what is the purpose of this meeting
play

What is the Purpose of this Meeting? To Present the Proposed - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

What is the Purpose of this Meeting? To Present the Proposed Realignment of SH-20 From Franklin Road to SH-66 in Rogers County and Obtain Public Input To Owasso Southaven Rd. Lone Elm Rd. Franklin Rd. Country Club Rd. Limits of Study N


  1. What is the Purpose of this Meeting? To Present the Proposed Realignment of SH-20 From Franklin Road to SH-66 in Rogers County and Obtain Public Input To Owasso Southaven Rd. Lone Elm Rd. Franklin Rd. Country Club Rd. Limits of Study N King Rd.

  2. What is the Purpose of the Project? …to Improve Safety and Traffic Mobility on SH-20 To Owasso Southaven Rd. Lone Elm Rd. Franklin Rd. Country Club Rd. N King Rd.

  3. Project History  A Corridor Study and Environmental Assessment (EA) was Approved in 2000 by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for SH-20 project from US-75 to Claremore. In Design Designed and/or Constructed Current Project Source: 2000 Environmental Assessment

  4. What did the Environmental Assessment Approve?  Proposed Alignment On Existing Alignment Through Collinsville and Owasso o New Alignment at Keetonville Hill o New Alignment From Franklin Road to SH-66 in Claremore (Current Project) o In Design Designed and/or Constructed Current Project Source: 2000 Environmental Assessment

  5. What did the Environmental Assessment Approve?  New Alignment South of Existing SH-20  4-Lane Divided Roadway With Shoulders Existing SH-20 Proposed SH-20 Source: 2000 Environmental Assessment

  6. Area Conditions Have Changed  Modifications to the Alignment and Typical Section are Necessary Because of new Developments Utilize a 5-Lane Curb and Gutter Roadway With Center Turn Lane o Slight Modification to Alignment to Avoid New Homes and Church o

  7. The Eastern End of the Project has been Modified Original Alignment  Through Traffic routed parallel to I-44 (Will Rogers Turnpike) o Connected to existing SH-20 near Turnpike Toll Gate east of o Claremore Required Construction of Parallel Frontage Roads Along the Turnpike o  Modified Alignment Merge onto SH-66 to the Lynn Riggs / Patti Page (SH-20/66/88) o Intersection  Oklahoma Turnpike Authority (OTA) Separate Project Planned to Construct o an Interchange on the Will Rogers Turnpike Near Flint/King Road Original Alignment along I-44

  8. The Eastern End of the Project has been Modified Original Alignment  Through Traffic routed parallel to I-44 (Will Rogers Turnpike) o Connected to existing SH-20 near Turnpike Toll Gate east of o Claremore Required Construction of Parallel Frontage Roads Along the Turnpike o  Modified Alignment Merge onto SH-66 to the Lynn Riggs / Patti Page Blvd. (SH-20/66/88) o Intersection  Oklahoma Turnpike Authority (OTA) Separate Project Planned to Construct o an Interchange on the Will Rogers Turnpike Near Flint/King Road New Terminus at SH-66

  9. The Eastern End of the Project has been Modified Original Alignment  Through Traffic routed parallel to I-44 (Will Rogers Turnpike) o Connected to existing SH-20 near Turnpike Toll Gate east of o Claremore Required Construction of Parallel Frontage Roads Along the Turnpike o  Modified Alignment Merge onto SH-66 to the Lynn Riggs / Patti Page Blvd. (SH-20/66/88) o Intersection  Oklahoma Turnpike Authority (OTA) Separate Project Planned to Construct o an Interchange on the Will Rogers Turnpike Near Flint/King Road New Terminus at SH-66

  10. What is the Reevaluation Process? Project Area What 2000 Conditions? Conditions Environmental Have Assessment Regulations? Changed? How Can we Modified Present to the Minimize Typical Section Public for Input Impacts? and Alignment TODAY  Do the Findings of the 2000 Environmental Assessment Still Hold True?

  11. What are the Features of Existing SH Existing SH Existing SH- Existing SH Existing SH Existing SH 20? Existing SH  General Data – SH-20 One Existing Bridge Structure o 2-Lane Roadway - Minor o  Tributary to Verdigris River Arterial Traffic Volumes (Number of Vehicles) o Local Intersecting Roads o • 2015 Recorded - 11,580 Vehicles / Day • NS-411 (Franklin Rd.) • 2040 Projected - 19,000 Vehicles / Day • Lone Elm Rd. • Southaven/Clubhouse Rd. Existing Posted Speed Limits o • Dupont St. • Varies From 55 mph to 35 mph N Clubhouse Rd. Dupont St. Franklin Rd. Southaven Rd. Lone Elm Rd.

  12. What are the Features of Existing SH Existing SH Existing SH Existing SH- Existing SH Existing SH Existing SH 20?  General Data – SH-20 One Existing Bridge Structure o 2-Lane Roadway - Minor o  Tributary to Verdigris River Arterial Traffic Volumes (Number of Vehicles) o Local Intersecting Roads o • 2015 Recorded - 11,580 Vehicles / Day • NS-411 (Franklin Rd.) • 2040 Projected - 19,000 Vehicles / Day • Lone Elm Rd. • Southaven/Clubhouse Rd. Existing Posted Speed Limits o • Dupont St. • Varies From 55 mph to 35 mph Clubhouse Rd. N N Clubhouse Rd. Dupont St. Southaven Rd. Franklin Rd. Lone Elm Rd. Southaven Rd.

