What Matters to Germans: Social, Economic and Political Values The - - PDF document

what matters to germans social economic and political
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

What Matters to Germans: Social, Economic and Political Values The - - PDF document

Do quote or use without permission What Matters to Germans: Social, Economic and Political Values The Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project Team The Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project Consumer Social Individual Social


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Do quote or use without permission (c) Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project 1

What Matters to Germans: Social, Economic and Political Values

The Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project Team

The Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project

Investors Workers Boards/TMT The Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project Consumer Social Responsibility Individual Social Responsibility

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Do quote or use without permission (c) Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project 2

The Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project

The Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project Consumer Social Responsibility Individual Social Responsibility

  • T. Devinney & P

. Auger

  • G. Dowling, C. Eckert, R. Belk,
  • G. Eckhardt, P. Burke, J. Louviere
  • M. Ulrych, V

. Laoledchai

  • R. Belk, C. Eckert,
  • J. Schwalbach, H. Sattler
  • R. DeSailly, M. Ulrych,
  • G. Murphy, V. Laoledchai,
  • A. Early, C. Erfgen

Project Overview

ò Multiple societies

ò Australia, USA, UK, Germany, Czech Republic ò Argentina/Chile/Mexico, Hong Kong, India

ò Pictures of complete representative populations ò Comparable socio-demographic, political, personality and religious measures (focus on actions) within and across societies ò Investigation of interactions with Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) ò Multiple measures of economic, social and political issue salience by:

ò Category (16 in total) ò Single issues (113 in total) That account for: ò Realistic trade-offs rather than costless characterizations

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Do quote or use without permission (c) Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project 3

Project Overview

ò Continuing investigations of CSO supporters

ò Work with specific CSOs at the “micro” level

ò WWF, Greenpeace, Amnesty International and Médecins Sans Frontières

ò Matching samples of supporters on

ò Social, economic and political profiles ò Personality and demographics

ò Utilizing multiple methods of investigation

ò Social preference profiling ò Personality measurement ò Ethnographies ò Economic & behavioral experimentation

All aimed at providing a comprehensive “anatomy” of CSO supporters within the contexts of the societies in which they exist

Some Background Information

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Do quote or use without permission (c) Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project 4

Social, Economic & Political Preferences

ò Population study

ò Sample: ò 1,527 (2011) ò Representative of the voting age population ò Geographically representative

Gender (Male) 49% Age (Mean) 42 Yrs Income (Household) 37,240€ Home Mortgage or Owned 36% Single 29% Married or Widowed 38% Children (Number) 1.5 German Citizen 97.00%

Some General International Comparisons

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Do quote or use without permission (c) Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project 5

Geographic Representation (Approximate)

19.1% (22%) 4.0% 8.0% (7%) 3.1% (3%) 11.1% (11%) 5.7% (7%) 5.5% (5%) 6.5% (7%) 12.0% (13%) 3.6% (3%) 14.5% (15%) 5.1% (5%)

Politics and Life Satisfaction

Politics Life Satisfaction

2.15 1.62 1.95 2.87 2.09 2.01 2.27

1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 Health Present job Life at home Political situation Job School Overall Satisfaction (1= very happy)

16% 21% 5% 20% 11% 27%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% CDU/CSU SDP FDP Greens Linke None/NA Orientation Voting

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Do quote or use without permission (c) Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project 6

Religion

Religious Beliefs Religion & Happiness

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Do Not Believe Fairly Unsure Neither Sure or Unsure Fairly Sure Absolutely Certain Americans Australians UK Germans 1.80 1.90 2.00 2.10 2.20 2.30 Do Not Believe Fairly Unsure Neither Sure or Unsure Fairly Sure Absolutely Certain

Religious Beliefs & Political Importance of Religion

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Do Not Believe Fairly Unsure Neither Sure or Unsure Fairly Sure Absolutely Certain Percent Indicating the Religious Belief of Politicians Matter to Their Vote Australia UK USA Germany

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Do quote or use without permission (c) Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project 7

Donating and Volunteering Behavior

Donating Volunteering

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% Family Planning Groups Civil Rights Groups Voting Rights Groups Disabilities and Age Care Organisations Museum and Arts Organisations General Philantropy (Not covered Homeless Shelters/Poverty Relief Educational Institutions Political Parties Human Rights Groups Intl Poverty Relief Organisations Health/Medical Institutes Children´s Health Care Organsisations Place of Worship Religious Organisations Children Welfare Organisations (Non- Intl Medical Relief Organisations Environmental Groups Animal Welfare Organisations 0% 2% 4% 6% Homeless Shelters/Povery Relief Intl Poverty Relief Organisations Family Planning Groups Civil Rights Organisations Museums and Arts Organisations General Philanthropy (Not covered Voting Rights Groups Human Rights Groups Health/Medical Institutes Children´s Health Care Intl Medical Relief Organisations Disabilities & Aged Care Children's Welfare Organisations Religious Organisations Environmental Groups Political Parties Animal Welfare Organisations Educational Institutions Place of Worship

Some International Comparisons

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Do quote or use without permission (c) Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project 8

Donating Activity

Average Annual Donation

0.00 € 4.00 € 8.00 € 12.00 € 16.00 € Family Planning Groups Voting Rights Groups Disabilities & Aged Care Organisations Homeless Shelters/Povery Relief General Philanthropy (Not covered Civil Rights Organisations Museums and Arts Organisations Intl Poverty Relief Organisations Children's Health Care Organisations Political Parties Health/Medical Institutes Human Rights Groups Intl Medical Relief Organisations Educational Institutions Environmental Groups Children's Welfare Organisations (Non- Place of Worship Religious Organisations Animal Welfare Organisations

Given Donating to that Cause

0.00€ 20.00€ 40.00€ 60.00€ Animal Welfare Organisations Environmental Groups Religious Organisations Children's Welfare Organisations Place of Worship Intl Medical Relief Organisations Educational Institutions Health/Medical Institutes Children's Health Care Organisations Human Rights Groups Political Parties General Philanthropy (Not covered Civil Rights Organisations Museums and Arts Organisations Intl Poverty Relief Organisations Homeless Shelters/Povery Relief Voting Rights Groups Family Planning Groups Disabilities & Aged Care Organisations

Donating and Religiosity

Donations to Religious Organizations

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

Do Not Believe Fairly Unsure Neither Sure or Unsure Fairly Sure Absolutely Certain

Donating and Volunteering and Religiosity

10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%

Do Not Believe Fairly Unsure Neither Sure or Unsure Fairly Sure Absolutely Certain Donate Volunteer

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Do quote or use without permission (c) Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project 9

Looking at Issue Categories Social Preference Profiles (Categories)

General Categories Selected Sub-Issues Food and health Water and sanitation, GM foods, obesity, abortion Local crime and public safety Safety, child pornography, violent crime, corruption Rights to basic services Healthcare, food, education, benefits of last resort Civil and personal liberties Rights: legal, to vote, marital, free speech etc. Equality of opportunities Discrimination based on age, gender etc. Individual economic well-being Inflation, taxation, interest rates, cost of living Worker/employment rights Work safety, unions, retirement, child labour Environmental sustainability Pollution, climate change, biodiversity loss Societal economic well-being Poverty, employment, energy prices, growth, deficit Global security Terrorism, nuclear weapons, criminal syndicates Societal social well-being Quality of schooling, public transport, immigration Global economic well-being Resources management, trade, global finance issues Animal welfare Treatment of individual animals and species' survival Global social well-being Peace, diseases, poverty Minority rights Rights including cultural preservation and expression Commercial rights Commerce and ownership such as IP rights

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Do quote or use without permission (c) Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project 10

General Social Preference (Category)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Commercial rights Global economic well-being Minority rights Global social well-being Societal economic well-being Animal welfare Individual economic well-being Global security Societal social well-being Environmental sustainability Worker/employment rights Local crime and public safety Equality of opportunities Food and health Rights to basic services Civil and personal liberties

International Category Comparisons

Germany Australia

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Commercial rights Global economic well-being Minority rights Global social well-being Societal economic well-being Animal welfare Individual economic well-being Global security Societal social well-being Environmental sustainability Worker/employment rights Local crime and public safety Equality of opportunities Food and health Rights to basic services Civil and personal liberties 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Civil & personal liberties Rights to basic services Food & health Equality of opportunities Local crime & public safety Worker/employment rights Environmental sustainability Societal economic well-being Global security Individual economic well-being Animal welfare Societal economic well-being Global social well-being Minority rights Global economic well-being Commercial rights

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Do quote or use without permission (c) Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project 11

International Category Comparisons

USA Germany

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Commercial rights Global economic well-being Minority rights Global social well-being Societal economic well-being Animal welfare Individual economic well-being Global security Societal social well-being Environmental sustainability Worker/employment rights Local crime and public safety Equality of opportunities Food and health Rights to basic services Civil and personal liberties 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Civil & personal liberties Rights to basic services Food & health Equality of opportunities Local crime & public safety Worker/employment rights Environmental sustainability Societal economic well-being Global security Individual economic well-being Animal welfare Societal economic well-being Global social well-being Minority rights Global economic well-being Commercial rights

International Category Comparisons

UK Germany

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Civil & personal liberties Rights to basic services Food & health Equality of opportunities Local crime & public safety Worker/employment rights Environmental sustainability Societal economic well-being Global security Individual economic well-being Animal welfare Societal economic well-being Global social well-being Minority rights Global economic well-being Commercial rights 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Commercial rights Global economic well-being Minority rights Global social well-being Societal economic well-being Animal welfare Individual economic well-being Global security Societal social well-being Environmental sustainability Worker/employment rights Local crime and public safety Equality of opportunities Food and health Rights to basic services Civil and personal liberties

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Do quote or use without permission (c) Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project 12

Adjusted International Differences

  • 15%
  • 10%
  • 5%

0% 5% 10% 15% Animal Welfare Civil and Personal Liberties Commercial Rights Environmental Sustainability Equality of Opportunities Food & Health Global Economic Well-Being Global Security Global Social Well-Being Individual Economic Well-Being Local Crime & Public Safety Minority Rights Rights to Basic Services Societal Economic Well-Being Societal Social Well-Being Worker/Employment Rights USA Australia UK

* * * * * * * * * *

Some Salient Demographic Differences

Gender Age (Correlation)

20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Civil and personal liberties Rights to basic services Food and health Equality of opportunities Local crime and public safety Worker/employment rights Environmental sustainability Societal social well-being Global security Individual economic well-being Animal welfare Societal economic well-being Global social well-being Minority rights Global economic well-being Commercial rights Female Male

  • 0.15
  • 0.10
  • 0.05

0.00 0.05 0.10 Civil and personal liberties Rights to basic services Food and health Equality of opportunities Local crime and public safety Worker/employment rights Environmental sustainability Societal social well-being Global security Individual economic well-being Animal welfare Societal economic well-being Global social well-being Minority rights Global economic well-being Commercial rights

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Do quote or use without permission (c) Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project 13

Some Salient Demographic Differences

Education Income (Correlation)

20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Civil and personal liberties Rights to basic services Food and health Equality of opportunities Local crime and public safety Worker/employment rights Environmental sustainability Societal social well-being Global security Individual economic well-being Animal welfare Societal economic well-being Global social well-being Minority rights Global economic well-being Commercial rights High School or Less University Graduate

  • 0.20
  • 0.10

0.00 0.10 Civil and personal liberties Rights to basic services Food and health Equality of opportunities Local crime and public safety Worker/employment rights Environmental sustainability Societal social well-being Global security Individual economic well-being Animal welfare Societal economic well-being Global social well-being Minority rights Global economic well-being Commercial rights

Some Salient Socio-Demographic Differences

Religiosity Happiness

  • 0.10
  • 0.05

0.00 0.05 0.10 Civil and personal liberties Rights to basic services Food and health Equality of opportunities Local crime and public safety Worker/employment rights Environmental sustainability Societal social well-being Global security Individual economic well-being Animal welfare Societal economic well-being Global social well-being Minority rights Global economic well-being Commercial rights

  • 0.15
  • 0.05

0.05 0.15 Civil and personal liberties Rights to basic services Food and health Equality of opportunities Local crime and public safety Worker/employment rights Environmental sustainability Societal social well-being Global security Individual economic well-being Animal welfare Societal economic well-being Global social well-being Minority rights Global economic well-being Commercial rights

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Do quote or use without permission (c) Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project 14

Political Orientation

CDU/CSU, Greens & Left CDU/CSU & SPD

20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Civil and personal liberties Rights to basic services Food and health Equality of opportunities Local crime and public safety Worker/employment rights Environmental sustainability Societal social well-being Global security Individual economic well-being Animal welfare Societal economic well-being Global social well-being Minority rights Global economic well-being Commercial rights CDU/CSU Greens Linke 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Civil and personal liberties Rights to basic services Food and health Equality of opportunities Local crime and public safety Worker/employment rights Environmental sustainability Societal social well-being Global security Individual economic well-being Animal welfare Societal economic well-being Global social well-being Minority rights Global economic well-being Commercial rights CDU/CSU SPD

Altruism, Donating & Volunteering

Machiavellianism Donating & Volunteering

  • 0.15
  • 0.05

0.05 0.15 Civil and personal liberties Rights to basic services Food and health Equality of opportunities Local crime and public safety Worker/employment rights Environmental sustainability Societal social well-being Global security Individual economic well-being Animal welfare Societal economic well-being Global social well-being Minority rights Global economic well-being Commercial rights

  • 0.15 -0.10 -0.05

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 Civil and personal liberties Rights to basic services Food and health Equality of opportunities Local crime and public safety Worker/employment rights Environmental sustainability Societal social well-being Global security Individual economic well-being Animal welfare Societal economic well-being Global social well-being Minority rights Global economic well-being Commercial rights Donate at All? Volunteer at All?

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Do quote or use without permission (c) Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project 15

Some Micro Issues

Looking at the Micro Issues

ò Individuals also were rotated through mixtures of 113 different social

  • issues. This was done within categories and then between categories. This

gives us two sets of measures for each person, allowing us to calibrate the validity of the measures

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Do quote or use without permission (c) Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project 16

Internationally The Least Salient Issues

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Do quote or use without permission (c) Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project 17

Internationally

Some Conclusions & Discussion

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Do quote or use without permission (c) Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project 18

What Do We Conclude (In General Across All Countries)

ò Proximity matters

ò Individuals focus more intently on issues that are materially closer to what influences their lives

ò Attempts at “demographic” characterizations are fraught with problems

ò Except potentially at the extremes

ò However, looking at more revealing “socio-political” factors reveals insights

ò Religiosity: Individuals with strong religious beliefs reveal different preference patterns ò Political Orientation: Individuals with extreme political views reveal different preference patterns

ò When it comes to CSO involvement the traditional stereotypes are unlikely to hold much validity

What Do We Conclude (About Germans)

ò The overall patterns seen in the Germany are mirrored elsewhere but with some exceptions

ò History Matters: Rights isues dominate in Germany ò Germans are less active in terms of civil society ò Germans are less religious but those with strong religious beliefs are not dissimilar to those in other countries ò Germans display a more left wing orientation politically but don’t act on it as directly as might seem ò Germans are more less concerned about economic well-being and marginally view social stability issues as more dominant

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Do quote or use without permission (c) Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project 19

How Might You Use What We are Doing?

ò People’s links to “causes” as seen in their donating and volunteering behaviour is only very, very weakly related to their preferences ò Can you work with what people believe?

ò If NO

ò Can you live with a niche of ‘believers’? ò Can you change everyone’s preferences? Or at least enough of them?

ò If YES

ò Understand the issues against which you are ‘competing’ ò Understand what issues can be reframed

ò Is there something fundamentally ‘incorrect’ in what people believe?

ò What are the mechanisms to ‘correct’ the error in belief?

Environmental Preference Segmentation A

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Do quote or use without permission (c) Anatomy of Civil Societies Research Project 20

Environmental Preference Segmentation B Thank You

A Break & Then a Discussion