC Recapture Reduction for Subsidized Financing Basis Reduction Wind Before 1/1/14. PTC equal to 1.5¢ per kwh of electricity sold (adjusted annually for inflation). PTC is 2.3¢ per kwh of electricity sold in 2013. ITC is equal to 30%

  • f basis of

qualified property. For PTC, no recapture and 10 year credit period begins on the date the facility is placed in service. For ITC, proportional amount of ITC is recaptured if property is disposed of or

  • therwise ceases

to qualify within 5 years from placed in service date. PTC reduced if the project is financed with grants, tax- exempt bonds or subsidized energy financing. ITC is not reduced if tax-exempt bonds or subsidized energy financing used. If ITC is received, adjusted basis of qualified property must be reduced by half of ITC amount. ______________

1 With respect to qualifying property, a taxpayer may elect to receive only one of ITC or PTC .

Tax Credits for Certain Energy Resources

slide-43
SLIDE 43

McGuireWoods LLP | 32

Energy Resource or Facility Required Start

  • f

Construction Date Amount of PTC or ITC 1 PTC Period or ITC Recapture Reduction for Subsidized Financing Basis Reduction Closed-Loop Biomass Closed-loop biomass facilities use organic material from a plant which is planted exclusively for the purpose of being used at a qualified facility to produce electricity. Before 1/1/14. PTC equal to 1.5¢ per kwh of electricity sold (adjusted annually for inflation). PTC is 2.3¢ per kwh of electricity sold in 2013. ITC equal to 30%

  • f basis of

qualified property. For PTC, no recapture and 10 year credit period begins on the date the facility is placed in service. For ITC, proportional amount of ITC is recaptured if property is disposed of or

  • therwise ceases

to qualify within 5 years from placed in service date. PTC reduced if the project is financed with grants, tax- exempt bonds or subsidized energy financing. ITC is not reduced if tax-exempt bonds or subsidized energy financing used. If ITC is received, adjusted basis of qualified property must be reduced by half of ITC amount. ______________

1 With respect to qualifying property, a taxpayer may elect to receive only one of ITC or PTC.

Tax Credits for Certain Energy Resources (cont’d)

slide-44
SLIDE 44

McGuireWoods LLP | 33

Energy Resource or Facility Required Start of Construction Date Amount of PTC or ITC 1 PTC Period or ITC Recapture Reduction for Subsidized Financing Basis Reduction Open-Loop Biomass Open-loop biomass facilities generate electricity from the use of (1) agricultural livestock waste nutrients or (2) solid, nonhazardous, cellulosic waste material or any lignin material which is derived from certain organic waste

  • resources. They do not

include facilities that burn biomass in conjunction with fossil fuel (cofiring) beyond such fossil fuel required for startup and flame stabilization. Before 1/1/14. PTC equal to half

  • f 1.5¢ per kwh of

electricity sold (adjusted annually for inflation). PTC is 1.1¢ per kwh of electricity sold in 2013. ITC equal to 30%

  • f basis of

qualified property. For PTC, no recapture and 10 year credit period begins on the date the facility is placed in service. For ITC , proportional amount of ITC is recaptured if property is disposed of or

  • therwise ceases

to qualify within 5 years from placed in service date. PTC reduced if the project is financed with grants, tax- exempt bonds or subsidized energy financing. ITC is not reduced if tax-exempt bonds or subsidized energy financing used. If ITC received, adjusted basis of qualified property must be reduced by half of ITC amount. ______________

1 With respect to qualifying property, a taxpayer may elect to receive only one of ITC or PTC.

Tax Credits for Certain Energy Resources (cont’d)

slide-45
SLIDE 45

McGuireWoods LLP | 34

Energy Resource or Facility Required Start of Construction Date Amount of PTC or ITC1 PTC Period or ITC Recapture Reduction for Subsidized Financing Basis Reduction Landfill Gas Landfill gas facilities produce electricity from gas derived from the biodegradation of municipal solid waste. Before 1/1/14. PTC equal to half

