What we will cover today Context - Discussion Document Submissions - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
What we will cover today Context - Discussion Document Submissions - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
What we will cover today Context - Discussion Document Submissions Your Questions the wider waste work programme The Waste Purpose Who, what and Minimisation Act how? What is product The Levy Review Confidentiality
What we will cover today
2
Context - the wider waste work programme
- The Waste
Minimisation Act
- The Levy Review
- TV Takeback
- Waste Minimisation
Fund
- How we got here
Discussion Document
- Purpose
- What is product
stewardship?
- WMA and the
intervention tools available
- Voluntary product
stewardship
- Current context
- 4 proposed waste
streams
Submissions
- Who, what and
how?
- Confidentiality and
your submissions
- Official Information
Act
- Next Steps
Your Questions
Consultation workshops
3
Workshop Location Date Wellington Friday 6 June Christchurch Monday 9 June Auckland Thursday 12 June Taupo Friday 13 June Invercargill Thursday 19 June Dunedin Friday 20 June
4
- rk
Legislative framework
New Zealand Waste Strategy
Waste Minimisation Act 2008 Local Government Act 2002 Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 Climate Change Response Act 2002 Resource Management Act 1991 Ozone Layer Protection Act 1996
Council waste minimisation and management plans (WMMP) Waste disposal levy Waste Minimisation Fund Voluntary product stewardship accreditation Product-based regulations ‘Priority product’ declaration Landfill levy-related regulation Long-term council community plans By-laws
(eg, prohibitions
- n disposal,
disposal fees, waste operator licence requirements)
Regulations related to hazardous substances Disposal facility regulations
(eg, methane emissions levy)
Synthetic greenhouse gas levy District and regional plans and resource consents
(eg, for landfills)
National environmental standards
(eg, air quality, cointaminated land)
Controls on import and release of
- zone-
depleting gases
Other tools
Ministry guidelines, codes of practice, and voluntary initiatives
Imports and Exports (Restrictions) Prohibition Order (No 2) 2004
Implement international conventions
(eg, Basel Convention)
Agricultural Compounds and Veterinary Medicines Act 1997
Registration
- f products
(eg, agrichemicals)
Education and awareness campaigns
Page 36
Waste Minimisation Act 2008
5
Page 35
Purpose is to encourage waste minimisation and a decrease in waste disposal to:
- Protect the environment from harm
- Provide environmental, social, economic and cultural benefits
Waste Minimisation Act 2008
- $10/ tonne levy on household waste disposed of to disposal facilities
– ½ distributed to territorial authorities – ½ (minus administration costs) forms the Waste Minimisation Fund
- Encourages producer responsibility through product stewardship
- Allows for regulations to improve waste data collection
- Clarifies roles and responsibilities of territorial authorities
- Creates the Waste Advisory Board
6
Page 35
Levy Review 2014
- Review considers the
‘effectiveness of the waste disposal levy’
- Minister’s review
- Due 1 July 2014
- Queries –
waste@mfe.govt.nz
7
8
Phase 1 September 2012 Hawke’s Bay Phase 1 September 2012 West Coast Phase 2 March 2013 Rest of South Island Phase 3 August 2013 Lower North Island Phase 4 October 2013 Rest of North Island
TV TakeBack
tvtakeback@mfe.govt.nz
Waste Minimisation Fund
- Purpose: Boost NZ’s performance in waste minimisation to ensure;
– investment in infrastructure and systems for waste minimisation occurs – educational and promotional capacity developed
- Give us a call or send us an email (0800 499 700 wmf@mfe.govt.nz)
- Guidance for applicants available at www.mfe.govt.nz/wmf
9
How we got here
- Waste Minimisation Act – passed in September 2008
- March 2009 Discussion Document – ‘Waste Minimisation in New
Zealand’
- Revised New Zealand Waste Strategy – 2010
10
Page 8
2014 Discussion Document
11
Consultation purpose
1. Have we correctly identified the four waste streams as priorities for action? 2. Should any of these waste streams be declared as priority products?