  13. What are the Features of Existing SH Existing SH Existing SH- Existing SH Existing SH Existing SH 20? Existing SH  General Data – SH-20 One Existing Bridge Structure o 2-Lane Roadway - Minor o  Tributary to Verdigris River Arterial Traffic Volumes (Number of Vehicles) o Local Intersecting Roads o • 2015 Recorded - 11,580 Vehicles / Day • NS-411 (Franklin Rd.) • 2040 Projected - 19,000 Vehicles / Day • Lone Elm Rd. • Southaven/Clubhouse Rd. Existing Posted Speed Limits o • Dupont St. • Varies From 55 mph to 35 mph N Clubhouse Rd. Dupont St. Franklin Rd. Southaven Rd. Lone Elm Rd.

  14. What are the Features of the Existing Lynn Riggs/ Patti Page I ntersection? Lynn Riggs/Patti Page  Intersection (SH-20/66/88) Signalized o Approach Lane o Configuration Varies Walgreens Sidewalk o RCB Bank Railroad Crossing o Carl’s Jr. Rogers County Courthouse

  15. What are the Features of the Existing Lynn Riggs/ Patti Page I ntersection? Lynn Riggs/Patti Page  Intersection (SH-20/66/88) Signalized o Approach Lane o Configuration Varies Walgreens Sidewalk o RCB Bank Railroad Crossing o Carl’s Jr. Rogers County Courthouse

  16. What is the Need for this Project? Defined in the 2000 EA  Existing Roadway Deficiencies o • Narrow or No Shoulders • Sharp Horizontal Curves • Limited Sight Distance • Steep Adjacent Roadside Slopes • Skewed Intersections • At-Grade Railroad Crossing Roadway Capacity – Level of Service o • 2040 Projected - 19,000 Vehicles / Day • 2040 Level of Service (LOS) is F (failing) • 2-Lane Roadway < 10,000 VPD is desirable Southaven/Clubhouse Rd. Dupont St. Lone Elm Rd. Franklin Rd.

  17. What is the Need for this Project? Defined in the 2000 EA  Existing Roadway Deficiencies o • Narrow or No Shoulders • Sharp Horizontal Curves • Limited Sight Distance • Steep Adjacent Roadside Slopes • Skewed Intersections • At-Grade Railroad Crossing Roadway Capacity – Level of Service o • 2040 Projected - 19,000 Vehicles / Day • 2040 Level of Service (LOS) is F (failing) • 2-Lane Roadway < 10,000 VPD is desirable Southaven/Clubhouse Rd. Dupont St. Lone Elm Rd. Franklin Rd.

  18. What is the Need for this Project? Defined in the 2000 EA  Existing Roadway Deficiencies o • Narrow or No Shoulders • Sharp Horizontal Curves • Limited Sight Distance • Steep Adjacent Roadside Slopes • Skewed Intersections • At-Grade Railroad Crossing Roadway Capacity – Level of Service o • 2040 Projected - 19,000 Vehicles / Day • 2040 Level of Service (LOS) is F (failing) • 2-Lane Roadway < 10,000 VPD is desirable Southaven/Clubhouse Rd. Dupont St. Lone Elm Rd. Franklin Rd.

  19. What is the Need for this Project? Defined in the 2000 EA  Existing Roadway Deficiencies o • Narrow or No Shoulders • Sharp Horizontal Curves • Limited Sight Distance • Steep Adjacent Roadside Slopes • Skewed Intersections • At-Grade Railroad Crossing Roadway Capacity – Level of Service o • 2040 Projected - 19,000 Vehicles / Day • 2040 Level of Service (LOS) is F (failing) • 2-Lane Roadway < 10,000 VPD is desirable Southaven/Clubhouse Rd. Dupont St. Lone Elm Rd. Franklin Rd.

  20. What is the Need for this Project? Defined in the 2000 EA  Existing Roadway Deficiencies o • Narrow or No Shoulders • Sharp Horizontal Curves • Limited Sight Distance • Steep Adjacent Roadside Slopes • Skewed Intersections • At-Grade Railroad Crossing Roadway Capacity – Level of Service o • 2040 Projected - 19,000 Vehicles / Day • 2040 Level of Service (LOS) is F (failing) • 2-Lane Roadway < 10,000 VPD is desirable Southaven/Clubhouse Rd. Dupont St. Lone Elm Rd. Franklin Rd.

  21. SH-20 Has a Very High Accident Rate Accident Data  1,057 Total Over Previous 10 o More Injury Collisions Years (2005-2015) 3x Compared to Statewide Rate on • 760 Property Damage Similar Highways • 296 Injury • 1 Fatal • Location of Frequent Accidents Clubhouse Rd. Dupont St. Southaven Rd. Lone Elm Rd. Franklin Rd.

  22. Project Constraints are Things to Project Constraints are Things to Consider and/ or Avoid if Possible Identified Key Project Features / Constraints and Collected Data  Developments o • Homes • Businesses Right-of-Way o Utilities o Environmental o

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend