What do we need to consider? Design Installation Cleaning - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

what do we need to consider
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

What do we need to consider? Design Installation Cleaning - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

What do we need to consider? Design Installation Cleaning methodology Water Quality at Practical Completion Design The system design should be reviewed to make sure that it allows good water quality to be achieved and


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

What do we need to consider?

  • Design
  • Installation
  • Cleaning methodology
  • Water Quality at Practical Completion
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Design

The system design should be reviewed to make

sure that it allows good water quality to be achieved and maintained

All necessary flushing facilities are present

(bypasses, flushing connections, valve arrangements etc.)

Dead legs should be avoided Pipework materials of installation Pressurisation units (flow through units, short

connecting pipework)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Design

Dosing pots (not automated dosing) Use of de-aerators Use of HEX units Water conservation in flushing Side stream filters The BMS needs to be considered to ensure

that routine circulation through all previously wetted areas can be achieve

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Installation

Clean installation practices Wet pipework and plant as close to the start

  • f flushing as possible

Use treated water for pressure test Take appropriate precautions after pipework is

wet

Water treatment planning to be co-ordinated

with installation plan

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Pipework waiting to be installed

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Pipework installed

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Even when racked no caps fitted

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Stored on site

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Installation

All points listed are common to both

conventional and low effluent processes and are instrumental in the successful

  • utcome of water treatment
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Cleaning Methodology

Conventional No/Low effluent

 Tried and tested  Will require significant water and

drainage capacity

 Is robust in approach  The long term prognosis is

understood

 Saves water and relies on filtration-

but filters go to ‘land fill’

 Possible time saving/ labour

reduction

 Requires consideration at the time

  • f design/installation

 Chemicals added to system stay

there increasing TDS and presenting

  • ther challenges

 If it should fail it would be

necessary to revert to conventional treatment

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Use of Side Stream Filter as Flushing Aid

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Water Treatment

 Flushing and cleaning should be undertaken in

accordance with BG 29/2012

 Dynamic flushing should be correctly undertaken  Biocide washes should be employed as necessary  Chemical cleaning should be carefully monitored  Final dosing chemicals should be effective and

selected with system metallurgy and components in mind

 Limitations of low flow devices when backflushing

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Where low flow occurs

2 port valve, kv value 0.25 (open)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Water Quality Maintenance until PC

 Take first set of samples 7 days after final chemical

  • dose. PCC samples

 Routine (daily) checks that completed systems are

kept full and pressurised

 Routine (daily) checks that pumps are circulating and

valves are in the correct position

 Control over any necessary drain downs and

pipework alterations

 Fortnightly sampling to allow timely chemical

additions as required

slide-16
SLIDE 16

At PC the client should be provided with:

 Stable and maintainable water in closed systems  Trend results as outlined in BSRIA 29/2012 (see next

2 slides)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

The Site LTHW TVC @22˚C CFU/ml Date Geometric mean PC Guideline PCC Guideline Trend 01/02/2012 105 100,000 10,000 17/02/2012 1 100,000 10,000 01/03/2012 1 100,000 10,000 Acceptable 15/03/2012 1 100,000 10,000 Acceptable

1 10 100 1000 10000 100000

TVC Level

Date

Site - LTHW -

Geometric mean PC Guideline PCC Guideline

slide-18
SLIDE 18

The Site LTHW Secondary Pseudomonad @30˚C CFU/100 ml Date Geometric mean PC Guideline PCC Guideline Trend 01/02/2012 412.13 10,000 1,000 17/02/2012 100 10,000 1,000 01/03/2012 2607.23 10,000 1,000 Increasing trend and above PCC level 15/03/2012 100000 10,000 1,000 Unacceptable

1.00 10.00 100.00 1000.00 10000.00 100000.00

Pseudomonad Level

Date

Site LTHW Secondary

Geometric mean PC Guideline PCC Guideline