12
Page 3
Problem definition
- It’s important to understand what the problem is
- Don’t confuse the problem with the symptoms
- The problem could be an opportunity
- Costs and benefits can be economic, environmental, social or cultural
13
Tools available under the WMA
14
Voluntary product stewardship accreditation Priority product declaration Waste levy
- TA
- WMF
Ministerial Guidelines Regulations
What is Product Stewardship?
15
Page 6
Product Stewardship and the WMA
Encourages parties involved in the life of a product to share responsibility for: – ensuring effective reduction, reuse, recycling or recovery
- f products
– managing environmental harm arising from the product when it becomes waste
16
17
Voluntary Product Stewardship schemes
18
Page 7
Accredited Schemes:
19
Mandatory Options
Priority Product
- Under the WMA, the Minister for the Environment may declare a product
to be a priority product
- A product stewardship scheme for the defined product must be
developed and accredited
Regulatory Tools
- Eg; Landfill ban, deposits and refunds, take-back services, product
labelling
20
Page 13
Current context
- Accredited voluntary schemes are delivering mixed results in waste
minimisation and harm reduction
- Two accredited schemes have approached Government asking for
regulatory intervention (refrigerants and agrichemicals)
- Other groups have advised Government that they will only participate
in a mandatory product stewardship framework (tyres and e-waste)
21
Page 5 - 9
Consultation theme 1: Product stewardship priorities
22
Page 8
How we chose the priorities
23
Waste stream evaluation criteria:
- Risk of harm
- Resource efficiency opportunities
- Voluntary measures insufficient
- Industry readiness
- Current producers
Page 10
24
Waste stream
Waste stream evaluation criteria
Risk of harm Resource efficiency
- pportunity
Voluntary measures insufficient Industry readiness Current products
Agrichemicals and containers
++ + ++ ++ +
Refrigerants and other SGGsa
++ – ++ ++ +
E-waste
++ ++ ++ ++ +
Tyres
+ ++ ++ ++ +
Used motor oil
++ ++ + ? +
Other farm plastics
+ ++ + ? +
End-of-life vehiclesa
+ ++ + + +
Contaminated soil
++ – ++ – –
Industrial hazardous wastes
++ ? + ? +
Primary sector hazardous wastes
++ ? + ? +
CCA treated timber (copper chrome arsenic)
++ + ++ ? +
Asbestos
++ – + – –
Medical waste
++ – + ? +
PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls)
++ – + – –
Paint
++ + ++ ? +
Batteries
++ + ++ ? +
Construction and demolition wastes
+ ++ + ? +
Nappies and sanitaryb
+ ? ++ ? +
Primary sector organic wasteb
+ ++ + ? –
Household organic wasteb
+ ++ ++ – –
Biosolids (sewage sludge)b
+ ++ ++ ? –
Lamps containing mercury
+ + ++ ? +
Commercial greenwasteb
+ ++ + ? –
Packaging
- ++
++ –d +
As New Zealand’s waste data is incomplete, this assessment is qualitative rather then quantitative
++ very high/ definitely + high/ probably
- No, or not
applicable ? unknown
Page 39
25
Proposed priority waste streams
26
Photo credits: Agrecovery Foundation, NZ Recovery and Ministry for the Environment
Priority waste stream evaluation criteria Risk of harm ++ Resource inefficiency ++ Voluntary unsuccessful ++ Industry readiness ++ Current products +
Proposed priority waste streams
27
Photo credits: Agrecovery Foundation, NZ Recovery and Ministry for the Environment
Priority waste stream evaluation criteria Risk of harm ++ Resource inefficiency ++ Voluntary unsuccessful ++ Industry readiness ++ Current products + Priority waste stream evaluation criteria Risk of harm + Resource inefficiency ++ Voluntary unsuccessful ++ Industry readiness ++ Current products +
Proposed priority waste streams
28
Photo credits: Agrecovery Foundation, NZ Recovery and Ministry for the Environment
Priority waste stream evaluation criteria Risk of harm ++ Resource inefficiency ++ Voluntary unsuccessful ++ Industry readiness ++ Current products + Priority waste stream evaluation criteria Risk of harm + Resource inefficiency ++ Voluntary unsuccessful ++ Industry readiness ++ Current products + Priority waste stream evaluation criteria Risk of harm ++ Resource inefficiency + Voluntary unsuccessful ++ Industry readiness ++ Current products +
Proposed priority waste streams
29
Photo credits: Agrecovery Foundation, NZ Recovery and Ministry for the Environment
Priority waste stream evaluation criteria Risk of harm ++ Resource inefficiency ++ Voluntary unsuccessful ++ Industry readiness ++ Current products + Priority waste stream evaluation criteria Risk of harm + Resource inefficiency ++ Voluntary unsuccessful ++ Industry readiness ++ Current products + Priority waste stream evaluation criteria Risk of harm ++ Resource inefficiency + Voluntary unsuccessful ++ Industry readiness ++ Current products + Priority waste stream evaluation criteria Risk of harm ++ Resource inefficiency - Voluntary unsuccessful + Industry readiness ++ Current products +
Consultation questions
- Do you agree that the evaluation criteria are suitable to select product
stewardship priorities?
- Do you agree with the assessment of the waste streams against the
criteria?
- Do you agree that these four product waste streams should be a priority
for the Government to consider regulatory interventions?
- Do you have any other information that could support this assessment?
30
Page 12
Consultation theme 2: Priority product declaration
- Do you think the Minister should declare any product groups as a
priority product?
- If you support priority product declaration, what timing do you think
is appropriate?
31
Page 30
Consultation questions
- What products do you think should be covered
in the scope of any declaration (or regulations)?
- Electrical and electronic equipment
- Tyres
- Agrichemicals and farm plastics
- Refrigerants and synthetic greenhouse gases
32
Page 30
Consultation purpose
- 1. Have we correctly identified the four waste
streams as priorities for action?
- 2. Should any of these waste streams be
declared as priority products?
33
Page 33
How to make a submission
34
Who can make a submission?
Anyone and everyone
- Individuals
- companies
- rganisations
- representative bodies and
- groups of individuals, companies or organisations
35
What can I make a submission
- n?
- Any aspect of the discussion document
- The questions are a guide for your feedback
- You may answer some or all of the questions
36
How do I make a submission?
1. Online submission tool www.consultation.mfe.govt.nz 2. Download a submission form, complete and return to us www.mfe.govt.nz/publications/waste/priority- waste-streams-may14
- 3. Separate document: by email or by post
waste@mfe.govt.nz or
37
Page 31
Priority Waste Stream Consultation Po Box 10362 WELLINGTON 6143
Tips for your submission
- Reference the relevant question numbers
- Provide alternatives proposals if you have other ideas
- Explain your rationale – why do you ‘agree’, ‘disagree’?
- Provide supporting evidence, data or other relevant
information
- Tell us who you are
38
Publishing Submissions
- We may publish all or part of any written submission on
- ur website
- You must clearly specify if you do not want your
submission published
- Clearly mark any personal or commercially sensitive or
confidential information that you do not want published
- Subject to the Official Information Act, 1982
39
Page 32
40
Submissions must be received by 5.00pm Wednesday 2 July 2014
Where are we now and what next?
41
Discussion Document
- Public consultation on high level priorities
- Public consultation on priority product
declaration
MfE analyse and summarise submissions
Cabinet decides
- n next steps
- ?
- ?
Status Quo Priority Product Declaration Guidelines Regulations ?
Page 37
But Wait, There’s More
- Project to develop
stakeholder-led options for product stewardship scheme model/s
42
E-waste Project
Further Information
- Phone: 0800 499 700
- Email: waste@mfe.govt.nz
- Website: www.mfe.govt.nz
- Ask us a question now