  • f 1.5¢ per kwh of

electricity sold (adjusted annually for inflation). PTC is 1.1¢ per kwh of electricity sold in 2013. ITC is equal to 30%

  • f basis of

qualified property. For PTC, no recapture and 10 year credit period begins on the date the facility is placed in service. For ITC, proportional amount of ITC is recaptured if property is disposed of or

  • therwise ceases

to qualify within 5 years from placed in service date. PTC reduced if the project is financed with grants, tax- exempt bonds or subsidized energy financing. ITC is not reduced if tax-exempt bonds or subsidized energy financing used. If ITC is received, adjusted basis of qualified property must be reduced by half of ITC is amount. ______________

1 With respect to qualifying property, a taxpayer may elect to receive only one of ITC or PTC.

Tax Credits for Certain Energy Resources (cont’d)

slide-46
SLIDE 46

McGuireWoods LLP | 35

Energy Resource or Facility Placed in Service Date Amount of PTC or ITC 1 PTC Period or ITC Recapture Reduction for Subsidized Financing Basis Reduction Solar Solar energy property includes equipment which uses solar energy to generate electricity, to heat

  • r cool (or provide hot

water for use in) a structure, to illuminate the inside of a structure using fiber-optic distributed sunlight, to provide solar process heat, except for property used to heat a swimming pool. Before 1/1/17. No PTC available. ITC is equal to 30%

  • f basis of

qualified property. No PTC available. For ITC, proportional amount of ITC is recaptured if property is disposed of or

  • therwise ceases

to qualify within 5 years from placed in service date. No PTC available. ITC is not reduced if tax-exempt bonds or subsidized energy financing used. If ITC is received, adjusted basis of qualified property must be reduced by half of ITC is amount. ______________

1 With respect to qualifying property, a taxpayer may elect to receive only one of ITC or PTC.

Tax Credits for Certain Energy Resources (cont’d)

slide-47
SLIDE 47

McGuireWoods LLP | 36

Energy Resource or Facility Required Start

  • f

Construction Date Amount of PTC or ITC 1 PTC Period or ITC Recapture Reduction for Subsidized Financing Basis Reduction Trash (Municipal Solid Waste) Trash facilities use municipal solid waste to produce electricity. Before 1/1/14. PTC equal to half

  • f 1.5¢ per kwh of

electricity sold (adjusted annually for inflation). PTC is 1.1¢ per kwh of electricity sold in 2013. ITC is equal to 30%

  • f basis of

qualified property. For PTC, no recapture and 10 year credit period begins on the date the facility is placed in service. For ITC, proportional amount of ITC is recaptured if property is disposed of or

  • therwise ceases

to qualify within 5 years from placed in service date. PTC reduced if the project is financed with grants, tax- exempt bonds or subsidized energy financing. ITC is not reduced if tax-exempt bonds or subsidized energy financing used. If ITC is received, adjusted basis of qualified property must be reduced by half of ITC amount. ______________

1 With respect to qualifying property, a taxpayer may elect to receive only one of ITC or PTC.

Tax Credits for Certain Energy Resources (cont’d)

slide-48
SLIDE 48

McGuireWoods LLP | 37

Questions, Resources and Contact Information

Dougl glas as E. Lamb 804.775 .775.110 .1107 dlamb@ b@mcgui mcguirewoods.com

  • ods.com

www.mcgui guirewoods

  • ods.com

.com  2012 McGuireWoods LLP http://ww ://www.e .eere ere.en .energy ergy.gov .gov http://ww ://www.dsire .dsireusa.org usa.org http://ww ://www.c .cdf dfif ifun und.gov d.gov http://ww ://www.c .cdf dfa.ne .net http://ww ://www.e .epa.gov pa.gov http://ww ://www.pa .pace cenow

  • w.or

.org http://ww ://www.a .ace ceee.or .org

slide-49
SLIDE 49

CDFA: Advancing Development Finance Knowledge, Networks & Innovation www.cdfa.net

Anita Molino

President Bostonia Partners LLC Boston, MA

Are you a CDFA Member? Members receive exclusive access to thousands of resources in the CDFA Online Resource Database. Join today at www.cdfa.net to set-up your unique login.

Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Financing Best Practices

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Financing Best Practices

2013 CDFA National Development Finance Summit

Anita P. Molino, Bostonia Partners August 8, 2013

www.bostonia.com

slide-51
SLIDE 51

www.bostonia.com

  • Energy financing is “project finance”
  • Cash flow driven
  • Non-recourse debt
  • Financing & contracting options
  • Renewables provide additional tax advantages
  • Projects are capital intensive (low cash flows vs. high project costs) with important

requirements

  • Investment grade developer and counterparty (e.g. PPA, ESPC)
  • Large projects required to justify tax equity structure / achieve economies of scale
  • Proven technologies
  • Capital stack typically consist of various sources
  • Debt (supported by PPA revenue and contracted RECs)
  • Tax equity if renewable energy project
  • Sponsor equity

Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Markets

Energy Financing Basics

slide-52
SLIDE 52

www.bostonia.com

3

Energy Efficiency Challenges

  • Scale of projects can be very small, even compared to small scale solar
  • Underlying credits most often not investment grade
  • Loan covenant issues
  • Misaligned economic incentives in commercial real estate (i.e. tenant vs. landlord)

Renewable Energy Challenges

  • State-by-State approach for renewable energy development
  • Relatively small size projects, especially in solar
  • Different incentives and programs for each State
  • Evolving sets of rules and regulations ongoing with less than clear results or predictable outcomes
  • Relatively immature markets needing time to develop and modify
  • NIMBY is an increasingly larger issue

For success, any financing program or aggregation strategy must proceed on a state by state basis, finding the critical path within common boundaries.

Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Markets

slide-53
SLIDE 53

www.bostonia.com

4

Critical Issues Associated with Aggregation

  • Sufficient size of asset pool
  • Need to attract experienced capital providers who will overlook the complexities of multiple smaller projects because of the

attractive size of the financing

  • Need to drive economies of scale: difficult to achieve since each project is examined separately, but there are cost savings

available

  • Sufficient scale so actual cash on cash returns justify the needed effort and investment horizon
  • Risk diversification among project team members
  • Equipment providers
  • EPC Contractors
  • O&M providers
  • Standardization
  • Credit quality of counterparties , particularly counter-parties providing revenue streams
  • Documentation: leases, assignments, PPA’s, REC contracts, O&M
  • Basic contractual terms (tenor, pricing, etc.)
  • Ability to simultaneously develop multiple projects in a timely fashion
  • Oftentimes need state or local utility support to bring projects to COD

Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Markets

slide-54
SLIDE 54

www.bostonia.com

  • Investment Grade (IG) Sponsors with projects of size can obtain cost-effective financing
  • Non-IG Sponsors with smaller projects are the challenge: residential, affordable housing,

commercial & industrial, and MUSH

  • Cost effective solutions for Non-IG Sponsors are in process or development:
  • MUSH Pools
  • Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Programs
  • State- or utility-backed programs
  • Warehousing followed by capital markets securitization
  • Alternative funding models (e.g., REITS/MLPs)
  • Residential loan secondary market sales

5

State of the Markets

Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Markets

slide-55
SLIDE 55

www.bostonia.com

Tax-Exempt MUSH Pools

  • MUSH/Small C&I/Residential/

Affordable Housing Sectors

  • Size/Credit

Requires Pools, Senior-Sub Structures and/or Reserves, and Higher Coverage

Non-Investment Grade

Taxable PACE for Small C&I and Residential REITs & MLPs Community Bank Partners for Residential/Affordable Housing Pools Tax-Exempt and Taxable Bank and Capital Market Debt On-Balance Sheet

  • Federal/MUSH/Large C&I Sectors
  • Size/Credit allow for stand-alone Transactions
  • Lower coverage and reserves

