When the going gets tough, the Dutch get going Edwin Spaans, PharmD - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

when the going gets tough the dutch get going
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

When the going gets tough, the Dutch get going Edwin Spaans, PharmD - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

When the going gets tough, the Dutch get going Edwin Spaans, PharmD Clinical Pharmacologist, ErasmusMC Sophia Childrens Hospital Director Clinical Research, Kinesis-Pharma Development Officer, Dutch MCRN Past Different


slide-1
SLIDE 1

“When the going gets tough, the Dutch get going”

Edwin Spaans, PharmD

Clinical Pharmacologist, ErasmusMC Sophia Children’s Hospital Director Clinical Research, Kinesis-Pharma Development Officer, Dutch MCRN

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Past
  • Different expectations
  • An example
  • Present
  • The Bright Future
slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Startup funding
  • Hiring project-managers, financial controllers,

methodologists

  • Hiring QA/QC; implement quality system
  • Impressive organisation (> 6FTE)
  • But not enough studies

Past

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Top down organisation
  • Focus on operational capacity
  • Added value for investigators unclear
  • Added value for sponsors unclear

Past

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Drug X: anti-arrhytmic
  • Adult program well advanced
  • Pediatric Plan approved
  • Study protocol for first peds study:

– 3 escalating doses, all ages – Objective: PK & tolerability

Example

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Feasibility within MCRN Network:

– No need for such a drug – Trial will never be approved – Recruitment will be impossible – Thus reluctant to participate

  • Dutch Central Ethics Committee (CCMO):

– Non-therapeutic: No way!

  • Free Consultancy:

– Change design into:

  • Bayesian type adjusted study
  • targeting desired exposure
  • or better targeting desired interval on ECG.
  • Result: study started as planned in US
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Mismatch in expectations

  • Added value for Sponsors?

– Feasibility analysis very realistic – Quick access to investigators – Many (for the NL situation) non-feasible studies in PIP’s – Science was done in PIP, now get the studies done:

  • perational mode

– MCRN in scientific mode – At the start-up: Industrial Founding Fathers of the MCRN: all local offices.

  • PIP’s are not written here
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Mismatch in expectations

  • Added value for Investigators/Academia?:

– Did not feel represented/involved: lack of interest – Drugs in development did not solve their problems: lack of interest. – Started rediscussing issues that were decided in PIP already: tried to get involved

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Current situation in NL: Dutch trial register: 22 trials: 3 industry sponsored EU trials register: 128 trials ClinicalTrials.gov:

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Industry sponsored: 95 Other funding: 88 Total: 183 studies

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Now (MCRN 2.0):

  • Network of experts and investigators
  • Supported by 0.5 FTE coordinator
  • Bottom-up approach: Network by and for

investigators

– Focus on exchange of information and knowledge – Less focus on operational capacity

  • Industry/CRO’s can access network

– To get connected – For Consultancy type questions

slide-12
SLIDE 12

It works…..

  • Ongoing projects (ZonMW funded):

– Farmacool, Hydrocortisone

  • Workpackage leader in 2 FP7 projects

– Enalapril (CHD), Gabapentin (Pain)

  • 2 ZonMW projects in second round

– Dosefinding of Haldol for Delirium on ICU – Studying PK in scavanged samples

  • Ongoing discussions on investigator initiatives
  • Industrial support currently primarily feasibility questions
  • New forms of collaboration explored

– More focussed on consulting, and bringing people together – Get the network involved earlier!

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Questions?

  • e.spaans@erasmusmc.nl
  • edwin.spaans@kinesis-pharma.com