Investment Grade

Taxable Contract Securitizations On- or Off-Balance Sheet Taxable PACE for Large C&I Taxable Private Placements for MUSH and Equity Funds for Renewables

Energy Financing Options

slide-56
SLIDE 56

www.bostonia.com

7

Cost of Funds

Expected Rate of Return Risk to Investor Tax- Exempt Debt Taxable Debt Tax Equity Project Equity

“Spread”

100% Recourse to Government Private Sector Transaction Public Sector Transaction Public-Private Risk Sharing

slide-57
SLIDE 57

www.bostonia.com

8

Cost of Capital

NOTE: Example presents a capital cost comparison only and does not attempt to assign values to efficiencies, savings, and retained or transferred risks, which would be part of a complete cost benefit analysis.

Based on a $50 Million Renewable Biogas-to-Energy Cogeneration and Thermal Drying— Wastewater Treatment Facility (20 Year Term)

Cost of Electricity/Sludge Processing

Debt 3.2% yield

  • 1.0x DSCR
  • Public

Ownership

  • 8.5 cents /

KWh – 3% escalation 100%

  • 1.6x DSCR
  • Private Ownership
  • 9.2 cents / KWh –

3% escalation Muni Tax-Exempt A rated 100% leveraged

Debt 3.8% Yield

Tax Equity – 30% ITC Monetization 13% yield Project Equity 20% yield

Tax-Advantaged NAIC-1, taxable private placement (35% tax rate) 5% 25% 70%

  • 1.35x DSCR
  • Private

Ownership

  • 8.5 cents / KWh –

3% escalation

Debt 3.8% Yield

Project Equity 20% yield

70% 30%

NAIC-1, taxable private placement (35% tax rate)

slide-58
SLIDE 58

www.bostonia.com

9

Evaluating the Cost Effectiveness of PPPs

  • Common misperception is that PPPs are always a more expensive form of project delivery for

Governments

  • As highlighted by the National Council for Public-Private Partnership’s (NCPPP) white paper,

“Testing Tradition: Assessing the Added Value of Public-Private Partnership”, a thorough and proper evaluation involves several analyses:

  • Costs of deferred maintenance, repair, replacement
  • Project timing
  • Complete financial analysis using Value for Money assessment on Net Present Value basis
  • Establish Public Sector Comparator as baseline to compare to PPP or privatized options
  • Conduct full Life-Cycle cost and revenue analysis for each option
  • Value and assess transfer of risk more effectively

Financing costs for projects may be higher for PPPs however FLC analysis often shows savings over time due to risk allocation, design, construction, and long-term O&M.

slide-59
SLIDE 59

www.bostonia.com

10

Project Overview

  • In its for-profit division, Citizens Energy focuses on the development and ownership of

renewable energy, high voltage transmission assets, and energy service activities.

  • Recently began operating a portfolio of 5 separate solar facilities located in Central and

Western Massachusetts with facility sizes ranging from 85 kW to 3.0 MW, totaling 9.2 MW.

  • Each solar facility has either net metering or power purchase agreements with investment

grade parties.

  • Citizens was successful in aggregating such projects, driving attractive returns to them as
  • wners, over a 20 year term.

Financing Overview

  • Bostonia Partners acted as Financial Advisor and Placement Agent, raising $56,000,000 in

construction loans, 1603 bridge financing, tax equity, and term financing for each project.

  • Each project was funded separately, not cross collateralized, but viewed as a collective

pool utilizing similar terms and structure.

  • The financing structure fully utilized the term of each power off-take agreement and the

10 year term of the Mass SREC market. Challenges / Lessons Learned

  • Aggregating sufficient MWs with similar profiles to bring to market.
  • Having sufficient owner/development capital to cover the unexpected
  • Capping or minimizing third party expenses and project reserves
  • Establishing standardization in documents and procedures for next set of projects
  • Transferring best practices to other asset classes and states
  • Securing long-term SREC contract from investment grade counterparty

Citizens Energy, Massachusetts Solar Portfolio

slide-60
SLIDE 60

www.bostonia.com

11

Pennsylvania Keystone Home Energy Loan Program (HELP)

Program Overview

  • Low interest rate consumer loan program for Energy Star and other energy savings home

improvements; Pennsylvania Treasury Department owned the Keystone HELP loans as an investment.

  • Keystone HELP has originated more than 10,000 loans totaling $75 million since Program

inception in 1986 using a contractor driven model managed by AFC First Corp, one of three FNMA approved underwriters in the nation.

  • Unsecured credit instruments with high FICO/low DTI borrowers has produced a low

charge off rate (<5%). Financing Overview

  • Bostonia structured and executed a secondary market sale by Treasury of more than 4,600

consumer loans with anticipated cash flows of more than $35,500,000.

  • Bostonia-Keystone HELP I LLC, a special purpose corporation owned and managed by

Bostonia Partners, purchased the loan pool from Treasury.

  • The loan pool supports a $20,000,000 senior secured seven-year term loan from three

community bank lenders led by Fox Chase Bank, with Treasury retaining a residual interest in the loan pool in addition to its cash sale proceeds received at closing.

  • Attractive yield given senior-sub structure and short WAL.

Challenges / Lessons Learned

  • Strengths: Treasury sponsorship and “equity” contribution; FNMA underwriting standards;

and AFC First program management.

  • Weaknesses: low dollar unsecured consumer credit instruments; relatively short program

history; high initial transaction due diligence and transaction costs; and credit rating not practical.

  • Expect lower funding costs for follow-on transactions; a modified approach to Keystone

HELP can work for new money programs.

slide-61
SLIDE 61

www.bostonia.com

12

White Sands Missile Range, Solar ESPC

Project Overview

  • $17,500,000 ESPC for US Army in White Sands, New Mexico
  • Largest solar installation on a US Army installation
  • ESPC includes 5 MW Solar PV array (ground mount and carport) and an Energy

Management Control System

  • Solar array produces 10.4 million kWh and contributes approximately 10% of total

energy consumption at the installation

  • Project will create total cost savings of approximately $44 million over the 25-year

contract term based on escalation of electricity rates Financing Overview

  • Unlike a traditional ESPC, private ownership of the energy assets allowed the project to

monetize federal tax credits

  • Long-term Energy Services Agreement (ESA) allows Government to acquire solar

power without upfront capital or a buy down of project capital cost

  • Title to non-solar ECMs will vest with the Government at acceptance
  • Government will pay same utility rate it currently pays, but with a lower escalator, and

will own the RECs Challenges / Lessons Learned

  • Long term PPA with investment grade off-taker essential to successful financing
  • Cost savings from energy efficiency made solar array more economical
  • Commitment and teamwork among the Army, Siemens, and Bostonia was a key to

success

slide-62
SLIDE 62

www.bostonia.com

U.S. FDA White Oak Federal Research Center, Silver Spring, Maryland

Project Overview

  • Public-Private Partnership to construct heat and power central utility plant and islanded

microgrid for the 3.9 million SF, $1.5 billion office and laboratory compound for the FDA.

  • The project features a 26MW combined heat and power plant (expansion capability up to

55MW) that reliably produces electricity for the critical laboratory needs of FDA and uses waste heat to produce building heating and cooling.

  • In addition to the combined heat and power plant, the project includes upgrades to the heating,

ventilation, and air conditioning systems, improvements to lighting—including the latest LED technology—and building envelope modifications. Financing Overview

  • The majority of the project was financed utilizing a $207+ million securitization of the cash

flow structure from energy cost savings derived from energy conservation measures implemented at the campus.

  • The utilization of the PPP and ESPC is estimated to create more than $25 million alone in the

first year of operation through energy savings and avoided operations and maintenance costs, and approximately $200 million in government savings over 20 years, according to a Public Service Comparator analysis. Highlights

  • The White Oak PPP between GSA and Honeywell represents the largest federal ESPC project

awarded under the Department of Energy’s ESPC program.

  • Helps achieve significant progress in energy security at FDA White Oak and towards federal

energy objectives outlined in Executive Order 13514 for the reduction of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.

  • The micorgrid at FDA White Oak allowed the campus maintained power and was able to

continue its operations during Hurricane Sandy in 2012 while the surrounding area was without power.

slide-63
SLIDE 63

www.bostonia.com

14

U.S. Virgin Islands Energy Alliance Program

Implementation and Financing Overview

  • Identify project opportunities and programs to reduce utility costs;
  • Present an overall assessment of the Virgin Islands marketplace for

utility demand reduction services;

  • Procure Energy Services Companies (ESCOs) for the Virgin Islands;
  • Devise the implementation strategy for the Government, Business and

Residential Markets;

  • Negotiate contract terms and pricing with ESCOs
  • Arrange financing for energy and water efficiency and renewable

energy generation to be installed throughout the Territory. Program Overview

  • Innovative, island-wide energy efficiency and clean energy

initiative for all utility rate classes

  • Government had little internal expertise-outsourced this expertise

through private sector “Implementation Agent” to design and implement program

  • Approximately $50MM in energy efficiency projects; first projects

are underway Challenges / Lessons Learned

  • Use Government facilities to start the program – the government is the highest single energy consumer in the territory
  • Implementation costs higher than mainland due to “off island” skills, labor, and materials
  • Savings and energy baseline were difficult to project due to electricity price volatility / up and down with oil companies
  • Actual savings greater than projected savings due to higher electric prices
slide-64
SLIDE 64

www.bostonia.com

Conclusions

15

Development

  • Each State needs to be approached as a distinct market
  • New PACE legislation bills in many different states
  • Landscape may be increasingly difficult to navigate as programs continue to be refined, modified or expanded,

coupled with NIMBY issues

  • Component pricing declines offer significant incentive to developers
  • Construction and engineering is very competitive and drawing interest from large EPC organizations at reduced

cost Financing

  • Significant capital looking for the right projects
  • Municipalities need to consider the strength and experience of the developers it chooses to work with in order to

ensure that projects are financeable

  • Creditworthy contracts and agreements are essential for successful financing
  • Financing parties will require that developers have sufficient capital and equity at risk. Developers will need to

protect investors and lenders in certain circumstances.

slide-65
SLIDE 65

www.bostonia.com

Contact Information

16 This information has been prepared solely for information purposes and is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any security or instrument

  • r to participate in any trading strategy. No representation or warranty can be given with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the information, or that any future
  • ffer of securities, if any, will conform to the terms hereof. Bostonia disclaims any and all liability relating to this information, including without limitation, any express
  • r implied representations or warranties for, statements contained in, and omissions from, this information.

Anita P. Molino President 617-226-8102 Direct 617-437-0150 Main amolino@bostonia.com

slide-66
SLIDE 66

CDFA: Advancing Development Finance Knowledge, Networks & Innovation www.cdfa.net

Julie Metty Bennett

Vice President Michigan Saves Lansing, MI Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Financing Best Practices

Need assistance with your energy finance programs? Consider CDFA’s Research & Advisory Services – offering customized and tailored technical assistance for all of your development finance needs. Learn more at www.cdfa.net.

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Michigan Saves:

Making Energy Improvements Easy and Affordable

August 8, 2013 CDFA National Development Finance Summit Julie Metty Bennett, Executive Director

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Homeowners Municipalities Businesses

What is Michigan Saves?

Energy Efficiency Loans

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Structure

Key Michigan Saves roles:

  • Provide loss reserve for participating lenders
  • Oversee authorized contractors
  • Drive demand for energy efficiency (outreach and incentives)
  • Set program guidelines and provide quality control

3

slide-70
SLIDE 70

4

Current Programs

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Home Energy Loan Program

  • Affordable, hassle-free loans
  • Easier than home equity – unsecured loan
  • $1,000 to $20,000
  • Affordable rates and terms for low monthly payment
  • Easy, quick approval over the phone or online
  • Energy efficiency, solar, and geothermal
  • Find Michigan Saves authorized contractors –

www.michigansaves.org

5

slide-72
SLIDE 72
  • Eight lenders provide statewide coverage
  • Michigan Saves provides 5% loss reserve

6

HELP Lenders

slide-73
SLIDE 73

HELP Loans Issued

Loan value: $22.1 million (of $68 million committed) Loan loss reserve committed: $779,018 (of $3.4 million committed) Loan defaults: 18 loans (out of 2,712 issued or 0.66%)

7

$0 $5,000,000 $10,000,000 $15,000,000 $20,000,000 $25,000,000 Cumulative Value Monthly Loan Value

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Business Energy Financing

  • Statewide commercial financing ($2,000–$150,000)

for energy efficiency improvements through local lender, Ervin Leasing

  • Available to all types of businesses

with focus on food industry

  • Fast, easy process
  • Below-market rates with flexible

terms up to 5 years

  • 1.99% for food businesses
  • Rates from 5.99% for others
slide-75
SLIDE 75

Typical Improvements

  • Lighting
  • HVAC
  • Refrigeration
  • Kitchen / cooking equipment
  • Controls and preventive

maintenance

Photograph by Marvin Shaouni

9

Special Offer!

$2,000 rebate

for 20% energy savings for businesses in food industry

slide-76
SLIDE 76

BEF Leases Issued

$0 $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 Nov Dec Feb Mar Apr May Jun Cumulative Lease Value Monthly Lease Value

Lease value: $956,993 (of $10 million committed) Loan loss reserve committed: $95,699 (of $1 million committed) Loan defaults:

slide-77
SLIDE 77

11

From left to right: Terri Schroeder, Sally Talberg, Gov. Rick Snyder, Julie Metty Bennett, and Todd O’Grady.

slide-78
SLIDE 78

Public Sector Energy Financing

  • Local and state governments and public schools
  • Energy efficiency and renewable energy upgrades
  • Building / property must be government owned
slide-79
SLIDE 79

Financing Vehicle

  • Installment purchase agreements through Ervin

Leasing

  • Authorized by PA 99 (1933) and PA 156 (1851)
  • Amounts of $5,000 to $1M
  • Streamlined approval and documentation
  • Firm-term contracts (2-5 years)
slide-80
SLIDE 80

Eligible Improvements

  • Pre-screened energy efficiency and renewable

energy measures

  • Indoor or outdoor lighting
  • HVAC, refrigeration, and more
  • Windows
  • Solar PV
  • Installed by Michigan Saves authorized

contractors

  • No new construction or remodeling
slide-81
SLIDE 81

BetterBuildings for Michigan

$30M grant from US DOE to support statewide residential and commercial energy efficiency improvements

slide-82
SLIDE 82

Grant goals

slide-83
SLIDE 83

Goal 1

communicate with 11,340 serve 9,180

slide-84
SLIDE 84

>50

1-99 100-199 200-299 300+

  • f varying size:

sweeps

slide-85
SLIDE 85

Goal 2

weatherize 13.5M square feet of commercial, industrial & public buildings

slide-86
SLIDE 86

Goal 3

>$162M >$162M

leverage $150M in private funds

slide-87
SLIDE 87

Goal 4

create 2,063 green jobs

slide-88
SLIDE 88

Residential Sweeps: Test and Learn

Driving Demand

Rebates

slide-89
SLIDE 89

Preliminary Finding: Driving Demand

Driving Demand

Rebates

18% 15% 67%

Participate in program Say "No" Don't respond

36%

conversion to additional measures

slide-90
SLIDE 90

Preliminary Finding: Location

Driving Demand

Rebates 8% 45%

  • St. Joseph County

Grand Rapids

(Oakdale, Eastown)

slide-91
SLIDE 91

Preliminary Finding: Co-pay

Driving Demand

Interest rates

HIGHER co-pays ($100)

produced higher average conversions:

47% vs. 28.6%

slide-92
SLIDE 92

Preliminary Finding: Sweep Size

Driving Demand Sweep Size

Location 7% 20% 29% High Medium Low

(>1,200) (500–1,200) (<500)

Sweep size impacts % participating

# of homes:

slide-93
SLIDE 93

Preliminary Finding: Duration

Driving Demand Duration

Co-pay 8% 32% 29% <3 mo. 4–6 mo. 7 + mo.

Ideal duration is 4–6 months

slide-94
SLIDE 94

Preliminary Finding: Marketing

Driving Demand Marketing

Sweep size

have conversions homeowners participate

&

Re-Sweeps

slide-95
SLIDE 95

Preliminary Finding: Contractors

Driving Demand Contractors

Duration Sweep 2 (Riverside) Sweep 3 (Oakdale) Sweep 4 (Westside) Sweep 5 (GVSU)

Contractor performance incentive put in place

slide-96
SLIDE 96

Preliminary Finding: Rebates

Driving Demand Rebates

Marketing 30% 12% 15% 44% Phase I Phase II

Initial Uptake

Initial Uptake and Conversion to Additional Measures

slide-97
SLIDE 97

Preliminary Finding: Interest Rates

Driving Demand Interest Rates

Contractors

slide-98
SLIDE 98

Preliminary Finding: Interest Rates

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

DeWitt Township Marquette Oakdale Riverside Park Roseville Sterling Heights Three Rivers Traverse City Westside GVSU Southgate Wyandotte 1 Eastown Ferndale Lathrup Village Rosedale Park Sturgis Low (0%) Medium (1.99%) High (3.99% and up)

Low (0%) Medium (1.99%) High (3.99% and up)

Averages: 44% 40% 10%

Average Conversion Rates

slide-99
SLIDE 99

Unique Marketing Approach: GVSU

slide-100
SLIDE 100

Resources and Contacts

Julie Metty Bennett, Executive Director jbennett@michigansaves.org Phone: (734) 494-2190 Websites: www.michigansaves.org www.betterbuildingsformichigan.org Email: info@michigansaves.org

slide-101
SLIDE 101

CDFA: Advancing Development Finance Knowledge, Networks & Innovation www.cdfa.net

Audience Questions

Fundamentals of Development Finance Bond Finance Tax Increment Finance Tax Credit Finance Revolving Loan Fund Finance Federal Financing Programs State & Local Financing Programs Energy Finance Innovation Finance – Seed, Angel & Venture Capital Brownfield Finance Transportation Finance Access to Capital Finance Special District Finance Public-Private Partnership Finance

slide-102
SLIDE 102

CDFA: Advancing Development Finance Knowledge, Networks & Innovation www.cdfa.net

Intro EB-5 Finance WebCourse Daily: 12-5pm (EDT) September 18-19, 2013 Advanced Bond Finance WebCourse Daily: 12-5pm (EDT) October 15-16, 2013 Intro Tax Increment Finance WebCourse

Daily: 12-5pm (EST) November 12-13, 2013 Register online at www.cdfa.net

Upcoming Events at CDFA

slide-103
SLIDE 103

CDFA: Advancing Development Finance Knowledge, Networks & Innovation www.cdfa.net

CDFA – BNY Mellon Development Finance Webcast Series Tuesday, September 17, 2013 @ 1:00pm Eastern CDFA – Stern Brothers Renewable Energy Finance Webcast Series Thursday, September 26, 2013 @ 1:00pm Eastern

Upcoming Webcasts

slide-104
SLIDE 104

CDFA: Advancing Development Finance Knowledge, Networks & Innovation www.cdfa.net

Les Krone Managing Director 314-743-3054 lkrone@sternbrothers.com Katie Kramer Director, Education & Programs 614-224-1316 kkramer@cdfa.net

For More Information